Nunes Memo Prediction Thread

[The Original Tree]

Laughing....and the pathetic excuses for why Trump shouldn't have to testify under oath have already begun.

You just blinked.

I don't care if he testifies. I am just telling you what the usual standard is.

Oh, obviously. That's why you've spent 4 posts awkwardly trying to justify why Trump shouldn't have to testify.

Smiling....because you 'don't care'.

You blinked. So much for 'transparency' and 'cooperation'. But then we already knew they were full of shit on that one when the White House instructed Bannon to refuse to cooperate with the House intel committee.

The stink of cold animal fear is thick in the air.

well he doesn't have to testify. a president doesn't have to ever give testimony. you know this right?

Unless they are acussed of an ACTUAL CRIME and they have EVIDENCE OF IT like Bill Clinton Was. Then you have to testify.

Nope. There's no such caveats. And Clinton wasn't accused of a crime in Clinton v. Jones. It was a civil matter.

President Trump can do what he wants, but Unlike Bill Clinton who was forced to testify and was impeached, they cannot force President Trump to testify because there is no criminal charges being investigated, nor are any criminal indictments being submitted to him

There is no universal immunity from judicial process for the president. Nixon was forced to comply with subpoenas. As was Clinton.

Trump's 'immunity' is quite imaginary.

Wrong again. That was a Civil Matter. The Impeachment had little to nothing to do with Paula Jones. The President was accused of NUMEROUS CRIMES. He also was GUILTY of Perjury. The Original Investigation was launched due to suspicious activities at The Rose Law Firm, Arkansas Savings and Loan White water, and a bunch of shady real estate deals, money laundering and bribery.

Also lets not forget other scandals in the corrupt Clinton administration like FBI Filegate and Travelgate.

Sorry Mr. Mental Midget, you cannot Compel The President to Testify. He committed NO CRIMES.
Also, we have this thing called the Constitution.

Since The President Committed NO CRIMES, exactly what can Mueller ask him? About his feelings? His motivations?
Thoughts are private, and the President Does Not have to Share his With KGB Stormtrooper Herr, Mueller

 

[Skylar]

Um, JC......Clinton was president. You said a president doesn't ever have to give testimony.

Then astonishingly contradicted yourself by giving us an example of a president who did.

I don't think 'fact' means what you think it means.

I said doesn't have to. correct. Clinton agreed to.

No, Clinton was forced to. The USSC itself ruled that clinton didn't have immunity for cases that arose before he was president.

Unanimously.

Remember, JC....and this point is important: You have *no* idea what you're talking about. Literally none. You're just making shit up as you go along.

not lewinsky. that's on him for lying. he fking lied. the jones case was dismissed. again, no need to testify. fk dude go through the link I gave you.

The question in the Clinton v. Jones case was whether or not a sitting president was subject to judicial process for acts BEFORE he was president. The court found unanimous that under certain circumstances, the president was subject to judicial process. Including the enforcement of subpoenas.

Clinton had *no* immunity in the Jones case. If subpeonad, he'd have to testify. Just like anyone else.

Your claims of universal immunity for the President is pure pseudo-legal fiction. And contradicted by the court repeatedly. Again, as quoted in Clinton v. Jones....is US v. Nixon.

".....neither the doctrine of separation of powers, nor the need for confidentiality of high level communications, without more, can sustain an absolute, unqualified Presidential privilege of immunity from judicial process under all circumstances."

US V. Nixon (1974)

Exactly as predicted, JC.....you don't know what you're talking about.

no united states president has ever forcibly testified. ever.

The Supreme Court has found TWICE that subpoenas can be enforced against sitting presidents under certain circumstances. Once in US v. Nixon. Once in Clinton v. Jones.

You're imagining a universal immunity to judicial process that simply doesn't exist. And the court has found *repeatedly* does not exist.

".....neither the doctrine of separation of powers, nor the need for confidentiality of high level communications, without more, can sustain an absolute, unqualified Presidential privilege of immunity from judicial process under all circumstances."

US V. Nixon (1974)

Nixon was forced to comply with subpoenas. And Clinton was subject to them as well. Your claim that a president 'never has to testify if he doesn't want to' is pseudo-legal fiction. Under certain circumstances, he's like anyone else and subject to judicial jurisdiction.​

 

[The Original Tree]

How can anyone subpoena a president if you cannot name a CRIME COMMITTED?

