Nunes Memo Prediction Thread

[jc456]

Very possible. They need a big distraction as their coup begins to unravel.

Wow. To be a trump supporter you've got to be a *real* conspiracy theorists. Secret Societies, coup attempts, deep states, international conspiracies, the works.

Who knew that the 'big tent' of the GOP was made of tin foil and filled to the brim with batshit.

You dickheads should have left well enough alone and not gone after Trump. Now your coup has failed and the treachery is being exposed. I wish I could see the look on "Faun"'s face when her world caves in on her and Barry the Fairy is being led out of his library (with the test-kitchen) in CHAINS....wait is that racist?? do I give a shit if it is??

And by 'coup', you mean the batshit ravings of your imagination you tell yourself to try and justify shutting down a *very* productive investigation into very serious crimes in the Trump team? 4 indictments and 2 guilty pleas don't bode well for your imagination.

Crimes in the Trump team are undeniable. As is the fact that those crimes are immediately related to Russia.

angry birds

 

[jc456]

i say nunes is possibly dirty.

this is a deflection & why is he privvy to anything russia related if he is recused from anything russia? unless this is all pure bullshit talking point memos MEANT to distract?

distract who from what?

 

[Skylar]

It quotes Try and saying that trump 'spoke hurriedly', and what he 'really intended' was something other than what he actually said; that he'd testify under oath.

We're being asked by Trump's own attorneies not to listen to Trump.

They've convinced me.

Nice try. Like I said, you're living on another planet. Got any more "interpretations" for us?

I'm living on this one. And all I have to do is quote Trump's own lawyer ....and my point is proven:

Donald Trump’s lawyer appeared to backtrack on the US President’s claim that he would be willing to be interviewed “under oath” by Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election.

Ty Cobb said Mr Trump “spoke hurriedly” and only intended to say that he would be willing to meet with special counsel.

Trump 'spoke hurriedly' when he vowed to be interviewed under oath by Robert Mueller, says White House lawyer
​

So Trump didn't mean he would testify under oath when he said he would testify under oath? He 'only intended to say' that he was willing to meet with special counsel?

If even Trump's lawyers are arguing that we shouldn't listen to Trump....why would I listen to Trump?​

Keep digging, this is entertaining.

I'll keep quoting. You keep pretending. We both win!

Donald Trump’s lawyer appeared to backtrack on the US President’s claim that he would be willing to be interviewed “under oath” by Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election.

Ty Cobb said Mr Trump “spoke hurriedly” and only intended to say that he would be willing to meet with special counsel.

Trump 'spoke hurriedly' when he vowed to be interviewed under oath by Robert Mueller, says White House lawyer

So much for Trump's promise to testify under oath.

You'll keep quoting something that was never said. That's what most people would call "pretending".

Laughing......oh, I'll gladly let the quote prove my point for me.

Donald Trump’s lawyer appeared to backtrack on the US President’s claim that he would be willing to be interviewed “under oath” by Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election.

Ty Cobb said Mr Trump “spoke hurriedly” and only intended to say that he would be willing to meet with special counsel.

Trump 'spoke hurriedly' when he vowed to be interviewed under oath by Robert Mueller, says White House lawyer

So much for Trump's promise to testify under oath!

 

[jc456]

You still make no sense. They said nothing of the kind, you're on another planet.

Donald Trump’s lawyer appeared to backtrack on the US President’s claim that he would be willing to be interviewed “under oath” by Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election.

Ty Cobb said Mr Trump “spoke hurriedly” and only intended to say that he would be willing to meet with special counsel.

Trump 'spoke hurriedly' when he vowed to be interviewed under oath by Robert Mueller, says White House lawyer

So Ty is arguing that we shouldn't listen to Trump when he said he'd be willing to be interviewed under oath.

I agree with Ty on one point: we shouldn't listen to Trump.

True. "Under oath" would be before a Grand Jury. Not under oath before Mueller and the feds would still represent a problem for Trump as lying to them is still illegal. Either way the worlds most prolific liar is going down. lol

Correct! No sworn under oath testimony is needed because lying to the FBI is
not just illegal, it's a felony! No oath required!

Trump doesn't even have to speak to Mueller because there is no evidence of any crimes committed by President Trump.
And there is no Evidence of Russian Collusion.

