Obama can't be prosecuted. You can thank Trump for that.

[ThisIsMe]

Sure it is. Anything related to presidential action is immune

Thats not what they said

 

[Marener]

Oh, is THAT the standard now? It's not really an attempt to overthrow the government if you don't have guns and stuff?

I think we all know where I'm going with this.

Did anyone try to remove Trump from office illegally?

 

[Marener]

Thats not what they said

Then what did they say exactly.

 

[Mac-7]

There was no attempt to remove Trump from office.

thats what the the impeachments were for

What obama wanted to do was lay the groundwork for a guilty verdict in the senate

 

[AntonToo]

This all centers on Obama trying to get Hillary elected.

Obama was trying to get Hillary elected by keeping hush-hush about a criminal investigation of Trump's campaign until AFTER election?

Even on the very surface none of this silly garbage adds up.

 

[progressive hunter]

Then what did they say exactly.

youre a sad pathetic ignorant fool,,

they depend on your ignorance,, thats why they call you useful idiots,,

 

[Chuz Life]

Naw, it's a nothingburger.
MAGAts are only trying to distract from Trump's Epstein cover up.

Can you explain why Brandon and Kumswaller Harris gave Trump a 4 year head start and assist on this coverup?

 

[Mac-7]

Marener

I have been too easy on you so far by letting you get away with the false claim of no insurrection

According to the definition insurrection was exactly what took place

insurrection /ĭn″sə-rĕk′shən/

noun​

1. The act or an instance of open revolt against civil authority or a constituted government.
2. A rising against civil or political authority, or the established government; open and active opposition to the execution of law in a city or state.
3. A rising in mass to oppose an enemy.

The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition • More at Wordnik

 

[AntonToo]

Evidence is already out.

Yes and that evidence shows that Gabbard is full of shit

CLAIM: “The intelligence community had one assessment: that Russia did not have the intent and capability to try to impact the outcome of the U.S. election leading up to Election Day. The same assessment was made after the election.” — Gabbard to Fox News on Tuesday.

The documents Gabbard released do not support her claim. She cites a handful of emails from 2016 in which officials conclude Russia had no intention of manipulating the U.S. vote count through cyberattacks on voting systems.

President Barack Obama's administration never alleged voting infrastructure was tampered with. Rather, officials have said, Russian operatives hacked emails of prominent Democrats that were subsequently released through WikiLeaks and launched a covert social media campaign to sow discord and inflame U.S. public opinion. More than two dozen Russians were indicted in 2018 in connection with those efforts.

 

[BlindBoo]

Dude, did you not read Mueller's report?

Mueller “did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”

Dude do you understand the difference between "collusion" and "criminal conspiracy"?

 

[mudwhistle]

Despite what your echo chamber may tell you, accusations aren't evidence. Especially with MAGA, as they lie and manufacture fake evidence like they breath.

Remember Trump's laughable 'photo' of MS-13 tattoos on Garcia's knuckles that he presented to the press? And NEVER presented as evidence to the court?

Remember Trump's insistence of a fraudulent election he presented to the press? And in court, his lawyers insisted at they weren't claiming any fraud had ever occurred?

Remember Trump's insistence about Obama's birth certificate being faked, with 'investigators in Hawaii turning up evidence'? Investigators that didn't exist, evidence Trump didn't have?

But this time its different, huh? Laughing....nope. If they had the 'irrefutable proof' that Trump claimed they had, they would have presented it. Instead, all they presented were their accusations.

As MAGA does.

All to distract MAGA mouth-breathers from the Trump admin's suppression of evidence of the rape of children and child sex trafficking.......to protect Donald Trump.




Laughing...what evidence?

Show me. Don't tell me.

I have a better idea....pay attention to the case as it progresses....the DOJ has announced the creation of a strike force to investigate the Russian Collusion hoax ordered by Obama before leaving office.

 

[hadit]

Its just silly. They are quite literally arguing that spreading a rumor about a president is an attempted coup.

Which begs the question, was Trump attempting to overthrow the government with the birther conspiracy?

I mean, if we're going to follow meaningless pseudo-legal gibberish, at least lets be consistent.

The standard is raised when the false rumor results in the victim being subjected to a years long, multi-million-dollar harassment by a prosecutor with virtually unlimited time and budget. Hillary's birther conspiracy never rose to the level.

 

[Marener]

thats what the the impeachments were for

What obama wanted to do was lay the groundwork for a guilty verdict in the senate

So now the coup is actually the constitutional means by which the president can be removed from office.

Jesus, this gets more and more stupid.

 

[Redfish]

If we didn't jail ex-presidents, Nixon would never have resigned, and Ford would never have pardoned him.

which ex-president was jailed? when did it happen? Nixon resigned because he would have been impeached, Ford pardoned him to save the country from an impeachment fiasco.

 

[hadit]

Did anyone try to remove Trump from office illegally?

Which has nothing to do with the standard, that overthrowing the government requires guns and stuff. Without those, you're not really trying to do it, at least that's what you said. Are you backing away from that now?

 

[Mac-7]

So now the coup is actually the constitutional means by which the president can be removed from office.

Jesus, this gets more and more stupid.

Using conspiracy and lies

 

[RetiredGySgt]

yes by lying to get an impeachment with no actual prroof on any of the claims, Shiff

Did anyone try to remove Trump from office illegally?

claimed he had proof but never once showed it.

 

[mudwhistle]

Nope. Its confirmed in the video, for anyone to watch. And its confirmed by Reuters, word for word, for anyone to see.

View attachment 1140322

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-accuses-obama-treason-escalating-attacks-over-2016-russia-probe-2025-07-23/

You're really not doing your case any good here. As every time you deny what anyone can verify, you demonstrate you're simply too indoctrinated to be taken seriously.

Trump himself described Gabbard catching Obama as a witch hunt. Which was quite the Freudian slip.

Every time you ignore it, I win.

You're gonna need a better distraction than this pseudo-legal gibberish for people to stop talking about Trump and Epstein.

James Clapper has lawyered-up.

The only protections they're counting on is Judge Boesberg who was involved in the original FISA application to give search warrants to the FBI to spy on Trump staffers.
He's the judge that ordered Trump to turn planes around in mid-air that were flying illegal criminals to El Salvador.
Judge Boesberg is the guy standing in the way of justice being served on Obama and his co-conspirators.

 

[Mac-7]

yes by lying to get an impeachment with no actual prroof on any of the claims, Shiff

No evidence is needed for an impeachment

Its all political theater and if the president’s party in the Senate is in total retreat they will vote guilty without irrefutable proof

 

[Independent thinker]

Yes and that evidence shows that Gabbard is full of shit

CLAIM: “The intelligence community had one assessment: that Russia did not have the intent and capability to try to impact the outcome of the U.S. election leading up to Election Day. The same assessment was made after the election.” — Gabbard to Fox News on Tuesday.

The documents Gabbard released do not support her claim. She cites a handful of emails from 2016 in which officials conclude Russia had no intention of manipulating the U.S. vote count through cyberattacks on voting systems.

President Barack Obama's administration never alleged voting infrastructure was tampered with. Rather, officials have said, Russian operatives hacked emails of prominent Democrats that were subsequently released through WikiLeaks and launched a covert social media campaign to sow discord and inflame U.S. public opinion. More than two dozen Russians were indicted in 2018 in connection with those efforts.

The evidence is the evidence. It doesen't really matter if Gabbard is full of shit or not.