You're so ******* deranged, it's funny. The "Live" at the bottom of the screen is not indicating the interview is live ... it's part of their rotating banner and always says live. I'm watching it right now as they're doing a story about a paraplegic girl and showing her onstage at some dance recital which is clearly prerecorded, yet "live CNN" still remains at the bottom of their screen.
I'm talking content and you're talking production.
It's still fake news. If it isn't live, then they shouldn't say it is.
If you read further down the article you would have seen where ABC faked a crime scene investigation.
Dice correlated this latest faux pas by the failing corporate media machine to similar recent incidents that included CNN staging a ‘long-distance’ live interview conducted with both subjects in the same parking lot, and also a staged ‘crime scene’ erected by ABC News operatives for a report on Good Morning America, which was nothing more than a small length of caution tape strung between camera stands.
More fake news, you ******* douche nozzle.
Holyfuckingshit!
Again ... you're talking about production while I'm talking about content. <smh>
They were reporting on a woman held captive against her will. Was that story fake? That they staged a prop for dramatic affect, while unethical at worst (and the woman was removed from field duty as a result) -- that's not fake news. The story was real. What's next, you're gonna complain MSM news is fake news because reporters sometimes wear shorts when shot from waist up?
Fake news is not about production. It's about creating bullshit stories and then portraying them as actual news.
Don't you ever tire of making yourself look like such a ******* idiot?
They create a fake crime scene, you ******* douche nozzle, and then they pretended they were actually at the crime scene. If the "production" is fake, then it's fake news.
Of course, there are also countless stories were CNN just plain lied. Take the Democrat debates where Donna Brazile gave Hillary all the questions before the debate. What could be more fake then that?
Again ...
you're complaining about production and not content.
The ex-field journalist was reporting on a story about a woman was was held against her will and sexually assaulted for months before being rescued. She also reported on the woman's claims that her abductor killed at least 4 other peoplel
Is that fake news? No, of course not. I wish it was, bur unfortunately, it's real news...
S.C. man charged with keeping woman captive confesses to killing 7 people: sheriff
You're so ******* stupid, you're actually arguing that real news is fake because the ex-field reporter staged a prop despite the news she was reporting being factual.
You clearly don't understand what the term, "fake news," even means. It's not about production -- it's about content.
Like your idiocy about Donna Brazille leaking the questions to Hillary ... that was unconscionable. Brazille was fired for it ... but that too is not "fake news."
If you wanna see what fake news actually looks like, check out Infowars.
Oh, wait, you already do.