Obama can't be prosecuted. You can thank Trump for that.

I have a better idea....pay attention to the case as it progresses....the DOJ has announced the creation of a strike force to investigate the Russian Collusion hoax ordered by Obama before leaving office.

Ah, so you're going to do what so many of the others did when I pressed them for actual evidence of any crime by Obama. You're going to lean into imaginary FUTURE evidence that you don't have, you can't establish exists or ever existed, that you can't tell me about, can't factually establish, or produce in away, but that shows you were write all along.

Um, somehow.

So much for Trump's "irrefutable proof", eh?
 
Dude do you understand the difference between "collusion" and "criminal conspiracy"?
Dude, read much?

Mueller did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”
 
Naw, it's a nothingburger.
MAGAts are only trying to distract from Trump's Epstein cover up.
I want to know who raped those girls in Epstein's operation and I want them to rot in jail or worse, for their part in it.

That said, help us understand why Brandon and Kumswallower didn't release any evidence (against Trump or anyone else) associated with Epstein, when they had 4 YEARS to do so?

What is stopping them from dropping names? Even now?
 
Last edited:
Dude, read much?

Mueller did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”

That's not the Mueller report either. So "who" are you "quoting" with these "quotation" marks?
 
Ah, so you're going to do what so many of the others did when I pressed them for actual evidence of any crime by Obama. You're going to lean into imaginary FUTURE evidence that you don't have, you can't establish exists or ever existed, that you can't tell me about, can't factually establish, or produce in away, but that shows you were write all along.

Um, somehow.

So much for Trump's "irrefutable proof", eh?
My suggestion to you is STFU.

Ask yourself why the DNI or the DOJ would provide evidence to me personally.

Not only is that information need to know, but I no longer work for the DOD or the Army Department.

I am retired after over 35 years of federal service and have been out of the loop for roughly 5 years.

Try selling your bogus BS to someone who's stupid enough to buy it.
 
I want to know who raped those girls in Epstein's operation and I want them to rot in jail or worse, for their part in it.
I do too. To be honest, the Epstein files were kinda off my radar after he died. But the political capital that Trump is burning right now to keep this evidence supressed, and the political damage Trump is willing to endure in the effort has me thinking that the release of those files would cause him more damage than he's already taken.

I'm party agnostic when it comes to people who **** minors. So if that means some democrats or famous people get swept up in this, **** em.
 
Dude, read much?

Mueller did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”
There was plenty of collusion between the two parties that Mueller's team found to investigate. It's all in the report.
 
Dude do you understand the difference between "collusion" and "criminal conspiracy"?
For purposes of the Mueller investigation, they used it interchangably


COLLINS:

Yes. Thank you. Although your reports states, "collusion is not some (ph) specific offense," -- and you said that this morning -- "or a term of art in federal criminal laws, conspiracy is." In the colloquial context, are collusion and conspiracy essentially synonymous terms?
MUELLER:

You're going to have to repeat that for me.
COLLINS:

Collusion is not a specific offense or a term of art in the federal criminal law. Conspiracy is.
MUELLER:

Yes.
 
The grand jury files from florida are not the entirety of the Epstein files. And its the DOJ that is refusing to release the Epstein Files. Bondi already confirmed that she had them.

And now Trump's story on the Epstein files changes almost daily. And this after MAGA ran on the release of the files.

And then refused to, suppressing them instead.
You don't no if it is the entirety of the files or not your making stuff up
 
My suggestion to you is STFU.

Ask yourself why the DNI or the DOJ would provide evidence to me personally.

Not only is that information need to know, but I no longer work for the DOD or the Army Department.

I am retired after over 35 years of federal service and have been out of the loop for roughly 5 years.

Try selling your bogus BS to someone who's stupid enough to buy it.
Or release that imaginary evidence to anyone. Wasn't the mantra 'accountability and transparency'. And now your argument has devolved into why you have jackshit to back up any of Trump's claims about Obama.

Maybe the 'irrefutable proof' is sitting next to the Epstein List that Bondi insists doesn't exist? Or beside that imaginary MS-13 tattoo on Garcia's knuckles?

Oh, wait. Its sitting next to what Trump's investigators in Hawaii found about Obama's birth certificate!

Or perhaps its sitting on top of Trump's replacement for Obamacare?

Laughing...all I need to do is believe hard enough! Its like Tinkerbell rules.
 
There was plenty of collusion between the two parties that Mueller's team found to investigate. It's all in the report.
Got it. There was also a lots of carousing and commingling and connections and perhaps cunnilingus. Yer point?
 
Nor does coup, or sedition, or any other mouthbreathing pseudo-legal dipshittery that comes tumbling out of that moron's puckered hole.

This is just more theater for idiots. Nothing Bondi presented in any way backs up the shiny, 'for the love of GOD, please stop talking about Epstein!' gibberish that Trump offered. With the USSC immunity just frosting on this layer cake of fail.
This post reeks of FEAR.
 
15th post
Or release that imaginary evidence to anyone. Wasn't the mantra 'accountability and transparency'. And now your argument has devolved into why you have jackshit to back up any of Trump's claims about Obama.

Maybe the 'irrefutable proof' is sitting next to the Epstein List that Bondi insists doesn't exist? Or beside that imaginary MS-13 tattoo on Garcia's knuckles?

Oh, wait. Its sitting next to what Trump's investigators in Hawaii found about Obama's birth certificate!

Or perhaps its sitting on top of Trump's replacement for Obamacare?

Laughing...all I need to do is believe hard enough! Its like Tinkerbell rules.
Here you go, read up on the evidence that's been released

 
I do too. To be honest, the Epstein files were kinda off my radar after he died. But the political capital that Trump is burning right now to keep this evidence supressed, and the political damage Trump is willing to endure in the effort has me thinking that the release of those files would cause him more damage than he's already taken.

I'm party agnostic when it comes to people who **** minors. So if that means some democrats or famous people get swept up in this, **** em.
So I ask again. Why do you suppose Brandon and Kumswaller did NOT release the details, if Trump is implicated?

They not only had 4 YEARS to do so, they could call the media and do it now.

They could post it on Social media, just like Trump does.
 
Last edited:
There was plenty of collusion between the two parties that Mueller's team found to investigate. It's all in the report.

Show me, don't tell me. Show Obama ordering his admin to 'help another candidate smear a candidate for president'.

Remember, Obama didn't order the IAC be fully reviewed until December 6th, 2016. And the IAC didn't come back until January 5th. So, um.....how could that have impacted the election?

Was a blue police box or a delorean involved? Because the election was in November.
Because Hilary was saying the election was rigged
 
Why do you need declassified documents to figure out what Obama told the public? That doesn’t make any sense.

Obama never said Trump colluded.
The files showing Obama made up Russian collusion to affect Trump's credibility and effectiveness of his presidency. Bondi declassified them.
 
Back
Top Bottom