Petition to Ban Conservative Websites

[Gunny]

After hearing news the other day that the Obama administration had appointed a new position to monitor and push back against negative online press we thought some liberals in DC might think it wasn't enough. So we sent Joe Schoffstall out to see just how far liberals would go to silence conservative speech. Joe went around Georgetown in DC with a petition to "Ban Conservative Hate Sites" that said this:

"The undersigned hereby adamantly demand that the United States government shut down right wing hate sites. The hate speech propagated by sites like the Drudge Report, Hot Air, Instapundit, Big Government, and others must not be allowed to corrupt our political discourse any longer. These sites are dangerous not only to truth and freedom but also to our society as a whole. BAN THEM NOW!"
That is pretty radical rhetoric that no reasonable, freedom-loving, red-blooded American could possibly agree with, right? Well, see for yourself:

video of these patriots

Read more: Video: DC Liberals Sign Petition to Ban Conservative Websites | NewsBusters.org

As if this wasn't next. Guess they got bored dogging Fox news.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

The right a bunch of paranoid lunatics think someone is stealing their freedom.Social change needs to happen. middle class isn"t in good shape.The rich has to step up and pay more if thats socialism count me in

Why does social change have to happen to your specifications and not mine? By attempting to restrict social change you are stealing freedom. I might be paranoid, but that does not make you right.

 

[TheBrain]

The right a bunch of paranoid lunatics think someone is stealing their freedom.Social change needs to happen. middle class isn"t in good shape.The rich has to step up and pay more if thats socialism count me in

Why does social change have to happen to your specifications and not mine? By attempting to restrict social change you are stealing freedom. I might be paranoid, but that does not make you right.

You know , it's odd, when I took my oath to defend the COTUS, nowhere in that oath did it specify that I should protect the rights of only parts of our population.


Some seem to not realize that person's rights who we should fight hardest to protect are the very people with whom we disagree most.

 

[freedombecki]

So DC Liberals want to put the kabosh on free speech for everybody except themselves?

That's what Mr. Fitnah is suggesting.​

May I remind them of Bush Derangement Syndrome and how many of their Dan Rathers got fired for unsubstantiated published lies written to get rid of someone everybody else loved?

By-all-means.....list them!!

<tick><tick><tick><tick><tick><tick><tick><tick>...​

Bush Bashers who got fired from their jobs for their less-than-truthful editorials and conflict-of-interest reporting:

1. Dan Rather
2. Robert B. Wallace
3. Betsy West
4. Josh Howard
5. Mary Murphy
6. Mary Mapes
7. Keith Olbermann
8. Whoopi Goldberg
9. Howard Stern
10. Paul Mooney

Not mentioned are numerous actresses and actors who diminished their own careers and those of their peers by perpetuating gross negativism and even calumnies against President Bush.

 

[daveman]

No... what you can put me down for is anti-slander. If you assholes are lying and misrepresenting the truth... you should be called out for it. If a leftie does the same... they should be called on it.

Good. Why don't you call out any lying lefties?

BTW... GroupthinK? WTF do you think you numbnuts engage in every single post? You guys are so lockstep that it's not even funny. I had to actually stop laughing to type this.

I've read your posts. Nothing I haven't seen elsewhere. Seriously, no original content.

 

[daveman]

The right a bunch of paranoid lunatics think someone is stealing their freedom.Social change needs to happen. middle class isn"t in good shape.The rich has to step up and pay more if thats socialism count me in

Why does social change have to happen to your specifications and not mine? By attempting to restrict social change you are stealing freedom. I might be paranoid, but that does not make you right.

Why to his specs?

Because he's a liberal. He knows better than you what's best for you.

No, really -- just ask him.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

The right a bunch of paranoid lunatics think someone is stealing their freedom.Social change needs to happen. middle class isn"t in good shape.The rich has to step up and pay more if thats socialism count me in

Why does social change have to happen to your specifications and not mine? By attempting to restrict social change you are stealing freedom. I might be paranoid, but that does not make you right.

Why to his specs?

Because he's a liberal. He knows better than you what's best for you.

No, really -- just ask him.

That is the problem. Personally, I prefer to let society change on its own. I don't like some of the changes I see occurring, but I have been wrong once or twice in the past, so I know that I might be wrong when I think those changes are bad. If I am I will live, if I am not society will eventually fix itself.

