Obama can't be prosecuted. You can thank Trump for that.

[buckeye]

And what do you think they’re going to be charged with?

I'm not an attorney. But so much of what they did is clearly illegal. Perjury would be a good start.

 

[yidnar]

This thread doesn't discuss how horrible you might think Obama is, or if he is guilty of treason. None of those thing matter. The SC granted trump, and all presidents immunity from prosecution for anything that can remotely be tied to his powers as president. Can you think of a legal reason why trump was able to walk, but Obama should be charged?
If so, now is the time to educate us all. I look forward to your reasoned legal opinion.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

notice the dem isn't claiming Obama is innocent .. he's claiming Obama cant be prosecuted because the SC granted the POTUS immunity for official actions [as if tampering with Intel to frame an incoming POTUS is an official act} .. we all know Obama wont be prosecuted even if he weren't immune .. we on the right know there is no way the left would be peaceful if Obama were to be indicted like Trump was during the lefts lawfare .. the left claims the right is a threat to democracy even though there was no mass violence from the right when the left tried to imprison the candidate that nearly 80 million people voted for .. we also know that if Obama was indicted the left would go absolutely ape shit and physically tear down half of the country ! for national security reasons Obama will not be indicted , because if he were the ensuing mass violence from the left would make the 2020 summer of love look like a REAL summer of love ! but whatever happens Obamas legacy will be remembered as the most vile corrupt admin in US history ..

 

[buckeye]

It is just so totally outlandish to think that there was a plan to get Trump impeached, knowing it would take a large portion of the Republican caucus to vote for it.

Oh please, democrats love a spectacle. The results were never important.

Never forget,,,,your party is fake, fake, fake. Set up a straw man (Russia loves Trump), beat him to death (Mueller investigation and Impeachment I) and then go away,

The damage has been done.

 

[Marener]

The results were never important.

It’s pretty important if you’re going to be so delusional as to claim it’s part or a coup.

 

[buckeye]

We’ve known about the disagreement for years.

Brennan Overruled CIA Officers Skeptical of Russia Effort to Boost Trump in 2016 Election | National Review

LOL. This is from Brennan, who we know shelved the original ICA and conjured up a new one to make trump look bad.

Here's a hint. Never link the liar when you're trying to prove something is true.

Try again. And use a link from an independent source, not the actual liar, if you even know what that is.

 

[BULLDOG]

notice the dem isn't claiming Obama is innocent .. he's claiming Obama cant be prosecuted because the SC granted POTUS immunity for official actions .. we all know Obama wont be prosecuted ! even if he weren't immune .. we on the right know there is no way the left would be peaceful if Obama were to be indicated like Trump was during the lefts lawfare .. the left claims the right is a threat to democracy even though there was no mass violence from the right when the left tried to imprison the candidate that nearly 80 million people voted for .. we also know that if Obama was indicted the left would go absolutely ape shit and physically tear down half of the country ! for national security reasons Obama will not be indicted , because if he were the ensuing mass violence from the left would make the 2020 summer of love look like a REAL summer of love !

No. I'm saying the Supreme Court made it immaterial if he did anything wrong. He' immune anyway.

 

[Marener]

LOL. This is from Brennan, who we know shelved the original ICA and conjured up a new one to make trump look bad.

Here's a hint. Never link the liar when you're trying to prove something is true.

Try again. And use a link from an independent source, not the actual liar, if you even know what that is.

None of your sources are independent!

 

[buckeye]

The house report was authored solely by Republicans with incentive to cover for Trump.

again, please post like an adult. Link this and stop pulling shit from your ass.

 

[yidnar]

No. I'm saying the Supreme Court made it immaterial if he did anything wrong. He' immune anyway.

ohy he did it commie ! ..and you don't care ! says a lot about you and your party ..

 

[Marener]

I'm not an attorney. But so much of what they did is clearly illegal. Perjury would be a good start.

Okay. When did anyone commit perjury?

You’re mistaking “clearly illegal” for “Trump doesn’t like what you say”. That’s happening a lot these days.

 

[Marener]

again, please post like an adult. Link this and stop pulling shit from your ass.

You don’t know what you’re going off of?

That’s the entire basis of Gabbard’s claim. It’s the document she “declassified”.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/23/us/politics/trump-russia-obama-gabbard.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

 

[buckeye]

Mueller investigated and had extensive evidence they did it. How do you not know this?

Because it was never proven, there's a whole lot of contradictory opinion and Mueller seemed like a partisan hack on the verge of dementia to me. I think he was a democrat tool.

 

[Marener]

Because it was never proven, there's a whole lot of contradictory opinion and Mueller seemed like a partisan hack on the verge of dementia to me. I think he was a democrat tool.

It’ll never be proven if you’re so closed minded to ignore all evidence.

Mueller’s team did extensive forensics and identified how the files were extracted and to where.

There’s never been any credible evidence to the contrary even after Fox News tried to hype the Seth Rich hoax.

 

[buckeye]

Do you have a different report?

Democrats always need their hands held.

Page 16, 17, 18, etc.

 

[Marener]

Ah, so Brennan, because he was the head, overruled his own and the other agencies' analysts' collective opinions they had made after an extensive investigation because he ........what? was smarter than all of them? Knew better? Had Obama breathing down his neck? Hated Trump and didn't care about the truth?

Why did Brennan throw their investigated conclusions out the window?

Ratcliffe ordered a review of the assessment after the fact and the assessment found that the conclusion should have been moderate and not high confidence.

That’s the scandal.

Retconning ‘Russiagate’

The CIA director encourages the rewriting of history.

www.lawfaremedia.org

 

[eagle1462010]

At some point, you people need to grow up and evolve. That doesn't mean you have to change your views, but if you can't function at a higher intellectual/behavioral level you put the rest of us at risk.

Not that you care about that, but it sure would be nice.

Calm down.

So if we speak our mind we put you at risk.

Hmmmm

Let me decode that. You want us to agree with you or else.

 

[DonGlock26]

This thread doesn't discuss how horrible you might think Obama is, or if he is guilty of treason. None of those thing matter. The SC granted trump, and all presidents immunity from prosecution for anything that can remotely be tied to his powers as president. Can you think of a legal reason why trump was able to walk, but Obama should be charged?
If so, now is the time to educate us all. I look forward to your reasoned legal opinion.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

We'll see what the SCOTUS thinks of all of Obama's crimes.

 

[buckeye]

It’s pretty important if you’re going to be so delusional as to claim it’s part or a coup.

Only to those desperately trying to push a false narrative after the fact.

And what does it matter after it resulted in tying up a country for 2 years and beating down a newly elected POTUS?

It also lead to Impeachment I. You're delusional that it didn't matter.

 

[Marener]

Democrats always need their hands held.

Page 16, 17, 18, etc.

There’s no emails published on those pages.

All this just to avoid admitting you lied this whole time about having seen the emails.

 

[buckeye]

That’s the entire basis of Gabbard’s claim. It’s the document she “declassified”.

That committee was headed by notorious liar, Adam Schiff. Enough said.

You want to say you don't trust the results, say it. But you haven't even read it and know next to nothing about it.