Pence could remove tRump from office on Sunday.

And he should. tRump has lost what little mind he ever had, with this talk of Martial law and other seditious acts.

You are not going to get away with stealing an election. This time, next time, next. What part do you not understand?

:desk:

Here's the part I don't understand....

--- how do self-delusionists think they can just warp the world of reality without anybody calling them on it?

I give up
Tell us
 
And he should. tRump has lost what little mind he ever had, with this talk of Martial law and other seditious acts.

You are not going to get away with stealing an election. This time, next time, next. What part do you not understand?

They might
It will always be tainted and some will need to pay a price.
Let's pay the PRICE on January 6, 2021. Better now. Joe is not going to be inaugurated.

Let's make them pay
But, yes.
 
My guess is they are already keeping the real nuclear codes from him.
Here's hoping.

I do wonder what would happen if he ordered some degree of domestic military action, against Americans.

I wonder how many people would refuse the orders.

I think all of them would. The Joint Chiefs have already come down hard on the LaFayette Square participation and said it won't happen again. They've also told Trump they won't help him stay in power now that he's lost the election.
 
Obviously you can't pardon somebody for something they "may have committed" without knowing what it was. What if the subject committed murder? Treason? Grand larceny? They just got a free pass for their entire past.
Yeah, he can.

WASHINGTON — Speculation that President Donald Trump might issue pardons before he leaves office for members of his family or other supporters raises a question about whether pardons can be issued pre-emptively — that is, before someone is charged with a crime.
And the answer is undoubtedly yes.
The Supreme Court said as far back as 1866 that the pardon power applies “to every offense known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment.”
That means a pardon can be issued before someone is investigated, charged or convicted.


It might seem counter-intuitive, but there you have it.


 
And he should. tRump has lost what little mind he ever had, with this talk of Martial law and other seditious acts.

no, the plan is for Trump to resign and pence to pardon him.
for what? What crime has Trump committed or even been charged with? Russian collusion LOL... Show me the PEE Tapes...
 
Obviously you can't pardon somebody for something they "may have committed" without knowing what it was. What if the subject committed murder? Treason? Grand larceny? They just got a free pass for their entire past.
Yeah, he can.

WASHINGTON — Speculation that President Donald Trump might issue pardons before he leaves office for members of his family or other supporters raises a question about whether pardons can be issued pre-emptively — that is, before someone is charged with a crime.
And the answer is undoubtedly yes.
The Supreme Court said as far back as 1866 that the pardon power applies “to every offense known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment.”
That means a pardon can be issued before someone is investigated, charged or convicted.


It might seem counter-intuitive, but there you have it.


Come on. Xi is the ruler now. I would watch cities be destroyed here. Such a beautiful sight.
 
Obviously you can't pardon somebody for something they "may have committed" without knowing what it was. What if the subject committed murder? Treason? Grand larceny? They just got a free pass for their entire past.
Yeah, he can.

WASHINGTON — Speculation that President Donald Trump might issue pardons before he leaves office for members of his family or other supporters raises a question about whether pardons can be issued pre-emptively — that is, before someone is charged with a crime.
And the answer is undoubtedly yes.
The Supreme Court said as far back as 1866 that the pardon power applies “to every offense known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment.”
That means a pardon can be issued before someone is investigated, charged or convicted.


It might seem counter-intuitive, but there you have it.


Come on. Xi is the ruler now. I would watch cities be destroyed here. Such a beautiful sight.
Summer of Love, amirite?
 
Obviously you can't pardon somebody for something they "may have committed" without knowing what it was. What if the subject committed murder? Treason? Grand larceny? They just got a free pass for their entire past.
Yeah, he can.

WASHINGTON — Speculation that President Donald Trump might issue pardons before he leaves office for members of his family or other supporters raises a question about whether pardons can be issued pre-emptively — that is, before someone is charged with a crime.
And the answer is undoubtedly yes.
The Supreme Court said as far back as 1866 that the pardon power applies “to every offense known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment.”
That means a pardon can be issued before someone is investigated, charged or convicted.


It might seem counter-intuitive, but there you have it.


Come on. Xi is the ruler now. I would watch cities be destroyed here. Such a beautiful sight.

Summa these posts, ya gotta wonder which chandelier they're hanging from while huffing paint fumes and acting out whatever's in those comic books.
 