 

[daveman]

Why does social change have to happen to your specifications and not mine? By attempting to restrict social change you are stealing freedom. I might be paranoid, but that does not make you right.

Why to his specs?

Because he's a liberal. He knows better than you what's best for you.

No, really -- just ask him.

That is the problem. Personally, I prefer to let society change on its own. I don't like some of the changes I see occurring, but I have been wrong once or twice in the past, so I know that I might be wrong when I think those changes are bad. If I am I will live, if I am not society will eventually fix itself.

But the left can't take that chance. The proles are too stupid to vote for their own best interests -- which are keeping the left in power. I'm sure that's just coincidence.

 

[AVG-JOE]

Six pages of posts arguing over a "demand" made of the US Government by a fringe group to circumvent the First Amendment for political purposes that may be bullshit created solely to stir up trouble.

Even if it's not bullshit,

 

[Czarcasm]

The right a bunch of paranoid lunatics think someone is stealing their freedom.Social change needs to happen. middle class isn"t in good shape.The rich has to step up and pay more if thats socialism count me in

Why? So more people can sit on their asses and reap the spoils of those who work to get ahead?
I have no doubt that your for socialism, son.

Because unless social change happens, his parents will eventually tire of letting him live in their basement for so long before forcing him to get a job.

 

[Steelplate]

You know... I find it amusing. Have any of you read the original article that announced the promotion of Jesse Lee and what his responsibilities are going to be, or just the re-hashed article that made it look like an attack on Freedom of Speech?

The truth is, the guy is going to be responsible for keeping an eye on the Right Wing Rumor Mill(you guys really are worse than a bunch of old biddies at a sewing circle), and refute the lies, mis-information and propaganda that you guys spew on a continual basis.

I don't know... whenever you're caught at it, you always say..."Look what they did to Bush!!!". But as God as my witness, I've never seen it as prevalent and as nasty as it is now.

So yeah, I guess in your Chronic distrust of Government(which by the way is extremely Partisan.. Homeland Security?... Cool....Patriot Act?..."if you have nothing to hide, what's the big deal?, that is, until Obama signs an extension...which I am also against) mindset, a dude refuting the whacky claims of the right would look like a Censorship drive.

But you don't have the right to scream fire in a Theater, which is what a large chunk of your inane ramblings are.


EDIT: BTW, just for the record? No, I would never sign a petition abridging other people's rights. You have the right to say whatever you want. But your opposition has every right to expose the lies and defend themselves.(and vice versa).

Why doesn't he keep track of the left wing sites and refute the lies, mis-information, and propaganda that spews out of them? Would you support this if a Republican administration decided to target left wing sites and not the right wing ones? Do you see that you are acting like a partisan hack, or are you actually a hack who cannot see the truth when it is right in front of you?

I'm sorry... I missed your question. Absolutely. I would support a GOP admin doing the same of Left Wing Sites spreading LIES and MISINFORMATION. Opinion is one thing, facts are another.

I've said the same thing about lobbying groups, Political Action Committees and Campaign Finance. I want all of the bullshit stopped. I always get asked the same question from you lunkheads.... What about the UNIONS?!??! Yeah... I want their money stopped being funneled into the "legislation buying" game too. Even though Corporations(collectively) absolutely DESTROY the Unions(Collectively) at the game. I want it all stopped. Just like this issue.

 

[Steelplate]

The right a bunch of paranoid lunatics think someone is stealing their freedom.Social change needs to happen. middle class isn"t in good shape.The rich has to step up and pay more if thats socialism count me in

Why? So more people can sit on their asses and reap the spoils of those who work to get ahead?
I have no doubt that your for socialism, son.

Right there is your side's problem and the thing that needs the truth told. Very few of us are "sitting on our asses". Any % of people in a large population is going to look like a big number. You know what I find Horribly astounding? That some 45% of our working people need foodstamps to survive? I know... they are just deadbeats... They should get second jobs and let their kids raise themselves. The people you hate so much(those people who get Checks)? still is only around 2-5% of the population.

That's what absolutely kills me about you guys... you are so worried about those couple million people getting something for nothing, that you are willing to bend over and be piledriven into the working poor because of it.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

You know... I find it amusing. Have any of you read the original article that announced the promotion of Jesse Lee and what his responsibilities are going to be, or just the re-hashed article that made it look like an attack on Freedom of Speech?