Mueller in the end most likely will just submit his questions in writing, and POTUS will reply in writing, and then Mueller will finally exhaust his witch hunt coming up empty.

Laughing....and the pathetic excuses for why Trump shouldn't have to testify under oath have already begun.

You just blinked.

well he doesn't have to you know this right?

 

[Skylar]

Very possible. They need a big distraction as their coup begins to unravel.

Wow. To be a trump supporter you've got to be a *real* conspiracy theorists. Secret Societies, coup attempts, deep states, international conspiracies, the works.

Who knew that the 'big tent' of the GOP was made of tin foil and filled to the brim with batshit.

You dickheads should have left well enough alone and not gone after Trump. Now your coup has failed and the treachery is being exposed. I wish I could see the look on "Faun"'s face when her world caves in on her and Barry the Fairy is being led out of his library (with the test-kitchen) in CHAINS....wait is that racist?? do I give a shit if it is??

And by 'coup', you mean the batshit ravings of your imagination you tell yourself to try and justify shutting down a *very* productive investigation into very serious crimes in the Trump team? 4 indictments and 2 guilty pleas don't bode well for your imagination.

Crimes in the Trump team are undeniable. As is the fact that those crimes are immediately related to Russia.

angry birds

Blue Hippo

 

[Skylar]

i say nunes is possibly dirty.

this is a deflection & why is he privvy to anything russia related if he is recused from anything russia? unless this is all pure bullshit talking point memos MEANT to distract?

We're expected to believe that its merely a coincidence that less than 48 hours after Bannon agreed to cooperate with Mueller......that a memo that 'justifies' the end of the investigation just magically appears.

But we're not allowed to look at it. We have to take their word on it.

 

[S.J.]

Nice try. Like I said, you're living on another planet. Got any more "interpretations" for us?

I'm living on this one. And all I have to do is quote Trump's own lawyer ....and my point is proven:

Donald Trump’s lawyer appeared to backtrack on the US President’s claim that he would be willing to be interviewed “under oath” by Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election.

Ty Cobb said Mr Trump “spoke hurriedly” and only intended to say that he would be willing to meet with special counsel.

Trump 'spoke hurriedly' when he vowed to be interviewed under oath by Robert Mueller, says White House lawyer
​

So Trump didn't mean he would testify under oath when he said he would testify under oath? He 'only intended to say' that he was willing to meet with special counsel?

If even Trump's lawyers are arguing that we shouldn't listen to Trump....why would I listen to Trump?​

Keep digging, this is entertaining.

I'll keep quoting. You keep pretending. We both win!

Donald Trump’s lawyer appeared to backtrack on the US President’s claim that he would be willing to be interviewed “under oath” by Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election.

Ty Cobb said Mr Trump “spoke hurriedly” and only intended to say that he would be willing to meet with special counsel.

Trump 'spoke hurriedly' when he vowed to be interviewed under oath by Robert Mueller, says White House lawyer

So much for Trump's promise to testify under oath.

You'll keep quoting something that was never said. That's what most people would call "pretending".

Laughing......oh, I'll gladly let the quote prove my point for me.

Donald Trump’s lawyer appeared to backtrack on the US President’s claim that he would be willing to be interviewed “under oath” by Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election.

Ty Cobb said Mr Trump “spoke hurriedly” and only intended to say that he would be willing to meet with special counsel.

Trump 'spoke hurriedly' when he vowed to be interviewed under oath by Robert Mueller, says White House lawyer

So much for Trump's promise to testify under oath!

So where does he say "Don't listen to Trump"? Oh wait. I know. It's your "interpretation". Is that what you're trying to say in all your eloquence?

 

[jc456]

Nice try. Like I said, you're living on another planet. Got any more "interpretations" for us?

I'm living on this one. And all I have to do is quote Trump's own lawyer ....and my point is proven:

Donald Trump’s lawyer appeared to backtrack on the US President’s claim that he would be willing to be interviewed “under oath” by Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election.

Ty Cobb said Mr Trump “spoke hurriedly” and only intended to say that he would be willing to meet with special counsel.

Trump 'spoke hurriedly' when he vowed to be interviewed under oath by Robert Mueller, says White House lawyer
​

So Trump didn't mean he would testify under oath when he said he would testify under oath? He 'only intended to say' that he was willing to meet with special counsel?