This is why Lefty is tragically stupid and why the Left has lost 1,000 seats since Obama was elected.

Mueller is on a Fishing Expedition, and Engaged in a Witch Hunt and he was already forced to remove roughly half of his corrupt and partisan staff from the so called Russia Investigation to NO WHERE.

 

[Skylar]

I don't care if he testifies. I am just telling you what the usual standard is.

Oh, obviously. That's why you've spent 4 posts awkwardly trying to justify why Trump shouldn't have to testify.

Smiling....because you 'don't care'.

You blinked. So much for 'transparency' and 'cooperation'. But then we already knew they were full of shit on that one when the White House instructed Bannon to refuse to cooperate with the House intel committee.

The stink of cold animal fear is thick in the air.

well he doesn't have to testify. a president doesn't have to ever give testimony. you know this right?

Unless they are acussed of an ACTUAL CRIME and they have EVIDENCE OF IT like Bill Clinton Was. Then you have to testify.

Nope. There's no such caveats. And Clinton wasn't accused of a crime in Clinton v. Jones. It was a civil matter.

President Trump can do what he wants, but Unlike Bill Clinton who was forced to testify and was impeached, they cannot force President Trump to testify because there is no criminal charges being investigated, nor are any criminal indictments being submitted to him

There is no universal immunity from judicial process for the president. Nixon was forced to comply with subpoenas. As was Clinton.

Trump's 'immunity' is quite imaginary.

Wrong again. That was a Civil Matter. The Impeachment had little to nothing to do with Paula Jones. The President was accused of NUMEROUS CRIMES. He also was GUILTY of Perjury. The Original Investigation was launched due to suspicious activities at The Rose Law Firm, Arkansas Savings and Loan White water, and a bunch of shady real estate deals, money laundering and bribery.

Also lets not forget other scandals in the corrupt Clinton administration like FBI Filegate and Travelgate.

Sorry Mr. Mental Midget, you cannot Compel The President to Testify. He committed NO CRIMES.
Also, we have this thing called the Constitution.

Since The President Committed NO CRIMES, exactly what can Mueller ask him? About his feelings? His motivations?
Thoughts are private, and the President Does Not have to Share his With KGB Stormtrooper Herr, Mueller

The case in which Clinton was found to be required to testify was Clinton v. Jones and in relation to a civil matter. The caveats that you've imagined that it must be a 'criminal' case for a president to be required to testify is nonsense.

You're literally making that up from nothing with the courts explicitly contradicting you. A president can be subject to judicial jurisdiction on non-criminal matters as well. As Clinton v. Jones elegantly demonstrates.

 

[Skylar]

How can anyone subpoena a president if you cannot name a CRIME COMMITTED?

This is why Lefty is tragically stupid and why the Left has lost 1,000 seats since Obama was elected.

The same way you can be subpoena'd to testify in any civil matter. Subpoenas don't require 'crimes'. They require judicial jurisdiction. Which both US v. Nixon and Clinton v. Jones establish unambiguously applies to presidents under certain circumstances.

You simply don't know what you're talking about.

 

[The Original Tree]

Just waiting for that indictment to come against President Trump after two years of Investigations, totaling some 8 Investigations so far, and 7 of them fell flat on their face. And this last one is about to do the same after exhausting all of their resources and being unable to manufacture any evidence while completely ignoring the FBI COUP right under their noses.

The Left should be forced to refund the Billion Dollar they wasted of the taxpayer's money from their own pockets.

 

[Skylar]

Just waiting for that indictment to come against President Trump after two years of Investigations, totaling some 8 Investigations so far, and 7 of them fell flat on their face. And this last one is about to do the same after exhausting all of their resources and being unable to manufacture any evidence while completely ignoring the FBI COUP right under their noses.

The Left should be forced to refund the Billion Dollar they wasted of the taxpayer's money from their own pockets.

The Mueller investigation is 6 months old and have already resulted in 4 indictments and 2 guilty pleas.

Benghazi in comparison took 8 investigations and 4 years. And resulted in jack shit. You're allowed to complain when the Mueller investigation is on say....year 3.

 

[The Original Tree]

How can anyone subpoena a president if you cannot name a CRIME COMMITTED?

This is why Lefty is tragically stupid and why the Left has lost 1,000 seats since Obama was elected.