The truth is, the guy is going to be responsible for keeping an eye on the Right Wing Rumor Mill(you guys really are worse than a bunch of old biddies at a sewing circle), and refute the lies, mis-information and propaganda that you guys spew on a continual basis.

I don't know... whenever you're caught at it, you always say..."Look what they did to Bush!!!". But as God as my witness, I've never seen it as prevalent and as nasty as it is now.

So yeah, I guess in your Chronic distrust of Government(which by the way is extremely Partisan.. Homeland Security?... Cool....Patriot Act?..."if you have nothing to hide, what's the big deal?, that is, until Obama signs an extension...which I am also against) mindset, a dude refuting the whacky claims of the right would look like a Censorship drive.

But you don't have the right to scream fire in a Theater, which is what a large chunk of your inane ramblings are.


EDIT: BTW, just for the record? No, I would never sign a petition abridging other people's rights. You have the right to say whatever you want. But your opposition has every right to expose the lies and defend themselves.(and vice versa).

Why doesn't he keep track of the left wing sites and refute the lies, mis-information, and propaganda that spews out of them? Would you support this if a Republican administration decided to target left wing sites and not the right wing ones? Do you see that you are acting like a partisan hack, or are you actually a hack who cannot see the truth when it is right in front of you?

I'm sorry... I missed your question. Absolutely. I would support a GOP admin doing the same of Left Wing Sites spreading LIES and MISINFORMATION. Opinion is one thing, facts are another.

I've said the same thing about lobbying groups, Political Action Committees and Campaign Finance. I want all of the bullshit stopped. I always get asked the same question from you lunkheads.... What about the UNIONS?!??! Yeah... I want their money stopped being funneled into the "legislation buying" game too. Even though Corporations(collectively) absolutely DESTROY the Unions(Collectively) at the game. I want it all stopped. Just like this issue.

I am not the lunkhead here, you are.

Tell me something, what do we do if the government is the one spreading lies and misinformation? If we give the government the power to argue their version of truth, and they are lying, then it will attack people who are actually spreading truth and information and simply refute it with lies and mis information. It is not the government's job to maintain truth, and I do not understand why most of the people that understand this are labelled as right wingers. This is not a partisan issue, and never has been, but some people insist on making it one.

If you ban lobbying groups and PACs you deny people the right to band together and let their government know how they feel. Take a look at the top 10 lobbying groups from this list.

Top 10 lobbying groups. Explore the offcial sites of the top lobbying groups.

I have no idea what criteria they used, nor do I care, I am just using the list to illustrate the point that lobbying groups and PACs are not just about corporations trying to buy elections, they are also about people coming together to make a difference in the world. Since there is no way to allow the groups I support and oppose the groups I do not without being a hack I simply support the right of everyone, even people I vehemently disagree with, to come together and lobby politicians, make issue ads, and even get stupid laws passed if they can. This preserves my right to do the same thing.

Public financing of elections, it is a bad idea precisely because it removes the public from elections. Have you ever noticed how many incumbent politicians support public election financing? The reason for that is that it takes a lot more money to get your message out if you are challenging a person who has the resources of the government at his beck and call. This effectively doubles the available money

The system you want would have more in common with a tyranny than anything that would arise out of our current system. Eliminating the public input into our government means that it will be less responsive, less likely to care about issues that have immediate impact, and less likely to change things that are bad for everyone.

If you really want an open government you should speak up and argue for, not against, everything you hate.

 

[TheBrain]

You know... I find it amusing. Have any of you read the original article that announced the promotion of Jesse Lee and what his responsibilities are going to be, or just the re-hashed article that made it look like an attack on Freedom of Speech?

The truth is, the guy is going to be responsible for keeping an eye on the Right Wing Rumor Mill(you guys really are worse than a bunch of old biddies at a sewing circle), and refute the lies, mis-information and propaganda that you guys spew on a continual basis.

I don't know... whenever you're caught at it, you always say..."Look what they did to Bush!!!". But as God as my witness, I've never seen it as prevalent and as nasty as it is now.

So yeah, I guess in your Chronic distrust of Government(which by the way is extremely Partisan.. Homeland Security?... Cool....Patriot Act?..."if you have nothing to hide, what's the big deal?, that is, until Obama signs an extension...which I am also against) mindset, a dude refuting the whacky claims of the right would look like a Censorship drive.

But you don't have the right to scream fire in a Theater, which is what a large chunk of your inane ramblings are.


