Obama can't be prosecuted. You can thank Trump for that.

[buckeye]

I wasn’t aware that they were obligated to accept the assessment by the lower level analysts.

Link me to where you prove that those were all lower level analysts from the first ICA.

 

[buckeye]

You’re avoiding answering my questions.

No, goofy, I answered your question. You're just too lazy to know the answer. It's right there in my post that you replied to.

 

[buckeye]

I say they fold like a cheap suit in order to avoid prison.

It will certainly be interesting. I hope their trials are televised.

 

[Marener]

It was a “crime” in search of a victim. In fact, the bank wanted to testify on Trump’s behalf and was eager to do another deal with him.

Doesn’t change the fact that Trump lied on the documents.

The amount is meaningless. That ***** Letitica had some gall to charge Trump with fraud when she HERSELF did it.

I don’t know. Is stealing candy bar the same as stealing a Mercedes? Doesn’t seem like it.

They both lied. Trump lies a lot. Some of those lies are crimes. If we kept digging, we’d find more lies that could be prosecuted.

Flail more. Obama and crew fabricated a story that Trump collided with a foreign adversary in order to undermine his presidency and get him impeached. Shame on him - and on you for defending it while you simultaneously scream about an expired misdemeanor.

You’re such a hypocrite.

Yet again, I have to remind you that the ICA being discussed didn’t say anything about collusion.

If he got impeached, it still wouldn’t be a coup since that’s the exact process that the constitution includes to get rid of a president. Jesus, you guys don’t think before you post. An impeachment cannot be considered a coup. Coups are illegal. Impeachments are not.

 

[Marener]

No, goofy, I answered your question. You're just too lazy to know the answer. It's right there in my post that you replied to.

You said to read the report. All im asking is if those emails are in the report.

It’s a simple question. You should be able to answer it with a yes or a no.

 

[Marener]

Link me to where you prove that those were all lower level analysts from the first ICA.

Brennan overruled them, correct? Seeing as how Brennan was the director of the CIA, they would be beneath him.

This isn’t complicated.

 

[Lisa558]

Doesn’t change the fact that Trump lied on the documents.

I don’t know. Is stealing candy bar the same as stealing a Mercedes? Doesn’t seem like it.

They both lied. Trump lies a lot. Some of those lies are crimes. If we kept digging, we’d find more lies that could be prosecuted.

Yet again, I have to remind you that the ICA being discussed didn’t say anything about collusion.

If he got impeached, it still wouldn’t be a coup since that’s the exact process that the constitution includes to get rid of a president. Jesus, you guys don’t think before you post. An impeachment cannot be considered a coup. Coups are illegal. Impeachments are not.

So you’re actually trying to say if Obama and Hillary concocted a scheme to falsely paint Trump as a traitor, using falsified information, with the goal that Congress would fall for the hoax and oust him - THAT wouldn’t have been a coup?! Undoing the votes of millions of Americans?

OMG. You are doing a lot of pretzel-twisting and deflection to defend what Obama was part of. I always knew he was a nasty guy who hated America, but this is a historic low.

And THAT is what you defend?

 

[buckeye]

No, it didn’t “disagree”. The analysts didn’t believe it had sufficient backing. They didn’t have analysis to the contrary.

Speaking out of your ass again, I see. Link this.

You NEVER link anything you say and you speak continually out of your ass.

You’re still ignoring the fact that further investigation confirmed the assessment.

Yet we have the House report which doesn't. So you're wrong again.

Remember back then Trump was saying Russia was totally innocent and didn’t have anything to do with the DNC hacking.

We don't know that Russia hacked the DNC emails. We know they ended up with WikiLeaks and Russia may have gotten them through them. They're not talking.

WikiLeaks is the middle guy here, not Russia.

 

[Captain Caveman]

This thread doesn't discuss how horrible you might think Obama is, or if he is guilty of treason. None of those thing matter. The SC granted trump, and all presidents immunity from prosecution for anything that can remotely be tied to his powers as president. Can you think of a legal reason why trump was able to walk, but Obama should be charged?
If so, now is the time to educate us all. I look forward to your reasoned legal opinion.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

As you know, the SCOTUS ruled that the president has immunity for his actions that fell within the core of his official duties. My understanding was, the argument with Trump was, is writing a cheque for hush money a presidential duty.

So what Obama has done, are those the official duties of a president?

And as I've been damn busy lately, I've not read up on this debacle stuff yet.

 

[Marener]

It will certainly be interesting. I hope their trials are televised.

And what do you think they’re going to be charged with?

 

[Lisa558]

As you know, the SCOTUS ruled that the president has immunity for his actions that fell within the core of his official duties.

