Ravi
Diamond Member
Amanda, do you also believe that males are more intelligent than females because they have superior strength?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Amanda, do you also believe that males are more intelligent than females because they have superior strength?
For now...they have greater upper body strength. Overall, I don't actually know unless you define physically stronger.Amanda, do you also believe that males are more intelligent than females because they have superior strength?
so YOU believe that men are physically stronger overall?
For now...they have greater upper body strength. Overall, I don't actually know unless you define physically stronger.Amanda, do you also believe that males are more intelligent than females because they have superior strength?
so YOU believe that men are physically stronger overall?
On average...that is hard for me to say. I tend to think yes but there are plenty of unmuscular men out there.For now...they have greater upper body strength. Overall, I don't actually know unless you define physically stronger.so YOU believe that men are physically stronger overall?
You can define it however you want. do you or do you not think that more men could physically dominate more women than women dominate men? overall body strength. on average.
That traditional societal roles evolved men into having better upper body strength.do you think your answer reflects a genetic reality?
On average...that is hard for me to say. I tend to think yes but there are plenty of unmuscular men out there.For now...they have greater upper body strength. Overall, I don't actually know unless you define physically stronger.
You can define it however you want. do you or do you not think that more men could physically dominate more women than women dominate men? overall body strength. on average.
That traditional societal roles evolved men into having better upper body strength.do you think your answer reflects a genetic reality?
This chick could beat up a lot of dudes on here:
![]()
Maybe you could answer the question I posed to Amanda.On average...that is hard for me to say. I tend to think yes but there are plenty of unmuscular men out there.You can define it however you want. do you or do you not think that more men could physically dominate more women than women dominate men? overall body strength. on average.
That traditional societal roles evolved men into having better upper body strength.do you think your answer reflects a genetic reality?
Your hesitation is cute but I think we all pretty much realize that men, on average, ARE physically stronger than women. This is a genetic reality. Are there individual women who could kick individual dudes? Of course. But the genetic reality of physically dominant men pretty much enabled paternal culture to manifest in almost every society we've seen since the dawn of man. Likewise, almost every personal characteristic can be grouped genetically. It's disingenuous to insist that all ethnicities are completely equal just as it's a farce to pretend that men are not physically stronger than women in general.
Maybe you could answer the question I posed to Amanda.On average...that is hard for me to say. I tend to think yes but there are plenty of unmuscular men out there.
That traditional societal roles evolved men into having better upper body strength.
Your hesitation is cute but I think we all pretty much realize that men, on average, ARE physically stronger than women. This is a genetic reality. Are there individual women who could kick individual dudes? Of course. But the genetic reality of physically dominant men pretty much enabled paternal culture to manifest in almost every society we've seen since the dawn of man. Likewise, almost every personal characteristic can be grouped genetically. It's disingenuous to insist that all ethnicities are completely equal just as it's a farce to pretend that men are not physically stronger than women in general.
I don't think it is, but amazingly enough many people think characteristics of the brain are reflected in skin pigment.Maybe you could answer the question I posed to Amanda.Your hesitation is cute but I think we all pretty much realize that men, on average, ARE physically stronger than women. This is a genetic reality. Are there individual women who could kick individual dudes? Of course. But the genetic reality of physically dominant men pretty much enabled paternal culture to manifest in almost every society we've seen since the dawn of man. Likewise, almost every personal characteristic can be grouped genetically. It's disingenuous to insist that all ethnicities are completely equal just as it's a farce to pretend that men are not physically stronger than women in general.
I don't think men are more intelligent because of their superior physical strength. Why would a characteristic of the brain be reflected in muscle tissue?
Sometimes stupid questions are the only way to make a point. And no, I don't think women should be assumed to have greater intelligence and I don't believe they do, just like I don't believe men do.That is kind of a stupid question, really. do you think that WOMEN should be assumed to have greater intelligence since men clearly are physically stronger?
It isn't brainpower. Girls and boys score statistically the same on math and science.How many decades after bra buring equality will it take to realize that it's not culture that puts more men into math and science roles?
Although people can look quite different from one another, all of us share 99.9% of the same DNA. So what makes us individuals? Our inherited differences—from our eye color to our risk for certain diseases-stem from the one tenth of one percent of human DNA that varies from person to person. Because our DNA contains more than three billion bits of information, this tiny percentage amounts to more than three million differences. Additionally, much of our individuality is not controlled by our genes, and instead develops from environmental, social and cultural influences, as well as from human behavior and thought.giving that a black man can be more similiar to a white man than he is to a black women in terms of DNA, there isn't that much difference between us. Himans in terms of DNA are the most alike animals on the planet. The only difference between races is skin pigmatation. Everything else has to do with envirnment.yes lets assume that we are adept at doublethink
for indeed we are !
fucking lemmings will believe anything their government preaches - whether it is about race or 911 or anything else
EVERYTHING IS DIFFERENT
man is different from woman
negroe is different from white man
and Chevy is different from BMW
See, I have a really hard time buying that because all you have to do is look at professional sports that require a lot of physical exertion. Do you really think there are so many more black pro basketball players because they grew up near a hoop?
No, it isn't wrong.thats wrong. The fact remains that men and women are different physiologically up to and including brain functions. The average female brain is fetter at some things while the average male brain is better at others. This is reflected in the very occupational differences we see in fields like math and science. CAN women function as well as a man? Sure, individuals can. But, statistically, we are still a product of the development of our specie.
What option is left is that both are of the same intelligence. Except maybe you since I had to explain that option to you.ps.. if you dont believe women are more intelligent nor do you believe men are more intelligent then what option is left? This is where you knee jerk PC'ism kicks your logic square in the balls.
soggy, I don't know why you keep posting the newsflash that men and women are different. I'm pretty sure most normal humans already know this...it has no bearing on intelligence. Even your original link said that.
And if you can't understand the statistics in the article I linked then there's no help for you.
It isn't racist to note that there are differences between ethnic groups. And I'm pretty sure I have never said that it was...that's your strawman.