Zohran Says Taxpayers Will Pay for Undocumented Families Daycare

Hiring an illegal is a felony. Coming here illegally is a misdemeanor.
Was your claim.

You link says nothing of the kind.

I recommend you do a search on the word "felony." and you'll see how you screwed up again. It only appears once in your link.

Oh, never mind. I did the homework for you, I might as well show it.

In addition, 18 U.S.C. § 1546(b) makes it a felony offense to use a false identification document, or misuse a real one, for the purpose of satisfying the employment verification provisions in 8 U.S.C. § 1324a(b).

For merely hiring an illegal, without use of false documents:

Title 8 U.S.C. § 1324a(a)(1)(A) makes it unlawful for any person or other entity to hire, recruit, or refer for a fee, for employment in the United States an alien knowing the alien is an unauthorized alien, as defined in subsection 1324a(h)(3).

Subsection 1324a(2) makes it unlawful for any person or entity, after hiring an alien for employment, to continue to employ the alien in the United States knowing the alien is or has become an unauthorized alien with respect to such employment.

Subsection 1324a(f) provides that any person or entity that engages in a "pattern or practice" of violations of subsection (a)(1)(A) or (a)(2) shall be fined not more than $3000 for each unauthorized alien with respect to whom such a violation occurs, imprisoned for not more than six months for the entire pattern or practice, or both. The legislative history indicates that "a pattern or practice" of violations is to be given a commonsense rather than overly technical meaning, and must evidence regular, repeated and intentional activities, but does not include isolated, sporadic or accidental acts. H.R.Rep. No. 99-682, Part 3, 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (1986), p. 59. See 8 C.F.R. § 274a.1(k).A scheme for civil enforcement of the requirements of § 1324a through injunctions and monetary penalties is set forth in § 1324a(e) and § 1324a(f)(2).


I see why you so rarely back up your claims. You're not good at it.
 
Was your claim.

You link says nothing of the kind.

I recommend you do a search on the word "felony." and you'll see how you screwed up again. It only appears once in your link.

Oh, never mind. I did the homework for you, I might as well show it.

In addition, 18 U.S.C. § 1546(b) makes it a felony offense to use a false identification document, or misuse a real one, for the purpose of satisfying the employment verification provisions in 8 U.S.C. § 1324a(b).

For merely hiring an illegal, without use of false documents:

Title 8 U.S.C. § 1324a(a)(1)(A) makes it unlawful for any person or other entity to hire, recruit, or refer for a fee, for employment in the United States an alien knowing the alien is an unauthorized alien, as defined in subsection 1324a(h)(3).

Subsection 1324a(2) makes it unlawful for any person or entity, after hiring an alien for employment, to continue to employ the alien in the United States knowing the alien is or has become an unauthorized alien with respect to such employment.

Subsection 1324a(f) provides that any person or entity that engages in a "pattern or practice" of violations of subsection (a)(1)(A) or (a)(2) shall be fined not more than $3000 for each unauthorized alien with respect to whom such a violation occurs, imprisoned for not more than six months for the entire pattern or practice, or both. The legislative history indicates that "a pattern or practice" of violations is to be given a commonsense rather than overly technical meaning, and must evidence regular, repeated and intentional activities, but does not include isolated, sporadic or accidental acts. H.R.Rep. No. 99-682, Part 3, 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (1986), p. 59. See 8 C.F.R. § 274a.1(k).A scheme for civil enforcement of the requirements of § 1324a through injunctions and monetary penalties is set forth in § 1324a(e) and § 1324a(f)(2).


I see why you so rarely back up your claims. You're not good at it.

If you are hiring illegals you are falsifying records.
 
If you are hiring illegals you are falsifying records.
Not if you are an off-books landscaper paying your employees cash. Or a family paying your illegal maid in cash, which Democrats are noted for.
 
Not if you are an off-books landscaper paying your employees cash.

Thousands of employers are falsifying records and as long as they are permitted to slide, I support the same for all.
 

(New York, New York) – Mayor Zohran Mamdani has confirmed that New York City’s push toward universal childcare will not restrict eligibility based on immigration status, a policy detail that has sparked sharp political debate.

