No Progressives Allowed On The Supreme Court

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,898
60,271
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
…or, any court. Here’s why:

1.They have no respect for the Constitution

2.They have no respect for human life.




3. Instead, Progressives, often called Liberals, are imbued with supreme faith in their own foresight, and ability to see things, including the future, far better than any intellect, sage, philosopher, politician or tactician that ever walked the earth before they did.
Of course, that includes our Founders, authors of the Constitution, as well.

The most glaring example of Progressives overstepping all that came before they graced this world, is their ignoring that which guided the Founders, the Judeo-Christian Bible, in which we find the initiating statement about human life: God said, 'Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness.
It is the basis for Western Civilization.

Not for Progressives.



4. Taking on the role that had been reserved for God, Progressives believe that they can perfect human beings, create a whole new human nature…..a promise also shared by Communists, Nazis, and every other breed of Leftist.
The name given to the era of Progressive guidance in order to produce that ‘new’ human society is Eugenics.



5. “California led the nation, performing nearly all sterilization procedures with little or no due process. In its first twenty-five years of eugenic legislation, California sterilized 9,782 individuals, mostly women. Many were classified as "bad girls," diagnosed as "passionate," "oversexed" or "sexually wayward." At Sonoma, some women were sterilized because of what was deemed an abnormally large clitoris or labia.
Only after eugenics became entrenched in the United States was the campaign transplanted into Germany, in no small measure through the efforts of California eugenicists, who published booklets idealizing sterilization and circulated them to German official and scientists.

Hitler studied American eugenics laws. He tried to legitimize his anti-Semitism by medicalizing it, and wrapping it in the more palatable pseudoscientific facade of eugenics. Hitler was able to recruit more followers among reasonable Germans by claiming that science was on his side. While Hitler's race hatred sprung from his own mind, the intellectual outlines of the eugenics Hitler adopted in 1924 were made in America.



During the '20s, Carnegie Institution eugenic scientists cultivated deep personal and professional relationships with Germany's fascist eugenicists. In Mein Kampf, published in 1924, Hitler quoted American eugenic ideology and openly displayed a thorough knowledge of American eugenics. "There is today one state," wrote Hitler, "in which at least weak beginnings toward a better conception [of immigration] are noticeable. Of course, it is not our model German Republic, but the United States."



Hitler proudly told his comrades just how closely he followed the progress of the American eugenics movement. "I have studied with great interest," he told a fellow Nazi, "the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would, in all probability, be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock."
The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics | History News Network





No Progressives/Liberals/Democrats should ever be elected to positions of power….and certainly never to the courts.

Santayana: Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Those who do not remember their past are condemned to repeat their mistakes.
 
I call Godwin's Law on you. You lose. Better luck next time, you hateful bitch.
No one cares what the likes of your lying hide calls.


To the OP:

In fact the new court should rule that all progressives should be placed in Guantanamo Bay Cuba for the rest of their miserable life.



Perhaps we can keep a few in zoos and museums as a cautionary warning for the next generation?
 
Democrats are prepared to add four progressive judges to SCOTUS


Bring the court back to defending the rights of the people instead of the profits of big business
 
In fact the new court should rule that all progressives should be placed in Guantanamo Bay Cuba for the rest of their miserable life.
download-3.jpg
 
So you want Americans to live as slaves under the control of right-wing morons. Your premise that progressive people do not respect the U.S. Constitution and human life is absurd.
 
I call Godwin's Law on you. You lose. Better luck next time, you hateful bitch.



Learn how to address your betters.
How is you hateful sideways slash. Is that better? You still lose via Godwin's Law, and didn't they teach you that in hom skool? I guess not. But I'd like to know what you think you're accomplishing by posting basically the same deranged thing every day. Are you severely in need of attention? You'd be a good study on what happens to kids after long periods of confinement like in hom skool.
 
In fact the new court should rule that all progressives should be placed in Guantanamo Bay Cuba for the rest of their miserable life.
View attachment 391648
Trump has brought out their inner authoritarian. To hell with all that "conservative values" and "limited government" bullcrap. They want Trump to jail the opposition, like good, solid, white, nationalist authoritarians have been doing for 90 years and more.
 
Imagine for a moment the first cave person or tree dweller faced with a progressive friend who says let's leave this tree or cave. No, says the PoliticalChic person of a long past time. But we can walk and run and farm and build homes. What are homes asks the PC person. Like caves they shelter but they are progress. What is progress asks the conservative. Well I am getting ahead of myself but healthy food, medicines, science, cures, electric, vaccines, and for your bad feet, shoes. Not me says the conservative. I am happy in the cave and tree. And so they go their separate ways even to today.