The same way you can be subpoena'd to testify in any civil matter. Subpoenas don't require 'crimes'. They require judicial jurisdiction. Which both US v. Nixon and Clinton v. Jones establish unambiguously applies to presidents under certain circumstances.

You simply don't know what you're talking about.

The President wasn't a witness to a crime either.

They had President Trump and his entire family under 24-7 Surveillance ILLEGALLY based on FALSE APPLICATION for a FISA WARRANT, based on FALSE EVIDENCE MANUFACTURED BY THE FBI.

Dear Stupid....you aren't going to get any better evidence than what was said during 24-7 wiretapping and surveillance of The Trump Campaign Team.

So how in the **** do you think Mueller is going to find something NEW? He won't even be able to find anything to legitimately lobby for a subpoena for. The 7 Investigations before his couldn't either, so neither will Herman Munster.

LMFAO.

 

[The Original Tree]

Just waiting for that indictment to come against President Trump after two years of Investigations, totaling some 8 Investigations so far, and 7 of them fell flat on their face. And this last one is about to do the same after exhausting all of their resources and being unable to manufacture any evidence while completely ignoring the FBI COUP right under their noses.

The Left should be forced to refund the Billion Dollar they wasted of the taxpayer's money from their own pockets.

The Mueller investigation is 6 months old and have already resulted in 4 indictments and 2 guilty pleas.

Benghazi in comparison took 8 investigations and 4 years. And resulted in jack shit. You're allowed to complain when the Mueller investigation is on say....year 3.

Horse shit, and they are jay walking offense that were trumped up over written statements vs. recalled statements when being interviewed over the dates of an event, you propagandist cock sucking jizz drinker.

We've been through this before and you got ***** slapped over it.

Mueller has NOTHING. In fact, Mueller and his friends are scrambling to save their own necks..

AGAIN *****, where is EVIDENCE of Russian Collusion?

 

[Skylar]

How can anyone subpoena a president if you cannot name a CRIME COMMITTED?

This is why Lefty is tragically stupid and why the Left has lost 1,000 seats since Obama was elected.

The same way you can be subpoena'd to testify in any civil matter. Subpoenas don't require 'crimes'. They require judicial jurisdiction. Which both US v. Nixon and Clinton v. Jones establish unambiguously applies to presidents under certain circumstances.

You simply don't know what you're talking about.

The President wasn't a witness to a crime either.

They had President Trump and his entire family under 24-7 Surveillance ILLEGALLY based on FALSE APPLICATION for a FISA WARRANT, based on FALSE EVIDENCE MANUFACTURED BY THE FBI.

That's an accusation. That's not evidence. Again, you're conflating the two, assuming that because you *believe* something, it must be true.

Sorry, Stupid. You're not in the right wing echo chamber. We're not just going to nod and grin at whatever hapless nonsense you allege.

You're gonna need proof. Show us, don't tell us.

Meanwhile, that there are very serious crimes within the Trump team is undeniable. As is the fact that these crimes are immediately related to Russia. We have guilty pleas from both Flynn and Papodopoulos admitting that they lied to the FBI about contacts between the Trump team and the Russians.

Your imagination v. 2 guilty pleas has the same winner every time; not your imagination.

 

[Skylar]

Just waiting for that indictment to come against President Trump after two years of Investigations, totaling some 8 Investigations so far, and 7 of them fell flat on their face. And this last one is about to do the same after exhausting all of their resources and being unable to manufacture any evidence while completely ignoring the FBI COUP right under their noses.

The Left should be forced to refund the Billion Dollar they wasted of the taxpayer's money from their own pockets.

The Mueller investigation is 6 months old and have already resulted in 4 indictments and 2 guilty pleas.

Benghazi in comparison took 8 investigations and 4 years. And resulted in jack shit. You're allowed to complain when the Mueller investigation is on say....year 3.

Horse shit, and they are jay walking offense that were trumped up over written statements vs. recalled statements when being interviewed over the dates of an event, you propagandist cock sucking jizz drinker.

We've been through this before and you got ***** slapped over it.

Mueller has NOTHING. In fact, Mueller and his friends are scrambling to save their own necks..

AGAIN *****, where is EVIDENCE of Russian Collusion?