EDIT: BTW, just for the record? No, I would never sign a petition abridging other people's rights. You have the right to say whatever you want. But your opposition has every right to expose the lies and defend themselves.(and vice versa).

Why doesn't he keep track of the left wing sites and refute the lies, mis-information, and propaganda that spews out of them? Would you support this if a Republican administration decided to target left wing sites and not the right wing ones? Do you see that you are acting like a partisan hack, or are you actually a hack who cannot see the truth when it is right in front of you?

I'm sorry... I missed your question. Absolutely. I would support a GOP admin doing the same of Left Wing Sites spreading LIES and MISINFORMATION. Opinion is one thing, facts are another.

I've said the same thing about lobbying groups, Political Action Committees and Campaign Finance. I want all of the bullshit stopped. I always get asked the same question from you lunkheads.... What about the UNIONS?!??! Yeah... I want their money stopped being funneled into the "legislation buying" game too. Even though Corporations(collectively) absolutely DESTROY the Unions(Collectively) at the game. I want it all stopped. Just like this issue.

Can you please show me where the First Amendment only protects the right to tell the truth? Oh and by truth , what we really mean here is truth as perceived by some. Because what these idiots REALLY want to ban is conservative OPINION. Let's talk about the boogie man Glenn Beck here for a moment. The man is a kook, a conspiracy theorist, but he never lies about facts. If he shows a fact on his show and it's wrong it's a mistake, not intentional, and he ALWAYS corrects it when he's made aware. But loons want to call him a liar. How can his OPINION be a lie, and further to THIS conversation who the hell are you , or anyone else, to say he doesn't have a right to express that opinion even if it were a lie?

 

[The T]

Why doesn't he keep track of the left wing sites and refute the lies, mis-information, and propaganda that spews out of them? Would you support this if a Republican administration decided to target left wing sites and not the right wing ones? Do you see that you are acting like a partisan hack, or are you actually a hack who cannot see the truth when it is right in front of you?

I'm sorry... I missed your question. Absolutely. I would support a GOP admin doing the same of Left Wing Sites spreading LIES and MISINFORMATION. Opinion is one thing, facts are another.

I've said the same thing about lobbying groups, Political Action Committees and Campaign Finance. I want all of the bullshit stopped. I always get asked the same question from you lunkheads.... What about the UNIONS?!??! Yeah... I want their money stopped being funneled into the "legislation buying" game too. Even though Corporations(collectively) absolutely DESTROY the Unions(Collectively) at the game. I want it all stopped. Just like this issue.

I am not the lunkhead here, you are.

Tell me something, what do we do if the government is the one spreading lies and misinformation? If we give the government the power to argue their version of truth, and they are lying, then it will attack people who are actually spreading truth and information and simply refute it with lies and mis information. It is not the government's job to maintain truth, and I do not understand why most of the people that understand this are labelled as right wingers. This is not a partisan issue, and never has been, but some people insist on making it one.

If you ban lobbying groups and PACs you deny people the right to band together and let their government know how they feel. Take a look at the top 10 lobbying groups from this list.

Top 10 lobbying groups. Explore the offcial sites of the top lobbying groups.

I have no idea what criteria they used, nor do I care, I am just using the list to illustrate the point that lobbying groups and PACs are not just about corporations trying to buy elections, they are also about people coming together to make a difference in the world. Since there is no way to allow the groups I support and oppose the groups I do not without being a hack I simply support the right of everyone, even people I vehemently disagree with, to come together and lobby politicians, make issue ads, and even get stupid laws passed if they can. This preserves my right to do the same thing.

Public financing of elections, it is a bad idea precisely because it removes the public from elections. Have you ever noticed how many incumbent politicians support public election financing? The reason for that is that it takes a lot more money to get your message out if you are challenging a person who has the resources of the government at his beck and call. This effectively doubles the available money

The system you want would have more in common with a tyranny than anything that would arise out of our current system. Eliminating the public input into our government means that it will be less responsive, less likely to care about issues that have immediate impact, and less likely to change things that are bad for everyone.

If you really want an open government you should speak up and argue for, not against, everything you hate.

 

[AVG-JOE]

Why doesn't he keep track of the left wing sites and refute the lies, mis-information, and propaganda that spews out of them? Would you support this if a Republican administration decided to target left wing sites and not the right wing ones? Do you see that you are acting like a partisan hack, or are you actually a hack who cannot see the truth when it is right in front of you?