Obviously you can't pardon somebody for something they "may have committed" without knowing what it was. What if the subject committed murder? Treason? Grand larceny? They just got a free pass for their entire past.
Yeah, he can.

WASHINGTON — Speculation that President Donald Trump might issue pardons before he leaves office for members of his family or other supporters raises a question about whether pardons can be issued pre-emptively — that is, before someone is charged with a crime.
And the answer is undoubtedly yes.
The Supreme Court said as far back as 1866 that the pardon power applies “to every offense known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment.”
That means a pardon can be issued before someone is investigated, charged or convicted.


It might seem counter-intuitive, but there you have it.


Come on. Xi is the ruler now. I would watch cities be destroyed here. Such a beautiful sight.

Summa these posts, ya gotta wonder which chandelier they're hanging from while huffing paint fumes and acting out whatever's in those comic books.
There is no difference between mano mano and blowing up buildings. Just the degree.
 
Obviously you can't pardon somebody for something they "may have committed" without knowing what it was. What if the subject committed murder? Treason? Grand larceny? They just got a free pass for their entire past.
Yeah, he can.

WASHINGTON — Speculation that President Donald Trump might issue pardons before he leaves office for members of his family or other supporters raises a question about whether pardons can be issued pre-emptively — that is, before someone is charged with a crime.
And the answer is undoubtedly yes.
The Supreme Court said as far back as 1866 that the pardon power applies “to every offense known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment.”
That means a pardon can be issued before someone is investigated, charged or convicted.


It might seem counter-intuitive, but there you have it.


Come on. Xi is the ruler now. I would watch cities be destroyed here. Such a beautiful sight.

Summa these posts, ya gotta wonder which chandelier they're hanging from while huffing paint fumes and acting out whatever's in those comic books.
There is no difference between mano mano and blowing up buildings. Just the degree.

Uh HUH. "Mano Mano" is it.

Is this "Mano Mano" in the room with us right now?
 
And he should. tRump has lost what little mind he ever had, with this talk of Martial law and other seditious acts.

You are not going to get away with stealing an election. This time, next time, next. What part do you not understand?
Don't be stupider than you have to be, Son.

4fba2bb14169b8f28307986aa0335974.png
 
Obviously you can't pardon somebody for something they "may have committed" without knowing what it was. What if the subject committed murder? Treason? Grand larceny? They just got a free pass for their entire past.
Yeah, he can.

WASHINGTON — Speculation that President Donald Trump might issue pardons before he leaves office for members of his family or other supporters raises a question about whether pardons can be issued pre-emptively — that is, before someone is charged with a crime.
And the answer is undoubtedly yes.
The Supreme Court said as far back as 1866 that the pardon power applies “to every offense known to the law, and may be exercised at any time after its commission, either before legal proceedings are taken or during their pendency, or after conviction and judgment.”
That means a pardon can be issued before someone is investigated, charged or convicted.


It might seem counter-intuitive, but there you have it.


Come on. Xi is the ruler now. I would watch cities be destroyed here. Such a beautiful sight.
Not seeing the connection, but your China fantasy is noted.
 
Last edited:
And he should. tRump has lost what little mind he ever had, with this talk of Martial law and other seditious acts.


All you do is project PROG. You voted for a guy who has CLEARLY lost his mind, so what do you do?

You declare it's the other guy who has lost his mind despite what's going on around you.
They can't even get gaslighting right. This clown is a failure of the first order.

At least those in the media understand how it is done.

WHAT IS GASLIGHTING?

The term originates in the systematic psychological manipulation of a victim by her husband in Patrick Hamilton’s 1938 stage play Gas Light, and the film adaptations released in 1940 and 1944. In the story, the husband attempts to convince his wife and others that she is insane by manipulating small elements of their environment and insisting that she is mistaken, remembering things incorrectly, or delusional when she points out these changes. The play's title alludes to how the abusive husband slowly dims the gas lights in their home, while pretending nothing has changed, in an effort to make his wife doubt her own perceptions. The wife repeatedly asks her husband to confirm her perceptions about the dimming lights, but in defiance of reality, he keeps insisting that the lights are the same and instead it is she who is going insane. Today we are living in a perpetual state of gaslighting. The reality that we are being told by the media is at complete odds with what we are seeing with our own two eyes. And when we question the false reality that we are being presented, or we claim that what we see is that actual reality, we are vilified as racist or bigots or just plain crazy. You’re not racist. You’re not crazy. You’re being gaslighted.

