- Oct 7, 2011
- 38,401
- 4,162
- 1,130
- Thread starter
- #101
Free this man from jail, and put real criminals like Eric Holder there instead. Now that would be justice.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Thousands of illegal scum slither across the border everyday ,and there worried about rainwater ?
View attachment 20229
Thousands of illegal scum slither across the border everyday ,and there worried about rainwater ?
View attachment 20229
Yeah, because the state of Oregon really has its hands full with illegal immigrants from Mexico.
I know this may go over some of your heads but I believe the issue is The Diversion Of Ground Water.
On a larger scale this same issue is fought over in many places. It seems simple that the man should be within his rights but there is more to it than that.
In some ways rain water run off is the property of the commons. I'm not saying that in this situation the man is wrong. I am saying that what he is doing MAY be illegal if his water diversion affects someone else's access to ground water.
It is not as open and shut as it could be seen.
Isn't rainwater run off part of a watershed?
Most technically, watershed refers to those naturally created and occurring bodies of water that are created by the collection of rainwater and/or snow melt, often times combining into larger bodies, with an eventual empying point. For example, an extensive network of streams, creeks, and rivers across some six or seven states in the US mid-atlantic region create the Chesapeake Bay watershed. These bodies all naturally (ultimately) drain into the Chesapeake Bay.
By contrast, rainwater runoff is technically that water which has not yet reached such a body, to include water collected by artificial means with the intent or future result of becoming part of the watershed. In a way, you could say that rainwater runoff is to watershed as embryo is to fetus.
What's next? Big Brother telling you what you can and can't eat? Oh wait, Obamacare did pass. What a country ay?
What's next? Big Brother telling you what you can and can't eat? Oh wait, Obamacare did pass. What a country ay?
They already do.
We are not allowed to eat Dogs and Cats.
And many states technically outlaw cunninglingus(sp?).
Heck the Damn FDA won't even let us eat meat with Salmonella in it. I want my liberty!
high places with limited water have a lot of regulations on collections
No, not clear at all. The argument that we, as citizens, have a constitutional right to take up arms against our lawfully constituted government is without any foundation. There is no support for such right, either historically or constitutionally. The American Revolution was a war waged for separation of the American colonies from the rule of the English monarchy, and not a rebellion against the established colonial governments. The colonies were being taxed under English laws in which they had no elected representatives in Parliament; and when the Crown refused to grant representation, the colonies, in Continental Congress, declared their separate statehood and independence. Likewise, the reliance on the supposed historical record of the founding fathers is wrong. George Washington, who is considered the father of our nation and who commanded the Continental Army during the Revolutionary War, was the president of the Constitutional Convention that drafted our Constitution that is the framework of our government of laws; and thereafter was elected to be the first President of the United States. During his term in office, President Washington put down the Whisky rebellion of 1794, which was an armed insurrection against the government in protest of the tax enacted by Congress in 1791. Washington personally lead the organized militia to quash the rebellion and assert the federal governments authority over the states and their citizens. We would do well to learn from history, and stop trying to rewrite it.
high places with limited water have a lot of regulations on collections
Oregon does not have Limited Water dumb fuck, the man lives in a temperate Rain Forest.
high places with limited water have a lot of regulations on collections
Oregon does not have Limited Water dumb fuck, the man lives in a temperate Rain Forest.
East of the cascades is very dry, west of the Cascades is pretty wet.
I lived in Orygun.
What's next? Big Brother telling you what you can and can't eat? Oh wait, Obamacare did pass. What a country ay?
They already do.
We are not allowed to eat Dogs and Cats.
And many states technically outlaw cunninglingus(sp?).
Heck the Damn FDA won't even let us eat meat with Salmonella in it. I want my liberty!