President Trump signs EO to crack down on mail-in ballots

I shall continue to respect actual impartial studies over hyper-partisan propaganda.

I can document no election whose result was changed by voter fraud, and endorse the existing safeguards that have prevented it.

Trump's various scheme to overthrow the certified 2020 election all failed, and that was by far the most serious attempt to defeat the will of the People.
voter fraud is by its very nature an attempt to defeat the will of the people. Thus, the need for the import of your millions of illegals.

 
When told that 45 state issued drivers licenses do not meet the requirements of the Bill the GOP House passed, that percent drops well below 50%. It will never pass the Senate anyway, unless they do away with the 60 vote threshold. Which is very unlikely.
Driver's licenses have nothing to do with voter registration under the SAVE Act. You are simply lying to obstruct, just like Dems in the Senate.
 
Please document your "millions of illegals" attempting to cast bogus votes via fake id's.
1775586115198.webp
 
As much as you want to usurp the Constitution, go eat some beef.

Article I, Section 4, Clause 1:

The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.
My comments did not eliminate Congress's authority. This issue is primary a states' right one, and the Save Act died on the road to nowhere.
 
The fantasy of millions of illegals voters casting anti-Trump votes is not supported by credible evidence, nor by state Attorneys Generals of both parties who safeguard elections.

Voter suppression by concocting bureaucratic barriers to an American's casting her ballot is the real threat to democracy.

A convicted felon being able to cast his vote by mail in Florida is an affirmation of American democracy.
 
Last edited:
The fantasy of millions of illegals voters casting anti-Trump votes is not supported by credible evidence, nor by state Attorneys Generals of both parties who safeguard elections.

Voter suppression by concocting bureaucratic barriers to an American's casting her ballot is the real threat to democracy.

A convicted felon being able to cast his vote by mail in Florida is an affirmation of American democracy.
If there is one things democrats fight like hell against hardest it is voting securities and voter fraud investigations.

. California Supreme Court halts GOP sheriff's voter fraud investigationom the 2025

Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco is one of the leading Republican candidates for governor in California

April 8, 2026, 2:56 PM EDT
 
If there is one things democrats fight like hell against hardest it is voting securities and voter fraud investigations.

. California Supreme Court halts GOP sheriff's voter fraud investigationom the 2025

Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco is one of the leading Republican candidates for governor in California

April 8, 2026, 2:56 PM EDT
If there is one thing that Trumpers try to do it is contrive bureaucratic red tape to obstruct an America's right to vote, despite being unable to concoct anything to contradict the reality that voter fraud is extremely rare, and cannot be shown to have ever altered an election's outcome.

If you want to try to pervert the results of an election, pressure voting officials to "find" your needed votes, try fake elector schemes, incite goons to attack Congress. Even then, you'll fail.

Should a convicted felon be allowed to vote by mail if his state law permits it? I think so.
 
Last edited:
If there is one thing that Trumpers try to do it is contrive bureaucratic red tape to obstruct an America's right to vote, despite being unable to concoct anything to contradict the reality that voter fraud is extremely rare, and cannot be shown to have ever altered an election's outcome.

If you want to try to pervert the results of an election, pressure voting officials to "find" your needed votes, try fake elector schemes, incite goons to attack Congress. Even then, you'll fail.

Should a convicted felon be allowed to vote by mail if his state law permits it? I think so.
How does making elections secure obstruct anyone's right to vote except for crooked voters committing fraud? America does not need to make it easier to vote if by doing so it makes every election unsecured from voter fraud.
 
The difficulties of convicting anyone of voter fraud results in very few successful convictions, but that does not mean that voter fraud does not exist. IMHO, there are quite a few cases of voter fraud that either go undetected, unreported, or thrown out of court for lack of evidence that stands up to scrutiny. Clearly there is a significant distrust of the election process, which leads to a distrust of gov't at every level. I submit that is not a good thing, and the current mail-in ballot process isn't very secure and a serious effort should be made to address that.
 
A very small mistrust by a small minority of the mail-in system
 
Driver's licenses have nothing to do with voter registration under the SAVE Act.
In 5 states we can use them to register to vote. Not in the other 45 states, because they can't be used to register to vote under the SAVE Act if it were to pass the Senate.
 
A very small mistrust by a small minority of the mail-in system

Depends on who you ask and who does the asking. Lefties love it, Righties and right-leaning not so much. And I suspect a not so small number of Indies might not trust the system either.

Trust in election results varies by the way in which we asked questions and is mediated by various factors, including partisan identification, support for candidates and satisfaction with how democracy and electoral system are working. When we asked respondents if they will trust the election results regardless of who wins, 37% say they will have a lot of trust in the results, 38% say somewhat, 18% say a little and 6% say not at all. Republicans (23%) and independents (30%) are less likely than Democrats (56%) to say they have a lot of trust in the election results. Trump supporters (21%) are substantially less likely than Harris supporters (60%) to say they will trust the election result a lot regardless of who wins.

Those who are satisfied with democracy in the U.S. (51%) are much more likely than those who are not (18%) to trust the results, and those who are satisfied with how the electoral system works (47%) are more likely than those who are not (25%) to say they will trust the election outcome a lot regardless of who wins. Trump supporters satisfied with how democracy works (34%) are four times more likely than Trump voters who are not (8%) to say they will trust the results. Trump supporters who are satisfied with how the electoral system works (33%) are eight times more likely than those who are not (4%) to say they will trust the results a lot.
 
Last edited:
Go ahead and ask. The great majority approves mail-in voting.

Pew Research Center (Aug. 2025)

  • 58% of Americans favor allowing any voter to cast a ballot by mail.
  • Support is sharply partisan:
    • 83% of Democrats support it
    • 68% of Republicans oppose it

/www.pewresearch.org/politics/2025/08/22/majority-of-americans-continue-to-back-expanded-early-voting-voting-by-mail-voter-id/?utm_source=copilot.com
 
15th post
Go ahead and ask. The great majority approves mail-in voting.

Pew Research Center (Aug. 2025)

  • 58% of Americans favor allowing any voter to cast a ballot by mail.
  • Support is sharply partisan:
    • 83% of Democrats support it
    • 68% of Republicans oppose it

/www.pewresearch.org/politics/2025/08/22/majority-of-americans-continue-to-back-expanded-early-voting-voting-by-mail-voter-id/?utm_source=copilot.com

Doesn't sound like a great majority to me, but whatever. If only 58% favor it, that leaves 42% who don't or at least have some doubts.
 
Doesn't sound like a great majority to me, but whatever. If only 58% favor it, that leaves 42% who don't or at least have some doubts.
More than enough in a democracy to stop the minority flat in their tracks.
 
More than enough in a democracy to stop the minority flat in their tracks.

Sorry, your response just flew over my head, what did you mean? The question isn't really how much fraud exists, but rather the lack of trust in our elections that leads to distrust in our gov't at every level. Good to see you accept the possibility that voter fraud is somewhat significant though. Enough to stop the minority in it's tracks is not a good thing.
 
Maga will have to not trust but verify within the law.

That means it must accept what the law adjudicates.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom