President Trump signs EO to crack down on mail-in ballots

[markef]

Trump votes by mail-in ballots and we have the usual inanity of MAGAs condemning something their cult leader does in nearly every election.

To be a Trumpist means your brain has to be running on fumes.

Those who do not believe unsecured balloting or unprotected voting practices will be corrupted by fraud are not very perceptive.

 

[markef]

Dead on arrival.

t-rump is playing to the base, nothing else.

Yes, President Trump still seems eager to please the majority of Americans.

 

[markef]

Trump doesn't need Congress, he's the King.

Now go have a protest or something.

If Trump really was a king he could order his subjects to take a dangerousn vaccine or lose their jobs if they don't.

 

[markef]

Since when do Trumpers care about the Constitution??

They never have and never will.

Are you suggesting Trump supporters will fight federal law enforcement officers for enforcing federal laws?

 

[markef]

I don't ever remember saying or writing anything like that.

Be that as it may, I notice you did not deny what I posted about Trumpist disdain for the Constitution!

Does the Constitution inspire Trumpists to defund the police and empty jails of dangerous felons?

 

[markef]

then you will be disappointed if that is true. the SAVE Act has 44% approval rating.

Leftist news reporters have produced polls they claim justify crushing democrat persecution of tens of millions of Americans simply wanting election security measures that would give them comfort that elections are not being corrupted.

 

[markef]

When told that 45 state issued drivers licenses do not meet the requirements of the Bill the GOP House passed, that percent drops well below 50%. It will never pass the Senate anyway, unless they do away with the 60 vote threshold. Which is very unlikely.

Do democrats opposing voter IDs and guarantees against illegal voting still claim they want our elections secured against fraud?

 

[markef]

Overall, the SAVE act, though, is a loser.

Do democrats believe that voter IDs can help prevent fraudulent voting at all? Do democrats even want fraudulent voting hindered? What recommendations do democrats propose to secure our elections against fraud?

 

[markef]

You are stupid as The Duke. You have no proof of any of that.

Do you believe former President Jimmy Carter was stupid for saying that the nation could use voter IDs to help prevent voter fraud of the kind he and James Baker uncovered more than 20 years ago?

 

[jacksonlamb]

You are right. Democrats have no idea whether few or many illegals illegally voted but democrats will still claim practically no illegals voted because that is how they cover for any and all fraud that was committed.

... because all facts reveal there is no systemic voting fraud, silly.

 

[markef]

We already have those laws, buckshot.

Of course we have immigration and election laws that crooks all over the nation are violating all the time. Requiring a voter ID would make it much harder for crooks to cheat in elections.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Are you suggesting Trump supporters will fight federal law enforcement officers for enforcing federal laws?

You are drinking very early.

 

[markef]

They are not. FAKE NEWS.

Democrats keep calling evidence of voting fraud fake news so they can comfort themselves while denying massive voting fraud they cannot possibly disprove.

 

[markef]

Trump's attempt at voter suppression will be overturned. An American's right to vote free of senseless bureaucratic impediments is essential to democracy. There is no exception made for partisan paranoia.

There have been no cases of the very rare instances of fraudulent votes impacting an election.

Obviously, Trump's cult don't need no stinkin' evidence. They do their bobble-head genuflections for whatever he pulls from his enormous butt, but the courts do require credible evidence.

In the past, Trump has baselessly claimed that thousands, if not millions, of undocumented immigrants voted against him in his presidential bids. Following the 2016 election, Trump claimed that between 3 million and 5 million “illegal votes” caused him to lose the popular vote to Hillary Clinton. When he lost the 2020 election to President Joe Biden four years later, he alleged that Biden won in key states due to tens of thousands of non-citizen votes.​

​

It’s already illegal for non-citizens to vote in federal U.S. elections, however, and research and recent state investigations have shown that non-citizen registration and voting occurs only very rarely, accounting for just a sliver of registered voters and an even more minuscule fraction of ballots cast.​

​

The preliminary results of recent investigations into potential non-citizen voting that have been conducted in multiple states have yielded numbers that are a fraction of a fraction of those Trump has claimed.​

​

Louisiana Secretary of State Nancy Landry announced in September that an ongoing investigation had found 390 non-citizens on the state’s voter rolls. That number represents roughly 0.01 percent of the 2.9 million registered voters in Louisiana. Of the 390 non-citizen registrants identified by the investigation, Landry said 79 had voted in at least one election.​

​

Utah’s election office, meanwhile, said last month that it had not discovered any cases of non-citizens casting ballots in the state after months of investigating.​

“We have not yet encountered anyone who voted illegally,” Utah Lt. Gov. Deidre Henderson said about her office’s review of the 2.1 million people on the state’s voter rolls.​

​

The Facts About Non-Citizen Voting

President Trump has repeatedly claimed non-citizen voting is widespread in the U.S.. Research shows it's extremely rare.

time.com

​

​

I believe Democrats are proving they do not want elections secured against fraud. Can anyone prove me wrong?

 

[jacksonlamb]

I believe Democrats are proving they do not want elections secured against fraud. Can anyone prove me wrong?

That's not how it works.

 

[markef]

So, you are unable to document any instance of the very rare instances of fraudulent votes ever impacting an election result.

I already knew that.

The irony of your beloved felon recently voting by mail in Florida is eminently chuckleworthy.

Parroting the same old lies is futile.

Trump and other Republicans have been repeating the false narrative that Democrats are purposefully letting migrants into the country so they will vote.​

​

There’s no evidence for the claim, which echoes a racist conspiracy theory known as the "great replacement."​

​

In fact, allegations about voter fraud and noncitizens have been floating around American politics for more than a century.... Millions of eligible voters — about 1 in 10 adult U.S. citizens, according to one recent survey — don’t have ready access to documents that prove their citizenship, such as a birth certificate or passport, and would face hurdles to vote.​

​

https://www.npr.org/2024/10/12/nx-s1-5147789/voting-election-2024-noncitizen-fact-check-trump

​

​

​

Concocting bureaucratic impediments to suppress voting is undemocratic and unAmerican.

Al Franken would have never won his 'miraculous come-from-behind' election if not for shady deals conjuring up mysterious extra ballots for days after the election, similar to the way Landslide Lindon won his election by last minute votes from a friendly county that turned in more votes than there were numbers of voters in the county.

 

[markef]

You troll, you have no evidence of any massive election fraud, you fool.

You claim I do not have what I and thousands of other Americans have in spades.

 

[jacksonlamb]

Al Franken would have never won his 'miraculous come-from-behind' election if not for shady deals conjuring up mysterious extra ballots for days after the election, similar to the way Landslide Lindon won his election by last minute votes from a friendly county that turned in more votes than there were numbers of voters in the county.

More allegations without any proof. Opinions are not proof in court.

 

[markef]

Ideological dogma is of no value, no matter how passionately embraced.

Document adjudications of fraudulent voting in elections.

Dominion machines were rejecting high percentages of ballots which were then 'adjudicated' by Trump-hating democrat election workers who then cast the ballots for the candidate they assumed the voter intended to vote for.

 

[markef]

Then document massive voter fraud. Hint: there is none.

Have you determined how many of the hundreds of thousands of illegally registered voters cast illegal votes?