One Of Trump's Unconstitutional EOs Is Being Raked Over the Coals By SCOTUS Tomorrow

[Unkotare]

Trump has put on a lot of theater for the rubes.

A lot.

One of those performances is EO 14160.

To satisfy the large crowd of bigots in the MAGA ranks, Trump signed an Executive Order on the proverbial Day One of his administration which unconstitutionally violated the 14th Amendment. Having never read the Constitution due to its big words, Trump thought he could get away with it.

So far, every court up the chain of command has slapped Trump's, Nazi Stephen Miller's, and third stringer traitor John Eastman's pointy heads down, and tomorrow the Supreme Court will do the same.

Enter your predictions here for what the score will be when the EO is struck down.

I predict 9-0 against the illegal, unconstitutional, bigoted, hateful EO.

You can listen to the sure-to-be-hilarious arguments tomorrow here:

LISTEN: Supreme Court hears arguments on Trump’s challenge to birthright citizenship

The Supreme Court is weighing whether to allow President Donald Trump’s restrictions on birthright citizenship to temporarily take effect in most of the country, even if they might ultimately be found unconstitutional.

www.pbs.org

Do you partisan prunes ever rehydrate and unclench your wrinkled asses? Even for a minute? The process will play out and the result will be what it will be.

 

[Orangecat]

How many cases do we need to point out to you?

Three US citizen children, one with cancer, deported to Honduras, lawyers say

Trump's border czar Tom Homan says the mothers had made the choice for their citizen children to be removed with them.

www.bbc.com

None of those children were deported. Their illegal parents were, and they did the honorable thing of keeping their own children with them. You people are intentionally dense.

 

[MayorQuimby]

Absolutely


Absolutely.



Absolutely but they do not become an anchor for their parents to stay and since you didn't ask that, you are fully aware of that.

It doesn't matter for what reason they do that. The important thing is that illegals are helping their children obtain citizenship through dubious means, and all you can do is defend this.

 

[pknopp]

None of those children were deported. Their illegal parents were, and they did the honorable thing of keeping their own children with them. You people are intentionally dense.

Right, the kids were not an anchor. Thank you.

 

[pknopp]

It doesn't matter for what reason they do that. The important thing is that illegals are helping their children obtain citizenship through dubious means, and all you can do is defend this.

Anything else you want to spin your falsehoods into?

 

[Unkotare]

....

Do try to catch up and stop listening to your lying, uneducated propagandists. ....

Oh, here we go. The "Me more educatedly than U" *****-fest part of the show is about to begin.

 

[Orangecat]

Right, the kids were not an anchor. Thank you.

Not this time, under this administration. Not so true in the past, though. That’s why the term exists, dummy.

 

[MayorQuimby]

Anything else you want to spin your falsehoods into?

I see that facing reality is too difficult for you.

 

[Unkotare]

No, it shows just how much of a destructive lawbreaker Trump is. Trump is the worst, most criminally offensive, president in history.

I've seen your propagandists make that bullshit argument.

Try to think for yourself.

Hey, have you heard? You lost.

 

[Unkotare]

Outside of your echo chamber the term absolutely exists.

You know
Real world.

People can say whatever they want, but the condition does not exist.

 

[Unkotare]

It’s a common phrase used to describe children born in the US to non-citizen parents. ...

It's a phrase the describes nothing real.

 

[Unkotare]

It feels that you are arguing semantics.

It doesn't matter if the term "anchor baby" exists or not. Do illegals sneak into the country to have kids in the hope of obtaining citizenship? Yes or No.

Obtaining citizenship for whom? If a child is born in the US they don't have to "obtain" anything. They are born US citizens. The immigration status of the parents remains unchanged.

 

[Orangecat]

It's a phrase the describes nothing real.

It’s a real term to describe a concept that many would like to see become a legal reality.

 

[Orangecat]

Obtaining citizenship for whom? If a child is born in the US they don't have to "obtain" anything. They are born US citizens. The immigration status of the parents remains unchanged.

I believe that’s the question that’s coming up before the supreme court to decide.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Trump has put on a lot of theater for the rubes.

A lot.

One of those performances is EO 14160.

To satisfy the large crowd of bigots in the MAGA ranks, Trump signed an Executive Order on the proverbial Day One of his administration which unconstitutionally violated the 14th Amendment. Having never read the Constitution due to its big words, Trump thought he could get away with it.

So far, every court up the chain of command has slapped Trump's, Nazi Stephen Miller's, and third stringer traitor John Eastman's pointy heads down, and tomorrow the Supreme Court will do the same.

Enter your predictions here for what the score will be when the EO is struck down.

I predict 9-0 against the illegal, unconstitutional, bigoted, hateful EO.

You can listen to the sure-to-be-hilarious arguments tomorrow here:

LISTEN: Supreme Court hears arguments on Trump’s challenge to birthright citizenship

The Supreme Court is weighing whether to allow President Donald Trump’s restrictions on birthright citizenship to temporarily take effect in most of the country, even if they might ultimately be found unconstitutional.

www.pbs.org

How do core Americans benefit from birthright citizenship?
Don’t you think core Americans should ALWAYS be the primary beneficiary of ‘immigration’?
Why would you prefer that core Americans get fucked by birthright citizenship?

 

[Unkotare]

It’s a real term to describe a concept that many would like to see become a legal reality.

Yet many people - even people here - really seem to take the term literally.

 

[Orangecat]

Yet many people - even people here - really seem to take the term literally.

It might’ve been a de facto reality under the previous administration.

 

[Unkotare]

I believe that’s the question that’s coming up before the supreme court to decide.

It seems to me that there are too many related consequences to make a change likely, but we'll see.

 

[Orangecat]

It seems to me that there are too many related consequences to make a change likely, but we'll see.

In your opinion, do you think a child should be given automatic US citizenship, regardless of the circumstances of their parents being here?

 

[Unkotare]

How do core Americans benefit from birthright citizenship?
Don’t you think core Americans should ALWAYS be the primary beneficiary of ‘immigration’?
Why would you prefer that core Americans get fucked by birthright citizenship?

There are no "core Americans," you infantile buffoon. There are just Americans and non-Americans. Your posts sure as hell seem like those of a non-American, non-adult, non-male human being.