No Justice For Ashli??

Floyd was arrested or in the process for passing a counterfeit bill. He resisted arrest and he died from a drug overdose. Babbit got no warning, she was never restrained, she was unarmed and shot for no reason.
If Republicans didn't LIE, they'd have NOTHING to say!
 
Floyd was arrested or in the process for passing a counterfeit bill. He resisted arrest and he died from a drug overdose. Babbit got no warning, she was never restrained, she was unarmed and shot for no reason.
If Republicans didn't LIE, they'd have NOTHING to say!
Politicians are liars and the majority are traitors. The party does not matter.
 
Politicians are liars and the majority are traitors. The party does not matter.
61423535.jpg


#LOLGOP #TooFunny #CLASSIC
 
Babbit was unarmed and murdered in cold blood while protesting against her government. Celebrate all you want, but you will reap what you sow.
Ashli was attempting to breach a secure perimeter protecting our Congressmen. Once that perimeter was breached, there would be no way to protect members of Congress who were being threatened by an angry mob.

Ashli‘s relatives should sue the hell out of Donald J Trump
He is the one who filled her with lies, he is the one who filled her with rage, he is the one who called her to Washington and sent her to the Capitol.
What threat did she pose to anyone? She prenented a physical threat to our Congressmen ? A verbal one? She was unarmed.

She was a member of a mob that was threatening members of Congress and Mike Pence. She reached the final perimeter of defense and tried to crawl through a broken window.
Cost her life.

Blame Trumps lies
Not an acceptable excuse to murder someone who posed no physical threat at all. If she was such a threat, why then did the officers on Ashli's side of the door do nothing to stop her? Why then were barricades removed outside of the capital and protesters led to the building?

By your broken logic, police in Portland should have gunned down anyone who entered the police precinct last summer. And anyone in Minnesota who threatens authority figures should be murdered as well. What a steep double standard!

By your broken logic, police in Portland should have gunned down anyone who entered the police precinct last summer.

The ironic part about this is......you folks are upset that this didnt happen....

It's almost as if, police shooting unarmed people in and of itself isn't bad....you are just upset they aren't shooting enough unarmed people you are predisposed to hate......

Which makes you one of these......
View attachment 479852
"you folks are upset that this didnt happen" Here is a large part of the problem. You don't know me. You dont know a single thing about me. But you don't have a problem pretending like you do. I dont think anyone should be shot without an inquiry or consequences. You clearly think that there are times when that is ok. I dont have to assume that because you have said such.

That makes me sad. People should hold their public servants to the very highest of standards. But Democrats only believe that when it serves their political goals.
 
Babbit was unarmed and murdered in cold blood while protesting against her government. Celebrate all you want, but you will reap what you sow.
Ashli was attempting to breach a secure perimeter protecting our Congressmen. Once that perimeter was breached, there would be no way to protect members of Congress who were being threatened by an angry mob.

Ashli‘s relatives should sue the hell out of Donald J Trump
He is the one who filled her with lies, he is the one who filled her with rage, he is the one who called her to Washington and sent her to the Capitol.
Odd...I could have sworn the members of Congress were protected, after the perimeter was breached. Moreover, wasn't she shot in the lobby?

You would be wrong.

There were members of Congress on the other side of that door Ashli was trying to breach. The door led to Congressional Chambers where some members were still hiding

Hiding from a small, unarmed woman? A citizen expressing her right to protest? What kind of cowards do we have in Congress?
 
Babbit was unarmed and murdered in cold blood while protesting against her government. Celebrate all you want, but you will reap what you sow.
Ashli was attempting to breach a secure perimeter protecting our Congressmen. Once that perimeter was breached, there would be no way to protect members of Congress who were being threatened by an angry mob.

Ashli‘s relatives should sue the hell out of Donald J Trump
He is the one who filled her with lies, he is the one who filled her with rage, he is the one who called her to Washington and sent her to the Capitol.
Odd...I could have sworn the members of Congress were protected, after the perimeter was breached. Moreover, wasn't she shot in the lobby?

You would be wrong.

There were members of Congress on the other side of that door Ashli was trying to breach. The door led to Congressional Chambers where some members were still hiding

Hiding from a small, unarmed woman? A citizen expressing her right to protest? What kind of cowards do we have in Congress?
Well she did have a phone and was taking pictures of the Capitol building....I mean...that could be viewed as a threat to the left...
 

"Federal prosecutors will not charge a police officer who shot and killed a woman as she climbed through the broken part of a door during the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. Authorities had considered for months whether criminal charges were appropriate for the Capitol Police officer who fatally shot Ashli Babbitt -- The Justice Department’s decision, though expected, officially closes out the investigation.

Prosecutors said they had reviewed video of the shooting, along with statements from the officer involved and other officers and witnesses, examined physical evidence from the scene and reviewed the autopsy results. “Based on that investigation, officials determined that there is insufficient evidence to support a criminal prosecution,” the department said in a statement."


This sets a very dangerous precedent....It basically gives officers a blank check to gun down people, unarmed people, good people.....and the officer face no consequences for his or her actions...Because of this decision, cops can essentially gun you down just because you didn't obey an order they gave -- they can gun you down then claim they feared for their safety while dehumanizing you as some violent person or a member of some angry mob... even tho that person is unarmed and was posing no threat.

Now to be fair, it's perfectly OK for certain types of unarmed people to be gunned down for not obeying cops or maybe using inappropriate language towards cops that could cause them to fear for their safety; but it's different when you are actually fighting against a tyrannical government who stole an election and your only recourse is to storm the Capitol to voice your grievances, cosplay in Neo-Nazi and Neo-Confederate apparel, joke about executing the VP and perhaps scare congress members into overturning the election for you and stuff...

The only precedence this sets is, if you storm the Capitol trying to shut down the US Gov't there is a chance you might catch a bullet.
 
Babbit was unarmed and murdered in cold blood while protesting against her government. Celebrate all you want, but you will reap what you sow.
Ashli was attempting to breach a secure perimeter protecting our Congressmen. Once that perimeter was breached, there would be no way to protect members of Congress who were being threatened by an angry mob.

Ashli‘s relatives should sue the hell out of Donald J Trump
He is the one who filled her with lies, he is the one who filled her with rage, he is the one who called her to Washington and sent her to the Capitol.
Odd...I could have sworn the members of Congress were protected, after the perimeter was breached. Moreover, wasn't she shot in the lobby?

You would be wrong.

There were members of Congress on the other side of that door Ashli was trying to breach. The door led to Congressional Chambers where some members were still hiding

Hiding from a small, unarmed woman? A citizen expressing her right to protest? What kind of cowards do we have in Congress?

So you are telling us you have a right to storm the Capitol or the WH anytime you want to.
 

"Federal prosecutors will not charge a police officer who shot and killed a woman as she climbed through the broken part of a door during the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. Authorities had considered for months whether criminal charges were appropriate for the Capitol Police officer who fatally shot Ashli Babbitt -- The Justice Department’s decision, though expected, officially closes out the investigation.

Prosecutors said they had reviewed video of the shooting, along with statements from the officer involved and other officers and witnesses, examined physical evidence from the scene and reviewed the autopsy results. “Based on that investigation, officials determined that there is insufficient evidence to support a criminal prosecution,” the department said in a statement."


This sets a very dangerous precedent....It basically gives officers a blank check to gun down people, unarmed people, good people.....and the officer face no consequences for his or her actions...Because of this decision, cops can essentially gun you down just because you didn't obey an order they gave -- they can gun you down then claim they feared for their safety while dehumanizing you as some violent person or a member of some angry mob... even tho that person is unarmed and was posing no threat.

