Arizona Willie
Gold Member
- Aug 27, 2015
- 1,064
- 220
- 210
================The Founding Fathers didn't envision a Supreme court filled with political activists, either.=============Politics shouldn't be considered when nominating a SC Judge. It should be whether they believe in the COTUS or not.
Apparently Republicans DO NOT.
The COTUS say it is Obama's RIGHT and DUTY to nominate a replacement Justice.
The Founding Fathers did not intend for America to go without a Supreme Court until the Republicans got another chance to put one of theirs in office to do the choosing.
REPUBLICANS DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO A PERMANENT REPUBLICAN SUPREME COURT MAJORITY.
If Obama yielded to their DEMANDS what would they do if Bernie or the Ice Queen is elected?
DEMAND WE WAIT FOUR MORE YEARS UNTIL THEY GET ANOTHER CHANCE
fuck Republicans
Funny but you have no objection to the RIGHT WINGER ACTIVIST JUDGES that's why you loved Scalia so much --- he always ruled in your favor.
Explain excactly HOW Scalia was an activist, please.
Scalia was one of those who wanted to follow the Constitution to the letter with no attempt to interpret it in the light of the world as it is today.
For instance, they had no concept of electricity or telephones so Scalia would claim the Constitution says nothing about them so government has no authority or power to do anything in relation to those things. He would do away with the FCC and all government agencies the regulate electricity or telephones.
THAT MAKES HIM A CONSERVATIVE ACTIVIST.