President Trump signs EO to crack down on mail-in ballots

[markef]

Your hyper-partisan whining is noted.

Nevertheless, no one has ever been convicted of conspiring to pervert a democratic elections by coordinating a cabal of bogus voters, no matter which party was in power.

Concocting bureaucratic barriers to impede an American's right to vote is an assault upon democracy.

Of course voting fraud is hardly ever rooted out and prosecuted which is why godless democrats in particular continue to commit so much fraud in every election.

 

[RedrickTheCoat]

Of course voting fraud is hardly ever rooted out and prosecuted which is why godless democrats in particular continue to commit so much fraud in every election.

Except you don't have anything.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Of course voting fraud is hardly ever rooted out and prosecuted which is why godless democrats in particular continue to commit so much fraud in every election.

That is stupid. Any more examples you want to share?

 

[markef]

You've done nothing to counter my comment, and you ignore 95% of it. You're an idiot. The only thing you have proven with your comment is that you are an idiot. Come on man, you don't think I can google why Tina Peters was sent to prison? Or do you just do no research yourself and just believe everything your fringe right wing sources tell you? You need to do better. You've ignored most of the things I've asked you in my comments.

I will once again ask you what were the best pieces of proven evidence of mass voter fraud from before January 6th, 2021? Please share them.

The SCOTUS heard a petition to hear a voter fraud case in Dec. 2020 that the court refused to hear and refused to rule on the merits. That does not disprove fraud, that proves courts in 2020 refused to even examine the clear evidence of fraud. In that petition the plaintiffs all but proved election fraud in Michigan and Dominion machine corruption. Failing to address the unrefuted facts does nothing to turn the facts into lies or false conspiracies in spite of democrat or leftist lies to the contrary.




Like
Dislike

U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 20‑815​

Case Title: Timothy King, et al., Petitioners v. Gretchen Whitmer, Governor of Michigan, et al. Supreme Court of the United States

Docketed: December 15, 2020
Lower Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Related Case Number: (20‑2205) Supreme Court of the United States

Summary of Proceedings​

The petitioners, led by Timothy King, sought a writ of certiorari before judgment in a Sixth Circuit case involving challenges to Michigan’s election procedures and the actions of state officials, including Governor Gretchen Whitmer, the Secretary of State, and the Michigan Board of State Canvassers Supreme Court of the United States.

Key Dates and Filings​

• Dec 11, 2020 – Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed (response due Jan 14, 2021) Supreme Court of the United States
• Dec 13, 2020 – Proposal under Rule 32.3 to lodge new evidence filed by petitioners Supreme Court of the United States
• Dec 15, 2020 – Supplemental brief of petitioner Timothy King filed Supreme Court of the United States
• Dec 18, 2020 – Motion to consolidate and expedite consideration filed; also motion to expedite merits briefing and oral argument Supreme Court of the United States
• Dec 28, 2020 – Response to motion from respondents filed Supreme Court of the United States
• Jan 11, 2021 – Petition DENIED Supreme Court of the United States

Outcome​

The Supreme Court denied the petition on March 26, 2021, without issuing a ruling on the merits

 

[markef]

That's a lie, market. She went to prison for allowing access to people not cleared for access.

The only adjudication in question (none of your points) is how long she should serve. I think twenty years is good.

One thing the case proves is that democrats nationwide fought like hell to prevent any reliable forensics examinations of voting machines after the 2020 election.

 

[markef]

You still don't get it. These admissions do not show or allege vote manipulation. They show foreign access to code and development processes, not interference with election results.

The facts don't prove Dominion machines were not corrupted. Further evidence against Dominion has been covered up by democrats fighting like hell to keep the evidence from coming out. Prior to the 2020 election Democrats even admitted Dominion voting machines were highly susceptible to fraud and manipulation, so their unproven claims that the machines were not corrupted belies the fact that they knew the machines were vulnerable to corruption.

The following facts were delineated in a Dec 2020 court case outlining the inconvenient facts about election officials using Dominion machines to commit fraud and corruption.

11. In Michigan, a preliminary report, conducted by Russell James Ramsland, Jr. of Allied Security Operations Group, LLC (“ASOG”), summarizing the results of ASOG’s court-ordered forensic audit of Dominion Voting Systems equipment used in Antrim County, Michigan, was released on December 14, 2020.
A copy of this report is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The report delivers the following preliminary conclusion: We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud.
Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified. Exh. A, ¶ B(2), p. 1.
This Interim Report finds that the Dominion software was updated between the November 3, 2020 election and the subsequent recounts and that the updated software inexplicably produced wildly different results from the election day version. Id. at ¶ B(3), p. 2.

 

[markef]

Except you don't have anything.

Here is how democrats hide voter fraud. When evidence surfaced that nearly half a million illegals were illegally registered to vote in California the democrats countered with evasive non applicable arguments that did nothing to disprove the evidence of a real possibility of widespread fraud.

Were nearly half a million registered California voters disqualified from jury duty in one year because they were not citizens?​

by Carmela GuaglianoneMarch 14, 2025

No.​

Though around 450,000 residents have been disqualified from jury duty because of their citizenship status over prior one-year periods, according to California officials, there is no evidence that the individuals were all registered voters. State officials have repeatedly refuted the claim that the noncitizen residents were registered to vote.

The truth: Were illegals registered to vote: The leftist says no, but that is false. The truth is that it is quite possible hundreds of thousands of illegals were registered to vote and did indeed vote, but nobody knows how many may have actually committed fraud. Democrats do not prove no significant illegal votes were cast, they just make that unproven claim and expect bozos to believe them.

 

[markef]

That is stupid. Any more examples you want to share?

Hundreds of illegal immigrants illegally voted in the 1996 election that resulted in democrats stealing Bob Dornan's seat but none of them were arrested and sent to prison or deported.

 

[Lockback]

Its ok. He is dead in twelve months. This will be blocked in twelve days.

FU.

 

[jacksonlamb]

market, the rulings revealed there was no merits to the pleadings.

That is the courts' right to do so.

And you have the right to be wrong about it.

 

[jacksonlamb]

One thing the case proves is that democrats nationwide fought like hell to prevent any reliable forensics examinations of voting machines after the 2020 election.

Allegation with no proof and allegation without arguing that "reliable forensics" would reveal proof.

 

[jacksonlamb]

markef, you have to show evidence of wrong doing, just not allege it.

And the court has no requirement to rebuke allegations without proof.

 

[jacksonlamb]

markef's allegations without proof is evidence of ... nothing.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Hundreds of illegal immigrants illegally voted in the 1996 election that resulted in democrats stealing Bob Dornan's seat but none of them were arrested and sent to prison or deported.

Allegation without proof.

 

[RedrickTheCoat]

Here is how democrats hide voter fraud. When evidence surfaced that nearly half a million illegals were illegally registered to vote in California the democrats countered with evasive non applicable arguments that did nothing to disprove the evidence of a real possibility of widespread fraud.

Were nearly half a million registered California voters disqualified from jury duty in one year because they were not citizens?​

by Carmela GuaglianoneMarch 14, 2025

No.​

Though around 450,000 residents have been disqualified from jury duty because of their citizenship status over prior one-year periods, according to California officials, there is no evidence that the individuals were all registered voters. State officials have repeatedly refuted the claim that the noncitizen residents were registered to vote.

The truth: Were illegals registered to vote: The leftist says no, but that is false. The truth is that it is quite possible hundreds of thousands of illegals were registered to vote and did indeed vote, but nobody knows how many may have actually committed fraud. Democrats do not prove no significant illegal votes were cast, they just make that unproven claim and expect bozos to believe them.

But like, why would they target California? California is like a sure thing to vote Democrat? Why would they even go to the length of committing fraud in California when it's a sure thing that they have California?

All your comment does is to continue to prove you have zero idea what you are talking about? Some of your most recent comments are just weird. They don't really seem to properly respond to the thing you are replying to? It's like you don't have any ability to understand what people are saying to you?

Can I ask you, do you even realize, or have awareness that you've ignored 95% of the things I've said or asked you in my previous comments? Do you have any ability to comprehend that?

 

[markef]

market, the rulings revealed there was no merits to the pleadings.

That is the courts' right to do so.

And you have the right to be wrong about it.

If a biased court refuses to look at the merits of a voter fraud case, then democrats lie when they claim that court has ruled that there was no evidence of fraud.

 

[markef]

Allegation with no proof and allegation without arguing that "reliable forensics" would reveal proof.

Democrats claim no investigation of voting machines should be allowed because there is evidence the machines were corrupted. Only low intelligence rubes will fail to realize that the reason more evidence is not uncovered is because democrats are blocking investigations without just cause.

 

[schmidlap]

Of course voting fraud is hardly ever rooted out and prosecuted which is why godless democrats in particular continue to commit so much fraud in every election.

Your hyper-partisan paranoia is not sustained by documented reality.

A rare, fraudulent voter, risking fine and imprisonment, to cast his one bogus vote to change an election's result?

Utter nonsense.

 

[markef]

markef, you have to show evidence of wrong doing, just not allege it.

And the court has no requirement to rebuke allegations without proof.

Courts have not disproven voting fraud and claiming there was no fraud because no court ruled on evidence of fraud is a lie. If a court refuses to examine the evidence that means the evidence remains unchallenged.

 

[RedrickTheCoat]

Democrats claim no investigation of voting machines should be allowed because there is evidence the machines were corrupted. Only low intelligence rubes will fail to realize that the reason more evidence is not uncovered is because democrats are blocking investigations without just cause.

Markef, it's already been explained to you multiple times that there were investigations and examinations of voting machines. And these were often done by Republicans. Are you OK, Markef?