President Trump signs EO to crack down on mail-in ballots

Ignorance of the facts does not mean the facts are not facts.
Ohio Secretary of State Refers Whopping 1,200 Criminal Cases to Bondi as Noncitizen Election Fraud Finally Being Addressed

Ohio Secretary of State Refers Whopping 1,200 Criminal Cases to Bondi as Noncitizen Election Fraud Finally Being Addressed

10-28-25
That is more than five months ago with no action by DOJ.

The actual figures are in the range of .0003 to .0006 over the last twenty years, as been posted many times on the board.
 
You have still not cited any adjudications of fraudulent voting (that are exceedingly rare, and have never affected the outcome of any election.)
1. FITTON: HUGE! 5 MILLION DIRTY NAMES CLEANED FROM VOTER ROLLS! - markemmett12@gmail.com - Gmail
Investigative Bulletin|May 13, 2025

2. Election Integrity Update: Five Million Names Cleaned from Voter Rolls Thanks to Judicial Watch

3.
2.4 Million Fraudulent NY Voter Registrations Uncovered

2.4 Million Fraudulent NY Voter Registrations Uncovered
 
Democrats lied about their fraud in 2020. Trump did not lie.
What are you talking about? Trump did not lie? What about all those Republicans from the post I commented to you that you completely ignored? Trump was telling his supporters conspiracy theories that had already been debunked by his own people?

At least pretend not to be bad faith.

What do you think of this following quote by Mike Pence (don't hang him, now)?
Mike Pence: "I want the American People to know that I had no right to overturn the election. And that on that day, President Trump asked me to put him over the constitution, but I chose the constitution, and I always will. Anyone who puts themself over the constitution should never be President of the United States, and anyone who asks someone else to put themselves over the constitution should never be President of the United States again. But what the president maintained that day, and frankly has said over and over again over the last 2.5 years, is completely false."

What do you think of the following regarding Chris Krebs, a lifelong Republican, and yet another person that was appointed to his position by Trump, and then was later fired by Trump because he would not go along with Trump's plan to steal an election.

Chris Krebs was tje director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security AGency (CISA).
As CISA's director, Krebs was the "administration's most senior cybersecurity official responsible for securing the presidential election", held on November 3, 2020. Sidney Powell, an attorney for Trump and Michael Flynn, asserted on the Lou Dobbs and Maria Bartiromo Fox News programs that a secret government supercomputer program had switched votes from Trump to Biden in the election, a claim Krebs dismissed as "nonsense" and a "hoax." CISA created a website to debunk election-related disinformation, much of which was being promoted by President Donald Trump and his allies. On November 12, it was reported that Krebs expected to be fired from his position.
On November 17, 2020, Krebs said in a tweet that "59 election security experts all agree, "in every case of which we are aware, these claims (of fraud) either have been unsubstantiated or are technically incoherent." Trump fired Krebs via Twitter the same day

What are all of these Republicans going against Trump if there was mass fraud? Why are they all telling him it doesn't exist? And why did Trump ignore all of them, fire anyone who didn't fall in line and then plot to steal the election?
 
That is more than five months ago with no action by DOJ.

The actual figures are in the range of .0003 to .0006 over the last twenty years, as been posted many times on the board.
Democrats nationwide claim voter fraud is rare, but they do not prove it is rare, especially since hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants are being found registered to vote on democrat controlled and protected voting rolls. They claim no illegals are voting but they cannot prove that because there are no current protections in place to make sure illegals are not voting.

Ohio has new leadership overseeing elections since 2020 when the officials claimed with one mouth that voting fraud was rare in Ohio, yet no serious investigations were ever commissioned to prove that was the case. The Trump DOJ has finally been given access over stout democrat objections to Ohio's voting rolls to determine if any significant illegitimate number of ineligible voters' names are on the rolls. Democrats claim no fraud is taking place, but they fight like hell to prevent anyone from examining the evidence which could either support or disprove the unproven democrat claims. Just like democrat leaders are fighting like hell to prevent national laws ensuring that illegitimate voters do not vote.

Ohio voter registration data sent to DOJ sparks privacy concerns

POLITICS

Ohio gives voter data to DOJ as Trump administration sues other states

The requested information includes voters' full name, date of birth, address, driver's license number and the last four digits of their Social Security number


Haley BeMiller


Columbus Dispatch


March 5, 2026, 1:48 p.m. ET

 
What are you talking about? Trump did not lie? What about all those Republicans from the post I commented to you that you completely ignored? Trump was telling his supporters conspiracy theories that had already been debunked by his own people?

At least pretend not to be bad faith.

