No, Charlie Kirk Was Not Practicing Politics the Right Way

What would cause one to want to be a productive member of a society that created laws to keep you in poverty and separate?

How many black people today live under these types of laws? Can you name a current law that keeps them in poverty and forces separation?
 
He wouldn’t need to “toss” anything in to trigger certain people. He touched a nerve on many subjects with lefties because he told the truth. Hearing the truth challenged their ideology/indoctrination. That is equaivlant to challenging someone’s faith to an indoctrinated person. Seeing as many, if not most, who opposed Charlie are godless, their de facto faith is their indoctrination and dedication to the Democratic Party and it’s ideals. This kind of explains why they get so defensive when challenged.

We have many wanting to put up statues honoring those who fought to keep peoples ancestors in slavery.

Why would a person want to be a productive member of that society?
 
How many black people today live under these types of laws? Can you name a current law that keeps them in poverty and forces separation?

 
So when you hire people you will get a few that are incompetent.

Sure, and even a few more when you hire based on race not merit. Race is prioritized over merit. How do you not understand how that would allow for some lesser qualified people?
 
What would cause one to want to be a productive member of a society that created laws to keep you in poverty and separate?
Bullshit excuse. Shove that race card up your ass.
Charlie made the point about black fathers dumbass.
1757678553570.webp
 
We have many wanting to put up statues honoring those who fought to keep peoples ancestors in slavery.

Why would a person want to be a productive member of that society?

They didn’t fight specifically to keep people’s ancestors in slavery. Many fought for states rights and unfair taxation. Very few Southerners, relative to the population, had slaves. But, I am not going to get into a Civil War discussion with you.

Regardless, are you saying that black people don’t want to be productive members of our society?
 
‘Tragedy is a powerful shaper of narratives. In the aftermath of the horrific assassination of MAGA champion Charlie Kirk, a husband and father of two, it was natural that his allies, including President Trump, lionized him as a patriot, free-speech advocate, and activist. And political opponents somberly denounced the terrible killing, as they should, with some hailing Kirk’s devotion to public debate. There’s a tendency in such a moment to look for the best in people or, at least, to not dwell on the negatives. That can be a good thing. Yet as Kirk is quickly canonized by Trump and his movement—on Thursday Trump announced he would bestow upon Kirk a posthumous Presidential Medal of Freedom—a full depiction of his impact on American politics is largely being sidestepped.
[…]
Here’s the problem: Kirk built that movement with falsehoods. And his advocacy was laced with racist and bigoted statements. Recognizing this does not diminish the awfulness of this act of violence. Nor does it lessen our outrage or diminish our sympathy for his family, friends, and colleagues. Yet if this is an appropriate moment to assess Kirk and issue bold statements about his participation in America’s political life, there ought to be room for a true discussion.

Kirk, a right-wing provocateur who founded and led Turning Point USA, an organization of young conservatives, was a promoter of Trump’s destructive and baseless conspiracy theory that the 2020 election was stolen from him. Two days before the January 6 riot, Kirk boasted in a tweet that Students for Trump and Turning Point Action were “Sending 80+ buses full of patriots to DC to fight for this president.”’


Kirk’s lawless killing shouldn’t be used to conceal or whitewash the fact that he was a promoter of racism, bigotry, and hate; a conservative ideologue who was responsible for spreading all manner of rightwing disinformation, conspiracy theories, and lies contributing to current political division and acrimony.
He let anyone no matter their political and personal beliefs speak on his platform. That's not racism or fascism you idiot. What is is people like yourself who threw toddler fits every time he came on to a campus and tried to get his events canceled.

This is Mr. Kirk you ignorant piece of garbage.

 
They didn’t fight specifically to keep people’s ancestors in slavery.

Some did and even those who didnt specifically do so would have accomplished that if they had won.


Many fought for states rights and unfair taxation. Very few Southerners, relative to the population, had slaves. But, I am not going to get into a Civil War discussion with you.

Regardless, are you saying that black people don’t want to be productive members of our society?

Not at all. I'm saying I understand how some have a hard time feeling a part of a society that fights to honor those who fought to keep their ancestors in slavery.
 
Based on the stated intentions of airlines to hire based on RACE, not qualifications.


You make your self look stupid when you ignore obvious truths.
Really now, document the claim that airlines hire on race. Should be easy. A policy statement, perhaps a list of company principals, a mission statement even. What you claim is an obvious truth is not obvious at all.

Wow, so he tells that young lady, here is the problem you are going to have to negotiate. When you are in that school that you worked hard to get into, well people are going to look at you and say to themselves, that girl got into this school because of her race, not because of your hard work. He said that was racism.