If even Trump's lawyers are arguing that we shouldn't listen to Trump....why would I listen to Trump?​

Keep digging, this is entertaining.

I'll keep quoting. You keep pretending. We both win!

Donald Trump’s lawyer appeared to backtrack on the US President’s claim that he would be willing to be interviewed “under oath” by Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election.

Ty Cobb said Mr Trump “spoke hurriedly” and only intended to say that he would be willing to meet with special counsel.

Trump 'spoke hurriedly' when he vowed to be interviewed under oath by Robert Mueller, says White House lawyer

So much for Trump's promise to testify under oath.

You'll keep quoting something that was never said. That's what most people would call "pretending".

Laughing......oh, I'll gladly let the quote prove my point for me.

Donald Trump’s lawyer appeared to backtrack on the US President’s claim that he would be willing to be interviewed “under oath” by Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election.

Ty Cobb said Mr Trump “spoke hurriedly” and only intended to say that he would be willing to meet with special counsel.

Trump 'spoke hurriedly' when he vowed to be interviewed under oath by Robert Mueller, says White House lawyer

So much for Trump's promise to testify under oath!

he doesn't have to. next?

 

[Skylar]

So Ty is arguing that we shouldn't listen to Trump when he said he'd be willing to be interviewed under oath.

I agree with Ty on one point: we shouldn't listen to Trump.

True. "Under oath" would be before a Grand Jury. Not under oath before Mueller and the feds would still represent a problem for Trump as lying to them is still illegal. Either way the worlds most prolific liar is going down. lol

Correct! No sworn under oath testimony is needed because lying to the FBI is
not just illegal, it's a felony! No oath required!

Trump doesn't even have to speak to Mueller because there is no evidence of any crimes committed by President Trump.
And there is no Evidence of Russian Collusion.

Mueller in the end most likely will just submit his questions in writing, and POTUS will reply in writing, and then Mueller will finally exhaust his witch hunt coming up empty.

Laughing....and the pathetic excuses for why Trump shouldn't have to testify under oath have already begun.

You just blinked.

I don't care if he testifies. I am just telling you what the usual standard is.

Oh, obviously. That's why you've spent 4 posts awkwardly trying to justify why Trump shouldn't have to testify.

Smiling....because you 'don't care'.

You blinked. So much for 'transparency' and 'cooperation'. But then we already knew they were full of shit on that one when the White House instructed Bannon to refuse to cooperate with the House intel committee.

The stink of cold animal fear is thick in the air.

 

[jc456]

True. "Under oath" would be before a Grand Jury. Not under oath before Mueller and the feds would still represent a problem for Trump as lying to them is still illegal. Either way the worlds most prolific liar is going down. lol

Correct! No sworn under oath testimony is needed because lying to the FBI is
not just illegal, it's a felony! No oath required!

Trump doesn't even have to speak to Mueller because there is no evidence of any crimes committed by President Trump.
And there is no Evidence of Russian Collusion.

Mueller in the end most likely will just submit his questions in writing, and POTUS will reply in writing, and then Mueller will finally exhaust his witch hunt coming up empty.

Laughing....and the pathetic excuses for why Trump shouldn't have to testify under oath have already begun.

You just blinked.

I don't care if he testifies. I am just telling you what the usual standard is.

Oh, obviously. That's why you've spent 4 posts awkwardly trying to justify why Trump shouldn't have to testify.

Smiling....because you 'don't care'.

You blinked. So much for 'transparency' and 'cooperation'. But then we already knew they were full of shit on that one when the White House instructed Bannon to refuse to cooperate with the House intel committee.

The stink of cold animal fear is thick in the air.

well he doesn't have to testify. a president doesn't have to ever give testimony. you know this right?

 

[Skylar]

Correct! No sworn under oath testimony is needed because lying to the FBI is
not just illegal, it's a felony! No oath required!

Trump doesn't even have to speak to Mueller because there is no evidence of any crimes committed by President Trump.
And there is no Evidence of Russian Collusion.

Mueller in the end most likely will just submit his questions in writing, and POTUS will reply in writing, and then Mueller will finally exhaust his witch hunt coming up empty.

Laughing....and the pathetic excuses for why Trump shouldn't have to testify under oath have already begun.

You just blinked.

I don't care if he testifies. I am just telling you what the usual standard is.

Oh, obviously. That's why you've spent 4 posts awkwardly trying to justify why Trump shouldn't have to testify.