What do you think of this following quote by Mike Pence (don't hang him, now)?
Mike Pence: "I want the American People to know that I had no right to overturn the election. And that on that day, President Trump asked me to put him over the constitution, but I chose the constitution, and I always will. Anyone who puts themself over the constitution should never be President of the United States, and anyone who asks someone else to put themselves over the constitution should never be President of the United States again. But what the president maintained that day, and frankly has said over and over again over the last 2.5 years, is completely false."

What do you think of the following regarding Chris Krebs, a lifelong Republican, and yet another person that was appointed to his position by Trump, and then was later fired by Trump because he would not go along with Trump's plan to steal an election.

Chris Krebs was tje director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security AGency (CISA).
As CISA's director, Krebs was the "administration's most senior cybersecurity official responsible for securing the presidential election", held on November 3, 2020. Sidney Powell, an attorney for Trump and Michael Flynn, asserted on the Lou Dobbs and Maria Bartiromo Fox News programs that a secret government supercomputer program had switched votes from Trump to Biden in the election, a claim Krebs dismissed as "nonsense" and a "hoax." CISA created a website to debunk election-related disinformation, much of which was being promoted by President Donald Trump and his allies. On November 12, it was reported that Krebs expected to be fired from his position.
On November 17, 2020, Krebs said in a tweet that "59 election security experts all agree, "in every case of which we are aware, these claims (of fraud) either have been unsubstantiated or are technically incoherent." Trump fired Krebs via Twitter the same day

What are all of these Republicans going against Trump if there was mass fraud? Why are they all telling him it doesn't exist? And why did Trump ignore all of them, fire anyone who didn't fall in line and then plot to steal the election?
Republicans who claim there was no voter fraud but fail to disprove the evidence of fraud are blowing smoke.
 
1. FITTON: HUGE! 5 MILLION DIRTY NAMES CLEANED FROM VOTER ROLLS! - markemmett12@gmail.com - Gmail
Investigative Bulletin|May 13, 2025

2. Election Integrity Update: Five Million Names Cleaned from Voter Rolls Thanks to Judicial Watch

3.
2.4 Million Fraudulent NY Voter Registrations Uncovered

2.4 Million Fraudulent NY Voter Registrations Uncovered
You have made it clear that you can cite no instances of fraudulent votes impacting any elections.

They are exceedingly rare, despite all the baseless hysteria from those who with to suppress voting.
 
Republicans who claim there was no voter fraud but fail to disprove the evidence of fraud are blowing smoke.
Fail to disprove? How can you fail to disprove something that was never proven in the first place? Didn't the legal challenges fail? And didn't Trump's lawyers take a much less aggressive stance when they were actually in front of the courts than what they told their voter base, because they didn't want to commit perjury?

What those Republicans were doing was not claiming that there was no vote fraud in all cases, they were saying that the cases they investigated were nothingbugers. It went like this: Trump raised cliams he had seen or had been bought to him, of supposed voter fraud > his team would investigate it and debunk the claim > They would tell Trump their findings > Trump would ignore their findings and continue to tell his voterbase those claims were evidence of mass voter fraud > Trump would in some cases fire or publically attack the person that informed him the claims were not true.

In your opinion, what were the best pieces of proven evidence of mass voter fraud from before January 6th, 2021? Please share them.
 
You have made it clear that you can cite no instances of fraudulent votes impacting any elections.

They are exceedingly rare, despite all the baseless hysteria from those who with to suppress voting.
Voter ID is suppressing voting, you mindlessly parrot leftist slogans.
 
Voter ID is suppressing voting, you mindlessly parrot leftist slogans.
You are unable to document your lies.

Imposing bureaucratic barriers on poor, elderly, and rural Americans is an attack on democracy.
 
The convicted felon who casts his votes by mail exploits the paranoid xenophobia of his toadies.

There has never been any credible evidence of a conspiracy to overthrow a democratic election by a cabal of coordinated bogus voters.

Our laws are based upon facts, not fantasies.

It would be a monumentally silly caper, since forging fake documents to flash at a poll nanny would be easier than it is for many of the targeted poor, elderly, and rural Americans to obtain whatever bureaucrats, hoping to suppress the voting of those Americans, is demanding of them.

After exhausting recounts, investigations, and legal appeals, a scheme of fake electors, intimidation by a loser of governors and secretaries-of-state to "find" imaginary votes, and goons attacking Congress would have a better chance of perverting democracy, and we know how that worked out. Not even hanging the vice president would have perverted the legitimate, certified election.

All Americans should be encouraged, not discouraged, from participating in our democracy.


OGC-4.gif
 
Last edited:
You have made it clear that you can cite no instances of fraudulent votes impacting any elections.

They are exceedingly rare, despite all the baseless hysteria from those who with to suppress voting.
Hundreds or more illegal immigrants voted in 1996 to help steal Bob Dornan's seat. Congress investigated some of the evidence and found hundreds of illegal votes but not enough to overturn the crooked democrat victory. What Congress did not do, however, was examine additional evidence of thousands of illegal votes, proving that some of the best lawmakers are not interested in getting to the bottom of the truth of election fraud if the investigations are too troublesome for them.