Then I suppose Kirk drives to the airport and there he sees a black pilot and he asks himself, "Ghee, I hope that guy is qualified". He assumes the pilot got the job because of his race, not his hard work and training. By Kirk's own definition, he was a racist.
 
Really now, document the claim that airlines hire on race. Should be easy. A policy statement, perhaps a list of company principals, a mission statement even. What you claim is an obvious truth is not obvious at all.

Wow, so he tells that young lady, here is the problem you are going to have to negotiate. When you are in that school that you worked hard to get into, well people are going to look at you and say to themselves, that girl got into this school because of her race, not because of your hard work. He said that was racism.

Then I suppose Kirk drives to the airport and there he sees a black pilot and he asks himself, "Ghee, I hope that guy is qualified". He assumes the pilot got the job because of his race, not his hard work and training. By Kirk's own definition, he was a racist.
Here you go.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Last week, the Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) notified America First Legal (AFL) that American Airlines has agreed to abandon the discriminatory employment practices AFL outlined in its federal civil rights complaint against the company. The airline acknowledged that recruiting and hiring based on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) violates federal laws and equal employment opportunities.


You mouth breathing idiots just can not do or think anything other than what you are told.
Nothing Mr. Kirk told that young women could be considered racist by anyone other than morons like yourself that believe the Black community can not succeed without the benevolence of the Democratic party and the left.

So much for Dr. King's dream. You loons ruined that.
 
15th post
<snip the garbage word salad>

Kirk’s lawless killing shouldn’t be used to conceal or whitewash the fact that he was a promoter of racism, bigotry, and hate; a conservative ideologue who was responsible for spreading all manner of rightwing disinformation, conspiracy theories, and lies contributing to current political division and acrimony.
So, anybody that leftist scum believe is any one of those things deserves to be murdered?

That shooter isn't the problem in this Country, YOU are -- And scum like you.

Some day. I can only hope -- Some day
 
Here you go.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Last week, the Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) notified America First Legal (AFL) that American Airlines has agreed to abandon the discriminatory employment practices AFL outlined in its federal civil rights complaint against the company. The airline acknowledged that recruiting and hiring based on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) violates federal laws and equal employment opportunities.


You mouth breathing idiots just can not do or think anything other than what you are told.
Nothing Mr. Kirk told that young women could be considered racist by anyone other than morons like yourself that believe the Black community can not succeed without the benevolence of the Democratic party and the left.

So much for Dr. King's dream. You loons ruined that.
Did I say what he told that young woman was racist? No. He defined racism to that young woman. He told her, you will be seen and judged by the color of your skin. He said that was racism. And when Kirk saw a black pilot he did see a pilot, he saw a black pilot, and he judged that pilot by the color of his skin.
 
‘Tragedy is a powerful shaper of narratives. In the aftermath of the horrific assassination of MAGA champion Charlie Kirk, a husband and father of two, it was natural that his allies, including President Trump, lionized him as a patriot, free-speech advocate, and activist. And political opponents somberly denounced the terrible killing, as they should, with some hailing Kirk’s devotion to public debate. There’s a tendency in such a moment to look for the best in people or, at least, to not dwell on the negatives. That can be a good thing. Yet as Kirk is quickly canonized by Trump and his movement—on Thursday Trump announced he would bestow upon Kirk a posthumous Presidential Medal of Freedom—a full depiction of his impact on American politics is largely being sidestepped.
[…]
Here’s the problem: Kirk built that movement with falsehoods. And his advocacy was laced with racist and bigoted statements. Recognizing this does not diminish the awfulness of this act of violence. Nor does it lessen our outrage or diminish our sympathy for his family, friends, and colleagues. Yet if this is an appropriate moment to assess Kirk and issue bold statements about his participation in America’s political life, there ought to be room for a true discussion.

Kirk, a right-wing provocateur who founded and led Turning Point USA, an organization of young conservatives, was a promoter of Trump’s destructive and baseless conspiracy theory that the 2020 election was stolen from him. Two days before the January 6 riot, Kirk boasted in a tweet that Students for Trump and Turning Point Action were “Sending 80+ buses full of patriots to DC to fight for this president.”’


Kirk’s lawless killing shouldn’t be used to conceal or whitewash the fact that he was a promoter of racism, bigotry, and hate; a conservative ideologue who was responsible for spreading all manner of rightwing disinformation, conspiracy theories, and lies contributing to current political division and acrimony.


I love the Dims labels thrown at Kirk. "Racist!!! Bigot!!! But then zero evidence. Nada. It's all bullshit.
 
He was not a politician
He was not running for office
He was a social commentator who was murdered for his correct assessments and speech
 
Back
Top Bottom