Smiling....because you 'don't care'.

You blinked. So much for 'transparency' and 'cooperation'. But then we already knew they were full of shit on that one when the White House instructed Bannon to refuse to cooperate with the House intel committee.

The stink of cold animal fear is thick in the air.

well he doesn't have to testify. a president doesn't have to ever give testimony. you know this right?

Says who?

Smiling....you're citing yourself as a legal authority, aren't you JC?

 

[jc456]

Trump doesn't even have to speak to Mueller because there is no evidence of any crimes committed by President Trump.
And there is no Evidence of Russian Collusion.

Mueller in the end most likely will just submit his questions in writing, and POTUS will reply in writing, and then Mueller will finally exhaust his witch hunt coming up empty.

Laughing....and the pathetic excuses for why Trump shouldn't have to testify under oath have already begun.

You just blinked.

I don't care if he testifies. I am just telling you what the usual standard is.

Oh, obviously. That's why you've spent 4 posts awkwardly trying to justify why Trump shouldn't have to testify.

Smiling....because you 'don't care'.

You blinked. So much for 'transparency' and 'cooperation'. But then we already knew they were full of shit on that one when the White House instructed Bannon to refuse to cooperate with the House intel committee.

The stink of cold animal fear is thick in the air.

well he doesn't have to testify. a president doesn't have to ever give testimony. you know this right?

Says who?

Smiling....you're citing yourself as a legal authority, aren't you JC?

it's just a fact. don't need to be a legal expert to know this. you should really educate yourself.

 

[Skylar]

Laughing....and the pathetic excuses for why Trump shouldn't have to testify under oath have already begun.

You just blinked.

I don't care if he testifies. I am just telling you what the usual standard is.

Oh, obviously. That's why you've spent 4 posts awkwardly trying to justify why Trump shouldn't have to testify.

Smiling....because you 'don't care'.

You blinked. So much for 'transparency' and 'cooperation'. But then we already knew they were full of shit on that one when the White House instructed Bannon to refuse to cooperate with the House intel committee.

The stink of cold animal fear is thick in the air.

well he doesn't have to testify. a president doesn't have to ever give testimony. you know this right?

Says who?

Smiling....you're citing yourself as a legal authority, aren't you JC?

it's just a fact. don't need to be a legal expert to know this. you should really educate yourself.

Then it will be remarkably easy to prove if its a fact. Prove that a president never has to testify.

If I can show you *any* example of a sitting president being obligated to testify under oath.....you'll admit you're full of shit, yes?

 

[playtime]

Correct! No sworn under oath testimony is needed because lying to the FBI is
not just illegal, it's a felony! No oath required!

Trump doesn't even have to speak to Mueller because there is no evidence of any crimes committed by President Trump.
And there is no Evidence of Russian Collusion.

Mueller in the end most likely will just submit his questions in writing, and POTUS will reply in writing, and then Mueller will finally exhaust his witch hunt coming up empty.

Laughing....and the pathetic excuses for why Trump shouldn't have to testify under oath have already begun.

You just blinked.

I don't care if he testifies. I am just telling you what the usual standard is.

Oh, obviously. That's why you've spent 4 posts awkwardly trying to justify why Trump shouldn't have to testify.

Smiling....because you 'don't care'.

You blinked. So much for 'transparency' and 'cooperation'. But then we already knew they were full of shit on that one when the White House instructed Bannon to refuse to cooperate with the House intel committee.

The stink of cold animal fear is thick in the air.

well he doesn't have to testify. a president doesn't have to ever give testimony. you know this right?

he does to anything before he was installed. & he cannot declare 'executive privilege' on himself either.

 

[jc456]

I don't care if he testifies. I am just telling you what the usual standard is.

Oh, obviously. That's why you've spent 4 posts awkwardly trying to justify why Trump shouldn't have to testify.

Smiling....because you 'don't care'.

You blinked. So much for 'transparency' and 'cooperation'. But then we already knew they were full of shit on that one when the White House instructed Bannon to refuse to cooperate with the House intel committee.

The stink of cold animal fear is thick in the air.

well he doesn't have to testify. a president doesn't have to ever give testimony. you know this right?

Says who?

Smiling....you're citing yourself as a legal authority, aren't you JC?

it's just a fact. don't need to be a legal expert to know this. you should really educate yourself.

