Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #141
Fair Labor Laws are the best route to being Just. The Union's have done allot in the past, either on purpose or by accident. Still, there is just as much bad that went along with the good. In an open and Free Representative society, why not just include what is best for all, in a way that benefits the whole rather than the select few? In some ways the Unions come off as the new Klan, the Privileged Few, that the rest of us have to Bank Roll. We pay for benefits for them that we ourselves do not have.
Fair labor laws? Let's begin by admitting a "fair labor law" is defined differently by a coal miner and a mine owner. Then, how does one define an "open and Free Representative society"? The Supreme Court answered the question in Citizens United v. FEC, well, at least five of them decided, and I believe that decision answered your question - laws are and will become more about what is best for the few and not the many.
Fair labor laws? Let's begin by admitting a "fair labor law" is defined differently by a coal miner and a mine owner.
Yes. Fair Labor Laws. What is the proportion of mine owners to mine workers, at the Polls? Focus, and stick to your guns.
Then, how does one define an "open and Free Representative society"? The Supreme Court answered the question in Citizens United v. FEC, well, at least five of them decided, and I believe that decision answered your question - laws are and will become more about what is best for the few and not the many.
We Vote, We elect Representatives, not Keepers. We Petition. We make our Needs known.
The Supreme Court is the Final Word short of Amendment. Where established that Injustice is being served by the Court, should it refuse to reverse a Ruling that is Unjust, Amendment is the next step. Amendment overrules the Court.
Money buys votes! Do you deny this truth? It matters not that there are few mine owners and many miners; the many cannot influence The Congress as well as the few.
We elect representatives based on what they say, not on what they do. If the electorate watched the feet of their representatives, and not their lips, most wouldn't have two terms. Sadly their feet are hidden and their lips move on the TV and Radio spewing words written by others learned in public relations and the tools of propaganda.
For good reason the Constitution sets a high hurdle for amedments. Suggesting an amendment restricting the influence of money in politics is desirable but will never happen is silly - why would Congress (or any legislative body) vote to kill the Golden Goose?