His official duties do not include creating a hoax to paint his opponent as a traitor.

 

[Marener]

So you’re actually trying to say if Obama and Hillary concocted a scheme to falsely paint Trump as a traitor, using falsified information, with the goal that Congress would fall for the hoax and oust him - THAT wouldn’t have been a coup?! Undoing the votes of millions of Americans?

OMG. You are doing a lot of pretzel-twisting and deflection to defend what Obama was part of. I always knew he was a nasty guy who hated America, but this is a historic low.

And THAT is what you defend?

They didn’t paint Trump as a traitor. Don’t be hysterical. It is just so totally outlandish to think that there was a plan to get Trump impeached, knowing it would take a large portion of the Republican caucus to vote for it.

Once again, impeachment is a constitutional process. It is not a coup.

This is so ******* stupid.

 

[Marener]

So you’re actually trying to say if Obama and Hillary concocted a scheme to falsely paint Trump as a traitor, using falsified information, with the goal that Congress would fall for the hoax and oust him - THAT wouldn’t have been a coup?! Undoing the votes of millions of Americans?

OMG. You are doing a lot of pretzel-twisting and deflection to defend what Obama was part of. I always knew he was a nasty guy who hated America, but this is a historic low.

And THAT is what you defend?

They didn’t paint Trump as a traitor. Don’t be hysterical. It is just so totally outlandish to think that there was a plan to get Trump impeached, knowing it would take a large portion of the Republican caucus to vote for it.

Once again, impeachment is a constitutional process. It is not a coup.

This is so ******* stupid.

 

[Captain Caveman]

His official duties do not include creating a hoax to paint his opponent as a traitor.

The Left fell Obama's fine words, everyone else knew and could smell all of his bullshit.

Caught up on the story -

Gabbard says declassified report 'exposes' Obama administration - BBC News

Democrats say the White House is trying to distract from its decision not to publish files relating to Jeffrey Epstein.

www.bbc.co.uk

 

[buckeye]

You should be able to answer it with a yes or a no.

Of course the emails are in there, goofball. And a whole lot more that you won't want to know but should.

You're spoon fed, it's pretty obvious. And until your next feeding, you won't know what to think.

 

[Marener]

Speaking out of your ass again, I see. Link this.

You NEVER link anything you say and you speak continually out of your ass.

We’ve known about the disagreement for years.

Brennan Overruled CIA Officers Skeptical of Russia Effort to Boost Trump in 2016 Election | National Review

Yet we have the House report which doesn't. So you're wrong again.

The house report was authored solely by Republicans with incentive to cover for Trump. Mueller doesn’t. The Senate report was unanimous and bipartisan.

So basically you just believe the partisan hacks.

We don't know that Russia hacked the DNC emails. We know they ended up with WikiLeaks and Russia may have gotten them through them. They're not talking.

WikiLeaks is the middle guy here, not Russia.

The **** we don’t. Mueller investigated and had extensive evidence they did it. How do you not know this?

 

[Marener]

Of course the emails are in there, goofball. And a whole lot more that you won't want to know but should.

You're spoon fed, it's pretty obvious. And until your next feeding, you won't know what to think.

https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/DIG/DIG-Declassified-HPSCI-Report-Manufactured-Russia-Hoax-July2025.pdf

There’s no emails in here. Do you have a different report?

 

[Marener]

His official duties do not include creating a hoax to paint his opponent as a traitor.

Trump claimed it was his official duty to create a hoax that the 2020 election was corrupt.

Stating that the Russians wanted to help Trump doesn’t paint Trump as a traitor. He did that when he asked Russia to hack Clinton’s emails.

 

[buckeye]

Brennan overruled them, correct? Seeing as how Brennan was the director of the CIA, they would be beneath him.

Ah, so Brennan, because he was the head, overruled his own and the other agencies' analysts' collective opinions they had made after an extensive investigation because he ........what? was smarter than all of them? Knew better? Had Obama breathing down his neck? Hated Trump and didn't care about the truth?

Why did Brennan throw their investigated conclusions out the window?

 

[scruffy]

They didn’t paint Trump as a traitor.

Russia Russia Russia.

All a hoax.

Don’t be hysterical. It is just so totally outlandish to think that there was a plan to get Trump impeached, knowing it would take a large portion of the Republican caucus to vote for it.

People like Liz Cheney would vote for it in a heartbeat.

Once again, impeachment is a constitutional process. It is not a coup.

Impeachment is not the issue, dumbass.

This is so ******* stupid.

Oh, do you think it's stupid when the Director of National Intelligence lies under oath to the Congress.

Figures. That's the way low life leftards roll.