I'm sorry... I missed your question. Absolutely. I would support a GOP admin doing the same of Left Wing Sites spreading LIES and MISINFORMATION. Opinion is one thing, facts are another.

I've said the same thing about lobbying groups, Political Action Committees and Campaign Finance. I want all of the bullshit stopped. I always get asked the same question from you lunkheads.... What about the UNIONS?!??! Yeah... I want their money stopped being funneled into the "legislation buying" game too. Even though Corporations(collectively) absolutely DESTROY the Unions(Collectively) at the game. I want it all stopped. Just like this issue.

I am not the lunkhead here, you are.

Tell me something, what do we do if the government is the one spreading lies and misinformation? If we give the government the power to argue their version of truth, and they are lying, then it will attack people who are actually spreading truth and information and simply refute it with lies and mis information. It is not the government's job to maintain truth, and I do not understand why most of the people that understand this are labelled as right wingers. This is not a partisan issue, and never has been, but some people insist on making it one.

If you ban lobbying groups and PACs you deny people the right to band together and let their government know how they feel. Take a look at the top 10 lobbying groups from this list.

Top 10 lobbying groups. Explore the offcial sites of the top lobbying groups.

I have no idea what criteria they used, nor do I care, I am just using the list to illustrate the point that lobbying groups and PACs are not just about corporations trying to buy elections, they are also about people coming together to make a difference in the world. Since there is no way to allow the groups I support and oppose the groups I do not without being a hack I simply support the right of everyone, even people I vehemently disagree with, to come together and lobby politicians, make issue ads, and even get stupid laws passed if they can. This preserves my right to do the same thing.

Public financing of elections, it is a bad idea precisely because it removes the public from elections. Have you ever noticed how many incumbent politicians support public election financing? The reason for that is that it takes a lot more money to get your message out if you are challenging a person who has the resources of the government at his beck and call. This effectively doubles the available money

The system you want would have more in common with a tyranny than anything that would arise out of our current system. Eliminating the public input into our government means that it will be less responsive, less likely to care about issues that have immediate impact, and less likely to change things that are bad for everyone.

If you really want an open government you should speak up and argue for, not against, everything you hate.

Since NOBODY actually KNOWS what will happen tomorrow if WhatEver is done politically today, all ANYBODY can do is spread opinions, not truth.

If you tell me that returning to the tax rates of the Regan Administration (which would be a pretty hefty increase on the upper crust) will plunge the nation into an unemployment driven recession because the top 10% won't be able to afford to hire help any more, I get to call "Bullshit!" because THAT'S predicting the future and I don't believe that you're correct. Besides, anyone who can really predict the future is sitting on South Beach with no cares for mortal politics, working with Mohito in one hand and smart-phone in the other while the stock market is open.

A leader is supposed to be the guy who most people believe makes sense when he says what he THINKS will happen.



In theory.

 

[AVG-JOE]

Why doesn't he keep track of the left wing sites and refute the lies, mis-information, and propaganda that spews out of them? Would you support this if a Republican administration decided to target left wing sites and not the right wing ones? Do you see that you are acting like a partisan hack, or are you actually a hack who cannot see the truth when it is right in front of you?

I'm sorry... I missed your question. Absolutely. I would support a GOP admin doing the same of Left Wing Sites spreading LIES and MISINFORMATION. Opinion is one thing, facts are another.

I've said the same thing about lobbying groups, Political Action Committees and Campaign Finance. I want all of the bullshit stopped. I always get asked the same question from you lunkheads.... What about the UNIONS?!??! Yeah... I want their money stopped being funneled into the "legislation buying" game too. Even though Corporations(collectively) absolutely DESTROY the Unions(Collectively) at the game. I want it all stopped. Just like this issue.

I am not the lunkhead here, you are.

Tell me something, what do we do if the government is the one spreading lies and misinformation? If we give the government the power to argue their version of truth, and they are lying, then it will attack people who are actually spreading truth and information and simply refute it with lies and mis information. It is not the government's job to maintain truth, and I do not understand why most of the people that understand this are labelled as right wingers. This is not a partisan issue, and never has been, but some people insist on making it one.

If you ban lobbying groups and PACs you deny people the right to band together and let their government know how they feel. Take a look at the top 10 lobbying groups from this list.