Congress was controlled by Democrats in 1996 and the democrats cheated, lied, obstructed, and committed every partisan trick in the book in allowing the democrat candidate to steal Dornan's seat in the corrupted 1996 election.

1. Proof Of Illegal Voters Falls Short, Keeping Sanchez In House - February 7, 1998

Proof Of Illegal Voters Falls Short, Keeping Sanchez In House

2. Inquiry Finds Possible Illegal Ballots Cast in Upset of Dornan - The New York Times

Inquiry Finds Possible Illegal Ballots Cast in Upset of Dornan

Feb. 16, 1997



3. Non-Citizens Admit Voting In Disputed Election Dornan's Complaints After Narrow Loss No Longer Just Sour Grapes

Non-Citizens Admit Voting In Disputed Election Dornan’s Complaints After Narrow Loss No Longer Just Sour Grapes

Sat., Dec. 28, 1996



4. House Report 105-416 - DISMISSING THE ELECTION CONTEST AGAINST LORETTA SANCHEZ

While the Democrats controlled Congress for forty years,

there was a consistent denial of access to facts, which

frustrated efforts to uncover possible vote fraud or

malfeasance in our electoral system.

 
Fail to disprove? How can you fail to disprove something that was never proven in the first place? Didn't the legal challenges fail? And didn't Trump's lawyers take a much less aggressive stance when they were actually in front of the courts than what they told their voter base, because they didn't want to commit perjury?

What those Republicans were doing was not claiming that there was no vote fraud in all cases, they were saying that the cases they investigated were nothingbugers. It went like this: Trump raised cliams he had seen or had been bought to him, of supposed voter fraud > his team would investigate it and debunk the claim > They would tell Trump their findings > Trump would ignore their findings and continue to tell his voterbase those claims were evidence of mass voter fraud > Trump would in some cases fire or publically attack the person that informed him the claims were not true.

In your opinion, what were the best pieces of proven evidence of mass voter fraud from before January 6th, 2021? Please share them.
Democrats claim if voter fraud is not investigated then it did not happen. That works well for cheats and liars.
 
15th post
You are unable to document your lies.

Imposing bureaucratic barriers on poor, elderly, and rural Americans is an attack on democracy.
Jimmy Carter was right. Crooks will steal elections and the best way to stop them is by requiring a voter ID.
 
Democrats claim if voter fraud is not investigated then it did not happen. That works well for cheats and liars.
But in this case it wans't Democrats....it was Republicans (Trump's own team, even) that did investigate it and told the President that there was no proof? Did you even read the comment that you responded to here? Your reply makes zero sense.

I'll ask again, in your opinion, what were the best pieces of proven evidence of mass voter fraud from before January 6th, 2021? Please share them.
 
The convicted felon who casts his votes by mail exploits the paranoid xenophobia of his toadies.

There has never been any credible evidence of a conspiracy to overthrow a democratic election by a cabal of coordinated bogus voters.

Our laws are based upon facts, not fantasies.

It would be a monumentally silly caper, since forging fake documents to flash at a poll nanny would be easier than it is for many of the targeted poor, elderly, and rural Americans to obtain whatever bureaucrats, hoping to suppress the voting of those Americans, is demanding of them.

After exhausting recounts, investigations, and legal appeals, a scheme of fake electors, intimidation by a loser of governors and secretaries-of-state to "find" imaginary votes, and goons attacking Congress would have a better chance of perverting democracy, and we know how that worked out. Not even hanging the vice president would have perverted the legitimate, certified election.

All Americans should be encouraged, not discouraged, from participating in our democracy.


Groups supporting voting fraud have been uncovered in elections for decades. Liberal news has minimized the illegal advocacy group Hermandad Mexicana Nacional, a local Hispanic rights group, but Congress found them involved in hundreds or even possibly thousands of illegal voter registrations.

House Report 105-416 - DISMISSING THE ELECTION CONTEST AGAINST LORETTA SANCHEZ
 
But in this case it wans't Democrats....it was Republicans (Trump's own team, even) that did investigate it and told the President that there was no proof? Did you even read the comment that you responded to here? Your reply makes zero sense.

I'll ask again, in your opinion, what were the best pieces of proven evidence of mass voter fraud from before January 6th, 2021? Please share them.
No serious investigations by democrats or republicans were ever done if the 'investigators' claimed they found no significant evidence of fraud. Let them produce the support supposedly backing the thoroughness of their investigations if they claim their investigations were thorough. Democrats stupidly claimed voter fraud was investigated and disproven in a matter of just weeks after the election. Intelligent people know that is nonsense.
 
Back
Top Bottom