What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Pelosi Appoints 2nd GOP Critic Of trump To Jan. 6 Committee

Catman51

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2020
Messages
1,179
Reaction score
491
Points
208
otto105 I did not give her anything. She is merely a congress person from a leftish den of idiots who has wormed her way into power. Deal with it if you support her socialism.
 

asaratis

Uppity Senior Citizen
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2009
Messages
18,545
Reaction score
7,456
Points
390
Location
Stockbridge
None of the threads about this “sham” ever actually produce any evidence for the conspiracy.

Capitol police didn’t take the warnings seriously. After all, it’s not like Trump supporters are known for being violent thugs, are they?
You don't keep up with the news very well.

The Capitol police requested more security (National Guard) before Jan 6 and were repeatedly denied such extra security by the Sergeants at Arms of the House and the Senate at the direction of Nancy Pelosi....because of "the optics". They ended up being scapegoats for Princess Pelosi and Chuckie Boy Schumer. Schumer said he would have fired the Senate Sergeant at Arms had he been the Majority Leader.

I suggest you read more and type less.
 

asaratis

Uppity Senior Citizen
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2009
Messages
18,545
Reaction score
7,456
Points
390
Location
Stockbridge
He's a secret service agent....so public disclosure in a climate were anti-gov't yahoos publicly target people for violence wouldn't be a smart thing to do. How people defend some Jan. 6th asshole trying to breach a barricade to get at senators as the Capital is being over run with rioters is beyond me. That more weren't shot by any of the cops is a miracle to me.
He's not a Secret Service agent. He's a Capitol Police officer...by the name of Michael Leroy Byrd.


Read more. Type less.
 

Chillicothe

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2021
Messages
1,783
Reaction score
1,146
Points
918
I got through 6 pages of this long thread.
Then had to bow out.
That was enough.
Still, there were some toothsome morsels offered by some posters.

For example:
***********************************************************************************************************8888888

"Speaker Nancy Pelosi, has accused her of being responsible for the breakdown in security during the protest at the Capitol...."
Any consideration, poster Doc7505, that those ne'er-do-well losers and Jackass Patriots who were savagely beating the cops ........ may also have been 'responsible for the breakdown in security'?

Just a thought.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"....they may compile a bunch of damning evidence, make it public, and challenge him (Trump) to voluntarily testify to refute any implications of the evidence. Then let the world watch as he squirms.
As we've seen in prior postings, FFI, has a perceptive eye on the real-world of today's U.S. politics.
For example ----- see the pulled quote above.

I look for his postings.
----------------------------------------------------------

"....pure political theater, nobody else cares about what happened way back on January...."
"Nobody cares"!
Who knew?
I love this bar. (insert 'rolled eyes' emoji here)
---------------------------------------------------------------------

"If the election was the result of cheating, they certainly have the right to object and attempt to overturn it."
Yupper, who would argue against that?
However, the poster 'Catman' seemingly is unaware the role our judiciary plays in America's 'rule-of-law'.
Courts are the tool for 'overturning it'.
Have you thought of that avenue poster Catman?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Have you watched him talk to the press lately? He is so terrible at hiding his body language clues that he is totally full of shit. It's like watching a toddler try to lie."
Poor Kevin. He's long been considered an unbright candle on the birthday cake. He was supposed to be the shoo-in for Speaker when Boehner got fed up and retired. Then he said something stupid on national TV about the Benghazi hearings only being a smear job to let the air out of the Dem's candidate.

Most Republicans in a responsible leadership position rolled their eyes, groaned.......and then passed over Kevin.
And chose Paul Ryan.
Who was smart.
While Kevin wasn't.
And still ain't.
--------------------------------------------------------------------

"As with any crime, investigation is key. The guilty always oppose investigation."
Umm, well.......poster C.A. that's kinda sorta the view on this investigation of January 6th.
And only the guilty (your words).......wouldn't cooperate with it?

I'm mildly sure you can see that.
 

Dragonlady

Designing Woman
Joined
Dec 1, 2012
Messages
33,121
Reaction score
14,671
Points
1,600
Location
Niagara Escarpment
Pelosi is trying to pack this committee with only those who will vote as she te3lls them to vote.

She has no business choosing or rejecting any from the opposition party as it only leads to a false committe;e.

Pelosi used the same resolution for the Special Committee as Republicans used for the last Benghazi Investigation. Republicans are the ones who wrote that power into the Resolution not Pelosi.

Last but not least, given that both Banks and Jordon are likely to be called to testify as material witnesses; both participated in a January 6th planning session with Donald Trump at the White House; both have fervently denied that Trump lost the election; and both went on national television the day they were appointed to the Committee to talk about how they intended to sabotage the investigation, Pelosi was well advised to remove the circus clowns from the Committee, and get only serious individuals to ask the questions.

Pelosi is now free to run a clean enquiry, without the usual political theatre that Trump's attack clown bring to the festivities. We saw that act on display throughout both impeachment hearings. Those two had NO INTEREST in getting to the bottom of anything, but the barrel.
 

Care4all

Warrior Princess
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
60,126
Reaction score
18,069
Points
2,290
Location
Maine
Pelosi is trying to pack this committee with only those who will vote as she te3lls them to vote.

She has no business choosing or rejecting any from the opposition party as it only leads to a false committee.
No one is going to tell Cheney how to vote, on anything! That is for certain! :eek:

And what is there to even vote on, in the committee that the committee would need republican votes for...???
 

Concerned American

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2020
Messages
8,895
Reaction score
9,113
Points
2,118
Location
In your head
And only the guilty (your words).......wouldn't cooperate with it?
Yeah, you're right. If there was to be an investigation. Piglosi choosing the judge, prosecution, defense and jury is not an investigation, moron.
Courts are the tool for 'overturning it'.
Odd, I didn't see any of this indignation when it was BLM/Antifa actually performing illegal, violent, seditious acts over the past year. Methinks you're a hypocrite.
Patriots who were savagely beating the cops
Again, you've proven yourself a liar. This has been debunked more times than it is worth. At least search out a MSM lie to link to.
 

JimH52

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Messages
34,804
Reaction score
10,051
Points
1,370
Location
US
Your guys gave her that authorization.

Deal with it
Yup, Kevin will need to sit in front of the TV and watch as evidence is presented that shows the repub party as the treasonous SOBs that they are. Too Bad...So Sad
 

JimH52

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Messages
34,804
Reaction score
10,051
Points
1,370
Location
US
No onecaes is going to tell Cheney how to vote, on anything! That is for certain! :eek:

And what is there to even vote on, in the committee that the committee would need republican votes for...???
We don't need a vote or a bill or a law. We need the facts. That is what scares the poopy out of Kevin.
 

Dadoalex

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Messages
3,339
Reaction score
1,478
Points
178
Pelosi is trying to pack this committee with only those who will vote as she te3lls them to vote.

She has no business choosing or rejecting any from the opposition party as it only leads to a false committee.
Republicans were given the chance to create a bipartisan commission.
They refused.
Bitching because you have no voice when you refused the offer of a voice will simply be ignored.
 

JimH52

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Messages
34,804
Reaction score
10,051
Points
1,370
Location
US
Republicans were given the chance to create a bipartisan commission.
They refused.
Bitching because you have no voice when you refused the offer of a voice will simply be ignored.
Exactly! They will just need to sit on the sidelines and watch the damaging facts roll out. Kevin....you blew it.
 

Dadoalex

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Messages
3,339
Reaction score
1,478
Points
178
Do you think it's right to do that? Do you think it's right to remove people who are skeptical of the narrative from committees?
Remove people?
The people removed will be targets of the investigation.
We don't let the criminal sit on the jury do we?
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$201.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top