Nunes Memo Prediction Thread

You still make no sense. They said nothing of the kind, you're on another planet.

Donald Trump’s lawyer appeared to backtrack on the US President’s claim that he would be willing to be interviewed “under oath” by Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election.

Ty Cobb said Mr Trump “spoke hurriedly” and only intended to say that he would be willing to meet with special counsel.

Trump 'spoke hurriedly' when he vowed to be interviewed under oath by Robert Mueller, says White House lawyer

So Ty is arguing that we shouldn't listen to Trump when he said he'd be willing to be interviewed under oath.

I agree with Ty on one point: we shouldn't listen to Trump.
Your link does not quote Cobb as saying "we shouldn't listen to Trump". Stop adding your own "facts".

It quotes Try and saying that trump 'spoke hurriedly', and what he 'really intended' was something other than what he actually said; that he'd testify under oath.

We're being asked by Trump's own attorneies not to listen to Trump.

They've convinced me.
Nice try. Like I said, you're living on another planet. Got any more "interpretations" for us? :lol:

I'm living on this one. And all I have to do is quote Trump's own lawyer ....and my point is proven:

Donald Trump’s lawyer appeared to backtrack on the US President’s claim that he would be willing to be interviewed “under oath” by Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election.

Ty Cobb said Mr Trump “spoke hurriedly” and only intended to say that he would be willing to meet with special counsel.

Trump 'spoke hurriedly' when he vowed to be interviewed under oath by Robert Mueller, says White House lawyer


So Trump didn't mean he would testify under oath when he said he would testify under oath? He 'only intended to say' that he was willing to meet with special counsel?

If even Trump's lawyers are arguing that we shouldn't listen to Trump....why would I listen to Trump?
Keep digging, this is entertaining. :dig:
 
Correct! No sworn under oath testimony is needed because lying to the FBI is
not just illegal, it's a felony! No oath required!
Good, then we should see Hillary in an orange jumpsuit pretty soon, right?
seriously SJ, what for?

According to the FBI she did not lie to them...
According to the FBI. Thank you. They're being exposed for their corruption and protection of Hillary as we speak.
 
So Ty is arguing that we shouldn't listen to Trump when he said he'd be willing to be interviewed under oath.

I agree with Ty on one point: we shouldn't listen to Trump.
Your link does not quote Cobb as saying "we shouldn't listen to Trump". Stop adding your own "facts".

It quotes Try and saying that trump 'spoke hurriedly', and what he 'really intended' was something other than what he actually said; that he'd testify under oath.

We're being asked by Trump's own attorneies not to listen to Trump.

They've convinced me.
Nice try. Like I said, you're living on another planet. Got any more "interpretations" for us? :lol:

I'm living on this one. And all I have to do is quote Trump's own lawyer ....and my point is proven:

Donald Trump’s lawyer appeared to backtrack on the US President’s claim that he would be willing to be interviewed “under oath” by Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election.

Ty Cobb said Mr Trump “spoke hurriedly” and only intended to say that he would be willing to meet with special counsel.

Trump 'spoke hurriedly' when he vowed to be interviewed under oath by Robert Mueller, says White House lawyer


So Trump didn't mean he would testify under oath when he said he would testify under oath? He 'only intended to say' that he was willing to meet with special counsel?

If even Trump's lawyers are arguing that we shouldn't listen to Trump....why would I listen to Trump?
Keep digging, this is entertaining. :dig:

I'll keep quoting. You keep pretending. We both win!

Donald Trump’s lawyer appeared to backtrack on the US President’s claim that he would be willing to be interviewed “under oath” by Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 US presidential election.

Ty Cobb said Mr Trump “spoke hurriedly” and only intended to say that he would be willing to meet with special counsel.

Trump 'spoke hurriedly' when he vowed to be interviewed under oath by Robert Mueller, says White House lawyer

So much for Trump's promise to testify under oath.
 
I predict that Mueller will seek to interview or indict Trump just as the Nunes memo is released.

