zaangalewa
Gold Member
- Jan 24, 2015
- 25,035
- 2,667
- 140
Roughly speaking, the following picture emerges there. Austrasia was before Romania, but both of them were Hunnic-Celt and knightly, the Merovingians and Carolingians were not Franks / Germans, they were from the Celts or Huns, representatives of Eastern European influence. Austrasia was also obviously different from Romania, Romania was closer to the Hungarians, and Austrasia to the Austrians (it was called Austria)
There is no reliable data that the Merovingians were Franks, this is just fiction. There are no traces of the Germans there at all. And there was no Christianity. There, bulls and snake-fighters are depicted on the icons of romantique
It is extremely stupid what you say. "Autrasia" for example had been in the North-East of Germany - this was the East of the Frankonian empire - and has nothing to do with Austria which had been in the East of Bavaria in the South of Germany. With Huns Germans had to do - but Germans had not been Huns (today: Hungarians). And Romania is not Rome and has also nothing to do with the 'Holy Roman empire of German (=united) nation' and so on and so on and so on. The swamp you swim in has absolutelly nohting to do with real history. Try to explain the Italians or the IroScots that they are Slaws. Perhaps they believe you your nonsense.
The theme here: "Origin of articles in Western European languages". All Slaws don't use articles as far as I know. From the Awars we know nothing about their language. The Romanians - and also the Romans - use a Romanic language - what a surprise. And Germans a Germanic language. English is also a Germanic language. And nowhere in Europe is Persia.
Last edited: