Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Poppycock! All these testimonials are from Democrats. Total bullshit! The purpose for voter ID is to make sure that everybody that votes is truly eligible to vote and that they vote only once.Got a legitimate reason for not backing such a plan?It's not suppression when it's offered for FREE. We hire people to take census. Hire some to visit those who simply cannot afford to go to the DMV, let them take a face picture, have the subject sign a form, email the form with picture to the DMV...go to the next house that requested a free photo ID. What is suppressing about that?I bet the GOP has dozens of bills doing this in the states right? Oh wait no, they ONLY have dozens of voter ID suppression laws!
Got a LINK to the GOP's proposal ANYWHERE to do that? ANYWHERE? lol
GAO: Photo ID Voting Restrictions Lowered Turnout in KS, TN
The Challenge of Obtaining Voter Identification
The 11 percent of eligible voters who lack the required photo ID must travel to a designated government office to obtain one. Yet many citizens will have trouble making this trip. In the 10 states with restrictive voter ID laws:
- Nearly 500,000 eligible voters do not have access to a vehicle and live more than 10 miles from the nearest state ID-issuing office open more than two days a week. Many of them live in rural areas with dwindling public transportation options.
- More than 10 million eligible voters live more than 10 miles from their nearest state ID-issuing office open more than two days a week.
- 1.2 million eligible black voters and 500,000 eligible Hispanic voters live more than 10 miles from their nearest ID-issuing office open more than two days a week. People of color are more likely to be disenfranchised by these laws since they are less likely to have photo ID than the general population.
- Many ID-issuing offices maintain limited business hours.
The Challenge of Obtaining Voter Identification Brennan Center for Justice
You mean since Dubya's DOJ UNPRECEDENTED 5 year investigation of over 300+ million votes found ZERO people to prosecute for impersonating other voters?
It's simply GOP voter suppression
GAO: Photo ID Voting Restrictions Lowered Turnout in KS, TN
Why Voter ID Laws Aren’t Really about Fraud
Why Voter ID Laws Aren t Really about Fraud Government Elections Politics FRONTLINE PBS
Former Florida GOP leaders say voter suppression was reason they pushed new election law
Former Florida GOP leaders say voter suppression was reason... www.palmbeachpost.com
6 Other Times Republicans Admitted Voting Restrictions Are Just About Disenfranchising Democrats The National Memo
Republicans Admit Voter-ID Laws Are Aimed at Democratic Voters
Republicans Admit Voter ID Laws Are Aimed at Democratic Voters - The Daily Beast
GOP Official Resigns After Saying Purpose Of Voter ID Is To Suppress Votes Of Democrats, ‘Lazy Blacks’
Top Pennsylvania Republican Admits Voter ID Helped Suppress Obama Voters
You died-in-the-wool liberals are simply too dependent on voter fraud to remain in power. That's because your message is nothing but lies and promises designed to do nothing other than GET ELECTED!
Liberalism is a goddamned mental disorder!
So, you come up against a logical question that you cannot answer...you stoop to ad hominem and name calling. What a childish approach!Where in the constitution does it say dead people can vote?Got a legitimate reason for not backing such a plan?Got a LINK to the GOP's proposal ANYWHERE to do that? ANYWHERE? lol
GAO: Photo ID Voting Restrictions Lowered Turnout in KS, TN
The Challenge of Obtaining Voter Identification
The 11 percent of eligible voters who lack the required photo ID must travel to a designated government office to obtain one. Yet many citizens will have trouble making this trip. In the 10 states with restrictive voter ID laws:
- Nearly 500,000 eligible voters do not have access to a vehicle and live more than 10 miles from the nearest state ID-issuing office open more than two days a week. Many of them live in rural areas with dwindling public transportation options.
- More than 10 million eligible voters live more than 10 miles from their nearest state ID-issuing office open more than two days a week.
- 1.2 million eligible black voters and 500,000 eligible Hispanic voters live more than 10 miles from their nearest ID-issuing office open more than two days a week. People of color are more likely to be disenfranchised by these laws since they are less likely to have photo ID than the general population.
- Many ID-issuing offices maintain limited business hours.
The Challenge of Obtaining Voter Identification Brennan Center for Justice
Let me play constitutional conservative for a moment...
The Founders never required photo ID to vote. Where in the Constitution are photo ID's?
So you are a moron and simply don't want to use your brain!
We are still waiting for the response as to what is the percentage of 100,000 of said illegally cast votes you claim to the total number of votes cast.Then what were the reasons the votes were illegally cast.
And finally.............how many of these "so-called" voters casting the illegal votes have been prosecuted or how many have had charges filed against them.
WAITING!!
Go back and read the link at my post.100,000 votes "said" to be , answer the question.How many have been prosecuted. It is a federal offense to commit voter fraud.
Show us the convictions that show they have wronged.
Not speculation.
Get it!
I showed you in this thread one case of over 100,000 votes in 1 election alone, that were found to be fraudulent. The fact you choose to ignore it is your problem, not mine.We are still waiting for your math to show up, give us the data in percentages that shows how many cases of voter fraud there are in any state. Numbers too. Then tell us how many have been prosecuted for voter fraud.
The oneness is on you! You are making the accusation.
First, your math is really lacking, maybe you need to go back to school. Secondly, nothing has been done of any consequence in states that do not require proof of who you are, since these major election frauds were discovered, to stop it from happening again. Third, I don't want fraud occurring from anyone in elections, left, right up, down, in between, whatever! I want my vote to count. Period. We are becoming a laughing stock in our elections, when once we were the shining beacon in which other new republics and democracies aspired to.
And last, Rolling Stone, really? Now I know why you think the way you do.
They haven't been caught?100,000 votes "said" to be , answer the question.How many have been prosecuted. It is a federal offense to commit voter fraud.
Show us the convictions that show they have wronged.
Not speculation.
Get it!
I showed you in this thread one case of over 100,000 votes in 1 election alone, that were found to be fraudulent. The fact you choose to ignore it is your problem, not mine.We are still waiting for your math to show up, give us the data in percentages that shows how many cases of voter fraud there are in any state. Numbers too. Then tell us how many have been prosecuted for voter fraud.
The oneness is on you! You are making the accusation.
First, your math is really lacking, maybe you need to go back to school. Secondly, nothing has been done of any consequence in states that do not require proof of who you are, since these major election frauds were discovered, to stop it from happening again. Third, I don't want fraud occurring from anyone in elections, left, right up, down, in between, whatever! I want my vote to count. Period. We are becoming a laughing stock in our elections, when once we were the shining beacon in which other new republics and democracies aspired to.
And last, Rolling Stone, really? Now I know why you think the way you do.The Adlai E. Marcos Style Of Politics - Chicago Tribune
Ever heard od Democrat Adlai Stevenson, III?
By insisting as a minority of one that he really won the 1982 gubernatorial election, Stevenson is keeping up with Marcos, who says the same thing about this year`s Philippine presidential election. According to the Illinois Board of Elections, Gov. James Thompson edged Stevenson by 5,000 votes. But such massive vote fraud was exposed in Chicago following the election that federal law enforcement officials have estimated that 100,000 fraudulent ballots probably were cast for Stevenson.
You need to go back 60+ years? lol
GOP outcries over the phantom menace of voter fraud escalated after 2008, when Obama's candidacy attracted historic numbers of first-time voters.
The GOP War on Voting Rolling Stone
You made my case, child. Thank you!So, you come up against a logical question that you cannot answer...you stoop to ad hominem and name calling. What a childish approach!Where in the constitution does it say dead people can vote?Got a legitimate reason for not backing such a plan?
Let me play constitutional conservative for a moment...
The Founders never required photo ID to vote. Where in the Constitution are photo ID's?
So you are a moron and simply don't want to use your brain!
Logical? FROM YOU BUBBA? lol
Americans like sensible voter ID laws
Well dad if you can wipe the partisan fog off your political windshield you might be able to see down the road. 74 per cent of Americans want some form of voter id laws. I guess all these people are haters and you are not crazy. Listen to the people, three quarters of the people who believe in the integrity of the voting process, you are on the wrong side of history dad and on the wrong side of the American people. For once start thinking about the country and not your partisan delusions. Life is too short to be mad all the time.
They haven't been caught?100,000 votes "said" to be , answer the question.How many have been prosecuted. It is a federal offense to commit voter fraud.
Show us the convictions that show they have wronged.
Not speculation.
Get it!
I showed you in this thread one case of over 100,000 votes in 1 election alone, that were found to be fraudulent. The fact you choose to ignore it is your problem, not mine.We are still waiting for your math to show up, give us the data in percentages that shows how many cases of voter fraud there are in any state. Numbers too. Then tell us how many have been prosecuted for voter fraud.
The oneness is on you! You are making the accusation.
First, your math is really lacking, maybe you need to go back to school. Secondly, nothing has been done of any consequence in states that do not require proof of who you are, since these major election frauds were discovered, to stop it from happening again. Third, I don't want fraud occurring from anyone in elections, left, right up, down, in between, whatever! I want my vote to count. Period. We are becoming a laughing stock in our elections, when once we were the shining beacon in which other new republics and democracies aspired to.
And last, Rolling Stone, really? Now I know why you think the way you do.You need to go back 60+ years? lol
GOP outcries over the phantom menace of voter fraud escalated after 2008, when Obama's candidacy attracted historic numbers of first-time voters.
The GOP War on Voting Rolling Stone
We are still waiting for the response as to what is the percentage of 100,000 of said illegally cast votes you claim to the total number of votes cast.Then what were the reasons the votes were illegally cast.
And finally.............how many of these "so-called" voters casting the illegal votes have been prosecuted or how many have had charges filed against them.
WAITING!!
Go back and read the link at my post.100,000 votes "said" to be , answer the question.How many have been prosecuted. It is a federal offense to commit voter fraud.
Show us the convictions that show they have wronged.
Not speculation.
Get it!
I showed you in this thread one case of over 100,000 votes in 1 election alone, that were found to be fraudulent. The fact you choose to ignore it is your problem, not mine.We are still waiting for your math to show up, give us the data in percentages that shows how many cases of voter fraud there are in any state. Numbers too. Then tell us how many have been prosecuted for voter fraud.
The oneness is on you! You are making the accusation.
100,000?
Are you sure it's not 100 million?
That's a pretty stupid question. If none have been caught, I can't list them for you. Talk about childlike!Apparently they haven't, its all speculation.
Can you post any one that has been charged? Taken to court and prosecuted.
Speaking of childlike.
They haven't been caught?100,000 votes "said" to be , answer the question.How many have been prosecuted. It is a federal offense to commit voter fraud.
Show us the convictions that show they have wronged.
Not speculation.
Get it!
I showed you in this thread one case of over 100,000 votes in 1 election alone, that were found to be fraudulent. The fact you choose to ignore it is your problem, not mine.We are still waiting for your math to show up, give us the data in percentages that shows how many cases of voter fraud there are in any state. Numbers too. Then tell us how many have been prosecuted for voter fraud.
The oneness is on you! You are making the accusation.
First, your math is really lacking, maybe you need to go back to school. Secondly, nothing has been done of any consequence in states that do not require proof of who you are, since these major election frauds were discovered, to stop it from happening again. Third, I don't want fraud occurring from anyone in elections, left, right up, down, in between, whatever! I want my vote to count. Period. We are becoming a laughing stock in our elections, when once we were the shining beacon in which other new republics and democracies aspired to.
And last, Rolling Stone, really? Now I know why you think the way you do.
That's a pretty stupid question. If none have been caught, I can't list them for you. Talk about childlike!Apparently they haven't, its all speculation.
Can you post any one that has been charged? Taken to court and prosecuted.
Speaking of childlike.
They haven't been caught?100,000 votes "said" to be , answer the question.How many have been prosecuted. It is a federal offense to commit voter fraud.
Show us the convictions that show they have wronged.
Not speculation.
Get it!
I showed you in this thread one case of over 100,000 votes in 1 election alone, that were found to be fraudulent. The fact you choose to ignore it is your problem, not mine.We are still waiting for your math to show up, give us the data in percentages that shows how many cases of voter fraud there are in any state. Numbers too. Then tell us how many have been prosecuted for voter fraud.
The oneness is on you! You are making the accusation.
No. It is childlike to say that liberals oppose voter ID for any other reason than the fact that it makes voter fraud simple.No, it's childlike to accuse someone of a wrong doing and assume they are guilty when there is not evidence to prosecute them.
Get your facts straight and correct before you accuse someone of a wrong doing.
That is childlike.
That's a pretty stupid question. If none have been caught, I can't list them for you. Talk about childlike!Apparently they haven't, its all speculation.
Can you post any one that has been charged? Taken to court and prosecuted.
Speaking of childlike.
They haven't been caught?100,000 votes "said" to be , answer the question.How many have been prosecuted. It is a federal offense to commit voter fraud.
Show us the convictions that show they have wronged.
Not speculation.
Get it!
I showed you in this thread one case of over 100,000 votes in 1 election alone, that were found to be fraudulent. The fact you choose to ignore it is your problem, not mine.
No. It is childlike to say that liberals oppose voter ID for any other reason than the fact that it makes voter fraud simple.No, it's childlike to accuse someone of a wrong doing and assume they are guilty when there is not evidence to prosecute them.
Get your facts straight and correct before you accuse someone of a wrong doing.
That is childlike.
That's a pretty stupid question. If none have been caught, I can't list them for you. Talk about childlike!Apparently they haven't, its all speculation.
Can you post any one that has been charged? Taken to court and prosecuted.
Speaking of childlike.
They haven't been caught?100,000 votes "said" to be , answer the question.How many have been prosecuted. It is a federal offense to commit voter fraud.
Show us the convictions that show they have wronged.
Not speculation.
Get it!
It doesn't take an epidemic to fraudulently elect an asshole like Al Franken to the US Senate. Just 312 votes. It happened.You still cannot get it through your childlike brain that you have never convinced someone with an adult mind that there is an epidemic of voter fraud.
When you can show evidence that it is wide spread and there have been individuals convicted of such a crime, then you will have something to go on.
Until then your case of a need for altering our voting system is moot.
It is like the group/NRA, that refuse to move at all on the right to bear arms.
It is a right to vote.
No. It is childlike to say that liberals oppose voter ID for any other reason than the fact that it makes voter fraud simple.No, it's childlike to accuse someone of a wrong doing and assume they are guilty when there is not evidence to prosecute them.
Get your facts straight and correct before you accuse someone of a wrong doing.
That is childlike.
That's a pretty stupid question. If none have been caught, I can't list them for you. Talk about childlike!Apparently they haven't, its all speculation.
Can you post any one that has been charged? Taken to court and prosecuted.
Speaking of childlike.
They haven't been caught?
It doesn't take an epidemic to fraudulently elect an asshole like Al Franken to the US Senate. Just 312 votes. It happened.You still cannot get it through your childlike brain that you have never convinced someone with an adult mind that there is an epidemic of voter fraud.
When you can show evidence that it is wide spread and there have been individuals convicted of such a crime, then you will have something to go on.
Until then your case of a need for altering our voting system is moot.
It is like the group/NRA, that refuse to move at all on the right to bear arms.
It is a right to vote.
No. It is childlike to say that liberals oppose voter ID for any other reason than the fact that it makes voter fraud simple.No, it's childlike to accuse someone of a wrong doing and assume they are guilty when there is not evidence to prosecute them.
Get your facts straight and correct before you accuse someone of a wrong doing.
That is childlike.
That's a pretty stupid question. If none have been caught, I can't list them for you. Talk about childlike!Apparently they haven't, its all speculation.
Can you post any one that has been charged? Taken to court and prosecuted.
Speaking of childlike.
So, you're admitting that Al Franken was fraudulently elected. Thank you.Or georgie bush. The SCOTUS had to put him in office. That doesn't seem to upset you. So if that isnt upsetting why should
0.0001 percent of a vote upset you.
Don't answer I know why. Because of your closed mindedness.
It doesn't take an epidemic to fraudulently elect an asshole like Al Franken to the US Senate. Just 312 votes. It happened.You still cannot get it through your childlike brain that you have never convinced someone with an adult mind that there is an epidemic of voter fraud.
When you can show evidence that it is wide spread and there have been individuals convicted of such a crime, then you will have something to go on.
Until then your case of a need for altering our voting system is moot.
It is like the group/NRA, that refuse to move at all on the right to bear arms.
It is a right to vote.
No. It is childlike to say that liberals oppose voter ID for any other reason than the fact that it makes voter fraud simple.No, it's childlike to accuse someone of a wrong doing and assume they are guilty when there is not evidence to prosecute them.
Get your facts straight and correct before you accuse someone of a wrong doing.
That is childlike.
That's a pretty stupid question. If none have been caught, I can't list them for you. Talk about childlike!
So, you're admitting that Al Franken was fraudulently elected. Thank you.Or georgie bush. The SCOTUS had to put him in office. That doesn't seem to upset you. So if that isnt upsetting why should
0.0001 percent of a vote upset you.
Don't answer I know why. Because of your closed mindedness.
It doesn't take an epidemic to fraudulently elect an asshole like Al Franken to the US Senate. Just 312 votes. It happened.You still cannot get it through your childlike brain that you have never convinced someone with an adult mind that there is an epidemic of voter fraud.
When you can show evidence that it is wide spread and there have been individuals convicted of such a crime, then you will have something to go on.
Until then your case of a need for altering our voting system is moot.
It is like the group/NRA, that refuse to move at all on the right to bear arms.
It is a right to vote.
No. It is childlike to say that liberals oppose voter ID for any other reason than the fact that it makes voter fraud simple.No, it's childlike to accuse someone of a wrong doing and assume they are guilty when there is not evidence to prosecute them.
Get your facts straight and correct before you accuse someone of a wrong doing.
That is childlike.
Never happened. SCOTUS did not decide the election. SCOTUS merely said enough with the fucking recounts. Even Gore supporters finally realized that their recounts would change nothing.No, but if you admit that the 43rd president of the US was put in to office by crooked means I might think about the 300+ votes you are ascribing too.
So, you're admitting that Al Franken was fraudulently elected. Thank you.Or georgie bush. The SCOTUS had to put him in office. That doesn't seem to upset you. So if that isnt upsetting why should
0.0001 percent of a vote upset you.
Don't answer I know why. Because of your closed mindedness.
It doesn't take an epidemic to fraudulently elect an asshole like Al Franken to the US Senate. Just 312 votes. It happened.You still cannot get it through your childlike brain that you have never convinced someone with an adult mind that there is an epidemic of voter fraud.
When you can show evidence that it is wide spread and there have been individuals convicted of such a crime, then you will have something to go on.
Until then your case of a need for altering our voting system is moot.
It is like the group/NRA, that refuse to move at all on the right to bear arms.
It is a right to vote.
No. It is childlike to say that liberals oppose voter ID for any other reason than the fact that it makes voter fraud simple.