Trump may be compelled to appear before the Grand jury, but there will be limits on what he can be asked in terms of scope and time. Further, while Trump is free to agree to answer any questions involving criminality, he cannot be compelled to answer why he did legal things. There is no legal obligation to see inside the thoughts of a President. Firing Comey and Flynn were wholly within the purview of his authority under Article 2, and Mueller may not compel him to explain why he did those things.
 
Correct! No sworn under oath testimony is needed because lying to the FBI is
not just illegal, it's a felony! No oath required!
Good, then we should see Hillary in an orange jumpsuit pretty soon, right?
seriously SJ, what for?

According to the FBI she did not lie to them...
According to the FBI. Thank you. They're being exposed for their corruption and protection of Hillary as we speak.
yes, so the partisan hacks and FOX news say..... :rolleyes:
 
Correct! No sworn under oath testimony is needed because lying to the FBI is
not just illegal, it's a felony! No oath required!
Good, then we should see Hillary in an orange jumpsuit pretty soon, right?
seriously SJ, what for?

According to the FBI she did not lie to them...

For conservatives investigations aren't about finding out what happened. But getting the results they want. Take Benghazi. The first Benghazi investigation didn't show crimes. So they ignored their own investigation and had another.

And another.

And another.

And another.

And another.

And another.

And another.

8 ******* investigations in all with jack shit as the result. No crimes. And in true conservative fashion, they're ignoring the previous 8 results and insisting that they need a *9th* investigation now.

Why would their desperate willful ignorance of the FBI investigation be any different? They don't care about what *actually* happened.
 
I predict that Mueller will seek to interview or indict Trump just as the Nunes memo is released.

Trump may be compelled to appear before the Grand jury, but there will be limits on what he can be asked in terms of scope and time. Further, while Trump is free to agree to answer any questions involving criminality, he cannot be compelled to answer why he did legal things. There is no legal obligation to see inside the thoughts of a President. Firing Comey and Flynn were wholly within the purview of his authority under Article 2, and Mueller may not compel him to explain why he did those things.

They can't ask him about the *intent* of his actions?

Says who?
 
I predict that Mueller will seek to interview or indict Trump just as the Nunes memo is released.

Trump may be compelled to appear before the Grand jury, but there will be limits on what he can be asked in terms of scope and time. Further, while Trump is free to agree to answer any questions involving criminality, he cannot be compelled to answer why he did legal things. There is no legal obligation to see inside the thoughts of a President. Firing Comey and Flynn were wholly within the purview of his authority under Article 2, and Mueller may not compel him to explain why he did those things.
nope! the preliminary topics for the interview the FBI gave for him shows this interview is ALL ABOUT his possible obstructing justice/an official investigation.

His questions will be all about the firings of the head of the investigation etc.....
 
According to DOJ IG, amazingly, the texts are recovered.
 
According to DOJ IG, amazingly, the texts are recovered.

It will be fun then to compare what the texts *actually* said to the ravings about 'secret societies' and 'coups' that conservatives have been imagining fever sweats about.
 
LOL it seems the secret society comment was made in jest. Memo's ha ha ha

 
Those texts were never missing. Nice try, though.
According to DOJ IG, amazingly, the texts are recovered.

It will be fun then to compare what the texts *actually* said to the ravings about 'secret societies' and 'coups' that conservatives have been imagining fever sweats about.
 
According to DOJ IG, amazingly, the texts are recovered.
And it turns out the "secret society" was just a joke, even the GOP have been forced to admit it![/QUOTE

Our esteemed Republican Congress trying their damnest to discredit the FBI, they may have their faults but this side of the aisle takes the cake. Nunes must be one of those babies born to Acid dropping hippies from California.
 
Those texts were never missing. Nice try, though.
According to DOJ IG, amazingly, the texts are recovered.

It will be fun then to compare what the texts *actually* said to the ravings about 'secret societies' and 'coups' that conservatives have been imagining fever sweats about.

Then it makes the ravings about 'secret societies' and 'coups' being bleated by our right wing posters all the more hilarious.
 
15th post
Republican Congress:

Prenatal Drug Exposure. Alcohol and illicit drugs are toxic to the placenta and developing fetus and can cause congenital syndromes and withdrawal symptoms. Prescription drugs also may have adverse effects on the fetus (see Table: SomeDrugs With Adverse Effects During Pregnancy).
 