4 indictments and 2 guilty pleas contradict your imaginary claims that the investigation is 'trumped up'. There are undeniably very serious crimes in the Trump team. These crimes are undeniably and immediately related to Russia.

And the Mueller investigation is just getting started. The more indictments, the more guilty pleas, the more your ilk bleat that the investigation must stop. Where by any rational standard, the opposite is true.

The indictments and guilty pleas demonstrate that Mueller investigation will continue.

Smiling...with all the caps you seem to be getting a little nervous. *****.

 

[The Original Tree]

Please Troll. I am reading your stuff and nearly spitting coffee on my screen.
That means NOTHING. You can indict a ham sandwhich. Indictments mean NOTHING.
Especially ones trumped up over written statements over perfectly legal actions vs. oral statements when interviewed.

None of it will stick. It's prosecutorial misconduct. Mueller's team has had this charge leveled at them numerous times. They are hacks, and have had numerous cases thrown out because of it. Every single thing Mueller's team is doing will be thrown out of court. And I suspect a couple of his conspirators are going to lose their law licenses over this so called "investigation"

The only function of Robert Mueller was the same as Jim Comey's, to influence our elections and in this case the 2018 midterms in which Mueller will fail miserably, and the public is already turning hostile against the Democratic Party who now caves like a drunken sorority girl with her panties around her ankles on the first date, because their public support is eroding daily as more and more facts come out about how corrupt the Dem Party is.

Drunk with Power and stupid, and trying to rig an election is no way to go through life.

Again Jizz Drinker..

Where is Evidence of Russian Collusion?

Half of Mueller's Staff has been fired because of Misconduct.

Get a clue numb nuts.

 

[Skylar]

Please Troll. I am reading your stuff and nearly spitting coffee on my screen.
That means NOTHING. You can indict a ham sandwhich. Indictments mean NOTHING.
Especially ones trumped up over written statements over perfectly legal actions vs. oral statements when interviewed.

Laughing......the grand jury thought otherwise. And of course, there are those pesky guilty pleas that prove, undeniably and undebateably, that there are very serious crimes in the Trump team. And that those crimes relate immediately to Russia.

You can't get around that.

None of it will stick. It's prosecutorial misconduct. Mueller's team has had this charge leveled at them numerous times. They are hacks, and have had numerous cases thrown out because of it.

The only function of Robert Mueller was the same as Jim Comey's, to influence our elections and in this case the 2018 midterms in which Mueller will fail miserably, and the public is already turning hostile against the Democratic Party who now caves like a drunken sorority girl, because their public support is eroding daily as more and more facts come out about how corrupt the Dem Party is.

Once again, and exactly as predicted.....you offer us your imagination.

You don't do well outside the right wing echo chamber, do you? As actual evidence doesn't seem to be your thing.

 

[The Original Tree]

Please Troll. I am reading your stuff and nearly spitting coffee on my screen.
That means NOTHING. You can indict a ham sandwhich. Indictments mean NOTHING.
Especially ones trumped up over written statements over perfectly legal actions vs. oral statements when interviewed.

Laughing......the grand jury thought otherwise. And of course, there are those pesky guilty pleas that prove, undeniably and undebateably, that there are very serious crimes in the Trump team. And that those crimes relate immediately to Russia.

You can't get around that.

None of it will stick. It's prosecutorial misconduct. Mueller's team has had this charge leveled at them numerous times. They are hacks, and have had numerous cases thrown out because of it.

The only function of Robert Mueller was the same as Jim Comey's, to influence our elections and in this case the 2018 midterms in which Mueller will fail miserably, and the public is already turning hostile against the Democratic Party who now caves like a
Adrunken sorority girl, because their public support is eroding daily as more and more facts come out about how corrupt the Dem Party is.

Once again, and exactly as predicted.....you offer us your imagination.

You don't do well outside the right wing echo chamber, do you? As actual evidence doesn't seem to be your thing.

Grand Juries mean nothing. Don't you know anything at all about the law?
You dumbasses throw around terms that you don't understand.

What did this so called GRAND JURY find?

I'll be waiting for you to show us that. It's Public Record so look it up and post it here.

Again, Shit Hole Licker.....where is EVIDENCE OF RUSSIAN COLLUSION?
What Crime was committed?

Cite US CODE

What is the Justification in US CODE for Mueller to Subpoena the President? How exactly is Mueller going to force THE PRESIDENT to Testify?

