flacaltenn
Diamond Member
Quite obviously, the target temperature is that extant before AGW. But we won't get their for centuries. Makes it a little pointless to think about. And the rhetorical nature of your query DOES make you sound like a denier. Are you?
PS, I am curious what you found amusing in my last post where you posted a laughing emoji.
CENTURIES to recover less than a 2 degree temp anomaly? Took LESS than that to recover 2 DegC during the end of ice ages where the NEGATIVE anomaly was like 14 DegC. That's why this study got attention. Because Mars might help ANSWER the question of what the surface temperature forcing factors on a planet WITHOUT a GreenHouse atmos behave like from orbital idiosyncrasies like orbital wobble.