One Of Trump's Unconstitutional EOs Is Being Raked Over the Coals By SCOTUS Tomorrow

[Missouri_Mike]

Trump has put on a lot of theater for the rubes.

A lot.

One of those performances is EO 14160.

To satisfy the large crowd of bigots in the MAGA ranks, Trump signed an Executive Order on the proverbial Day One of his administration which unconstitutionally violated the 14th Amendment. Having never read the Constitution due to its big words, Trump thought he could get away with it.

So far, every court up the chain of command has slapped Trump's, Nazi Stephen Miller's, and third stringer traitor John Eastman's pointy heads down, and tomorrow the Supreme Court will do the same.

Enter your predictions here for what the score will be when the EO is struck down.

I predict 9-0 against the illegal, unconstitutional, bigoted, hateful EO.

You can listen to the sure-to-be-hilarious arguments tomorrow here:

LISTEN LIVE: Supreme Court hears arguments on Trump’s challenge to birthright citizenship

Birthright citizenship is among several issues the administration has asked the court to deal with on an emergency basis, after lower courts acted to slow Trump’s agenda.

www.pbs.org

You sound just like you did before Roe went down in flames. Do you really think this EO was issued without solid reasoning and legal standing being considered? Like just today Trumps lawyers are going to try to come up with an argument? This has been well thought out in advance in order to get to this point. It won’t be a 9-0 decision either way.

 

[Unkotare]

It might’ve been a de facto reality under the previous administration.

I can tell you it wasn't.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Trump has put on a lot of theater for the rubes.

A lot.

One of those performances is EO 14160.

To satisfy the large crowd of bigots in the MAGA ranks, Trump signed an Executive Order on the proverbial Day One of his administration which unconstitutionally violated the 14th Amendment. Having never read the Constitution due to its big words, Trump thought he could get away with it.

So far, every court up the chain of command has slapped Trump's, Nazi Stephen Miller's, and third stringer traitor John Eastman's pointy heads down, and tomorrow the Supreme Court will do the same.

Enter your predictions here for what the score will be when the EO is struck down.

I predict 9-0 against the illegal, unconstitutional, bigoted, hateful EO.

You can listen to the sure-to-be-hilarious arguments tomorrow here:

LISTEN LIVE: Supreme Court hears arguments on Trump’s challenge to birthright citizenship

Birthright citizenship is among several issues the administration has asked the court to deal with on an emergency basis, after lower courts acted to slow Trump’s agenda.

www.pbs.org

You're too emotional to render any kind of objective prediction.

That said, it will be a 5-4 decision whichever way it goes.

I'm leaning on the side of it being struck down, not on the merits, but because of judicial reticence.

Even someone as blind as you can see that you don't confer citizenship on someone born of someone else who isn't because they came here illegally.

It's like putting a Ferrari engine in a Ford Pinto and calling it a Ferrari. It just isn't. It's still a Ford Pinto, albeit jacked up.

 

[MayorQuimby]

There are no "core Americans," you infantile buffoon. There are just Americans and non-Americans. Your posts sure as hell seem like those of a non-American, non-adult, non-male human being.

You know what he means, he means non-beaner, legal, real, bona-fide Americans, who you should care about instead of illegal beaners, but don't.

 

[Unkotare]

In your opinion, do you think a child should be given automatic US citizenship, regardless of the circumstances of their parents being here?

The child isn't "given" citizenship, he IS a citizen at birth. I don't think the reality of the child's citizenship should alter the parents' immigration status. This is the reality as it now stands.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

There are no "core Americans," you infantile buffoon. There are just Americans and non-Americans. Your posts sure as hell seem like those of a non-American, non-adult, non-male human being.

If two Americans have a child in Mexico is that child a Mexican citizen or a US citizen? No he or she isn’t a Mexican citizen and has no rights nor can the child or family stay and claim to be citizens and will be arrested and sent home.

Now, if two Mexicans have a child in the US should that not match what happened with the first couple? Why should we treat that any differently?

JD Vance had it right, paraphrasing, yes we are a nation of immigrants but that’s not a reason in 2025 to have the dumbest immigration policies on the planet. And birthright citizenship is one of those dumb things.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

The child isn't "given" citizenship, he IS a citizen at birth. I don't think the reality of the child's citizenship should alter the parents' immigration status. This is the reality as it now stands.

So the only choice is to take the child and send them to foster care and deport the parents. If we’re going to support the law.

 

[Unkotare]

You know what he means...

Do you? Do you think there is more than one kind of American citizen?

 

[Unkotare]

So the only choice is to take the child and send them to foster care and deport the parents. If we’re going to support the law.

Most of the time the child is left with a relative legally in the US (even if the familial relation is sometimes dubious), or taken with the parents if they are deported.

 

[MayorQuimby]

Do you? Do you think there is more than one kind of American citizen?

I don't think it matters how many kinds of American citizens there are or aren't. My question for you is why do you feel no outrage about the questionable manner by which illegals help their children obtain citizenship?

 

[Unkotare]

If two Americans have a child in Mexico is that child a Mexican citizen or a US citizen? ...

That depends on the constitution of Mexico and if the American parents complete the proper paperwork to have the child declared a US citizen should they so choose.

 

[Unkotare]

...

Now, if two Mexicans have a child in the US should that not match what happened with the first couple? Why should we treat that any differently?
...

Are you saying we should base US law on Mexican law? Really?

 

[MayorQuimby]

So the only choice is to take the child and send them to foster care

I know that Americans have to do this, because these babies are technically American, so they can't just leave them to die. But I would be extremely resentful, if I were an American. Why should American tax money be spent on the children that were shat out by some foreigners who shouldn't have been here in the first place? The Mexican government should really pay for these baby beaners.

 

[MayorQuimby]

Are you saying we should base US law on Mexican law? Really?

Why do you have this uncontrollable urge to answer people's question with another question? Is it because there is something wrong with you?

 

[Unkotare]

I don't think it matters how many kinds of American citizens there are or aren't. ...

That doesn't answer my question.

 

[Unkotare]

....My question for you is why do you feel no outrage about the questionable manner by which illegals help their children obtain citizenship?

They don't "obtain" citizenship, a child born in the US IS a US citizen right from the get-go. The 14th Amendment doesn't "outrage" me any more than the 2nd Amendment does. I support the US Constitution.

 

[Unkotare]

Why do you have this uncontrollable urge to answer people's question with another question? ....

I believe it is YOU who has avoided directly answering questions here.

 

[Orangecat]

The child isn't "given" citizenship, he IS a citizen at birth.

Under the previously accepted interpretation of the amendment. Might not be so after tomorrow. My personal opinion is a child born here of foreign citizens should be a citizen of their parents’ country.

 

[Unkotare]

I know that Americans have to do this, because these babies are technically American...

There is no "technically" American. These babies are entirely American.

 

[MayorQuimby]

I believe it is YOU who has avoided directly answering questions here.

I will only answer questions if I feel that they are both legitimate and relevant. Your question is neither.

But now I just answered you. Now it's your turn to properly address other people's posts. Why do you always answer people's question with another question? Is it because you are a little weasel?