If there is NO Crime, how is Mueller going to get President Trump To Testify and Also To Incriminate Himself, when he has a RIGHT AGAINST DOING THAT VERY THING?

CITE US CODE, AND SPECIFICALLY CITE HOW THE PRESIDENT VIOLATED SPECIFIC US CODES YOU CITE Right HERE AND RIGHT NOW OR GO CHOKE ON YOUR FAVORITE DILDO AND STFU.

The very word "Incriminate" implies that a crime has been committed, without being able to CITE a VIOLATION OF US CODE, there can be no Self Incrimination, and even if there WERE A CRIME, Mueller has no EVIDENCE, and ALL CITIZENS have a right to Refuse to INCRIMINATE THEMSELVES.

Y'all are Fucked, and this is coming to an END, and this is why Mueller is making desperate attempts to attack The Trump Administration with the last few measly chess pieces he has on the board after losing half of his corrupt staff.

Your ass, and your entire scum sucking CORRUPT PARTY is about to be painted in to a corner and CHECK MATED.

 

[Skylar]

Please Troll. I am reading your stuff and nearly spitting coffee on my screen.
That means NOTHING. You can indict a ham sandwhich. Indictments mean NOTHING.
Especially ones trumped up over written statements over perfectly legal actions vs. oral statements when interviewed.

Laughing......the grand jury thought otherwise. And of course, there are those pesky guilty pleas that prove, undeniably and undebateably, that there are very serious crimes in the Trump team. And that those crimes relate immediately to Russia.

You can't get around that.

None of it will stick. It's prosecutorial misconduct. Mueller's team has had this charge leveled at them numerous times. They are hacks, and have had numerous cases thrown out because of it.

The only function of Robert Mueller was the same as Jim Comey's, to influence our elections and in this case the 2018 midterms in which Mueller will fail miserably, and the public is already turning hostile against the Democratic Party who now caves like a
Adrunken sorority girl, because their public support is eroding daily as more and more facts come out about how corrupt the Dem Party is.

Once again, and exactly as predicted.....you offer us your imagination.

You don't do well outside the right wing echo chamber, do you? As actual evidence doesn't seem to be your thing.

Again, Shit Hole Licker.....where is EVIDENCE OF RUSSIAN COLLUSION?
What Crime was committed?
Cite US CODE
What is the Justification in US CODE for Mueller to Subpoena the President? How exactly is Mueller going to force THE PRESIDENT to Testify?

Again, 4 indictments and 2 guilty pleas.

You're stuck, Tree. There is no debate that there are very serious crimes in the Trump team. There is no debate that those crimes relate immediately to Russia. Both Flynn and Papodopoulos have admitted, under oath, that they lied to the FBI about contacts between the Trump team and Russians.

Yet despite this undeniable evidence of crimes in the Trump team, you insist that there is no justification for any investigation. The assistant attorney general disagreed. And as a special counsel he has the authority to subpoena people in pursuit of his investigation.

If you think this isn't the case.....then you'll have to explain why the courts enforced the subpoena of the special prosecutor during the Watergate investigation, instructing the president to comply.

Smiling.....you can't.

You're out of your depth, son. You're not going to win a legal debate with me as you don't know what you're talking about. I've already forced you to abandon your imaginary 'caveats' to a president being forced to testify only in criminal trials. And I'm looking at US v. Nixon right now. You won't win on your imaginary 'universal immunity' argument where the president doesn't have to honor subpoenas.

But give us some more caps, boy. It makes me giggle.

 

[The Original Tree]

Please Troll. I am reading your stuff and nearly spitting coffee on my screen.
That means NOTHING. You can indict a ham sandwhich. Indictments mean NOTHING.
Especially ones trumped up over written statements over perfectly legal actions vs. oral statements when interviewed.

Laughing......the grand jury thought otherwise. And of course, there are those pesky guilty pleas that prove, undeniably and undebateably, that there are very serious crimes in the Trump team. And that those crimes relate immediately to Russia.

You can't get around that.

None of it will stick. It's prosecutorial misconduct. Mueller's team has had this charge leveled at them numerous times. They are hacks, and have had numerous cases thrown out because of it.

