Obama One Term President

[MaggieMae]

Sarah Is Always Right

There is no pleasing the "Pick at Palin" Pinkos . If she is Conservative she is bad, if she is Liberal she is bad. She can't win against that kind of onslaught.

Fact is, Democrats are scared Sh**less of her, but everything they do and say against her makes her stronger, for if God is for her, who can be against her.

She did her job as mayor of a city, and governor of Alaska superbly, witness the 80 plus % approval rating she had, and has.

She is the penultimate mother grizzly bear, and she takes care of her cubs. When she was governor she took care of Alaska ONLY, and when she is President, which she will be, she will take care of America ONLY. She can only do one job at a time.

Sure, earmarks are bad, but as long as they are legal ANY legislator that does not beg, borrow and steal to get them for his, or her, state is derelict in their duty.

I oppose earmarks, but were I in Congress, or a governor, I would get all I could for MY state. That would be my job until the rules are changed, you play by the rules, or you are an idiot.

You know what? Even if Sara Palin was the most brilliant and fair politician out there, I couldn't stand listening to her piercing voice for four years straight. Can anyone imagine her sitting down with heads of state and sounding like an adult instead of a teenager on steroids ranting about her BFF competition?

BIGOT!!!

Look, Wake-Up! By your words, you are taking a juvenile animalistic approach yourself, and sadly, you don't even know it.

When you attack people based on their looks, their voice, their race, their gender, their age, their culture, their language, and so forth, and all of these are the same, you are nothing but a vicious, unreasoning, illogical, uncivilized BIGOT . Admit it.

Now, I'm honest, so I can see those unpleasant tendencies even in my perfect self, but it is really sad that you can't see yourself and your own faults.

To say what you said about her is like me saying, "Even if Obama was the greatest thing for America and the world that had come down the pike that I just couldn't stand his Black skin, his big ears, his Curious George look, his use of teleprompters, his lack of religion, his two ugly kids, his ugly Portuguese dog, his Hippie White mother, his Black father and so forth. Saying such would mark me as a BIGOT, and yet you do the same sort of thing to Sarah, you along and most all the BIGOT Democrats.

You have the nerve to say you would not support her because YOU don't like the tone of her voice. Well, to those who love her, her voice is like the sweetest thing in the world, and wake up, that is human nature.

Finally, I think lurking deep below your disdain for her high voice is a hatred for women in general. Are you sure you are not one of those women haters who pretend they are not?

Sarah Palin does not have the basic inherent intelligence, nor the rational thought process to be anything other than exactly what she is: A showpiece with a big mouth and a cute ass. If that makes me a "bigot" by your logic, so be it. I call 'em like I see 'em.

That said, you might be interested in knowing that I have several younger female friends who ARE intelligent and can think like rational adults, and they are also extremely articulate and have cute asses. In fact, one of them is here with me now; as I checked my mail and this site, she was on a conference call. I showed her your comments and she laughed heartily, reminding me that I once supported Hillary Clinton too and that I should tell you that.

 

[MaggieMae]

Why would anyone listen to advice from his enemy that wants to kill him? When Democrats give us Republicans advice, the smart thing for us to do is to do the exact opposite. [/B]

And there we have it, boys and girls. A legitimately elected party going up against the JUST SAY NO Republicans. No excuses, no attempt at justifying their attitude (waaah, we weren't 'invited' in), just a dogged determination to have it their way or no way.

 

[MaggieMae]

Why would anyone listen to advice from his enemy that wants to kill him? When Democrats give us Republicans advice, the smart thing for us to do is to do the exact opposite.

You Lefties say we would be foolish to nominate Sarah, well, that means the best thing for us to do is to nominate her, which is exactly what we are going to do.

If you think she would be such a disaster for us you should be encouraging us to nominate her, right? So, get off her case and encourage us to self-destruct. LOL

Please nominate half governor Palin.

Please!

Does anyone remember why she resigned in the first place?

 

[MaggieMae]

Birds of Prey...

When you birds (vultures) attack Sarah, we all know we are on the right track in nominating her, and we will. The very fact of your vitriol spewing at her and her family is proof of your fear of her. You lie when you say you don't fear her.

No one bothers attacking something they do not fear. You trash are quaking in your boots that she is going to take away your perverted sex lives and your perverted life styles, and your perverted values. Well, go ahead and quake and tremble, for she will do just that, if Jesus doesn't come and get all of you before that.