Then it will be remarkably easy to prove if its a fact. Prove that a president never has to testify.

If I can show you *any* example of a sitting president being obligated to testify under oath.....you'll admit you're full of shit, yes?

Clinton. you need to read up on why he was giving testimony. funny. he's the only president.

 

[Skylar]

Oh, obviously. That's why you've spent 4 posts awkwardly trying to justify why Trump shouldn't have to testify.

Smiling....because you 'don't care'.

You blinked. So much for 'transparency' and 'cooperation'. But then we already knew they were full of shit on that one when the White House instructed Bannon to refuse to cooperate with the House intel committee.

The stink of cold animal fear is thick in the air.

well he doesn't have to testify. a president doesn't have to ever give testimony. you know this right?

Says who?

Smiling....you're citing yourself as a legal authority, aren't you JC?

it's just a fact. don't need to be a legal expert to know this. you should really educate yourself.

Then it will be remarkably easy to prove if its a fact. Prove that a president never has to testify.

If I can show you *any* example of a sitting president being obligated to testify under oath.....you'll admit you're full of shit, yes?

Clinton. you need to read up on why he was giving testimony. funny. he's the only president.

Laughing!

So a president doesn't have to ever give testimony......unless he does.

So much for your 'fact'.

 

[playtime]

i say nunes is possibly dirty.

this is a deflection & why is he privvy to anything russia related if he is recused from anything russia? unless this is all pure bullshit talking point memos MEANT to distract?

distract who from what?

distract from the witch hunting hoax because it is supposta be a great big nothing burger.

 

[jc456]

Trump doesn't even have to speak to Mueller because there is no evidence of any crimes committed by President Trump.
And there is no Evidence of Russian Collusion.

Mueller in the end most likely will just submit his questions in writing, and POTUS will reply in writing, and then Mueller will finally exhaust his witch hunt coming up empty.

Laughing....and the pathetic excuses for why Trump shouldn't have to testify under oath have already begun.

You just blinked.

I don't care if he testifies. I am just telling you what the usual standard is.

Oh, obviously. That's why you've spent 4 posts awkwardly trying to justify why Trump shouldn't have to testify.

Smiling....because you 'don't care'.

You blinked. So much for 'transparency' and 'cooperation'. But then we already knew they were full of shit on that one when the White House instructed Bannon to refuse to cooperate with the House intel committee.

The stink of cold animal fear is thick in the air.

well he doesn't have to testify. a president doesn't have to ever give testimony. you know this right?

he does to anything before he was installed. & he cannot declare 'executive privilege' on himself either.

no he doesn't. It had to be existing. he has none. only Clinton did.

 

[jc456]

well he doesn't have to testify. a president doesn't have to ever give testimony. you know this right?

Says who?

Smiling....you're citing yourself as a legal authority, aren't you JC?

it's just a fact. don't need to be a legal expert to know this. you should really educate yourself.

Then it will be remarkably easy to prove if its a fact. Prove that a president never has to testify.

If I can show you *any* example of a sitting president being obligated to testify under oath.....you'll admit you're full of shit, yes?

Clinton. you need to read up on why he was giving testimony. funny. he's the only president.

Laughing!

So a president doesn't have to ever give testimony......unless he does.

So much for your 'fact'.

nope, he doesn't have to. at all.

 

[Skylar]

Laughing....and the pathetic excuses for why Trump shouldn't have to testify under oath have already begun.

You just blinked.

I don't care if he testifies. I am just telling you what the usual standard is.

Oh, obviously. That's why you've spent 4 posts awkwardly trying to justify why Trump shouldn't have to testify.

Smiling....because you 'don't care'.

You blinked. So much for 'transparency' and 'cooperation'. But then we already knew they were full of shit on that one when the White House instructed Bannon to refuse to cooperate with the House intel committee.

The stink of cold animal fear is thick in the air.

well he doesn't have to testify. a president doesn't have to ever give testimony. you know this right?

he does to anything before he was installed. & he cannot declare 'executive privilege' on himself either.

no he doesn't. It had to be existing. he has none. only Clinton did.

Um, JC......Clinton was president. You said a president doesn't ever have to give testimony.

Then astonishingly contradicted yourself by giving us an example of a president who did.

I don't think 'fact' means what you think it means.