A progressive story more up to date than my thoughts above.


"Liberals demand that the social order should in principle be capable of explaining itself at the tribunal of each person's understanding." Jeremy Waldron

Shall we compare and contrast liberal progressivism with conservatism, lets.

Liberal Progressivism (LP) first:

Leaves the cave to create better lodging outside in the sun
Creation of tools
Hunting and fishing
Farming and husbandry
Creation of markets and merchants
Renaissance
Enlightenment
Political liberalism
Constitutional democracy
Public education for all
Abolished Slavery
Suffrage
Child labor laws
Unions fair pay and safe working conditions
Food and product safety regulations
Regulation to control financial meltdowns
Social Security
Won the war against fascism
Creation of United Nations
Civil rights voting rights
End of segregation
Poverty safety net
Woman's right to decide
Environmental controls
Equal rights for marriage to all
Universal health care

And we just keep going....

Now Conservatism:

Cave living and howling at the moon
Refusal to follow liberals out of the cave
Whine
More whining
More and more whining
More and more and more whining
Earth is flat stay put and whine
More and more and more and more whining
Red scare loud whining and finger pointing
More and more and more and more and more whining
More and more and more and more and more and more whining
Create think tanks for improved whining.
More and more and more and more and more and more and more whining
Terrorist acts create more whining with the addition of fear
Above whining and increased finger pointing
Create media centers for national whining, and do you know what they do best whine on radio and TV
More and more and more and more and more and more and more and more whining
More and more and more and more and more and more and more and more and more whining
Tea Party increased whining.

During the Dark Ages and the Bubonic Plague, Conservative whining decreased, not enough to measure the change, but these times were consistent with their 'do nothing but whine philosophy,' and thus were the best times for conservatism.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: DBA
Bring the court back to defending the rights of the people instead of the profits of big business

Democrats on the court are ideologues. They all vote in line with the Democratic party. They are obviously intelligent, but, just like the average Democrat, their programming controls their thoughts.

Your premise that progressive people do not respect the U.S. Constitution and human life is absurd.

Really? They don't like the electoral college because it doesn't favor them. They treated a SC nominee like a criminal(Kavanaugh) and wouldn't vote to confirm him despite no evidence of any wrongdoing. They impeached a sitting president with no evidence of wrongdoing, just conjecture. Democrats, particularly the wacko left that runs the party, don't like the US system because people who work can make it but people that don't won't. That is contrary to their idealistic view that we should all live in the same houses and have the same amount of money, despite skill level or work ethic. Democrats are pro-abortion and pro-late term abortion, meaning right up until the point of birth. That is not respect for human life.
 
So you want Americans to live as slaves under the control of right-wing morons. Your premise that progressive people do not respect the U.S. Constitution and human life is absurd.


"... right-wing morons. "


Your post is about to become a boomerang.


Here, for your day's education:

The Founders, classical liberals, conservatives
a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists
b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).

They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.

They all follow Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."




Whether personal beliefs, or what we call 'politics,' or perhaps 'religion,' the real idea that determines what we will do in any and every situation, is one simple idea. Either one believes that human lives are sacred, or one believes that they can be exchanged to achieve some secular material goal.

Choose a. or b.
a. From Schindler's List: “Whoever saves one life saves the world entire.”
or
b. Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."
 
In fact the new court should rule that all progressives should be placed in Guantanamo Bay Cuba for the rest of their miserable life.
View attachment 391648
Trump has brought out their inner authoritarian. To hell with all that "conservative values" and "limited government" bullcrap. They want Trump to jail the opposition, like good, solid, white, nationalist authoritarians have been doing for 90 years and more.



OK, OK.....you can have an education as well.


The Founders, classical liberals, conservatives
a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.


Fascists, Nazis, Liberals, Progressives, Socialists, Communists
b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


None of the totalitarian forms of political plague have the slightest concern for human life: not communism (gulags), not Nazism (concentration camps), not Liberalism (abortion), not Progressivism (eugenics), not socialism (theft), not fascism (murder).

They only differ in the final outcome: slavery, serfdom, or death.

They all follow Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."

Whether personal beliefs, or what we call 'politics,' or perhaps 'religion,' the real idea that determines what we will do in any and every situation, is one simple idea. Either one believes that human lives are sacred, or one believes that they can be exchanged to achieve some secular material goal.

Choose a. or b.
a. From Schindler's List: “Whoever saves one life saves the world entire.”
or
b. Trotsky: "We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."
 