The only function of Robert Mueller was the same as Jim Comey's, to influence our elections and in this case the 2018 midterms in which Mueller will fail miserably, and the public is already turning hostile against the Democratic Party who now caves like a
Adrunken sorority girl, because their public support is eroding daily as more and more facts come out about how corrupt the Dem Party is.

Once again, and exactly as predicted.....you offer us your imagination.

You don't do well outside the right wing echo chamber, do you? As actual evidence doesn't seem to be your thing.

Again, Shit Hole Licker.....where is EVIDENCE OF RUSSIAN COLLUSION?
What Crime was committed?
Cite US CODE
What is the Justification in US CODE for Mueller to Subpoena the President? How exactly is Mueller going to force THE PRESIDENT to Testify?

Again, 4 indictments and 2 guilty pleas.

You're stuck, Tree. There is no debate that there are very serious crimes in the Trump team. There is no debate that those crimes relate immediately to Russia. Both Flynn and Papodopoulos have admitted, under oath, that they lied to the FBI about contacts between the Trump team and Russians.

Yet despite this undeniable evidence of crimes in the Trump team, you insist that there is no justification for any investigation. The assistant attorney general disagreed. And as a special counsel he has the authority to subpoena people in pursuit of his investigation.

If you think this isn't the case.....then you'll have to explain why the courts enforced the subpoena of the special prosecutor during the Watergate investigation, instructing the president to comply.

Smiling.....you can't.

You're out of your depth, son. You're not going to win a legal debate with me as you don't know what you're talking about. I've already forced you to abandon your imaginary 'caveats' to a president being forced to testify only in criminal trials. And I'm looking at US v. Nixon right now. You won't win on your imaginary 'universal immunity' argument where the president doesn't have to honor subpoenas.

But give us some more caps, boy. It makes me giggle.

You are fucked TROLL.

No Crime

Without a Crime, and without you being able to CITE US CODE, or EVEN TELL US what a GRAND JURY said, and it is a matter of PUBLIC RECORD....

Mueller has NO EVIDENCE

Neither do you.

Half of his Staff was fired due to BIAS and Corruption.

Without a CRIME, there can be NO INCRIMINATION.

But continue masturbating to an image of your own stupidity.

THE MEMO IS GOING TO BE RELEASED

A TRULY INDEPENDENT COUNSEL is going to be appointed to Investigate FBI Corruption, Perjury, Obstruction of Justice, TREASON and Mueller as well as Comey and Mueller's Corrupt staff will be charged with High Crimes and Misdemeanors.

We are talking REAL JAIL TIME.

And they don't like Crooked Cops in Prison.

CITE US CODES VIOLATED.
SPECIFICALLY EXPLAIN US CODES PRESIDENT TRUMP VIOLATED.

 

[Skylar]

Please Troll. I am reading your stuff and nearly spitting coffee on my screen.
That means NOTHING. You can indict a ham sandwhich. Indictments mean NOTHING.
Especially ones trumped up over written statements over perfectly legal actions vs. oral statements when interviewed.

Laughing......the grand jury thought otherwise. And of course, there are those pesky guilty pleas that prove, undeniably and undebateably, that there are very serious crimes in the Trump team. And that those crimes relate immediately to Russia.

You can't get around that.

None of it will stick. It's prosecutorial misconduct. Mueller's team has had this charge leveled at them numerous times. They are hacks, and have had numerous cases thrown out because of it.

The only function of Robert Mueller was the same as Jim Comey's, to influence our elections and in this case the 2018 midterms in which Mueller will fail miserably, and the public is already turning hostile against the Democratic Party who now caves like a
Adrunken sorority girl, because their public support is eroding daily as more and more facts come out about how corrupt the Dem Party is.

Once again, and exactly as predicted.....you offer us your imagination.

You don't do well outside the right wing echo chamber, do you? As actual evidence doesn't seem to be your thing.

Again, Shit Hole Licker.....where is EVIDENCE OF RUSSIAN COLLUSION?
What Crime was committed?
Cite US CODE
What is the Justification in US CODE for Mueller to Subpoena the President? How exactly is Mueller going to force THE PRESIDENT to Testify?

Again, 4 indictments and 2 guilty pleas.

You're stuck, Tree. There is no debate that there are very serious crimes in the Trump team. There is no debate that those crimes relate immediately to Russia. Both Flynn and Papodopoulos have admitted, under oath, that they lied to the FBI about contacts between the Trump team and Russians.

