Right Wing Media (and Politicians) Breaking With Trump Over Minneapolis Shooting Narrative

Why was he attacked and beaten?
He is allowed to CC.
You clowns know that.
He never reached for his gun..... NEVER, not even a flinch.

So why was he attacked?
 
Why was he attacked and beaten?
He is allowed to CC.
You clowns know that.
He never reached for his gun..... NEVER, not even a flinch.

So why was he attacked?
He was breaking the law and resisting.

A perp resisting while armed is justification to use deadly force. That's enough to make any officer fear for his life.

How could you not know that? WTF is wrong with you?
 
He was breaking the law and resisting.
Was the 'resisting' before or after the Ice agent pushed the lady to the ground?
Was the 'resisting' before or after he was pepper sprayed?
Was the 'resisting' before or after they through him to the ground?
 
I guess straight up murder and lying is a tad too far for the Wall Street Journal and possibly Fox News. Nothing seems too far for Newsmax though so you right wing idiots can turn to them for your news now. The dam on this lie is breaking.

The right wing family (Murdoch) owned Wall Street Journal came out with an article claiming that the leaders of the Federal Government are lying about their claims. The WSJ felt so strongly that they outlined a frame by frame breakdown of the bystander video that it authenticated. Its a brutal takedown of the federal version of events and paints a clearly illegal killing.

Even Fox News' main story says: "Federal officials initially claimed Pretti approached agents with a 9 mm handgun and resisted disarmament. Bystander video and eyewitness accounts circulating online raised questions about that version of events and whether Pretti was threatening officers when he was shot."


Murdoch Owned WSJ Concludes: Videos Contradict Feds Account of Minneapolis


Federal agents claimed Alex Pretti, 37, forced their hand, alleging he “violently resisted” disarmament until the officers fired “defensive shots.”

Bystander footage appears to tell a different story. A frame-by-frame review by The Wall Street Journal shows a federal officer pulling a handgun away from Pretti. Less than a second later, an agent fires several rounds. Pretti died at the scene.

“Where is the gun?” agents shouted in the chaotic aftermath.

Pretti, an intensive-care nurse, had been on a Minneapolis street Saturday morning and was filming Border Patrol agents. Videos appear to show what happened next.

The tides are turning, but the pressure will not cease. No political figure can get in the way of the public opinion: CRUSH ICE!

ICE over body of Lady Liberty 'she was brandishing a torch'.webp


White House Wobbles, Distancing Trump From Initial Response to Minnesota Killing

Officials clearly understood that the fatal shooting of a demonstrator posed one of the gravest political threats to President Trump since his inauguration.


Faced with broad outcry over the killing of a protester on Saturday in Minneapolis, the White House on Monday pulled a top border official from the city and tried to distance President Trump from the response of his most senior officials, who had immediately characterized the man fatally shot by federal agents as a “domestic terrorist” who was “brandishing” a gun, before video evidence undercut their charges.

Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, notably did not defend the rhetoric of White House officials, including Stephen Miller, the deputy chief of staff, and Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary, who were the most vocal in spreading false accusations against the victim, Alex Pretti. Mr. Pretti was shot roughly 10 times by immigration agents after he was apparently filming them with his camera.

He was licensed to carry a gun in Minnesota, but video from several angles shows he never pulled one, and his hands were visible as he was shot in the back.

White House officials clearly understood that the killing, the second of an American citizen protesting the presence of Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Minneapolis, posed one of the gravest political threats to Mr. Trump since his inauguration just a little over a year ago. Yet they seemed frozen in place, unwilling to walk back the statements by Mr. Miller and Ms. Noem, which were widely repeated throughout the administration, while sending Ms. Leavitt out to insist that “we will let the facts lead and we will let the facts play out in this investigation.”
 
Was the 'resisting' before or after the Ice agent pushed the lady to the ground?
Was the 'resisting' before or after he was pepper sprayed?
Was the 'resisting' before or after they through him to the ground?
None of that is relevant.

He was armed and resisting. That alone is justification to use deadly force. Those facts are relevant. Your dysfunctional emotions are not.
 
Last edited:
Unlike you simple thinkers who compare a man interfering with a police situation WHILE ARMED to Jewish children and women and men being shot by German soldiers, we understand nuance and complications.

YOU are the simple thinkers here, minion
So now folks don't have 2nd Amendment rights, how is recording interfering with a police situation. They had done what they came to do why didn't they leave? So now you take a man's life because you are pissed off 2 women are blowing a whistle.
 
They had done what they came to do why didn't they leave?
You are mistaken. They were there waiting for a violent criminal invader who fled into a donut shop.

They were going to wait for him to come out and arrest him. Then....moonbats everywhere!