The initiative expands on the city’s existing free pre-K and 3-K programs and begins with a pilot offering no-cost childcare for children under age 2 in high-need neighborhoods. City officials say the program is designed to help working families across New York City, with eligibility tied to residency and a child’s age – not a parent’s citizenship.

Under current guidelines, families can apply regardless of income or immigration status, a practice city leaders say aligns with how other universal programs are structured. Supporters argue the approach prevents children from being excluded from early education and allows parents to stay in the workforce.

Critics, however, say the policy effectively extends taxpayer-funded benefits to undocumented immigrants and raises concerns about cost, capacity, and fairness. The pilot program is expected to expand gradually, with officials stressing that long-term funding and enrollment rules will continue to be debated as the city works toward full universal childcare.




Now raise their taxes another 10% live on TV.

Let them feel the burn.

They’re about to lear the hard way. ;)

Yeah, but that's what ny voted for right.. Hopefully this is just the beginning.
 
Thousands of employers are falsifying records and as long as they are permitted to slide, I support the same for all.
Of course, they are not being permitted to slide by anyone but Democrat judges.

Write your Party to complain, please!
 

(New York, New York) – Mayor Zohran Mamdani has confirmed that New York City’s push toward universal childcare will not restrict eligibility based on immigration status, a policy detail that has sparked sharp political debate.

The initiative expands on the city’s existing free pre-K and 3-K programs and begins with a pilot offering no-cost childcare for children under age 2 in high-need neighborhoods. City officials say the program is designed to help working families across New York City, with eligibility tied to residency and a child’s age – not a parent’s citizenship.

Under current guidelines, families can apply regardless of income or immigration status, a practice city leaders say aligns with how other universal programs are structured. Supporters argue the approach prevents children from being excluded from early education and allows parents to stay in the workforce.

Critics, however, say the policy effectively extends taxpayer-funded benefits to undocumented immigrants and raises concerns about cost, capacity, and fairness. The pilot program is expected to expand gradually, with officials stressing that long-term funding and enrollment rules will continue to be debated as the city works toward full universal childcare.




Now raise their taxes another 10% live on TV.

Let them feel the burn.

They’re about to lear the hard way. ;)

This confirms that libs lie when they say illegal aliens cant get welfare
 
He visited Trump at the White House begging for money.
 
The federal government continues to allow people to work here regardless of status and you want to blame someone not in charge of enforcing immigration?
Does he have authority to decide how the city handles the illegal immigration problem? If so, yes, he's fair game for criticism.
 
Do Americans finally understand what is going on? The Democrats intentionally drew tens of millions of Third-World wretches into the country; they intend to feed them as "generously" as possible from the public fisc; they are doing everything they can to make sure that Trump and the Republicans remove as few of them as possible. The ultimate intention is to give each and everyone of them a "path to citizenship," so that the Democrats can take over the entire U.S. government...Federal, states, localities, you name it.

Get it?

Have you figured out Trump has no intention of ever holding anyone with .gov in their name to account?

Will you wake up January 2029 and wonder why the Illegal Immigration Infrastructure was completely untouched?

Billions in fraud by Illegals in MN, zero arrests, no .gov officials held to account
 
Does he have authority to decide how the city handles the illegal immigration problem? If so, yes, he's fair game for criticism.

Very little but oddly few want to blame those who clearly do.
 

(New York, New York) – Mayor Zohran Mamdani has confirmed that New York City’s push toward universal childcare will not restrict eligibility based on immigration status, a policy detail that has sparked sharp political debate.

The initiative expands on the city’s existing free pre-K and 3-K programs and begins with a pilot offering no-cost childcare for children under age 2 in high-need neighborhoods. City officials say the program is designed to help working families across New York City, with eligibility tied to residency and a child’s age – not a parent’s citizenship.

Under current guidelines, families can apply regardless of income or immigration status, a practice city leaders say aligns with how other universal programs are structured. Supporters argue the approach prevents children from being excluded from early education and allows parents to stay in the workforce.

Critics, however, say the policy effectively extends taxpayer-funded benefits to undocumented immigrants and raises concerns about cost, capacity, and fairness. The pilot program is expected to expand gradually, with officials stressing that long-term funding and enrollment rules will continue to be debated as the city works toward full universal childcare.




Now raise their taxes another 10% live on TV.

Let them feel the burn.

They’re about to lear the hard way. ;)


Great news! This is what they wanted.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom