Amy Coney Barrett has seven children and believes in God-Alarm! Alarm! Alarm!

Ray9

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2016
Messages
1,455
Reaction score
1,728
Points
1,970
Amy Coney Barrett is feared by liberals not for anything she has done but for she did not do. She did not go to Planned Parenthood and flush five of her seven children down the plumbing. This makes her a wicked human being by the standards of the Democratic Party. They will fight her to the end.

 

Lysistrata

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2017
Messages
14,210
Reaction score
3,636
Points
290
So she made her choices five times. I'm wondering who got her pregnant five times.
 

cnm

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2013
Messages
31,931
Reaction score
14,390
Points
2,905
Location
Aotearoa
Someone should tell her it's not a clown car.
 

Penelope

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
48,607
Reaction score
6,992
Points
1,860
Amy Coney Barrett is feared by liberals not for anything she has done but for she did not do. She did not go to Planned Parenthood and flush five of her seven children down the plumbing. This makes her a wicked human being by the standards of the Democratic Party. They will fight her to the end.

Amy Coney Barrett, the judge at the top of Trump’s list to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg, has said we should always remember that a “legal career is but a means to an end … and that end is building the Kingdom of God."
--------------------------------
not good, but tramp will pick the one in Florida as he wants to win Florida. Its all about himself and what is good for him,
but I like a woman. I wish the woman would be RBG reincarnated.
 

DGS49

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2012
Messages
9,526
Reaction score
3,745
Points
360
Location
Pittsburgh
Well, in the last hearings for Judge Barrett, the Leftists basically tried to make the case that a believing Catholic could not be an impartial Justice on the Supreme Court, and they basically got the shit beat out of them for that tactic.

Barrett, if she makes it through this ordeal, would make SIX of the nine SC members "practicing Catholics."

She WILL state during the hearings that "Roe v. Wade is settled law." But that will not be enough for the Leftists, who know that...

RvW is ANYTHING BUT "settled law." It is a "Constitutional" principle that was made up out of thin air, and can be jettisoned quickly given the right case.

Consider the situation where a woman seven months pregnant elects to get an abortion against the wishes of her Impregnator, who in turn has a legal guardian appointed for the in-utero person, who sues to protect the baby's own LIFE.

Even though the case would be moot by the time it ever got to the USSC, it is a case that the Court could take up because of its broad applicability. Perversely, the Court could affirm the father's (and baby's) rights UNDER THE PRECEDENT OF ROE v WADE, which stated that, once the child reaches viability, it has the full panoply of Constitutional rights, the first and most important of which is the right to LIFE.

Thus, the Left's figurative hair would be set on fire by an AFFIRMATION of the principles set out in Roe v. Wade.

Priceless.
 

LordBrownTrout

Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
29,626
Reaction score
8,012
Points
480
Location
South Texas
Amy Coney Barrett is feared by liberals not for anything she has done but for she did not do. She did not go to Planned Parenthood and flush five of her seven children down the plumbing. This makes her a wicked human being by the standards of the Democratic Party. They will fight her to the end.

Amy Coney Barrett, the judge at the top of Trump’s list to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg, has said we should always remember that a “legal career is but a means to an end … and that end is building the Kingdom of God."
--------------------------------
not good, but tramp will pick the one in Florida as he wants to win Florida. Its all about himself and what is good for him,
but I like a woman. I wish the woman would be RBG reincarnated.
Shes already exponentially better than ginsburg and she's not confirmed yet.
 

Mac1958

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2011
Messages
73,809
Reaction score
18,163
Points
2,210
Location
Opposing Authoritarian Ideological Fundamentalism.
Evidently it's unreasonable to be concerned that a Supreme Court Justice might base decisions on what her god is "telling" her.

Why would anyone be concerned about that?
As we continue to kick God out of america we will devolve into complete depravity.
Is the concern unreasonable, then?
 

Flash

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2014
Messages
38,623
Reaction score
15,110
Points
1,590
Location
Florida
A successful working Christian breeding Conservative Mom.

A nightmare for the Democrat filth.

I wonder who they are going to come up with to claim that she raped?

Maybe she force a boy to kiss her in a 6th grade Spin the Bottle game.
 

martybegan

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
53,808
Reaction score
11,142
Points
2,040
Evidently it's unreasonable to be concerned that a Supreme Court Justice might base decisions on what her god is "telling" her.

Why would anyone be concerned about that?
As we continue to kick God out of america we will devolve into complete depravity.
Is the concern unreasonable, then?
if there is a bias in a jurist, who cares if it comes flavored as divinely inspired or secular inspired?
 

LordBrownTrout

Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
29,626
Reaction score
8,012
Points
480
Location
South Texas
Evidently it's unreasonable to be concerned that a Supreme Court Justice might base decisions on what her god is "telling" her.

Why would anyone be concerned about that?
As we continue to kick God out of america we will devolve into complete depravity.
Is the concern unreasonable, then?
To answer your question, Id be concerned about the gods with a little g ie spaghetti monster, ra, tree god, etc. The SC can't write law, well....roberts did but, thats not their job. So they cant make us into a theocracy. Id be 100 percent against that.
 

22lcidw

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2018
Messages
14,030
Reaction score
3,836
Points
275
I am sure she has no more morals past the no abortion thingy? If abortion is such a bad thing why were they not illegal in the US until one hundred years later after the Constitution was signed?
Why did Judges get involved in it in the first place? From interpeting to making laws.
 

GHook20

Active Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2020
Messages
160
Reaction score
183
Points
43
Location
Las Vegas
Amy Coney Barrett is feared by liberals not for anything she has done but for she did not do. She did not go to Planned Parenthood and flush five of her seven children down the plumbing. This makes her a wicked human being by the standards of the Democratic Party. They will fight her to the end.

They are going to call her a racist even though 2 of her kids are black and were SAFED from the Haiti... ignorance and hypocrisy are leftist traits.
 

LeftofLeft

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
12,591
Reaction score
4,243
Points
350
Evidently it's unreasonable to be concerned that a Supreme Court Justice might base decisions on what her god is "telling" her.

Why would anyone be concerned about that?
As we continue to kick God out of america we will devolve into complete depravity.
Is the concern unreasonable, then?
To answer your question, Id be concerned about the gods with a little g ie spaghetti monster, ra, tree god, etc. The SC can't write law, well....roberts did but, thats not their job. So they cant make us into a theocracy. Id be 100 percent against that.
The Supreme Court - I don’t care if it is staked with Conservatives - should not be “legislating from the Bench” or otherwise being “activists judges”. My sense is that the Courts are the branch that Liberals live so much because it is easier to push policies from the Bench than in an Election. If any Conservative judge takes this approach they will draw more of an ire from myself.
 

candycorn

Alis volat propriis
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
67,475
Reaction score
11,507
Points
2,030
Amy Coney Barrett is feared by liberals not for anything she has done but for she did not do. She did not go to Planned Parenthood and flush five of her seven children down the plumbing. This makes her a wicked human being by the standards of the Democratic Party. They will fight her to the end.

Hope to see her record examined. So far, she sounds pretty good
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top