No Progressives Allowed On The Supreme Court

[Taz]

In fact the new court should rule that all progressives should be placed in Guantanamo Bay Cuba for the rest of their miserable life.

View attachment 391648

Trump has brought out their inner authoritarian. To hell with all that "conservative values" and "limited government" bullcrap. They want Trump to jail the opposition, like good, solid, white, nationalist authoritarians have been doing for 90 years and more.

OK, OK.....you can have an education as well.


The Founders, classical liberals, conservatives
a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists
b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).

They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.

They all follow Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."

Whether personal beliefs, or what we call 'politics,' or perhaps 'religion,' the real idea that determines what we will do in any and every situation, is one simple idea. Either one believes that human lives are sacred, or one believes that they can be exchanged to achieve some secular material goal.

Choose a. or b.
a. From Schindler's List: “Whoever saves one life saves the world entire.”
or
b. Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."

Your ability to copy&paste is outstanding. Can I get hom skooled on this too?

 

[Moonglow]

Without progressives the US would not be the US, there would still be slavery, there would still be Robber-baron capitalism, there could still be people dying in the streets from conservative tough love, there would be no women voting or equal rights for women or minorities without progressives..

 

[norwegen]

…or, any court. Here’s why:

1.They have no respect for the Constitution

2.They have no respect for human life.




3. Instead, Progressives, often called Liberals, are imbued with supreme faith in their own foresight, and ability to see things, including the future, far better than any intellect, sage, philosopher, politician or tactician that ever walked the earth before they did.
Of course, that includes our Founders, authors of the Constitution, as well.

The most glaring example of Progressives overstepping all that came before they graced this world, is their ignoring that which guided the Founders, the Judeo-Christian Bible, in which we find the initiating statement about human life: God said, 'Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness.
It is the basis for Western Civilization.

Not for Progressives.



4. Taking on the role that had been reserved for God, Progressives believe that they can perfect human beings, create a whole new human nature…..a promise also shared by Communists, Nazis, and every other breed of Leftist.
The name given to the era of Progressive guidance in order to produce that ‘new’ human society is Eugenics.



5. “California led the nation, performing nearly all sterilization procedures with little or no due process. In its first twenty-five years of eugenic legislation, California sterilized 9,782 individuals, mostly women. Many were classified as "bad girls," diagnosed as "passionate," "oversexed" or "sexually wayward." At Sonoma, some women were sterilized because of what was deemed an abnormally large clitoris or labia.
Only after eugenics became entrenched in the United States was the campaign transplanted into Germany, in no small measure through the efforts of California eugenicists, who published booklets idealizing sterilization and circulated them to German official and scientists.

Hitler studied American eugenics laws. He tried to legitimize his anti-Semitism by medicalizing it, and wrapping it in the more palatable pseudoscientific facade of eugenics. Hitler was able to recruit more followers among reasonable Germans by claiming that science was on his side. While Hitler's race hatred sprung from his own mind, the intellectual outlines of the eugenics Hitler adopted in 1924 were made in America.



During the '20s, Carnegie Institution eugenic scientists cultivated deep personal and professional relationships with Germany's fascist eugenicists. In Mein Kampf, published in 1924, Hitler quoted American eugenic ideology and openly displayed a thorough knowledge of American eugenics. "There is today one state," wrote Hitler, "in which at least weak beginnings toward a better conception [of immigration] are noticeable. Of course, it is not our model German Republic, but the United States."



Hitler proudly told his comrades just how closely he followed the progress of the American eugenics movement. "I have studied with great interest," he told a fellow Nazi, "the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would, in all probability, be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock."
The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics | History News Network





No Progressives/Liberals/Democrats should ever be elected to positions of power….and certainly never to the courts.

Santayana: Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Those who do not remember their past are condemned to repeat their mistakes.

Though a shift to the left of the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution remained a "right-of-center" charter for the new government. Even with amendments, it's still a right-of-center document.

Leftists have so maligned the Constitution that now the general consensus is that the Supreme Court should not reflect our right-of-center origins but rather be centrist, or even left of center.

 

[norwegen]

Moonbats embrace the Marxist idea of creating a "new man."

Conservatives embrace the natural man (or perhaps the new man as biblically defined).

 

[PoliticalChic]

…or, any court. Here’s why:

1.They have no respect for the Constitution

2.They have no respect for human life.




3. Instead, Progressives, often called Liberals, are imbued with supreme faith in their own foresight, and ability to see things, including the future, far better than any intellect, sage, philosopher, politician or tactician that ever walked the earth before they did.
Of course, that includes our Founders, authors of the Constitution, as well.

The most glaring example of Progressives overstepping all that came before they graced this world, is their ignoring that which guided the Founders, the Judeo-Christian Bible, in which we find the initiating statement about human life: God said, 'Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness.
It is the basis for Western Civilization.

