5 things to know about the latest Minneapolis shooting

[meaner gene]

If they proved that he’d be convicted

The gun was purchased legally for him, by a guy named Black and stored at his family’s house

After the trial the gun was destroyed

The gun was illegal. That's why it was destroyed. If it was legal, it would have been returned to him.

Not being convicted doesn't mean they didn't prove the underlying facts of the case.

They proved he crossed state lines with an illegal firearm, but the judge threw out he charge on a technicality.

 

[struth]

The gun was illegal. That's why it was destroyed. If it was legal, it would have been returned to him.

Not being convicted doesn't mean they didn't prove the underlying facts of the case.

They proved he crossed state lines with an illegal firearm, but the judge threw out he charge on a technicality.

Nope it was legally purchased. In fact they dropped the charge, because it was not a short barrel. Yes it was dropped because it wasn’t illegal…

It was destroyed only because he agreed to it being destroyed

Once again what you think you know doesn’t match up to the facts

 

[meaner gene]

Nope it was legally purchased. In fact they dropped the charge, because it was not a short barrel. Yes it was dropped because it wasn’t illegal…

It was destroyed only because he agreed to it being destroyed

Once again what you think you know doesn’t match up to the facts

The gun was illegal. It was an illegal straw gun purchase, and the purchaser was charged, but plea bargained the charge down to contributing to the delinquency of a minor.

Because the gun was used in a crime, the police were able to confiscate it, and subsequently destroy it, instead of returning it.

 

[struth]

The gun was illegal. It was an illegal straw gun purchase, and the purchaser was charged, but plea bargained the charge down to contributing to the delinquency of a minor.

Because the gun was used in a crime, the police were able to confiscate it, and subsequently destroy it, instead of returning it.

Yoh keep saying but the charge was dropped because it wasn’t illegal

So you know, don’t let reality get in the way of your lies

 

[meaner gene]

Yoh keep saying but the charge was dropped because it wasn’t illegal

So you know, don’t let reality get in the way of your lies

The gun was illegal, or the police would have had to return it under the 14th amendment.

Fourteenth Amendment (Due Process): ... ensuring no person is deprived of property without "due process of law".

 

[struth]

The gun was illegal, or the police would have had to return it under the 14th amendment.

Fourteenth Amendment (Due Process): ... ensuring no person is deprived of property without "due process of law".

Not if the owner volunteered its destruction as he did

 

[meaner gene]

Police can destroy seized firearms

Destruction usually happens if the firearm is illegal, used in a crime, or if the owner is prohibited from possessing it.

 

[meaner gene]

Not if the owner volunteered its destruction as he did

Only after it was illegal to return it to him.

Kyle Rittenhouse seeks return of AR-15 style rifle used in Kenosha shootings

Lawyer Mark Richard files request for return of gun and other items ‘to ensure firearm in question is properly destroyed’

www.theguardian.com

Kyle Rittenhouse seeks return of AR-15 style rifle used in Kenosha shootings

On Wednesday his attorney, Mark Richards, filed court documents in Kenosha county seeking the return of the AR-15-style rifle Rittenhouse used on the evening of 25 August 2020, along with other items.

Rittenhouse is also attempting to retrieve ammunition, a sling and magazines, his iPhone, a cloth mask, and a $1 bill. He is also looking to retrieve the clothing he wore the night of the shooting, including boots, a baseball cap, jeans, socks, a belt and a T-shirt.

 

[struth]

Police can destroy seized firearms

Destruction usually happens if the firearm is illegal, used in a crime, or if the owner is prohibited from possessing it.

Of if the owner says take it

He was found but guilty there was nothing prohibiting him from taking the gun. He literally asked for them to destroy it, they agreed

 

[struth]

Only after it was illegal to return it to him.