Top 10 lobbying groups. Explore the offcial sites of the top lobbying groups.

I have no idea what criteria they used, nor do I care, I am just using the list to illustrate the point that lobbying groups and PACs are not just about corporations trying to buy elections, they are also about people coming together to make a difference in the world. Since there is no way to allow the groups I support and oppose the groups I do not without being a hack I simply support the right of everyone, even people I vehemently disagree with, to come together and lobby politicians, make issue ads, and even get stupid laws passed if they can. This preserves my right to do the same thing.

Public financing of elections, it is a bad idea precisely because it removes the public from elections. Have you ever noticed how many incumbent politicians support public election financing? The reason for that is that it takes a lot more money to get your message out if you are challenging a person who has the resources of the government at his beck and call. This effectively doubles the available money

The system you want would have more in common with a tyranny than anything that would arise out of our current system. Eliminating the public input into our government means that it will be less responsive, less likely to care about issues that have immediate impact, and less likely to change things that are bad for everyone.

If you really want an open government you should speak up and argue for, not against, everything you hate.

Banning ANY political discussion for ANY reason is JUST PLAIN WRONG. Banning money from changing hands is another issue when it involves elected officials.

 

[Big Fitz]

After hearing news the other day that the Obama administration had appointed a new position to monitor and push back against negative online press we thought some liberals in DC might think it wasn't enough. So we sent Joe Schoffstall out to see just how far liberals would go to silence conservative speech. Joe went around Georgetown in DC with a petition to "Ban Conservative Hate Sites" that said this:

"The undersigned hereby adamantly demand that the United States government shut down right wing hate sites. The hate speech propagated by sites like the Drudge Report, Hot Air, Instapundit, Big Government, and others must not be allowed to corrupt our political discourse any longer. These sites are dangerous not only to truth and freedom but also to our society as a whole. BAN THEM NOW!"
That is pretty radical rhetoric that no reasonable, freedom-loving, red-blooded American could possibly agree with, right? Well, see for yourself:

video of these patriots

Read more: Video: DC Liberals Sign Petition to Ban Conservative Websites | NewsBusters.org

If these fucktards thought it could be done, they'd have conservatives shot on sight.

 

[Luissa]

After hearing news the other day that the Obama administration had appointed a new position to monitor and push back against negative online press we thought some liberals in DC might think it wasn't enough. So we sent Joe Schoffstall out to see just how far liberals would go to silence conservative speech. Joe went around Georgetown in DC with a petition to "Ban Conservative Hate Sites" that said this:

"The undersigned hereby adamantly demand that the United States government shut down right wing hate sites. The hate speech propagated by sites like the Drudge Report, Hot Air, Instapundit, Big Government, and others must not be allowed to corrupt our political discourse any longer. These sites are dangerous not only to truth and freedom but also to our society as a whole. BAN THEM NOW!"
That is pretty radical rhetoric that no reasonable, freedom-loving, red-blooded American could possibly agree with, right? Well, see for yourself:

video of these patriots

Read more: Video: DC Liberals Sign Petition to Ban Conservative Websites | NewsBusters.org

If these fucktards thought it could be done, they'd have conservatives shot on sight.

Lock'n load.

 

[Mr.Nick]

After hearing news the other day that the Obama administration had appointed a new position to monitor and push back against negative online press we thought some liberals in DC might think it wasn't enough. So we sent Joe Schoffstall out to see just how far liberals would go to silence conservative speech. Joe went around Georgetown in DC with a petition to "Ban Conservative Hate Sites" that said this:

"The undersigned hereby adamantly demand that the United States government shut down right wing hate sites. The hate speech propagated by sites like the Drudge Report, Hot Air, Instapundit, Big Government, and others must not be allowed to corrupt our political discourse any longer. These sites are dangerous not only to truth and freedom but also to our society as a whole. BAN THEM NOW!"
That is pretty radical rhetoric that no reasonable, freedom-loving, red-blooded American could possibly agree with, right? Well, see for yourself:

video of these patriots

Read more: Video: DC Liberals Sign Petition to Ban Conservative Websites | NewsBusters.org

If these fucktards thought it could be done, they'd have conservatives shot on sight.

Too bad for the liberals, they don't believe in guns.

Of course these are the same ***** who threaten those who do have guns while spewing their happy-happy-joy-joy thoughts of a socialist revolution.

Doesn't make any ******* sense.