Not for Progressives.



4. Taking on the role that had been reserved for God, Progressives believe that they can perfect human beings, create a whole new human nature…..a promise also shared by Communists, Nazis, and every other breed of Leftist.
The name given to the era of Progressive guidance in order to produce that ‘new’ human society is Eugenics.



5. “California led the nation, performing nearly all sterilization procedures with little or no due process. In its first twenty-five years of eugenic legislation, California sterilized 9,782 individuals, mostly women. Many were classified as "bad girls," diagnosed as "passionate," "oversexed" or "sexually wayward." At Sonoma, some women were sterilized because of what was deemed an abnormally large clitoris or labia.
Only after eugenics became entrenched in the United States was the campaign transplanted into Germany, in no small measure through the efforts of California eugenicists, who published booklets idealizing sterilization and circulated them to German official and scientists.

Hitler studied American eugenics laws. He tried to legitimize his anti-Semitism by medicalizing it, and wrapping it in the more palatable pseudoscientific facade of eugenics. Hitler was able to recruit more followers among reasonable Germans by claiming that science was on his side. While Hitler's race hatred sprung from his own mind, the intellectual outlines of the eugenics Hitler adopted in 1924 were made in America.



During the '20s, Carnegie Institution eugenic scientists cultivated deep personal and professional relationships with Germany's fascist eugenicists. In Mein Kampf, published in 1924, Hitler quoted American eugenic ideology and openly displayed a thorough knowledge of American eugenics. "There is today one state," wrote Hitler, "in which at least weak beginnings toward a better conception [of immigration] are noticeable. Of course, it is not our model German Republic, but the United States."



Hitler proudly told his comrades just how closely he followed the progress of the American eugenics movement. "I have studied with great interest," he told a fellow Nazi, "the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would, in all probability, be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock."
The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics | History News Network





No Progressives/Liberals/Democrats should ever be elected to positions of power….and certainly never to the courts.

Santayana: Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Those who do not remember their past are condemned to repeat their mistakes.

Though a shift to the left of the Articles of Confederation, the Constitution remained a "right-of-center" charter for the new government. Even with amendments, it's still a right-of-center document.

Leftists have so maligned the Constitution that now the general consensus is that the Supreme Court should not reflect our right-of-center origins but rather be centrist, or even left of center.

wegie.....they, Leftists, Progressives, Democrats, whatever, have so reversed everything America stood for at inception, that is is not beyond arguendo to point to this authority behind their machinations:


" The dark god of the democrats "

There is no other valid explanation for this:
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

 

[Sunni Man]

No Progressives/Liberals/Democrats should ever be elected to positions of power….and certainly never to the courts.

I couldn't agree with you more!! ...

 

[PoliticalChic]

Moonbats embrace the Marxist idea of creating a "new man."

Conservatives embrace the natural man (or perhaps the new man as biblically defined).

The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. Nazi attempt to do exactly the same thing: in German, "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"

a. "In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris


In 1969, Hillary Rodham gave the student commencement address at Wellesley in which she said that “ for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible….We’re not interested in social reconstruction; it’s human reconstruction.”
-http://www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/Commencement/1969/053169hillary.html

 

[Lysistrata]

Bring the court back to defending the rights of the people instead of the profits of big business

Democrats on the court are ideologues. They all vote in line with the Democratic party. They are obviously intelligent, but, just like the average Democrat, their programming controls their thoughts.

Your premise that progressive people do not respect the U.S. Constitution and human life is absurd.

Really? They don't like the electoral college because it doesn't favor them. They treated a SC nominee like a criminal(Kavanaugh) and wouldn't vote to confirm him despite no evidence of any wrongdoing. They impeached a sitting president with no evidence of wrongdoing, just conjecture. Democrats, particularly the wacko left that runs the party, don't like the US system because people who work can make it but people that don't won't. That is contrary to their idealistic view that we should all live in the same houses and have the same amount of money, despite skill level or work ethic. Democrats are pro-abortion and pro-late term abortion, meaning right up until the point of birth. That is not respect for human life.

Many people who work just get by paying every day bills without anything left over to save. There was plenty of evidence against trump, but the senate would not hold a full trial in which everything would come out on the senate floor, with witnesses. Being pro-choice on the abortion issue is not being "pro-abortion". It just means that politicians do not rule and government needs to stay the hell out of this decision. A treasured friend of mine chose to bring her pregnancy to term, against the advice of her doctors because she was born a Type I diabetic. She endured months of bed rest and the birth was harrowing. She came close to dying. It was her choice and she made it. Not the government or politicians or "religious" leaders. Pro-choice just means letting the person decide, not big government.

