President Trump signs EO to crack down on mail-in ballots

Allegation without proof.
Claiming hundreds of illegal votes should be disregarded because they are not enough to overturn the election is a far cry from proving no significant number of illegal votes are cast.

Proof Of Illegal Voters Falls Short, Keeping Sanchez In House

By Jackie Koszczuk, CQ Staff Writer
Task force Chairman Vernon J. Ehlers, R-Mich., said investigators had found concrete evidence of 748 illegal votes by non-citizens, not enough to throw Sanchez's victory into doubt. He and other Republicans said the results nonetheless show that Dornan's challenge was not frivolous and that the GOP was not unfairly targeting Hispanic voters.

"The fact that we ended up with 748 illegal votes makes it clear his allegations had merit," Ehlers said.
 
But like, why would they target California? California is like a sure thing to vote Democrat? Why would they even go to the length of committing fraud in California when it's a sure thing that they have California?

All your comment does is to continue to prove you have zero idea what you are talking about? Some of your most recent comments are just weird. They don't really seem to properly respond to the thing you are replying to? It's like you don't have any ability to understand what people are saying to you?

Can I ask you, do you even realize, or have awareness that you've ignored 95% of the things I've said or asked you in my previous comments? Do you have any ability to comprehend that?
By my pointing out that California has evidence of hundreds of thousands of illegals illegally registered to vote somehow suggests to you that I don't know what I am talking about is a stupid nonsensical assumption.
 
If a biased court refuses to look at the merits of a voter fraud case, then democrats lie when they claim that court has ruled that there was no evidence of fraud.
There you go again with an allegation of "biased." There was only the law but no bias.
 
Democrats claim no investigation of voting machines should be allowed because there is evidence the machines were corrupted. Only low intelligence rubes will fail to realize that the reason more evidence is not uncovered is because democrats are blocking investigations without just cause.
No, there were allegations but no factual proof.
 
Your hyper-partisan paranoia is not sustained by documented reality.

A rare, fraudulent voter, risking fine and imprisonment, to cast his one bogus vote to change an election's result?

Utter nonsense.
You say illegal voting fraud is rare, but who has proven that? Nobody. Democrats claim that voting fraud is rare, but they have never supplied evidence to reasonably support that unproven claim.
 
You say illegal voting fraud is rare, but who has proven that? Nobody. Democrats claim that voting fraud is rare, but they have never supplied evidence to reasonably support that unproven claim.
It comes from the Brennan Center for Justice, in their well‑known report “The Truth About Voter Fraud.” The Brennan Center found that impersonation fraud occurs at rates between 0.0003% and 0.0025%.
 
Courts have not disproven voting fraud and claiming there was no fraud because no court ruled on evidence of fraud is a lie. If a court refuses to examine the evidence that means the evidence remains unchallenged.
That is not the duty of the court, to investigate unproven claims. The plaintiffs must argue with evidence, and that did not happen.
 
By my pointing out that California has evidence of hundreds of thousands of illegals illegally registered to vote somehow suggests to you that I don't know what I am talking about is a stupid nonsensical assumption.
It wasn't this comment alone, markef. It's how you've continued to ignore what you are told, consistently.
Can you tell me markef, what are your top 2 pieces of evidence that you think shows there was mass voter fraud in the 2020 election?

Regarding California, why would those illegal immigrants take the risk in registrating to vote in a state that is already won? Does it make any sense to you why they would take that risk? Does it make sense, markef?
 
Markef, it's already been explained to you multiple times that there were investigations and examinations of voting machines. And these were often done by Republicans. Are you OK, Markef?
Dominion machines have been analyzed for years by both republicans and democrats and both republicans and democrats have claimed the machines are vulnerable to corruption, with some forensics examiners going further to show specific examples of corruption that demonstrate election fraud.



Flashback: Democrats Said Voting Machines Can Be Hacked, Votes Can Be Switched

Commentary

Flashback: Democrats Said Voting Machines Can Be Hacked, Votes Can Be Switched



By Taylor Penley July 19, 2021 at 3:09pm

Only Republicans claim voting machines are a flawed, vulnerable Election Day tool, right?

