One Of Trump's Unconstitutional EOs Is Being Raked Over the Coals By SCOTUS Tomorrow

Most of the time the child is left with a relative legally in the US (even if the familial relation is sometimes dubious), or taken with the parents if they are deported.
So then what’s the point of birthright citizenship. You get dumped off on some relatives or go home with your real parents. Why put people through that. Keep the family together, deport them all, let them apply for immigration legally and the problem is solved.
 
They are the ones who interpret the Constitution, are they not?
Oooh, so you are saying that you can't think for yourself and will let the SCOTUSES do all your thinking for you.

Can't say I am surprised, dodging little *****.
 
That depends on the constitution of Mexico and if the American parents complete the proper paperwork to have the child declared a US citizen should they so choose.
Oh I see, so the place of the child’s birth has nothing to do with it. That’s kinda the point.
 
Are you saying we should base US law on Mexican law? Really?
I think we should at least be on par with every other nation in the world. The birthright citizenship thing was unnecessary and became an actual problem after the slaves were made citizens. It should have stopped decades ago.
 
I think we should at least be on par with every other nation in the world. ...
Since when does The United States of America give a shit about what "every other nation in the world" does?
 
Since when does The United States of America give a shit about what "every other nation in the world" does?
He literally said, "I think", not "The United States of America thinks"

Little ***** can't even read, haha.
 
I know that Americans have to do this, because these babies are technically American, so they can't just leave them to die. But I would be extremely resentful, if I were an American. Why should American tax money be spent on the children that were shat out by some foreigners who shouldn't have been here in the first place? The Mexican government should really pay for these baby beaners.
I’m thinking more for the kids well being and also the family members who are US citizens.

First of all the kid has to know they were only brought here to be born because it was supposed to benefit their parents.

Second, are these relatives supposed to just take in their illegal cousins ******* kids and not be pissed off about that? They have their own kids and limited resources to raise them but your ******* illegal cousin squirts one out and if you don’t take them the family gets in a tiff? What a fucked up thing to drop on them.
 
I’m thinking more for the kids well being and also the family members who are US citizens.

First of all the kid has to know they were only brought here to be born because it was supposed to benefit their parents.

Second, are these relatives supposed to just take in their illegal cousins ******* kids and not be pissed off about that? They have their own kids and limited resources to raise them but your ******* illegal cousin squirts one out and if you don’t take them the family gets in a tiff? What a fucked up thing to drop on them.
Good point sir, and I also thought of something. What if the relatives aren't willing to take the kid? What's gonna happen? Someone has to care for the kid, and most likely, it's Americans, through their tax money.

Sometimes I just feel extremely resentful and I am not even American.
 
15th post
It has everything to do with it. If the child is born in the US, he is a US citizen.
And that’s the point of this case. There’s more to being a citizen than the spot you were born in. Far more things need to be considered.
 
Oooh, so you are saying that you can't think for yourself and will let the SCOTUSES do all your thinking for you.

...
We are a representative democracy. That's why we elect representatives, senators, and a president to represent the will of the people. That's why we recently elected President Trump. Justices of the Supreme Court, nominated by presidents, interpret laws relative to the US Constitution. Got it?
 
Back
Top Bottom