One Of Trump's Unconstitutional EOs Is Being Raked Over the Coals By SCOTUS Tomorrow

[Unkotare]

And why should I answer your homosexually-motivated question? ...

??????????????
What the hell does that mean?

 

[MayorQuimby]

There is no "technically" American. These babies are entirely American.

It doesn't matter. Why should American tax money be spent on babies shat out by illegal beaners? Why don't you answer this question instead of trying to dodge like the lil bitch that you are?

 

[Captain Caveman]

Trump has put on a lot of theater for the rubes.

A lot.

One of those performances is EO 14160.

To satisfy the large crowd of bigots in the MAGA ranks, Trump signed an Executive Order on the proverbial Day One of his administration which unconstitutionally violated the 14th Amendment. Having never read the Constitution due to its big words, Trump thought he could get away with it.

So far, every court up the chain of command has slapped Trump's, Nazi Stephen Miller's, and third stringer traitor John Eastman's pointy heads down, and tomorrow the Supreme Court will do the same.

Enter your predictions here for what the score will be when the EO is struck down.

I predict 9-0 against the illegal, unconstitutional, bigoted, hateful EO.

You can listen to the sure-to-be-hilarious arguments tomorrow here:

LISTEN LIVE: Supreme Court hears arguments on Trump’s challenge to birthright citizenship

Birthright citizenship is among several issues the administration has asked the court to deal with on an emergency basis, after lower courts acted to slow Trump’s agenda.

www.pbs.org

I decided to Google the likes of Biden, Obama, Clinton EO's challenged in court and they've all been there done that.

 

[Unkotare]

... Get fucked, beaner-lover.
...

Reduced to plain ignorant racism now? You might as well just say you give up and leave it at that.

 

[MayorQuimby]

??????????????
What the hell does that mean?

I know you always like to pick the easy part to respond to, so you can avoid having to address the actual meat of people's arguments. You are a fucking bitch, I am getting to know you.

So now, I am re-posting my post below, in a manner that even a seasoned little weasel bitch like you can't dodge. Now why don't you try and not weasel out of it again, you lil fucking bitch?


~~~~~~
You think you are some kind of god who can dictate the terms of this discussion to me? Get fucked, beaner-lover.

Now you answer MY question, you fucking piece of illegal-loving garbage. Why aren't you outraged by the illegal parents' questionable way of obtaining citizenship for their children? Finding this one a bit hard to field, huh, Latina-fucker?

 

[Unkotare]

... you fucking piece of illegal-loving garbage. ... huh, Latina-fucker?

Is your brain shrinking with each post, Junior?

 

[MayorQuimby]

Reduced to plain ignorant racism now? You might as well just say you give up and leave it at that.

I will address this post of yours, if you promise to answer why you aren't outraged by the illegal parents' questionable way of obtaining citizenship for their children.

 

[Unkotare]

Under the previously accepted interpretation of the amendment. ...

Currently accepted.

 

[MayorQuimby]

Is your brain shrinking with each post, Junior?

Oooh, weaseled out of it again, huh? Little bitch, I must say I am impressed by your complete lack of shame.

 

[Unkotare]

... My personal opinion is a child born here of foreign citizens should be a citizen of their parents’ country.

You are not a justice of the US Supreme Court, are you?

 

[BackAgain]

Find the federal statute then, which allows one person to go judge shopping, file a complaint, and the judge can issue a national injunction to stop a president from executing his Constitutional powers. I'll wait. Pssst... there isn't one.

Our libturds won’t listen.

While there is always a margin of error in predicting things out of our SCOTUS, I have a good hunch that, when the Justices assess the details of the legal arguments, they will be asking: “what process is due?”

I didn’t invent that phrase, by the way.

 

[MayorQuimby]

You are not a justice of the US Supreme Court, are you?

I guess if you ever try to address people's argument without asking a question, your brain will blow up.

 

[Unkotare]

...Why should American tax money be spent on the children ...

American tax money is spent on many things for American children.

 

[Orangecat]

Currently accepted.

Yes, but could soon very well be previously, depending on the SCOTUS. You’re okay with the decision, whichever way it goes?

 

[Unkotare]

... the children that were shat out ...

I don't know how it works in whatever bizarro-world country you're from, but American babies are given birth to, not shat out. I guess that would explain you...

 

[Orangecat]

You are not a justice of the US Supreme Court, are you?

Are only SCOTUS justices allowed to have opinions?

 

[MayorQuimby]

American tax money is spent on many things for American children

I didn't say it's not. I am saying that if I were an American, I would be resentful in this particular instance, because these children shouldn't have been born American, because the way their parents helped them achieve their citizenship was extremely questionable.

Why can't you just admit this?

 

[MayorQuimby]

I don't know how it works in whatever bizarro-world country you're from, but American babies are given birth to, not shat out. I guess that would explain you...

Lmao, now you're bringing out the big guns. I guess your "Look at me I am so real smooth and cool and I am very good at dodging people's posts" facade is starting to crumble.

Look, the point isn't whether babies are "shat out" or not. Of course they aren't, but an autistic like you who can only read sentences literally fail to get the anger that people are expressing here. People are extremely resentful about these children. Can you please be honest enough for like, two micro-seconds, to acknowledge this?

 

[Unkotare]

I will only answer questions if I feel that they are both legitimate and relevant. ...

= duck

 

[Unkotare]

.... Why do you always answer people's question with another question? ....

I don't, but you have done so many times here.