New York State has twice as many deaths from Covid-19 than any other state, and New York has accounted for one-fifth of all Covid-19 deaths, but we are told that New York Governor Andrew Cuomo has handled the pandemic better than any other governor. But if we support policies of Governors whose states had only a fraction of the infections and deaths as New York, we’re called anti-science and want people to die. So, we ask ourselves, am I crazy? No, you’re being gaslighted.

We see mobs of people looting stores, smashing windows, setting cars on fire, and burning down buildings, but we are told that these demonstrations are peaceful protests And when we call this destruction of our cities, riots, we are called racists. So, we ask ourselves, am I crazy? No, you’re being gaslighted.

We see the major problem destroying many inner-cities is a crime; murder, gang violence, drug dealing, drive-by shootings, armed robbery, but we are told that it is not a crime, but the police that are the problem in the inner-cities. We are told we must defund the police and remove law enforcement from crime-riddled cities to make them safer But if we advocate for more policing in cities overrun by crime, we are accused of being white supremacists and racists. So, we ask ourselves, am I crazy? No, you’re being gaslighted.

The United States of America accepts more immigrants than any other country in the world. The vast majority of the immigrants are “people of color”, and these immigrants are enjoying the freedom and economic opportunity not available to them in their country of origin, but we are told that the United States is the most racist and oppressive country on the planet, and if we disagree, we are called racist and xenophobic. So, we ask ourselves, am I crazy? No, you’re being gaslighted.

Capitalist countries are the most prosperous countries in the world The standard of living is the highest in capitalist countries. We see more poor people move up the economic ladder to the middle and even the wealthy class through their effort and ability in capitalist countries than any other economic system in the world, but we are told capitalism is an oppressive system designed to keep people down. So, we ask ourselves, am I crazy? No, you’re being gaslighted.

Communist countries killed over 100 million people in the 20th century. Communist countries strip their citizens of basic human rights, dictate every aspect of their lives, treat their citizens as slaves, and drive their economies into the ground, but we are told that Communism is the fairest, most equitable, freest, and most prosperous economic system in the world. So, we ask ourselves, am I crazy? No, you’re being gaslighted.

The most egregious example of gaslighting is the concept of “white fragility”. You spend your life trying to be a good person, trying to treat people fairly and with respect. You disavow racism and bigotry in all its forms. You judge people solely on the content of their character and not by the color of their skin. You don’t discriminate based on race or ethnicity. But you are told you are a racist, not because of something you did or said, but solely because of the color of your skin. You know instinctively that charging someone with racism because of their skin color is itself racist. You know that you are not racist, so you defend yourself and your character, but you are told that your defense of yourself is proof of your racism. So, we ask ourselves, am I crazy? No, you’re being gaslighted.

Gaslighting has become one of the most pervasive and destructive tactics in American politics. It is the exact opposite of what our political system was meant to be. It deals in lies and psychological coercion, and not the truth and intellectual discourse. If you ever ask yourself if you’re crazy, you are not. Crazy people aren’t sane enough to ask themselves if they’re crazy. So, trust yourself, believe what’s in your heart. Trust your eyes over what you are told. Never listen to the people who tell you that you are crazy because you are not, you’re being gaslighted.

Sophocles said: "What people believe prevails over the truth."

Question, Question, Question.

Then do your own research, and use some of your own critical thinking skills to get to the truth. Listen with your heart and with your mind.

Sadly, 95% of the masses don't even know that they are being gaslighted. At least now you do.

Remember the key words Power, Control, Manipulation, Money, Corruption, Indoctrination & Propaganda... the Lucky #7

I didn't write this, but it is very accurate.
Wow, a whole page of rationalization.

Did it make you feel any better?
 
And he should. tRump has lost what little mind he ever had, with this talk of Martial law and other seditious acts.

You didn’t read the article.
I’m shocked!
But I did.

Maybe you just didn't understand it?
 
And he should. tRump has lost what little mind he ever had, with this talk of Martial law and other seditious acts.

You are not going to get away with stealing an election. This time, next time, next. What part do you not understand?

:desk:

Here's the part I don't understand....

--- how do self-delusionists think they can just warp the world of reality without anybody calling them on it?
^^^ I rest My case.
Ummm..... Don't you need to make one, first?
 

Forum List

Back
Top