Trump Re-Indicted On Coup Attempt Charges To Honor Supreme Court Immunity Ruling

[WEATHER53]

Double, triple jeopardy from this wild eyed persecutional zealot

 

[MagicMike]

The layout I heard this morning from Mike Davis - Judge Cannon has ruled that jack smith has no standing or federal office to appeal from, IE he's not a federal employee as required by the Constitution,

Judge Cannon's ruling is faulty as the appeal will demonstrate.
It may even be enough to have her removed from the case.

nothing will happen before the election, literally

Wrong dumbass. It already has happened.

... Trump will fire jack smith on Day 1, and shut down the faux case

He won't win the election. He's already toast.

, and then go after jack smith like it just burned an elementary school down with the kids in it.

That would be a political persecution. A POTUS' job is never to "go after" people.
Thanks for providing a perfect illustration of what everyone has been saying about Trump being UNFIT for office though.
You just nailed it here.

Ok I made that last part up.... but only slightly.

As usual you are just full of shit.
Thanks for admitting that.

If jack smith doesn't hang itself by the end of the year, I will be shocked.

That's because you are a clueless simpleton.

 

[berg80]

Double, triple jeopardy from this wild eyed persecutional zealot

Eff off.

In a case marked by Donald Trump’s determined efforts to delay it at any cost, it was a little perplexing when Special Counsel Jack Smith asked the judge in the Jan. 6 case to push back a deadline by a month to give him more time to evaluate the impact of the Supreme Court’s noxious decision on presidential immunity. Now we know why.

During the interregnum, Smith took the case back to a new federal grand jury in DC but stripped out evidence that the Supreme Court ruled would be inadmissible and pared down other elements of the case that the high court squarely immunized. The new grand jury, untainted by the now-inadmissible evidence, returned a superseding indictment against Trump that otherwise largely mirrors the original indictment.

The abundance of caution exhibited by Smith and DOJ is another indicator, if we needed any, of the stakes in this case. The new indictment is different in three fundamental respects:

1. It ditches the allegations related to Trump’s effort to enlist the Justice Department itself in his scheme to overturn the 2020 election. This includes the whole sordid Jeff Clark episode. The Supreme Court was clear that these were immunized official acts by Trump, a travesty of its own.
2. It removes the extended narration of evidence of Trump’s knowledge and state of mind that was based on evidence the Supreme Court indicated would be inadmissible because it would weaken the president’s immunity protection, another screaming travesty that is now the law of the land.
3. It leans more heavily into Vice President Mike Pence’s constitutional role as Senate president, which placed him at the center of the Jan. 6 certification of the Electoral College vote. Smith appears to be responding to the Supreme Court’s invitation in the immunity decision (pp. 23-24, citations removed):

Now We Know What Jack Smith Was Up To In The Jan. 6 Case

Smith to the SC's conservatives......."check."

 

[Nostra]

Why don't you THINK Smith has any legal authority?
Do you have yourself one of those fancy law degrees from Trump University like most of the other MAGAt cultroaches?

A judge has made that ruling.

 

[MagicMike]

A judge has made that ruling.

The ruling has been appealed. It is so faulty it has no chance of standing.

 

[Nostra]

The ruling has been appealed. It is so faulty it has no chance of standing.

Your opinion means squat, Simp.

The ruling is in place.

 

[two_iron]

Judge Cannon's ruling is faulty as the appeal will demonstrate.
It may even be enough to have her removed from the case.

I couldn't get past that.

That's a federal judge with a clear, concise ruling. Are you above the law, shit-for-brains?

**** off with your ****** anarchy. RULE.OF.LAW.... learn it, live it, eat it.

On a lighter note, one of these two ingested horse cum to the point of being hospitalized. You figure out which one.

 

[Clipper]

What a stupid comment. Show me a case that lasts a lifetime, Simp.

I was referring to the documents case, assclown.

 

[skye]

Well of course! What else would the "Democrats" (LOL) do except fire up another Trump indictment just before the election?

You are right!





"THIS IS WHAT YOU CALL REVERSE LAWFARE, JAIL THE INNOCENT AND FREE THE CRIMINAL"

 

[kyzr]

Why don't you THINK Smith has any legal authority?
Do you have yourself one of those fancy law degrees from Trump University like most of the other MAGAt cultroaches?

Read and weep dumbass.

Justice Thomas just gifted Judge Cannon a reason to blow up Trump's Mar-a-Lago prosecution

Clarence Thomas provided Trump legal ammunition for undoing his Mar-a-Lago prosecution, where Judge Cannon recently permitted amici to argue some of the very points the justice made on Monday.

lawandcrime.com

Justice Thomas just gifted Judge Cannon a reason to blow up Trump’s Mar-a-Lago prosecution, another bad sign for Jack Smith​

 

[lennypartiv]

Are you saying the new grand jury was comprised of all Dems?

It could have been.

 

[MagicMike]

Appointed for life, Simp.

DOH!

You really

Read and weep dumbass.

Justice Thomas just gifted Judge Cannon a reason to blow up Trump's Mar-a-Lago prosecution

Clarence Thomas provided Trump legal ammunition for undoing his Mar-a-Lago prosecution, where Judge Cannon recently permitted amici to argue some of the very points the justice made on Monday.

lawandcrime.com

Justice Thomas just gifted Judge Cannon a reason to blow up Trump’s Mar-a-Lago prosecution, another bad sign for Jack Smith​

This is an old article. Meaningless now.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

1. There was no coup, nor is there any such allegation in this superseding indictment.

2. The DOJ just violated their own rule by filing this within 90 days of the election.

3. This also may be a case of laches where they [DOJ] took too long to bring a superseding indictment, and I expect Trump's attorneys to make such a fling as violating laches doctrine.

60 days. The rule is 60 days which pertains to new charges. Not existing cases.