You can hear their virtue signals whistle. Then the moonbats interfered with the operation. Pretti assaulted an officer.

He virtue signaled himself to death.

:abgg2q.jpg:
 
Anyone with even a shred of any kind of decency will break with Trump.
Why? Where was your decency to break with Biden when he released thousands upon thousands of illegal alien criminals into American cities to commit crime and immune from prosecution?
 
I guess straight up murder and lying is a tad too far for the Wall Street Journal and possibly Fox News. Nothing seems too far for Newsmax though so you right wing idiots can turn to them for your news now. The dam on this lie is breaking.

The right wing family (Murdoch) owned Wall Street Journal came out with an article claiming that the leaders of the Federal Government are lying about their claims. The WSJ felt so strongly that they outlined a frame by frame breakdown of the bystander video that it authenticated. Its a brutal takedown of the federal version of events and paints a clearly illegal killing.

Even Fox News' main story says: "Federal officials initially claimed Pretti approached agents with a 9 mm handgun and resisted disarmament. Bystander video and eyewitness accounts circulating online raised questions about that version of events and whether Pretti was threatening officers when he was shot."


Murdoch Owned WSJ Concludes: Videos Contradict Feds Account of Minneapolis


Federal agents claimed Alex Pretti, 37, forced their hand, alleging he “violently resisted” disarmament until the officers fired “defensive shots.”

Bystander footage appears to tell a different story. A frame-by-frame review by The Wall Street Journal shows a federal officer pulling a handgun away from Pretti. Less than a second later, an agent fires several rounds. Pretti died at the scene.

“Where is the gun?” agents shouted in the chaotic aftermath.

Pretti, an intensive-care nurse, had been on a Minneapolis street Saturday morning and was filming Border Patrol agents. Videos appear to show what happened next.
Murdoch isn't right wing.
 
I guess straight up murder and lying is a tad too far for the Wall Street Journal and possibly Fox News. Nothing seems too far for Newsmax though so you right wing idiots can turn to them for your news now. The dam on this lie is breaking.

The right wing family (Murdoch) owned Wall Street Journal came out with an article claiming that the leaders of the Federal Government are lying about their claims. The WSJ felt so strongly that they outlined a frame by frame breakdown of the bystander video that it authenticated. Its a brutal takedown of the federal version of events and paints a clearly illegal killing.

Even Fox News' main story says: "Federal officials initially claimed Pretti approached agents with a 9 mm handgun and resisted disarmament. Bystander video and eyewitness accounts circulating online raised questions about that version of events and whether Pretti was threatening officers when he was shot."


Murdoch Owned WSJ Concludes: Videos Contradict Feds Account of Minneapolis


Federal agents claimed Alex Pretti, 37, forced their hand, alleging he “violently resisted” disarmament until the officers fired “defensive shots.”

Bystander footage appears to tell a different story. A frame-by-frame review by The Wall Street Journal shows a federal officer pulling a handgun away from Pretti. Less than a second later, an agent fires several rounds. Pretti died at the scene.

“Where is the gun?” agents shouted in the chaotic aftermath.

Pretti, an intensive-care nurse, had been on a Minneapolis street Saturday morning and was filming Border Patrol agents. Videos appear to show what happened next.
We know they're lying. It's like there's a video right there showing you what's happening, and they're tell us something completely different, something we can't see.

That's how much they respect the people. Not at all.
 
15th post
None of that is relevant.

He was armed and resisting. That alone is justification to use deadly force. Those facts are relevant. Your dysfunctional emotions are not.
Also, there is a video segment showing him pulling something from his pocket after his gun was taken away. Law enforcement probably thought he was drawing a gun. In the video shot it looked like ammo magazine or maybe a phone.
 
Why? Where was your decency to break with Biden when he released thousands upon thousands of illegal alien criminals into American cities to commit crime and immune from prosecution?

I was never with Biden to break from him but sadly that is how you've been brainwashed to see things.
 
Unlike you simple thinkers who compare a man interfering with a police situation WHILE ARMED to Jewish children and women and men being shot by German soldiers, we understand nuance and complications.

YOU are the simple thinkers here, minion
What both sides aren't getting is that the agents weren't planning to shoot him at all. Once they disarmed him that was supposed to be it. But the gun, a Sig Sauer P320, underwent something called a "neglegent discharge" in other words it went off in the disarming agent's hand without him touching the trigger.

That triggered a defense response from the agents attempting to restrain Pretti.

Sig Sauer P320s have a record of discharging like that. This was an accident.

Even so, Pretti ignored the advice of his parents not to go near ICE agents when he went out to protest.

In short, a defective gun and a disobedient son ignoring his parents caused this giant clusterf**k.
 
Back
Top Bottom