j-mac
Nuthin' but the truth
Shortly....IF the administration can reach agreement with Walz and Frey to work together....
Alex Pretti was ‘known’ to feds, and had rib broken in anti-ICE protest a week before he was killed by Border Patrol
- Thread starter excalibur
- Start date
What it justifies is that the narrative being told is contrary to reality. The narrative that Pretti, the beloved ICU nurse who wouldn't hurt a fly, never carried his firearm and was a non-violent man -- is quickly falling apart as more video footage continues to be uncovered. I'm not commenting on justification -- I'll wait for the evidence to tell the story instead of armchair investigators who continue to be fueled by the narrative.
gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 79,530
- 43,790
- 2,605
Except that in America, Americans have the right to demonstrate against their government. Well…we use to. Maybe now after all you supporters of his murder, that right like so many others will evaporate.
OODA_Loop
Account Terminated
Not in the street without a permit in MN. Sorry.
gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 79,530
- 43,790
- 2,605
He had a permit to carry a gun.
If you claim he needs a permit to demonstrate, you need to read the Constitution and the writings of The Founders. Or maybe you don’t support the Constitution. Maybe you support a Fascist police state.
OODA_Loop
Account Terminated
Where does it say in the Constitution you can protest in the street without a permit?
iamwhatiseem
Diamond Member
LOL - yeah - you are right, no difference between adults and children - equal ability to think clear and realize consequences.
FFS dude.
postman
Diamond Member
- Feb 23, 2017
- 24,999
- 14,117
- 1,400
Waltz and the sec of state won't be blackmailed into giving up personal information from their voter rolls.,
The state has a duty to protect personal information that could be used to steal peoples identities.,
postman
Diamond Member
- Feb 23, 2017
- 24,999
- 14,117
- 1,400
Do you know how hard it is to get a CCW?
It's like a drivers license. People don't go through the trouble time and expense of getting a license, and don't use it.
Think for once.
postman
Diamond Member
- Feb 23, 2017
- 24,999
- 14,117
- 1,400
They supported the rioters of January 6th.
Saying those convicted were treated unfairly.
In the olden days, they would have all been hung.
postman
Diamond Member
- Feb 23, 2017
- 24,999
- 14,117
- 1,400
The supreme court says in small crowds, and spontaneous gatherings that states can't impose a permit requirement.
postman
Diamond Member
- Feb 23, 2017
- 24,999
- 14,117
- 1,400
The 1st (and 14th) amendments.
OODA_Loop
Account Terminated
Cite?
Exactly, yet it’s the narrative from the media and social media that stated he never carried his firearm, which many of us know is most likely bullshit
postman
Diamond Member
- Feb 23, 2017
- 24,999
- 14,117
- 1,400
If you're old enough to carry a gun, you're old enough to act responsibly.
That's why Rittenhouse carrying a gun at age 17 wasn't legal.
Maybe that should sink in.
One was a law abiding gun owner licensed to carry his legally purchased firearm.
The other was a teen who broke law after law to buy, transport and use his unlicensed firearm.
gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 79,530
- 43,790
- 2,605
Sorry but I’m not with you on 1/6.
Government agents were obviously involved in instigating the riot. Many rioters were unjustly prosecuted for merely walking in and out of the Capitol. Many were allowed in and did nothing wrong. It was a set up.
Those who committed violence should be prosecuted, including the cop who murdered that woman.
iamwhatiseem
Diamond Member
Wrong
He was not law abiding.
It is illegal to interfere with law enforcement in the act of duties.
It is illegal to refuse an order to leave
It is illegal to vandalize any vehicle, let alone a federal government one.
It is illegal to engage in harassment and terrorizing any group of people - law enforcement or not.
gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 79,530
- 43,790
- 2,605
You’ll do well in the forthcoming police state.
iamwhatiseem
Diamond Member
You will do well to think logically, rather than emotionally like a child.
Everything I said is true, and has been true for well over 100 years in this country. Not one of those laws are remotely recent.
I'm going to challenge this .. why do you feel it was illegal for Rittenhouse to carry a firearm at age 17? Wisconsin law has exceptions for carrying firearms for minors -- Wisconsin Statute 948.60(3)(c) contradicts your narrative.
"(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28."
This covers restrictions for minors under 16, hunter education and short-barreled rifles, and the exact reason why this charge was dismissed.
Similar threads
