- Mar 31, 2009
- 95,057
- 71,590
- 3,605
1. Official says gunman made 'no more baby parts' comment1. His comment "no more baby parts" after the shooting..We know he was anti-abortion.
How do we know he's anti-abortion? How many people inside the clinic did he kill?
2. He committed the massacre at the PP clinic.
2. His ex-wife said he was anti-abortion, conservative Christian.
1. His comment "no more baby parts" after the shooting..
The police are not in the business of being quoted, you need to provide a source for this information, until then it is just Internet speculation, to be kind.
2. He committed the massacre at the PP clinic.
According to CNN and a PP employee NO ONE at the PP clinic was injured, no one. Hardly a massacre at the PP clinic as you claim.
2. His ex-wife said he was anti-abortion, conservative Christian.
Provide the quote, and a link to this info, I have read the news report and didn't find that information. Besides I don't believe him and his wife has anything to do with each other. Besides your statement is a damn smear job. Being anti-abortion or a conservative Christian has absolutely NOTHING to do what this guy did. Using your twisted logic, I can make the claim if you were not so pro-abortion these things wouldn't happen, so you are the one responsible. But that would be ridiculous as is the claim you made.
1a. (CNN)Suspected Colorado Springs Planned Parenthood shooter Robert Lewis Dear mentioned "baby parts" to investigators and in later interviews expressed anti-abortion and anti-government views, a law enforcement official briefed on the investigation told CNN."
Source: Colorado shooting suspect spoke of 'baby parts' - CNN.com
2. You don't call it a massacre? Wow. Six officers shot, one killed, two others killed and four more civilian casualties. "Hardly a massacre."
The only reason clinic workers were saved was they has a safe room with bullet proof vests, and he couldn't advance much further. He opened fire on the clinic.
"The encounter could be heard in transfixing detail on the police scanner, with the authorities describing how they had driven a BearCat armored vehicle into the Planned Parenthood building, smashing through two sets of doors into the lobby and rescuing some of those inside.
“We’re exchanging gunfire,” one officer said on the radio. “We are trying to keep him pinned down.”
“Put gunfire through the walls,” came a reply. “Whatever, we got to stop this guy.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/28/us/colorado-planned-parenthood-shooting.html
3. 'Planned Parenthood attacker' was once a happily married father
1. so the statement made by the shooter is relayed to us second hand? Do police officers give out statements made by defendents? Really?
2. Not one person injuried at PP, that part is hardly a massacre at PP which was the statement implying that people were murdered at PP. Whether or not they escaped to a "safe" room, which they all did not, no one was killed at PP. As you point out, who did they rescue with the bear cat if they all were in the safe room?
The truth is that this guy has no more of an idea who he was attacking then we do. PP may have been his target because he needed a target but if it were he certainly didn't hurt anyone at the clinic, employees and patients. At least as reported by CNN.
The left's hope that it was a white, Christian, conservative, gun nut is circling the drain