Yet despite this undeniable evidence of crimes in the Trump team, you insist that there is no justification for any investigation. The assistant attorney general disagreed. And as a special counsel he has the authority to subpoena people in pursuit of his investigation.

If you think this isn't the case.....then you'll have to explain why the courts enforced the subpoena of the special prosecutor during the Watergate investigation, instructing the president to comply.

Smiling.....you can't.

You're out of your depth, son. You're not going to win a legal debate with me as you don't know what you're talking about. I've already forced you to abandon your imaginary 'caveats' to a president being forced to testify only in criminal trials. And I'm looking at US v. Nixon right now. You won't win on your imaginary 'universal immunity' argument where the president doesn't have to honor subpoenas.

But give us some more caps, boy. It makes me giggle.

You are fucked TROLL.

No Crime

Multiple, serious crimes. 4 indictments and 2 guilty pleas. Just for the record....the guilty pleas remove any doubt that a crime actually occured. Flynn and Papodopoulos already admitted, in court and under oath, that they lied to the FBI about contacts between the Trump team and the Russians.

There is no debating this fact. There is no debating the crimes committed in the Trump team. There is no debating that these crimes immediately involved Russia.

You can ignore them. But you can't make us ignore them. And certainly not Mueller.

Without a Crime, and without you being able to CITE US CODE, or EVEN TELL US what a GRAND JURY said, and it is a matter of PUBLIC RECORD....

Mueller has NO EVIDENCE

Lets test your 'knowledge' on what evidence Mueller has.

Flynn has agreed to fully cooperate with Mueller before his February sentencing hearing. Read to us Flynn's testimony to Mueller given after the plea deal, specifically the parts about who ordered him to make contact with Russians and why. If you're so perfectly versed in what evidence Flynn has, this should be child's play.

No, go ahead. I'll wait.

......

....


..


.

Nothing? That's right....you're offering us your *imagination* about what evidence Mueller has. But you have no idea. Again and again you keep offering us what you want to believe about the Mueller investigation as evidence.

But your desires aren't facts, son. Your accusations aren't facts. Your imagination isn't facts.

And Mueller isn't going to stop just because you pretend he has to.

 

[The Original Tree]

CITE US CODES VIOLATED BY PRESIDENT TRUMP SPECIFICALLY AND IN DETAIL OR GO ON IGNORE TROLL.

SO, Mueller can Indict and should have Indicted based on what you "feel" was Flynn's testimony. Any good prosecutor is able to prosecute someone based on the testimony of a "witness" There is NOTHING THERE you desperate Wanker.

“We learned today about information that in the immediate aftermath of [Trump’s] election, that there may have been a secret society of folks within the Department of Justice and the FBI -- to include Page and Strzok -- that would be working against him,” Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, said Monday on Fox News.

In another infamous message, Strzok appeared to make reference to an “insurance policy” against a Trump win.


“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office — that there’s no way he gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40…” he wrote.

Hillary Clinton: "If Trump gets elected, we will all hang!"

Yes you will, and I'll be watching with my bag of popcorn and Junior Mints.

DOJ recovers missing text messages between anti-Trump FBI agents Strzok and Page

 

[jc456]

I don't care if he testifies. I am just telling you what the usual standard is.

Oh, obviously. That's why you've spent 4 posts awkwardly trying to justify why Trump shouldn't have to testify.

Smiling....because you 'don't care'.

You blinked. So much for 'transparency' and 'cooperation'. But then we already knew they were full of shit on that one when the White House instructed Bannon to refuse to cooperate with the House intel committee.

The stink of cold animal fear is thick in the air.

well he doesn't have to testify. a president doesn't have to ever give testimony. you know this right?

Unless they are acussed of an ACTUAL CRIME and they have EVIDENCE OF IT like Bill Clinton Had against him Then you have to testify. They just couldn't pin enough on him, because well....the guy who KNEW and could testify to the crimes murdered himself, and others chose to go to jail rather than Rat out Bill and Hillary.

No one will go to Jail from The Trump Administration, like they went to jail from The Clinton Administration.

President Trump can do what he wants, but Unlike Bill Clinton who was forced to testify and was impeached, they cannot force President Trump to testify because there are no criminal charges being investigated, nor are any criminal indictments being submitted to him or his attorneys that implicate or indicate The President.

impeachment does not mean remove from office. to be removed from office there needs to be a 2/3 vote in the senate. Never gonna happen ever.