Well, not exactly. But that has been the case since President Joe Biden eked out a win over incumbent President Donald Trump in November.

Now the idea of hacked voting machines seems preposterous to Democrats — and, of course, to their allies in the establishment media — but the story wasn’t the same in 2018.

In fact, you might recognize one of the biggest voting machine skeptics as none other than Vice President Kamala Harris.
 
There you go again with an allegation of "biased." There was only the law but no bias.
Are you claiming courts cannot be biased?

Complicit Bias and the Supreme Court​

Parent Category: Stereotype, Bias, RacismCategory:Bias and the Law26 January 2024Hits: 3601


Abstract

Excerpted From: Michele Goodwin, Complicit Bias and the Supreme Court, 136 Harvard Law Review Forum 119 (December, 2022) (295 Footnotes) (Full Document)

Even as judges and courts serve as important safeguards and guardians against state and federal enforcement of unjust, harmful, and unconstitutional laws and discriminatory policies, they too may be fallible, weak in judgement and character, personally and professionally indifferent to systemic injustice, or corruptible. As history demonstrates, judges may be complicit in perpetuating harms or furthering discrimination against vulnerable people, including racial minorities, women, individuals with disabilities, and people who identify as LGBTQ. In other words, judges may possess cognitive awareness of a past or present harm against a vulnerable group and yet refuse to intervene to avert the continuance of harm or discrimination.
 
It comes from the Brennan Center for Justice, in their well‑known report “The Truth About Voter Fraud.” The Brennan Center found that impersonation fraud occurs at rates between 0.0003% and 0.0025%.
You still seem too eager to accept the word of pundits, groups, or people who fail to supply sufficient evidence to make their claims more believable.
 
That is not the duty of the court, to investigate unproven claims. The plaintiffs must argue with evidence, and that did not happen.
How much time did dozens of courts give investigators before the Biden inauguration to gather evidence of fraud from precincts that fought like hell against the investigations? Democrats don't think very deeply about what they claim or believe without thinking.
 
15th post
It wasn't this comment alone, markef. It's how you've continued to ignore what you are told, consistently.
Can you tell me markef, what are your top 2 pieces of evidence that you think shows there was mass voter fraud in the 2020 election?

Regarding California, why would those illegal immigrants take the risk in registrating to vote in a state that is already won? Does it make any sense to you why they would take that risk? Does it make sense, markef?
What I know about voting fraud includes fake voter registrations, bloated voting registries, numerous illegal immigrants voting that cannot easily be uncovered or numbered, flaws and inconsistencies in voting records and reported results, all but impossible statistical anomalies, blocking of election observers, hiding thousands of apparently mimeographed ballots, destruction of evidence after the election, obstruction of voter fraud investigations, vote buying, vote harvesting, ballot box stuffing, manipulation of data, missing tabulators, missing signature verifications, late night arrivals of tens of thousands of unverified ballots after election day with no chain of custody records, and more.
 
Dominion machines have been analyzed for years by both republicans and democrats and both republicans and democrats have claimed the machines are vulnerable to corruption, with some forensics examiners going further to show specific examples of corruption that demonstrate election fraud.



Flashback: Democrats Said Voting Machines Can Be Hacked, Votes Can Be Switched

Commentary

Flashback: Democrats Said Voting Machines Can Be Hacked, Votes Can Be Switched



By Taylor Penley July 19, 2021 at 3:09pm

Only Republicans claim voting machines are a flawed, vulnerable Election Day tool, right?

Well, not exactly. But that has been the case since President Joe Biden eked out a win over incumbent President Donald Trump in November.

Now the idea of hacked voting machines seems preposterous to Democrats — and, of course, to their allies in the establishment media — but the story wasn’t the same in 2018.

In fact, you might recognize one of the biggest voting machine skeptics as none other than Vice President Kamala Harris.
This is what I mean, markef. You are not making any sense. Are you a bot? If you're not a bot, I think you might be having some kind of mental breakdown. I hope you can find some help.
 
What I know about voting fraud includes fake voter registrations, bloated voting registries, numerous illegal immigrants voting that cannot easily be uncovered or numbered, flaws and inconsistencies in voting records and reported results, all but impossible statistical anomalies, blocking of election observers, hiding thousands of apparently mimeographed ballots, destruction of evidence after the election, obstruction of voter fraud investigations, vote buying, vote harvesting, ballot box stuffing, manipulation of data, missing tabulators, missing signature verifications, late night arrivals of tens of thousands of unverified ballots after election day with no chain of custody records, and more.
But markef, all I'm asking you to supply is the following:
What are your top 2 pieces of evidence that you think shows there was mass voter fraud in the 2020 election?
 
But markef, all I'm asking you to supply is the following:
What are your top 2 pieces of evidence that you think shows there was mass voter fraud in the 2020 election?
Where to begin with all the extant evidence of voting fraud still unrefuted from 2020?

1. There were not more votes than voters in Pennsylvania | AP News

There were not more votes than voters in Pennsylvania

Published 5:05 PM EST, December 29, 2020

CLAIM: There were 205,000 more votes than voters in the 2020 election in Pennsylvania.


Yes there were until democrats quickly moved after the election to change the data.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

2.
https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=b271...CstK0thbXpvbCtyZXBvcnQmZm9ybT1DU0JSQU5E&ntb=1

Microsoft Word – Kamzol Report Overview​

The Kamzol report is a data analysis document authored by Jesse Kamzol, a former Republican National Committee Chief Data Officer and data science expert, who has over 15 years of experience in data management and analysis Nevada Republican Party. It was produced in the context of the 2020 U.S. presidential general election and is referenced in a Nevada court case involving a challenge to the election results.

Purpose and Context​

The report was submitted as part of a contested election case in the First Judicial District Court of Carson City, Nevada. The “Contestants” — Trump’s presidential electors — designated Kamzol as an expert witness under Nevada Rule of Civil Procedure 16.1(a)(2) ewscripps.brightspotcdn.com. His role was to analyze voter and commercial databases to identify potential irregularities in Nevada’s 2020 election.

Scope of Analysis​

Kamzol reviewed over 2 million records from multiple public and commercial databases, including:

  • Nevada city/county/jurisdiction voter files
  • Nevada state voter files
  • Election Day and mail/absentee vote files
  • Early voting files
  • Consumer data files
  • USPS National Change of Address (NCOA) files Nevada Republican Party
He did not include provisional vote data, which he was denied access to, but still found significant anomalies.

Key Findings​

From the available data, Kamzol identified 130,709 unique cases with multiple levels of “illegal ballots” Nevada Republican Party. Notable issues included:

  • Non-Nevada mailing addresses: 19,218 Nevada voters had addresses outside Nevada; 15,164 of these voted by mail/absentee.
  • Non-existent addresses: 8,111 voters had registered addresses that were physically non-existent (e.g., vacant lots, non-existent apartment/house numbers). Of these, 3,262 voted by mail and 4,849 voted in person.
  • Other anomalies: voters with the same name, deceased voters, nonresidential addresses, undeliverable mail, and inconsistencies between Nevada’s vote reporting systems ewscripps.brightspotcdn.com.

Legal Use​

In the court case, Kamzol’s testimony was intended to show fraudulent and improper voting in Nevada that exceeded the candidates’ vote differences in the 2020 presidential election ewscripps.brightspotcdn.com. The report and his analysis were part of the evidence presented to the court.

Access​

The full Kamzol report is available as a Microsoft Word document (e.g., “kamzol data report.docx”) on the Nevada GOP website Nevada Republican Party. It contains detailed methodology, data sources, and statistical conclusions.

Tip: If you need to open or edit the report in Microsoft Word, you can download it from the source and use Microsoft Word or Word Online for editing, collaboration, and formatting word.cloud.microsoft+1.
 
Back
Top Bottom