 

[hadit]

Democrats on the court are ideologues. They all vote in line with the Democratic party. They are obviously intelligent, but, just like the average Democrat, their programming controls their thoughts.

Liberals on the court stand up for the rights of We the People

Aren't they supposed to stand up for the Constitution?

 

[Mac1958]

In fact the new court should rule that all progressives should be placed in Guantanamo Bay Cuba for the rest of their miserable life.

View attachment 391648

No not tough at all just sick to death of you lying pieces of shit. In fact I'm nearly 70 years old and you filthy scum aren't shit to me.

So your defense is that you're a grumpy old man that hates wearing a Depends but fills it up anyways. Got it.

Pretty incredible, how angry and hateful these people still are, despite how things are going their way right now.

I think it means they know, at some level, that this is temporary only.

 

[Mac1958]

In fact the new court should rule that all progressives should be placed in Guantanamo Bay Cuba for the rest of their miserable life.

View attachment 391648

Trump has brought out their inner authoritarian. To hell with all that "conservative values" and "limited government" bullcrap. They want Trump to jail the opposition, like good, solid, white, nationalist authoritarians have been doing for 90 years and more.

OK, OK.....you can have an education as well.


The Founders, classical liberals, conservatives
a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists
b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).

They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.

They all follow Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."

Whether personal beliefs, or what we call 'politics,' or perhaps 'religion,' the real idea that determines what we will do in any and every situation, is one simple idea. Either one believes that human lives are sacred, or one believes that they can be exchanged to achieve some secular material goal.

Choose a. or b.
a. From Schindler's List: “Whoever saves one life saves the world entire.”
or
b. Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."

Your ability to copy&paste is outstanding. Can I get hom skooled on this too?

She appears to think she accomplishes something with these tedious, one-sided walls of words, as if sheer volume can replace intellectual honesty or critical thinking.

I wonder if anyone ever reads all that stuff, besides her.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Bring the court back to defending the rights of the people instead of the profits of big business

Democrats on the court are ideologues. They all vote in line with the Democratic party. They are obviously intelligent, but, just like the average Democrat, their programming controls their thoughts.

Your premise that progressive people do not respect the U.S. Constitution and human life is absurd.

Really? They don't like the electoral college because it doesn't favor them. They treated a SC nominee like a criminal(Kavanaugh) and wouldn't vote to confirm him despite no evidence of any wrongdoing. They impeached a sitting president with no evidence of wrongdoing, just conjecture. Democrats, particularly the wacko left that runs the party, don't like the US system because people who work can make it but people that don't won't. That is contrary to their idealistic view that we should all live in the same houses and have the same amount of money, despite skill level or work ethic. Democrats are pro-abortion and pro-late term abortion, meaning right up until the point of birth. That is not respect for human life.

Many people who work just get by paying every day bills without anything left over to save. There was plenty of evidence against trump, but the senate would not hold a full trial in which everything would come out on the senate floor, with witnesses. Being pro-choice on the abortion issue is not being "pro-abortion". It just means that politicians do not rule and government needs to stay the hell out of this decision. A treasured friend of mine chose to bring her pregnancy to term, against the advice of her doctors because she was born a Type I diabetic. She endured months of bed rest and the birth was harrowing. She came close to dying. It was her choice and she made it. Not the government or politicians or "religious" leaders. Pro-choice just means letting the person decide, not big government.

"There was plenty of evidence against trump, "


I see that, like Mueller, you couldn't find any.

With minimal effort you've become our best source of greenhouse gases.



Pro-Choice means you acquiesce to some persons being permitted to commit murder against other persons.

 

[rightwinger]

I wonder if anyone ever reads all that stuff, besides her.

Most of PCs stuff is unreadable.

But she is persistent

 

[norwegen]

Bring the court back to defending the rights of the people instead of the profits of big business

Democrats on the court are ideologues. They all vote in line with the Democratic party. They are obviously intelligent, but, just like the average Democrat, their programming controls their thoughts.

Your premise that progressive people do not respect the U.S. Constitution and human life is absurd.

Really? They don't like the electoral college because it doesn't favor them. They treated a SC nominee like a criminal(Kavanaugh) and wouldn't vote to confirm him despite no evidence of any wrongdoing. They impeached a sitting president with no evidence of wrongdoing, just conjecture. Democrats, particularly the wacko left that runs the party, don't like the US system because people who work can make it but people that don't won't. That is contrary to their idealistic view that we should all live in the same houses and have the same amount of money, despite skill level or work ethic. Democrats are pro-abortion and pro-late term abortion, meaning right up until the point of birth. That is not respect for human life.

Many people who work just get by paying every day bills without anything left over to save. There was plenty of evidence against trump, but the senate would not hold a full trial in which everything would come out on the senate floor, with witnesses. Being pro-choice on the abortion issue is not being "pro-abortion". It just means that politicians do not rule and government needs to stay the hell out of this decision. A treasured friend of mine chose to bring her pregnancy to term, against the advice of her doctors because she was born a Type I diabetic. She endured months of bed rest and the birth was harrowing. She came close to dying. It was her choice and she made it. Not the government or politicians or "religious" leaders. Pro-choice just means letting the person decide, not big government.

"There was plenty of evidence against trump, "


I see that, like Mueller, you couldn't find any.

With minimal effort you've become our best source of greenhouse gases.



Pro-Choice means you acquiesce to some persons being permitted to commit murder against other persons.

Moonbats have even changed the meaning of evidence to include hearsay.

 

[PoliticalChic]

If Progressives.....Liberals/Democrats have their way, citizens are treated as any domesticated animal, and have not rights not even to their own bodies.

8. “Carrie Buck was sterilized against her will by order of the Supreme Court, decision (Buck v. Bell) written by Oliver Wendell Holmes, who said : ”The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes.” It turned out that she was not retarded, as the state had contended. Based on the Buck Decision, more than 60 thousand were operated on across the U.S. as late as the 1970’s. And the opinion was adopted in Germany, where, within a year, some 56 thousand German ‘patients’ had been sterilized.

The only vote against the state, in an 8-1 decision was the archconservative and only Catholic on the court, Pierce Butler. “Butler was a Roman Catholic and a Democrat, but was also, most importantly, a political conservative.” http://www.michaelariens.com/ConLaw/justices/butler.htm



Ultimately, 60,000” Americans were coercively sterilized — legally and extra-legally. Many never discovered the truth until decades later. Those who actively supported eugenics include America's most progressive figures: Woodrow Wilson, Margaret Sanger and Oliver Wendell Holmes."
War Against The Weak - Home Page



Historian Paul A. Lombardo argued in 1985 that Buck was not "feeble-minded" at all, but that she had been put away to hide her rape, perpetrated by the nephew of her adoptive mother.
Buck v. Bell - Wikipedia



Can Soylent Green be far off the Progressive's menu??????

 

[BluesLegend]

We wouldn't allow a Nazi on the SCOTUS so why should we tolerate a progressive on the SCOTUS?

 

[Taz]

No Progressives/Liberals/Democrats should ever be elected to positions of power….and certainly never to the courts.

I couldn't agree with you more!! ...

Not surprised, you're 2 religious nutjobs. And sunni gets a chubby every time he reads the word "Nazi". You 2 infidels should hook up.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Bring the court back to defending the rights of the people instead of the profits of big business

Democrats on the court are ideologues. They all vote in line with the Democratic party. They are obviously intelligent, but, just like the average Democrat, their programming controls their thoughts.

Your premise that progressive people do not respect the U.S. Constitution and human life is absurd.

Really? They don't like the electoral college because it doesn't favor them. They treated a SC nominee like a criminal(Kavanaugh) and wouldn't vote to confirm him despite no evidence of any wrongdoing. They impeached a sitting president with no evidence of wrongdoing, just conjecture. Democrats, particularly the wacko left that runs the party, don't like the US system because people who work can make it but people that don't won't. That is contrary to their idealistic view that we should all live in the same houses and have the same amount of money, despite skill level or work ethic. Democrats are pro-abortion and pro-late term abortion, meaning right up until the point of birth. That is not respect for human life.

Many people who work just get by paying every day bills without anything left over to save. There was plenty of evidence against trump, but the senate would not hold a full trial in which everything would come out on the senate floor, with witnesses. Being pro-choice on the abortion issue is not being "pro-abortion". It just means that politicians do not rule and government needs to stay the hell out of this decision. A treasured friend of mine chose to bring her pregnancy to term, against the advice of her doctors because she was born a Type I diabetic. She endured months of bed rest and the birth was harrowing. She came close to dying. It was her choice and she made it. Not the government or politicians or "religious" leaders. Pro-choice just means letting the person decide, not big government.

If being pro choice is no government interference then why do progressive insist an making those who disagree pay for the choice. You cant have both but that's what leftists do. Demand the government interfere when they say so.

 

[miketx]

Democrats are prepared to add four progressive judges to SCOTUS


Bring the court back to defending the rights of the people instead of the profits of big business

You filthy vermin are ignoring peoples rights all over the country.

 

[miketx]

No Progressives/Liberals/Democrats should ever be elected to positions of power….and certainly never to the courts.

I couldn't agree with you more!! ...

Not surprised, you're 2 religious nutjobs. And sunni gets a chubby every time he reads the word "Nazi". You 2 infidels should hook up.

Don't take the roof top tour if they offer you one.