President Trump signs EO to crack down on mail-in ballots

[markef]

Regarding your 2nd example, the court concluded that Kamzol's data was not credible.
The court concluded that the Kamzol's data was not credible, and Russell wrote that his methodology "had little to no information about or supervision over the origins of his data, the manner in which it had been matched, and what the rate of false positives would be. Additionally, there was little or no verification of his numbers."

In the 35-page order, Russell also wrote that "the record does not support a finding that any Nevada voter voted twice." - https://www.aol.com/news/fact-check-voter-fraud-claims-232634307.html

Marc Elias argued this case before Judge Russell. Elias is about the most radical leftist democrat lawyer in the DC swamp of crooked lawyers. Nevertheless, his argument was not that he could disprove Kamzol's evidence, but that Kamzol did not have the qualifications to present the evidence and that Kamzol did not meet all the impossible deadlines and requirements set by the leftist court in the hurried case. That is not proof there was no fraud but a failure to prove the evidence was false.

Marc Elias and Legal Challenges​

Marc Elias, a prominent Democratic elections attorney and founder of the Elias Law Group, has been involved in multiple high-profile legal actions — but there is no credible public record of him being charged with a criminal offense.

Elias is best known for his role in shaping Democratic campaign and election rules, serving as general counsel for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and John Kerry’s 2004 campaign, and for leading the Democratic National Committee’s legal defense of the 2020 election results Wikipedia. In recent years, he has represented Democratic candidates and groups in litigation over voting laws, including:

 

[markef]

Markef will not be getting paid for this very, very soon.

Unlike overpaid democrat pundits and liars, I do not work for any human. I serve Jesus and only He will be paying me for what good or bad I do in the flesh.

 

[markef]

Based on the plaintiffs' lack of evidence, the Court's time was wasted on frivolous lawsuits.

No credible evidence of voter fraud was offered, so the Cour concluded the evidence of voter fraud was not credible.

It is very easy for leftist politicians, lawmakers, and pundits to claim that prosecuting voter fraud is a waste of time, as long as the voting fraud crooks and their crooked supporters do not have to refute evidence they know they cannot refute.

 

[markef]

More allegations without any proof.

markef, you need to offer evidence.

There can be no doubt that hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants have been found illegally registered to vote in blue districts, which is clear voting fraud. Dishonestly denying the facts is all the democrats have.

 

[markef]

There was insufficient evidence provided in sixty cases.

That is a heck of well-constructed conspiracy against Trump.

You misrepresent the totality of the facts. Of course two weeks is insufficient time to do deep dives into evidence of voting fraud, but it is clearly a lie to claim the courts examined all the evidence in the two months following the election and concluded the evidence was false.

 

[markef]

Fallacy of unsupported assertion

Really? Republicans claimed possibly hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants illegally voted in the 2020 election. How many have you found actually voted, if you know the answer?

 

[the watcher]

Why? Do you think the Constitution makes massive unverified mail-in ballots a voting right?

Not electing who the democrats like is voter suppression.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Marc Elias argued this case before Judge Russell. Elias is about the most radical leftist democrat lawyer in the DC swamp of crooked lawyers. Nevertheless, his argument was not that he could disprove Kamzol's evidence, but that Kamzol did not have the qualifications to present the evidence and that Kamzol did not meet all the impossible deadlines and requirements set by the leftist court in the hurried case. That is not proof there was no fraud but a failure to prove the evidence was false.

Marc Elias and Legal Challenges​

Marc Elias, a prominent Democratic elections attorney and founder of the Elias Law Group, has been involved in multiple high-profile legal actions — but there is no credible public record of him being charged with a criminal offense.

Elias is best known for his role in shaping Democratic campaign and election rules, serving as general counsel for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and John Kerry’s 2004 campaign, and for leading the Democratic National Committee’s legal defense of the 2020 election results Wikipedia. In recent years, he has represented Democratic candidates and groups in litigation over voting laws, including:

And the Judge did not rule for and on Trump's behalf. This is about voter fraud not about leftist attorneys.

There was no fraud.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Not electing who the democrats like is voter suppression.

The would-be Safe Act is voter suppression.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Unlike overpaid democrat pundits and liars, I do not work for any human. I serve Jesus and only He will be paying me for what good or bad I do in the flesh.

Then emulate him better in public.