Cheers

Then I guess we've been imagining all those 24/7 attacks by the right against Obama, leading to the formation of the Tea Party, armed militias, gross photoshopped caricatures, allegations that he is an Islamic fundamentalist at best and/or the Anti-Christ at worst.

 

[Vast LWC]

Sewer Worker Winger

The unemployment rate was 7.4% Dec 2009, the month before Barak Hussein took over, it's now 9.7%, that's a 32% increase since Obama took over

It was 4.4% when the democrats took over Congress, that's a 122% increase thanks to Obama and the democrat congress.

Still spouting those bad numbers I see. Didn't you learn last time?

The unemployment rate in February of 2009, Obama's first full month of office was 8.2%, not 7.4%.

That means that the unemployment rate grew 3.8% under Bush, and 1.8% under Obama, to the 10% high it reached a few months ago, and has now shrunk to 9.7%, or 1.5% higher than Feb 2009.

Thus the growth under Bush was more than twice as much as the growth under Obama.

But hey if you want to pick a random point in time, and start from there, and then blame it on Obama, why not go back to 2007? Then you can say that Obama is responsible for a 250% increase in Unemployment!

 

[Meister]

Sewer Worker Winger

The unemployment rate was 7.4% Dec 2009, the month before Barak Hussein took over, it's now 9.7%, that's a 32% increase since Obama took over

It was 4.4% when the democrats took over Congress, that's a 122% increase thanks to Obama and the democrat congress.

Still spouting those bad numbers I see. Didn't you learn last time?

The unemployment rate in February of 2009, Obama's first full month of office was 8.2%, not 7.4%.

That means that the unemployment rate grew 3.8% under Bush, and 1.8% under Obama, to the 10% high it reached a few months ago, and has now shrunk to 9.7%, or 1.5% higher than Feb 2009.

Thus the growth under Bush was more than twice as much as the growth under Obama.

But hey if you want to pick a random point in time, and start from there, and then blame it on Obama, why not go back to 2007? Then you can say that Obama is responsible for a 250% increase in Unemployment!

Perhaps a better number to use would be the total number of Americans that are out of work. That would probably rise to around 16-18% of people out of work.....which would be the real number. I think that is the number to be used with each administration, no?

 

[Vast LWC]

Sewer Worker Winger

The unemployment rate was 7.4% Dec 2009, the month before Barak Hussein took over, it's now 9.7%, that's a 32% increase since Obama took over

It was 4.4% when the democrats took over Congress, that's a 122% increase thanks to Obama and the democrat congress.

Still spouting those bad numbers I see. Didn't you learn last time?

The unemployment rate in February of 2009, Obama's first full month of office was 8.2%, not 7.4%.

That means that the unemployment rate grew 3.8% under Bush, and 1.8% under Obama, to the 10% high it reached a few months ago, and has now shrunk to 9.7%, or 1.5% higher than Feb 2009.

Thus the growth under Bush was more than twice as much as the growth under Obama.

But hey if you want to pick a random point in time, and start from there, and then blame it on Obama, why not go back to 2007? Then you can say that Obama is responsible for a 250% increase in Unemployment!

Perhaps a better number to use would be the total number of Americans that are out of work. That would probably rise to around 16-18% of people out of work.....which would be the real number. I think that is the number to be used with each administration, no?

Which would give us a similar ratio.

But more importantly, as for CMike's other point: that all of the unemployment was due to a Democratic congress, is also a load of crap, as that congress did not pass any significant legislation that affected the economy in any way.

Anything they tried to pass could not get past the veto, and half their spending was blocked by line-item veto anyway. So the unemployment prior to Obama firmly belongs to Bush and the Republicans.

 

[Vast LWC]

Of course, I personally believe that the President or Congress' actions of the last few years would not have affected anything one way or the other unless they repealed the 1999 and 2000 deregulation legislations.

But really, there's only so much the government can do to spur growth, whether it was Bush or Obama or whoever.

It's not like they can force employers to hire, now can they?

I was just pointing out the gaping holes in the other poster's argument.

 

[Titanic Sailor]

Fred Flintstone for President, VP Barney Rubble. The girls, Wilma and Betty, run the world behind the scenes.

I'm down with that.

Bam Bam lumps up the 20 percenters.

 

[Vast LWC]

Fred Flintstone for President, VP Barney Rubble. The girls, Wilma and Betty, run the world behind the scenes.