Now to be fair, it's perfectly OK for certain types of unarmed people to be gunned down for not obeying cops or maybe using inappropriate language towards cops that could cause them to fear for their safety; but it's different when you are actually fighting against a tyrannical government who stole an election and your only recourse is to storm the Capitol to voice your grievances, cosplay in Neo-Nazi and Neo-Confederate apparel, joke about executing the VP and perhaps scare congress members into overturning the election for you and stuff...

The only precedence this sets is, if you storm the Capitol trying to shut down the US Gov't there is a chance you might catch a bullet.

Look at you shilling for the cops' "right" to gun down unarmed protesters. LOL
 
We should dig her up, hang her, and allow her body to rot in front of the Capitol.
 
You’ll notice there’s no mention of a verbal warning to Ms. Babbitt or other efforts to subdue her without the use of deadly force.

Continuing on, the DOJ maintains that the “focus of the criminal investigation was to determine whether federal prosecutors could prove that the officer violated any federal laws, concentrating on the possible application of 18 U.S.C. § 242, a federal criminal civil rights statute.”

The press release focused on the term “willfully”:

How fucking lame is that?
 

"Federal prosecutors will not charge a police officer who shot and killed a woman as she climbed through the broken part of a door during the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. Authorities had considered for months whether criminal charges were appropriate for the Capitol Police officer who fatally shot Ashli Babbitt -- The Justice Department’s decision, though expected, officially closes out the investigation.

Prosecutors said they had reviewed video of the shooting, along with statements from the officer involved and other officers and witnesses, examined physical evidence from the scene and reviewed the autopsy results. “Based on that investigation, officials determined that there is insufficient evidence to support a criminal prosecution,” the department said in a statement."


This sets a very dangerous precedent....It basically gives officers a blank check to gun down people, unarmed people, good people.....and the officer face no consequences for his or her actions...Because of this decision, cops can essentially gun you down just because you didn't obey an order they gave -- they can gun you down then claim they feared for their safety while dehumanizing you as some violent person or a member of some angry mob... even tho that person is unarmed and was posing no threat.

Now to be fair, it's perfectly OK for certain types of unarmed people to be gunned down for not obeying cops or maybe using inappropriate language towards cops that could cause them to fear for their safety; but it's different when you are actually fighting against a tyrannical government who stole an election and your only recourse is to storm the Capitol to voice your grievances, cosplay in Neo-Nazi and Neo-Confederate apparel, joke about executing the VP and perhaps scare congress members into overturning the election for you and stuff...

The only precedence this sets is, if you storm the Capitol trying to shut down the US Gov't there is a chance you might catch a bullet.
I don't think it sets any precedent. I thought, it was common knowledge that if you are in the act of committing a criminal act, you run the high risk of being killed by police. At least that was the common understanding...until recently...if you are an African-American apparently that risk shouldn't apply...and if you are, it gives the Dem backed insurrectionist reason to loot, assault, rob, burn, and even attempt to overthrow the Govt.
 

"Federal prosecutors will not charge a police officer who shot and killed a woman as she climbed through the broken part of a door during the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. Authorities had considered for months whether criminal charges were appropriate for the Capitol Police officer who fatally shot Ashli Babbitt -- The Justice Department’s decision, though expected, officially closes out the investigation.

Prosecutors said they had reviewed video of the shooting, along with statements from the officer involved and other officers and witnesses, examined physical evidence from the scene and reviewed the autopsy results. “Based on that investigation, officials determined that there is insufficient evidence to support a criminal prosecution,” the department said in a statement."


This sets a very dangerous precedent....It basically gives officers a blank check to gun down people, unarmed people, good people.....and the officer face no consequences for his or her actions...Because of this decision, cops can essentially gun you down just because you didn't obey an order they gave -- they can gun you down then claim they feared for their safety while dehumanizing you as some violent person or a member of some angry mob... even tho that person is unarmed and was posing no threat.