Imagine for a moment the first cave person or tree dweller faced with a progressive friend who says let's leave this tree or cave. No, says the PoliticalChic person of a long past time. But we can walk and run and farm and build homes. What are homes asks the PC person. Like caves they shelter but they are progress. What is progress asks the conservative. Well I am getting ahead of myself but healthy food, medicines, science, cures, electric, vaccines, and for your bad feet, shoes. Not me says the conservative. I am happy in the cave and tree. And so they go their separate ways even to today.

A progressive story more up to date than my thoughts above.


"Liberals demand that the social order should in principle be capable of explaining itself at the tribunal of each person's understanding." Jeremy Waldron

Shall we compare and contrast liberal progressivism with conservatism, lets.

Liberal Progressivism (LP) first:

Leaves the cave to create better lodging outside in the sun
Creation of tools
Hunting and fishing
Farming and husbandry
Creation of markets and merchants
Renaissance
Enlightenment
Political liberalism
Constitutional democracy
Public education for all
Abolished Slavery
Suffrage
Child labor laws
Unions fair pay and safe working conditions
Food and product safety regulations
Regulation to control financial meltdowns
Social Security
Won the war against fascism
Creation of United Nations
Civil rights voting rights
End of segregation
Poverty safety net
Woman's right to decide
Environmental controls
Equal rights for marriage to all
Universal health care

And we just keep going....

Now Conservatism:

Cave living and howling at the moon
Refusal to follow liberals out of the cave
Whine
More whining
More and more whining
More and more and more whining
Earth is flat stay put and whine
More and more and more and more whining
Red scare loud whining and finger pointing
More and more and more and more and more whining
More and more and more and more and more and more whining
Create think tanks for improved whining.
More and more and more and more and more and more and more whining
Terrorist acts create more whining with the addition of fear
Above whining and increased finger pointing
Create media centers for national whining, and do you know what they do best whine on radio and TV
More and more and more and more and more and more and more and more whining
More and more and more and more and more and more and more and more and more whining
Tea Party increased whining.

During the Dark Ages and the Bubonic Plague, Conservative whining decreased, not enough to measure the change, but these times were consistent with their 'do nothing but whine philosophy,' and thus were the best times for conservatism.



I can see why you ignored the OP that wounded you so....

....you couldn't find a single thing I wrote that you could dispute.


Better luck next time.
 
6. The most brilliant, the most feted, most celebrated of Progressives have proven susceptible to these flaws: They have no respect for the Constitution. They have no respect for human life. They see themselves as god….in fact, called Obama exactly that.



And, as proof, Oliver Wendell Holmes

Another of those ‘Liberal Lions,’ one of whose ‘achievements’ was to rubber stamp the ability of Progressive government to perform involuntary surgery on citizens they deem….’undesirable.’ In 1911, Progressive racist Democrat Woodrow Wilson signed New Jersey’s forceable sterilization law. In 1927, Progressive Oliver Wendell Holmes invoked the Progressive assault on individuals in favor of the collective, the most basic Progressive doctrine, “ruled that a state statute permitting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, "for the protection and health of the state" did not violate the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.”





7. The most common names Progressives assume today are Liberal, and Democrat.

"Hillary Clinton says she doesn't really like the descriptive word "liberal," preferring to be characterized as a "progressive."

"You know, (liberal) is a word that originally meant that you were for freedom … that you were willing to stand against big power and on behalf of the individual," she said at the CNN/YouTube debate. "Unfortunately, in the last 30, 40 years, it has been turned up on its head, and it's been made to seem as though it is a word that describes big government, totally contrary to what its meaning was in the 19th and early 20th century." She continued: "I prefer the word 'progressive,' which has a real American meaning, going back to the progressive era at the beginning of the 20th century. I consider myself a modern progressive."





And instead of the term they used to mutilate earlier Americans, ‘undesirable,’ or ‘unfit,’ the recent term was ‘deplorable.’
 
Democrats on the court are ideologues. They all vote in line with the Democratic party. They are obviously intelligent, but, just like the average Democrat, their programming controls their thoughts.

Liberals on the court stand up for the rights of We the People
 
In fact the new court should rule that all progressives should be placed in Guantanamo Bay Cuba for the rest of their miserable life.
View attachment 391648
No not tough at all just sick to death of you lying pieces of shit. In fact I'm nearly 70 years old and you filthy scum aren't shit to me.
So your defense is that you're a grumpy old man that hates wearing a Depends but fills it up anyways. Got it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top