Oh, and it was an informant that spoke of the secret society/meetings.
FBI informant ‘told Congress of secret society meetings' | Daily Mail Online
Those texts were never missing. Nice try, though.
According to DOJ IG, amazingly, the texts are recovered.

It will be fun then to compare what the texts *actually* said to the ravings about 'secret societies' and 'coups' that conservatives have been imagining fever sweats about.

Then it makes the ravings about 'secret societies' and 'coups' being bleated by our right wing posters all the more hilarious.
 
Look at all the foaming at the mouth Lying Liberals loosing their cotton picking minds!

Every One of you cock sucking liberals KNEW this was a HOAX from the beginning.

YOU KNEW because you KNEW how CORRUPT CLINTON was and YOU KNEW because you were FULLY AWARE that the DEMOCRAT PARTY shit canned their own MORAL COMPASS Long ago with THE First time around with THE CLINTON CRIME FAMILY.

You didn't care that Clinton stole money from Haiti.
You didn't care that Clinton took bribes from Russia
You didn't care that Clinton sold 20% of our Uranium to Russia
You didn't care that John McCain was promoting a FAKE RUSSIAN DOSSIER full of FAKE RUSSIAN PROPAGANDA in order to help HIllary Clinton BUY her way in to the WHITE HOUSE.
You didn't care about Anthony Weiner's nor The Clinton's Perverse Sexual Appetites, Open Marriage and Loose Morals
You didn't care that Hillary Clinton violated two Federal Preservation Orders when she destroyed 33,000 government documents, and 17 blackberries, Iphones, Ipads, Tablets, and Laptops.

You didn't care about The Clinton Foundation Laundering Money and Peddling Influence and Access to The State Department.
You didn't care about Hillary Clinton's gun running operation in Benghazi and that cover up.
You didn't care about Hillary Clinton's Illegal Assasination of Quadaffi, nor that she plotted with Terrorists in Egypt, Syria, The Sudan and Libya to stage coups.

You didn't care that Clinton and Obama paid out Billions of Dollars to Terrorists in The Middles East, Arming them and Funding them to put Pressure on Israel to sue for peace.
You did not care then, NOR DO YOU CARE NOW that Mueller has been forced to remove over half of his BIASED and TREASONOUS Staff from his team.

You do not care then, nor do you care now, that Obama, and his corrupt FBI used a FAKE DOSSIER they knew was fake, and knew was sourced by The DNC, paid for by them, Clinton and even Obama and Illegally Lobbied FISA for the sole purpose of Spying on The Trump Campaign in the middle of an Election with THE END GAME of RIGGING a Presidential Election.

You did not care then and you do not care NOW, that Corrupt Top Echelon Officials Appointed By Obama not only Conducted a FAKE Investigation of Hillary Clinton that they were forced to do by Public Pressure, and Ignored all Evidence pointing to her Guilt and Planned on a Coverup and Exoneration of her far before they even interviewed her or her staff..... Because that is what you do in an Investigation in to someone you Prosecute. You give them Immunity from Prosecution, so you never have to prosecute them despite the evidence stating they are guilty.

But Worst YET, NONE OF YOU CORRUPT LIBERALS GAVE A FLYING **** that THE FBI which is supposed to PROTECT US FROM INJUSTICE, actually PLOTTED A COUP to UNJUSTLY OUST A DULY ELECTED PRESIDENT in an UNPRECEDENTED ATTACK on AMERICAN DEMOCRACY!

Clean the egg of your face old one.
 
Oh, and it was an informant that spoke of the secret society/meetings.
FBI informant ‘told Congress of secret society meetings' | Daily Mail Online
Those texts were never missing. Nice try, though.
According to DOJ IG, amazingly, the texts are recovered.

It will be fun then to compare what the texts *actually* said to the ravings about 'secret societies' and 'coups' that conservatives have been imagining fever sweats about.

Then it makes the ravings about 'secret societies' and 'coups' being bleated by our right wing posters all the more hilarious.

Is that the double double secret society that you need that $19.95 secret decoder ring to join?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom