JD Vance Wants Abused Women Not To Be Allowed To Get A Divorce

[Anathema]

Some here will judge you because of the business partnership thing. I say if it's working all the power to you. Marriage really begins when the lovey dovey and newness wears off.

They have in the past they will now and in the future. Thsts their problem.

 

[boilermaker55]

Stupid and subversive...who? LOL, your attempt here is comical.
Let's just venture to the "weird" and subversive side of someone who NOW calls himself JD. Vance!
"Vance was born James Donald Bowman, after his biological father, Donald Bowman, who separated from Vance’s mother Beverly when he was young. When Beverly later remarried, Vance was adopted by his stepfather and became James David Hamel; this is the name he kept through his early adulthood. He went by J.D., before and after the name change, but when he enlisted in the Marines, he was known officially as Corporal James D. Hamel. Then in 2013, around the time he was admitted to the bar, he opted to change his surname to Vance. In Hillbilly Elegy, he notes that he chose the name in honor of Bonnie Blanton Vance, the grandmother who helped raise him. (In his recent campaign speeches, Vance has spoken fondly of his “Mamaw” and her extensive arsenal.)

The AP’s recitation of the changes also solves one more remaining mystery about the potential vice president’s name for the punctuation aware among us. For years, we have known him as “J.D. Vance,” but more recently, he has reverted to “JD,” sans periods, on his Senate website and press releases. The campaign spokesperson confirmed that Vance prefers the streamlined version. So, no periods for JD."

Just a quick look into the volatile mind that is to whom you try to make seem reasonable.

Again, I have to ask, Are you Lefties stupid or subversive. I know you are evil, but the stupidity question remains relevant.

Vance never said or implied what the OP states.

Stupid or what?

 

[MagicMike]

That's exactly what he said.

He admitted some marriages were even violent, but it was worse to allow divorce.

For the children.

The man is an idiot. A violent marriage is far, far worse for the children than a divorce.



,

He's the perfect running mate for the party that excuses sexual assault against a woman "not rape" because the perpetrator only forced his fingers into the vagina instead of a penis.
Of COURSE they hate women!
I feel sorry for the female MAGAt cultroaches on this board who actually have to support this shit just because their ignorant MAGAt husbands force them to.
Why else would any woman support the convicted felon.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

More and more of JD Vance's hatred of women is surfacing from his past comments in interviews.

Just two years ago, Vance said it was a bad thing the "sexual revolution" resulted in physically abused women being able to escape their violent marriages.

"This is one of the great tricks that I think the sexual revolution pulled on the American populace, which is the idea that like, ‘well, OK, these marriages were fundamentally, you know, they were maybe even violent, but certainly they were unhappy."

On a more humorous note, Vance also added that the sexual revolution is "making it easier for people to shift spouses like they change their underwear".

When you consider Vance called himself a Never Trumper, and said Trump was "America's Hitler", and how he criticized the ability for people like Trump to change spouses like they changes their underwear, you have to wonder how Shady Vance is able to look at himself in the mirror these days.

If you eject your principles so easily for political gain, what are you, exactly?

For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?

Vance: "And what we have is a lot of very, very real family dysfunction that’s making our kids unhappy.”

Yeah. The Trump kids are definitely not happy people. That much is true.

JD Vance Suggests People in ‘Violent’ Marriages Shouldn’t Get Divorced​

​

I know this may shock you...

But the cult is insisting he didn't say what he clearly said.

 

[d0gbreath]

I'm secretly sending Mrs. Vance a blackjack, and cat o' nine tails, to level the playing field.

 

[OldFlame]

Our marriage is far more of a business partnership than anything else. We both learned the folly of love and how badly one can be hurt very early in life. She provides things in the remotest I can’t and vice versa. It’s worked for 10+ years now.

How sad for you, I'd say that you're in no position mentor or give advice on marriage then.

 

[lantern2814]

That's exactly what he said.

He admitted some marriages were even violent, but it was worse to allow divorce.

For the children.

The man is an idiot. A violent marriage is far, far worse for the children than a divorce.



,

No it really isn't. YOU are an idiot. Who saw a clipped comment and immediately ran with it like the good little sheep you are

 

[lantern2814]

Who's desperate?

2024 National: Trump vs. Harris | RealClearPolling

2024 National: Trump vs. Harris | RealClearPolling

www.realclearpolling.com

You are obviously.

 

[Anathema]

How sad for you, I'd say that you're in no position mentor or give advice on marriage then.

Why is that? We’ve been married more than a decade. We rarely fight. We get things done. We’re far more stable than most marriages based on emotion thst I see out there today.

 

[scruffy]

I know this may shock you...

But the cult is insisting he didn't say what he clearly said.

The thread title is a lie.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Vance is a nut job.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Vance is a nut job.

Poor dOPey, so desperate...

 

[Lesh]

Who swims with a t shirt on besides chubby 11 year old boys… and JD Couchfucker?

 

[schmidlap]

More and more of JD Vance's hatred of women is surfacing from his past comments in interviews.

Just two years ago, Vance said it was a bad thing the "sexual revolution" resulted in physically abused women being able to escape their violent marriages.

"This is one of the great tricks that I think the sexual revolution pulled on the American populace, which is the idea that like, ‘well, OK, these marriages were fundamentally, you know, they were maybe even violent, but certainly they were unhappy."

On a more humorous note, Vance also added that the sexual revolution is "making it easier for people to shift spouses like they change their underwear".

When you consider Vance called himself a Never Trumper, and said Trump was "America's Hitler", and how he criticized the ability for people like Trump to change spouses like they changes their underwear, you have to wonder how Shady Vance is able to look at himself in the mirror these days.

If you eject your principles so easily for political gain, what are you, exactly?

For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?

Vance: "And what we have is a lot of very, very real family dysfunction that’s making our kids unhappy.”

Yeah. The Trump kids are definitely not happy people. That much is true.

JD Vance Suggests People in ‘Violent’ Marriages Shouldn’t Get Divorced​

​

I am convinced that most freedom-loving Americans are repulsed by self-appointed ayatollahs hellbent on perverting the State to impose their noxious, authoritarian agenda on the People.

 

[OldFlame]

Why is that? We’ve been married more than a decade. We rarely fight. We get things done. We’re far more stable than most marriages based on emotion thst I see out there today.

Because a marriage without love or emotion is just a partnership, a convenience, a business arrangement, not a true marriage.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Because a marriage without love or emotion is just a partnership, a convenience, a business arrangement, not a true marriage.

We know.

 

[initforme]

Because a marriage without love or emotion is just a partnership, a convenience, a business arrangement, not a true marriage.

The truth is that they all become more like a partnership after a few years. It takes hard work to keep it going. There should be 1 day per year set aside for the spouses to try and reconnect.

 

[schmidlap]

Because a marriage without love or emotion is just a partnership, a convenience, a business arrangement, not a true marriage.

A marriage is a contract, hopefully, but not necessarily, based upon an emotional relationship. What is essential is that the two parties involved concur in defining it for themselves, without some meddling politician trying to define it for them.

 

[OldFlame]

The truth is that they all become more like a partnership after a few years. It takes hard work to keep it going. There should be 1 day per year set aside for the spouses to try and reconnect.

They're a partnership from the outset, the don't 'become' one after a few years. But they're also much more than just a partnership as well.

 

[OldFlame]

A marriage is a contract, hopefully, but not necessarily, based upon an emotional relationship. What is essential is that the two parties involved concur in defining it for themselves, without some meddling politician trying to define it for them.

I know what a marriage is, I've been in a successful one for over 30 years.