Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
1. Prove Trump did not declassify all those "classified" documents
2. Prove that any documents Trump took were not his personal records.
www.google.com
Prove that the protocol process applies to the president. Hint: It doesn'tProve Trump declassified them. There is a protocol process, that Trump was trained on.
www.verifythis.com
Prove that the protocol process applies to the president. Hint: It doesn't
Yes, the president can declassify documents, but there isn’t a set protocol they have to follow
Former President Trump claimed documents found at Mar-a-Lago were “all declassified.” We explain why sitting presidents can declassify documents and how it works.
That link said it was unverified, but did not prove that Trump did not declassify it.Easy:
Presidential records under the law are our records, with NARA in custody of them. The president is to turn them over before his last day in office.2. Prove that any documents Trump took were not his personal records. Precedent is on Trump's side. Keep trying, its fun to watch the disappointment
Your picture is in the dictionary under dolt, dolt.Not in the slightest except for the small minority MAGA dolts. They won't vote for anyone but who Trump tells them to vote for.
That link said it was unverified, but did not prove that Trump did not declassify it.
That won't hold up in court.
While I agree with your post, I'm not seeing any illegality for the FPOTUS.Actually it does, let me explain why to the uninformed with something beyond a bumper sticker post.
See this is what people that don't understand "classified" shows. Documents are not "declassified" it is the information in the document that is declassified.
For example let’s say that there are 6 copies of a specific document containing specific classified information. One located in the White House, 5 located amongst various agencies which also need the document. In addition there are subordinate documents that contain (either in part of in whole some of the same classified information).
Under a normal process when the information contained in a highly classified documents is declassified (or downgraded) that impacts all copies of the document (its information, and subordinate documents containing the same information in whole or portions of a subordinate document).
So If the FPOTUS "declassified" a document, he is really declassifying the information in that document. If the FPOTUS, while acting as POTUS, "declassified" the information without telling anyone (either directly or in writing) for that specific document, you end up with:
The result is someone could be prosecuted for improper handling of classified material for actions related to the 5 responsible agency documents, but not for improper handling of the exact same document if the source of the document was the White House. But they contain the same information! By this we are talking about the information in the document and subordinate information which sourced the document which can have even wider reaching impacts.
- One copy of the information located at the White House (or one of his Country Clubs) being "declassified", and
- Five copies of the information located at the responsible agencies still being classified as the responsible agencies will not know the information was declassified because the FPOTUS (while POTUS) just mentally declassified the information in his head.
The national security infrastructure cannot function in a reasonable way if the same information is both classified and declassified at the same time simply because the POTUS chooses not to tell anyone.
Kind of a Schrodinger's Classified document where the same information is both classified and declassified at the same time until someone asks the FPOTUS to find out if he mentally and secretly declassified it without telling anyone while still POTUS. Normal people wouldn't know just be looking at the document.
WW
Not many people brag about inflicting a witch hunt on an innocent man.It sounds like the indictment(s) will be forthcoming this week - so which day?
EX-PREZ IN A PANIC: TRUMP THINKS CHARGES ARE CLOSE
1. All presidents have their "personal records". Who decides which are personal and which are NARA's?Presidential records under the law are our records, with NARA in custody of them. The president is to turn them over before his last day in office.
Clinton tapes purposely made by his contracted biographer for a book, were not government's records, but Clinton's records is what the judge ruled.
top secret classified and military classified documents can not be confused with personal tapes for a book....it's a ridiculous argument.
No money trail for Pence, but there is a money trail for Biden's influence peddling schemes.Sure sure...say, do you have anything remotely like that on Biden or Pence?
1 No he did not. He had some classified documents in a few of the cases of paperwork packed and sent when he left office.1. Biden had boxes of classified documents that he was NOT allowed to have
2. Trump said he declassified all documents he had in his possession.
3. Who took money from America's adversaries?
4. Biden needs to be impeached.
Do you think Trump's lawyers should use "Biden's money trail!!!" as part of their defense strategy before the jury?No money trail for Pence, but there is a money trail for Biden's influence peddling schemes.
While I agree with your post, I'm not seeing any illegality for the FPOTUS.
If he legally declassified the docs in his possession, the same classified docs still in the various departments are now over classified. No harm no foul.
1 There are regulations and rules that guide the govt worker determining what is the governments. When there is a dispute,such as with Clinton, a Court will decide.1. All presidents have their "personal records". Who decides which are personal and which are NARA's?
2. Clinton's tapes were made while he was president. Yet he called them personal records not subject to FOIA or NARA.
3. Trump could declassify any documents he wanted, military or not.
I guess your world hasn't told you about the recording of him saying he couldn't tell someone about a document because it was classified.The ones he declassified?
1. LIAR. He was NOT allowed to have ANY classified docs outside of a SCIF. Biden had classified docs at many unsecure locations.1 No he did not. He had some classified documents in a few of the cases of paperwork packed and sent when he left office.
2 Trump nor his lawyer's have made the claim that Trump declassified them before leaving office.
he made the ridiculous claim that HE COULD DO THAT, just by thinking about it.
the latest breaking news and tape proves Trump did not declassify them and shows he knew he did not declassify them before leaving office.
3 Bunk. With no proof. Allegations with no evidence to support the claim, as if yet.
4. Good Luck!
www.nbcnews.com
www.newsweek.com
No. But Trump is innocent until proven guilty.Do you think Trump's lawyers should use "Biden's money trail!!!" as part of their defense strategy before the jury?
trump should have stashed the documents in his car like biden did.....I mean damn, would you let hunter in your garage