Now to be fair, it's perfectly OK for certain types of unarmed people to be gunned down for not obeying cops or maybe using inappropriate language towards cops that could cause them to fear for their safety; but it's different when you are actually fighting against a tyrannical government who stole an election and your only recourse is to storm the Capitol to voice your grievances, cosplay in Neo-Nazi and Neo-Confederate apparel, joke about executing the VP and perhaps scare congress members into overturning the election for you and stuff...

The only precedence this sets is, if you storm the Capitol trying to shut down the US Gov't there is a chance you might catch a bullet.
I don't think it sets any precedent. I thought, it was common knowledge that if you are in the act of committing a criminal act, you run the high risk of being killed by police. At least that was the common understanding...until recently...if you are an African-American apparently that risk shouldn't apply...and if you are, it gives the Dem backed insurrectionist reason to loot, assault, rob, burn, and even attempt to overthrow the Govt.
People forget resisting arrest is a crime. No matter what color you are. Too bad they didn't give her that chance.
 
Babbit was unarmed and murdered in cold blood while protesting against her government. Celebrate all you want, but you will reap what you sow.
Ashli was attempting to breach a secure perimeter protecting our Congressmen. Once that perimeter was breached, there would be no way to protect members of Congress who were being threatened by an angry mob.

Ashli‘s relatives should sue the hell out of Donald J Trump
He is the one who filled her with lies, he is the one who filled her with rage, he is the one who called her to Washington and sent her to the Capitol.
Ashli was attempting to breach a secure perimeter protecting our Congressmen.

Correction...
Ashli was attempting to breach a secure perimeter protecting Wall Street's Congressmen.
 
It is sad that Ashley was gullible enough to believe the wild lies from a President too proud to admit he lost.

It cost her life
 
Babbit was unarmed and murdered in cold blood while protesting against her government. Celebrate all you want, but you will reap what you sow.
Ashli was attempting to breach a secure perimeter protecting our Congressmen. Once that perimeter was breached, there would be no way to protect members of Congress who were being threatened by an angry mob.

Ashli‘s relatives should sue the hell out of Donald J Trump
He is the one who filled her with lies, he is the one who filled her with rage, he is the one who called her to Washington and sent her to the Capitol.
Odd...I could have sworn the members of Congress were protected, after the perimeter was breached. Moreover, wasn't she shot in the lobby?

You would be wrong.

There were members of Congress on the other side of that door Ashli was trying to breach. The door led to Congressional Chambers where some members were still hiding

Hiding from a small, unarmed woman? A citizen expressing her right to protest? What kind of cowards do we have in Congress?
Well she did have a phone and was taking pictures of the Capitol building....I mean...that could be viewed as a threat to the left...
Smashing a window to gain access to Congressmen is a threat.
So is participating in a Mob attack
 
Babbit was unarmed and murdered in cold blood while protesting against her government. Celebrate all you want, but you will reap what you sow.
Ashli was attempting to breach a secure perimeter protecting our Congressmen. Once that perimeter was breached, there would be no way to protect members of Congress who were being threatened by an angry mob.

Ashli‘s relatives should sue the hell out of Donald J Trump
He is the one who filled her with lies, he is the one who filled her with rage, he is the one who called her to Washington and sent her to the Capitol.
Odd...I could have sworn the members of Congress were protected, after the perimeter was breached. Moreover, wasn't she shot in the lobby?

You would be wrong.

There were members of Congress on the other side of that door Ashli was trying to breach. The door led to Congressional Chambers where some members were still hiding

Hiding from a small, unarmed woman? A citizen expressing her right to protest? What kind of cowards do we have in Congress?
Well she did have a phone and was taking pictures of the Capitol building....I mean...that could be viewed as a threat to the left...
Smashing a window to gain access to Congressmen is a threat.
So is participating in a Mob attack
Did she smash a window? Or was she one of the folks let in by the Cap Police after they were ordered to stand down by Nancy P?

Sounds like she actually might of been set up, and put in a trap to be murdered by Nancy P
 
If her family will get a good lawyer they can sue for wrongful death- get it before a jury and make them prove their case- which may be what this is all about.
 

Forum List

Back
Top