I'm down with that.

Bam Bam lumps up the 20 percenters.

Wilma and Betty are obviously Liberals.

 

[Maple]

One problem.....

Have you seen the stiffs the GOP has available to run against him?
Have you seen the economy in the last year?

Obama landslide in 2012

Keep on drinking that coolaid Rightwinger. 8 out of 10 people don't think this government can turn things around and solve the country's problems, that's a definite vote of NO CONFIDENCE in the Obama administration. They will hardly support him in 2 years. Pretty soon we are going to start the " Misery index," like the one Jimmy Carter had going at the end of his first and only term.

 

[MaggieMae]

Sewer Worker Winger

The unemployment rate was 7.4% Dec 2009, the month before Barak Hussein took over, it's now 9.7%, that's a 32% increase since Obama took over

It was 4.4% when the democrats took over Congress, that's a 122% increase thanks to Obama and the democrat congress.

Still spouting those bad numbers I see. Didn't you learn last time?

The unemployment rate in February of 2009, Obama's first full month of office was 8.2%, not 7.4%.

That means that the unemployment rate grew 3.8% under Bush, and 1.8% under Obama, to the 10% high it reached a few months ago, and has now shrunk to 9.7%, or 1.5% higher than Feb 2009.

Thus the growth under Bush was more than twice as much as the growth under Obama.

But hey if you want to pick a random point in time, and start from there, and then blame it on Obama, why not go back to 2007? Then you can say that Obama is responsible for a 250% increase in Unemployment!

Perhaps a better number to use would be the total number of Americans that are out of work. That would probably rise to around 16-18% of people out of work.....which would be the real number. I think that is the number to be used with each administration, no?

Of course there's always another way to look at the numbers: About 90% are employed.

 

[MaggieMae]

Fred Flintstone for President, VP Barney Rubble. The girls, Wilma and Betty, run the world behind the scenes.

I'm down with that.

Bam Bam lumps up the 20 percenters.

Those are all old white folk. Really old.

 

[boedicca]

Of course there's always another way to look at the numbers: About 90% are employed.

That's not true. The U3 measure of unemployment (the 9.7%) excludes people who have taken much lower paying part time jobs for subsistence, and those who have given up looking for work. The U6 version provides a more accurate picture; it is currently around 17%.

And I doubt the 15M+ who are counted in the official Unemployed figures (44% of whom have been out of work longer than 6 months) take much comfort in the fact that not everyone is suffering as much as they are.

 

[MaggieMae]

One problem.....

Have you seen the stiffs the GOP has available to run against him?
Have you seen the economy in the last year?

Obama landslide in 2012

Keep on drinking that coolaid Rightwinger. 8 out of 10 people don't think this government can turn things around and solve the country's problems, that's a definite vote of NO CONFIDENCE in the Obama administration. They will hardly support him in 2 years. Pretty soon we are going to start the " Misery index," like the one Jimmy Carter had going at the end of his first and only term.

Eight out of ten? Where do you get those numbers?

Obama: Job Ratings

Scroll down three results here and you'll see even Fox polls are favorable:
Obama: Favorability

 

[SuMar]

One problem.....

Have you seen the stiffs the GOP has available to run against him?
Have you seen the economy in the last year?

Obama landslide in 2012

Too damn funny....Obama will be lucky to finish one term.

 

[MaggieMae]

Of course there's always another way to look at the numbers: About 90% are employed.

That's not true. The U3 measure of unemployment (the 9.7%) excludes people who have taken much lower paying part time jobs for subsistence, and those who have given up looking for work. The U6 version provides a more accurate picture; it is currently around 17%.

And I doubt the 15M+ who are counted in the official Unemployed figures (44% of whom have been out of work longer than 6 months) take much comfort in the fact that not everyone is suffering as much as they are.

I really wasn't trying to be technical there--just giving a half-empty/half-full point of view.

 

[rightwinger]

One problem.....

Have you seen the stiffs the GOP has available to run against him?
Have you seen the economy in the last year?

Obama landslide in 2012

Too damn funny....Obama will be lucky to finish one term.

Name names...

Give me one Republican who is capable of defeating Obama

 

[CMike]

Sarah Palin.

Name on person that isn't capable of defeating Barak Hussein who has led this country to economic disaster?

 

[CMike]

FOXNews.com - Politics

Direction of Country

Right Direction
36.6%


Wrong Track
58.0%