Theowl32
Diamond Member
- Dec 8, 2013
- 23,165
- 17,696
- 2,415
One thing of many things that confuse me in regards to Islam among their followers. Muhammad by their own admission isn't God. The term blasphemy is a term reserved only for God. So, why are they claiming it is blasphemy if anyone even depicts Muhammad in a picture of any kind but not any of their other Muslim warlords?
Meaning people can show pictures, photographs or paintings of the Sultans or Ayatollah etc and no problem.
You can even criticize them, but if anyone paints a painting or drawing or speaks out against Muhammad it is considered blasphemy.
That makes little sense and that reaction of exalting Muhammad as God (which they all say he wasn't) is a blasphemy unto itself.
How am I wrong?
Meaning people can show pictures, photographs or paintings of the Sultans or Ayatollah etc and no problem.
You can even criticize them, but if anyone paints a painting or drawing or speaks out against Muhammad it is considered blasphemy.
That makes little sense and that reaction of exalting Muhammad as God (which they all say he wasn't) is a blasphemy unto itself.
How am I wrong?