I wouldn't say 'never'. But certainly not until at least 2018.

if it has never happened, it has never happened. funny! what is it you think they can do? impeach doesn't remove from office. you know this correct? even if dems take the house they can't remove him from office. so what is it you think you're going?

 

[The Original Tree]

Please Troll. I am reading your stuff and nearly spitting coffee on my screen.
That means NOTHING. You can indict a ham sandwhich. Indictments mean NOTHING.
Especially ones trumped up over written statements over perfectly legal actions vs. oral statements when interviewed.

Laughing......the grand jury thought otherwise. And of course, there are those pesky guilty pleas that prove, undeniably and undebateably, that there are very serious crimes in the Trump team. And that those crimes relate immediately to Russia.

You can't get around that.

None of it will stick. It's prosecutorial misconduct. Mueller's team has had this charge leveled at them numerous times. They are hacks, and have had numerous cases thrown out because of it.

The only function of Robert Mueller was the same as Jim Comey's, to influence our elections and in this case the 2018 midterms in which Mueller will fail miserably, and the public is already turning hostile against the Democratic Party who now caves like a
Adrunken sorority girl, because their public support is eroding daily as more and more facts come out about how corrupt the Dem Party is.

Once again, and exactly as predicted.....you offer us your imagination.

You don't do well outside the right wing echo chamber, do you? As actual evidence doesn't seem to be your thing.

Again, Shit Hole Licker.....where is EVIDENCE OF RUSSIAN COLLUSION?
What Crime was committed?
Cite US CODE
What is the Justification in US CODE for Mueller to Subpoena the President? How exactly is Mueller going to force THE PRESIDENT to Testify?

Again, 4 indictments and 2 guilty pleas.

You're stuck, Tree. There is no debate that there are very serious crimes in the Trump team. There is no debate that those crimes relate immediately to Russia. Both Flynn and Papodopoulos have admitted, under oath, that they lied to the FBI about contacts between the Trump team and Russians.

Yet despite this undeniable evidence of crimes in the Trump team, you insist that there is no justification for any investigation. The assistant attorney general disagreed. And as a special counsel he has the authority to subpoena people in pursuit of his investigation.

If you think this isn't the case.....then you'll have to explain why the courts enforced the subpoena of the special prosecutor during the Watergate investigation, instructing the president to comply.

Smiling.....you can't.

You're out of your depth, son. You're not going to win a legal debate with me as you don't know what you're talking about. I've already forced you to abandon your imaginary 'caveats' to a president being forced to testify only in criminal trials. And I'm looking at US v. Nixon right now. You won't win on your imaginary 'universal immunity' argument where the president doesn't have to honor subpoenas.

But give us some more caps, boy. It makes me giggle.

You are fucked TROLL.

No Crime

Multiple, serious crimes. 4 indictments and 2 guilty pleas. Just for the record....the guilty pleas remove any doubt that a crime actually occured. Flynn and Papodopoulos already admitted, in court and under oath, that they lied to the FBI about contacts between the Trump team and the Russians.

There is no debating this fact. There is no debating the crimes committed in the Trump team. There is no debating that these crimes immediately involved Russia.

You can ignore them. But you can't make us ignore them. And certainly not Mueller.

Without a Crime, and without you being able to CITE US CODE, or EVEN TELL US what a GRAND JURY said, and it is a matter of PUBLIC RECORD....

Mueller has NO EVIDENCE

Lets test your 'knowledge' on what evidence Mueller has.

Flynn has agreed to fully cooperate with Mueller before his February sentencing hearing. Read to us Flynn's testimony to Mueller given after the plea deal, specifically the parts about who ordered him to make contact with Russians and why. If you're so perfectly versed in what evidence Flynn has, this should be child's play.

No, go ahead. I'll wait.

......

....


..


.

Nothing? That's right....you're offering us your *imagination* about what evidence Mueller has. But you have no idea. Again and again you keep offering us what you want to believe about the Mueller investigation as evidence.

But your desires aren't facts, son. Your accusations aren't facts. Your imagination isn't facts.

And Mueller isn't going to stop just because you pretend he has to.

One more time *****.

Cite US CODE THE PRESIDENT VIOLATED OR GO ON IGNORE!