Eliminate Unions in the Public Sector for Legal Reasons.
Don't respond to this thread, again, I don't want fake liberals posting in this thread.
Telling the rightÂ’s opposition to speech and freedom of assembly.
And eliminate public sector unions based on what ‘legal reasons,’ teachers have the First Amendment right to join a union.
Where has education ever been made better by paying teachers more?? Our government schools can't even prepare a student for college today.
Appropriate teacher pay is but one of many components needed for a quality education system. Over the past three decades, unfortunately, education has been politicized and teachers made a scapegoat for poor decisions by policy makers and politicians.
Schools and education have suffered from budget cuts and other dogmatic mandates by conservative lawmakers in an effort to destroy public education in the general context of hostility to the public sector, and such cuts were occurring well before the December 2007 recession.
Indeed, this is the vital role of teacher unions, to fight back against partisan efforts to destroy public education and ensure the integrity of the public education system.
Yes, let's end public education altogether and let only those who can pay for it educate their children.
That ought to work out real well.
Per rightist dogma, it would. Only those able to afford an education may have one, as with any other good or service. To the right public education is a ‘disincentive’ to hard work and achievement.
Who do conservatives want to educate our children? Private companies, the quality of one’s education – or whether one is educated or not - is predicated on what one can afford to pay. It’s one of the more perverted aspects of rightist dogma.
No one is denying that teachers should be free to negotiate for their pay and benefits. They should do so on an individual basis based on performance and responsibility, not on seniority and political persuasion.
I negotiated my own salary for nearly my whole career. I consistently out earned union workers in my field, certainly not because of my boyish good looks, either. I'm very good at what I do and people are willing to pay me quite well.
You make the mistake typical of many on the right: comparing private and public sectors.
The difference between working for a Government Agency and the Private Sector is that the Government Agency are forced to abide by the Constitution/Bill of Rights and if they don't, the employee has strong constitutional grounds that they easily take to the Supreme Court. The Private Sector has to abide by these rules too but they can easily hide their wrongdoings because it's within the PRIVATE sector. Why is that the employees of Apple Inc. never were able to sue Steve for he's got with his violations of human rights?
This is comprehensively ignorant and makes no sense.
There is no justification whatsoever for public employee unions, NONE. They should ALL be terminated, all of them.
In the opinion of a tedious partisan hack.
Still, there is just as much bad that went along with the good. In an open and Free Representative society, why not just include what is best for all, in a way that benefits the whole rather than the select few? In some ways the Unions come off as the new Klan, the Privileged Few, that the rest of us have to Bank Roll. We pay for benefits for them that we ourselves do not have.
Nothing even close to that. MUST BE YOUR STATE.