Kyle Rittenhouse seeks return of AR-15 style rifle used in Kenosha shootings

Lawyer Mark Richard files request for return of gun and other items ‘to ensure firearm in question is properly destroyed’

www.theguardian.com

Kyle Rittenhouse seeks return of AR-15 style rifle used in Kenosha shootings

On Wednesday his attorney, Mark Richards, filed court documents in Kenosha county seeking the return of the AR-15-style rifle Rittenhouse used on the evening of 25 August 2020, along with other items.

Rittenhouse is also attempting to retrieve ammunition, a sling and magazines, his iPhone, a cloth mask, and a $1 bill. He is also looking to retrieve the clothing he wore the night of the shooting, including boots, a baseball cap, jeans, socks, a belt and a T-shirt.

Haha show me where anyone said it was illegal to return to him! Haha your article literally says he was seeking it back to destroy it, the govt said ok we will do that for you! Haha

 

[meaner gene]

Of if the owner says take it

He was found but guilty there was nothing prohibiting him from taking the gun. He literally asked for them to destroy it, they agreed

That's absolutely wrong. His lawyer was trying to get the gun back, along with Kyles other property, and was denied because it was used in a crime (by the facts).

Remember: On Wednesday his attorney, Mark Richards, filed court documents in Kenosha county seeking the return of the AR-15-style rifle Rittenhouse used on the evening of 25 August 2020, along with other items.

Rittenhouse is also attempting to retrieve ammunition, a sling and magazines, his iPhone, a cloth mask, and a $1 bill. He is also looking to retrieve the clothing he wore the night of the shooting, including boots, a baseball cap, jeans, socks, a belt and a T-shirt.

Why would he want the sling, magazine and bullets back, if he didn't want the gun.

 

[meaner gene]

Haha show me where anyone said it was illegal to return to him! Haha your article literally says he was seeking it back to destroy it, the govt said ok we will do that for you! Haha

The court said it was illegal.
You know due process, after his lawyer filed for it to be returned.

 

[TimFitz]

Not surprised at all you aren’t concerned with the content of the files

You deflect and protect pedos

Your bs bout concern was the attempt to deflect.

You lied when you claimed Trump released the Epstein files. He did not. 2% barely registers.

 

[Dante]

NPR is a total left-wing news source.

Okie Dokie and FOX paid out about a billion dollars for lying to dopes like and laughing at you

next

 

[meaner gene]

Okie Dokie and FOX paid out about a billion dollars for lying to dopes like and laughing at you
View attachment 1211523

next

Don't exaggerate. It was only $787.5 million

 

[Dante]

Don't exaggerate. It was only $787.5 million

Trump in MOSCOW when they were all ecstatic over what a dumb fuk and great unwitting asset that fool would be

 

[80zephyr]

Congratulations. You just described someone who brought an assault weapon with dozens of rounds of ammunition, across state lines to shoot rioters.

Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted of all criminal charges, including a misdemeanor weapon charge regarding possession of the rifle, on November 19, 2021. Contrary to popular belief, Rittenhouse did not cross state lines with the gun; it was already stored in Kenosha. The judge dismissed the weapon possession charge before jury deliberations, citing an exception in Wisconsin law for minors with long-barreled firearms.

 

[struth]

Your bs bout concern was the attempt to deflect.

You lied when you claimed Trump released the Epstein files. He did not. 2% barely registers.

No unlike I am very concerned

I did not lie https://www.justice.gov/epstein

This is why I am aware of how your party is all over the Epstein files

 

[candycorn]

The ICE Princess lie is starting to fall apart. He did not brandish his weapon at agents. The videos show the weapon was discovered while he was on the ground and was taken away from him before he was shot. She won’t get away with the lie this time.

I expect there were Proud Boys or Oath Keepers in that mob. They are now part of trump’s private army,

This doesnt’ count the uses of force not involving fire-arms.

12 in 6 months (nationwide)

Since 2008, there have been 53 officer involved shootings by the MSP police. \

Officer-involved shooting dashboard

We track officer-involved shootings in the city.

www.minneapolismn.gov

 

[skye]