No, Charlie Kirk Was Not Practicing Politics the Right Way

[drudge X]

Please link to any appearance he ever made that wasn't political.

You're saying a citizen cannot make political statements and if so, that citizen must be a politician?

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Did I say what he told that young woman was racist? No. He defined racism to that young woman. He told her, you will be seen and judged by the color of your skin. He said that was racism. And when Kirk saw a black pilot he did see a pilot, he saw a black pilot, and he judged that pilot by the color of his skin.

You are so full of shit. He judged that pilot by the practices of the racist policies of the company.

This is Charlie Kirk.

 

[BULLDOG]

Please tell me what office he ran for.
He spoke at the GOP conventions, but was promoting better policies, critiquing immoral democrat policies.
You can interpret his debates as "political", but essentially he was advocating for God and Country.

He founded Turning Point, a political organization that was intimately involved in countless tight wing campaigns, and every statement, appearance, video, or donation was in support of far right political goals. He advocated for right wing politics, and only right wing politics. You can depict him as a religious figure as you have with trump, but that would be just another lie.

 

[BULLDOG]

If you are ever put into the crosshairs, you will change your views pretty quickly.

What is the deal? Are you cult members trying to out-stupid each other's posts?

 

[BULLDOG]

You're saying a citizen cannot make political statements and if so, that citizen must be a politician?

If he founded and ran a large political organization, and regularly made appearances in support of that one party and oppose any alternative to that one party, yes, he was a politician.

 

[SweetSue92]

In your mind, was Kirk a religious figure or a political figure?

Who cares?! You're cooked either way, no matter what I think

 

[Rawley]

Having conversations is now considered not practicing politics the right way.

If you disagree with their orthodoxy, you are racist and a provocateur.

 

[kyzr]

He founded Turning Point, a political organization that was intimately involved in countless tight wing campaigns, and every statement, appearance, video, or donation was in support of far right political goals. He advocated for right wing politics, and only right wing politics. You can depict him as a religious figure as you have with trump, but that would be just another lie.

TURNING POINT USA is a conservative organization, not a PAC. Advocating for God and Country is not a lie.

Home - TPUSA

We play offense with a sense of urgency to win America's culture war

tpusa.com

Turning Point USA is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization founded in 2012 by Charlie Kirk. The organization’s mission is to identify, educate, train, and organize students to promote the principles of fiscal responsibility, free markets, and limited government.​

 

[WEATHER53]

Kirk was not a politician but was a social influencer. The wretched Dems were so afraid of his effect on young people that they had to murder him before any political career got underway.

 

[WEATHER53]

He founded Turning Point, a political organization that was intimately involved in countless tight wing campaigns, and every statement, appearance, video, or donation was in support of far right political goals. He advocated for right wing politics, and only right wing politics. You can depict him as a religious figure as you have with trump, but that would be just another lie.

A social influencer
What political position had Kirk ever run for ??

 

[WEATHER53]

TURNING POINT USA is a conservative organization, not a PAC. Advocating for God and Country is not a lie.

Home - TPUSA

We play offense with a sense of urgency to win America's culture war

tpusa.com

Turning Point USA is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization founded in 2012 by Charlie Kirk. The organization’s mission is to identify, educate, train, and organize students to promote the principles of fiscal responsibility, free markets, and limited government.​

Watch out. This sort of fact draws live fire

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Do you support offing people who disagree with you?

.

Of course it does.

.

 

[BackAgain]

‘Tragedy is a powerful shaper of narratives. In the aftermath of the horrific assassination of MAGA champion Charlie Kirk, a husband and father of two, it was natural that his allies, including President Trump, lionized him as a patriot, free-speech advocate, and activist. And political opponents somberly denounced the terrible killing, as they should, with some hailing Kirk’s devotion to public debate. There’s a tendency in such a moment to look for the best in people or, at least, to not dwell on the negatives. That can be a good thing. Yet as Kirk is quickly canonized by Trump and his movement—on Thursday Trump announced he would bestow upon Kirk a posthumous Presidential Medal of Freedom—a full depiction of his impact on American politics is largely being sidestepped.
[…]
Here’s the problem: Kirk built that movement with falsehoods. And his advocacy was laced with racist and bigoted statements. Recognizing this does not diminish the awfulness of this act of violence. Nor does it lessen our outrage or diminish our sympathy for his family, friends, and colleagues. Yet if this is an appropriate moment to assess Kirk and issue bold statements about his participation in America’s political life, there ought to be room for a true discussion.

Kirk, a right-wing provocateur who founded and led Turning Point USA, an organization of young conservatives, was a promoter of Trump’s destructive and baseless conspiracy theory that the 2020 election was stolen from him. Two days before the January 6 riot, Kirk boasted in a tweet that Students for Trump and Turning Point Action were “Sending 80+ buses full of patriots to DC to fight for this president.”’

No, Charlie Kirk was not practicing politics the right way

His assassination deserves full condemnation; his full impact should not be sidestepped.

www.motherjones.com

Kirk’s lawless killing shouldn’t be used to conceal or whitewash the fact that he was a promoter of racism, bigotry, and hate; a conservative ideologue who was responsible for spreading all manner of rightwing disinformation, conspiracy theories, and lies contributing to current political division and acrimony.

Yes. Charlie Kirk WAS practicing politics the right way. No protests. No violence. Open to discussion and debate. Non sarcastic (for the most part). Resorting to facts and the use of logic. Challenging baseless presuppositions.

And it is flatly untrue that Charlie Kirk buttressed his position with — or based it in any way upon — racism.

Another cut and paste hack job by one of the usual offenders.

 

[WEATHER53]

The right way is what lib loons try to say that I can say

 

[jbrownson0831]

Yes. Charlie Kirk WAS practicing politics the right way. No protests. No violence. Open to discussion and debate. Non sarcastic (for the most part). Resorting to facts and the use of logic. Challenging baseless presuppositions.

And it is flatly untrue that Charlie Kirk buttressed his position with — or based it in any way upon — racism.

Another cut and paste hack job by one of the usual offenders.

Yep, good ole facediaper.....

 

[eagle7-31]

‘Tragedy is a powerful shaper of narratives. In the aftermath of the horrific assassination of MAGA champion Charlie Kirk, a husband and father of two, it was natural that his allies, including President Trump, lionized him as a patriot, free-speech advocate, and activist. And political opponents somberly denounced the terrible killing, as they should, with some hailing Kirk’s devotion to public debate. There’s a tendency in such a moment to look for the best in people or, at least, to not dwell on the negatives. That can be a good thing. Yet as Kirk is quickly canonized by Trump and his movement—on Thursday Trump announced he would bestow upon Kirk a posthumous Presidential Medal of Freedom—a full depiction of his impact on American politics is largely being sidestepped.
[…]
Here’s the problem: Kirk built that movement with falsehoods. And his advocacy was laced with racist and bigoted statements. Recognizing this does not diminish the awfulness of this act of violence. Nor does it lessen our outrage or diminish our sympathy for his family, friends, and colleagues. Yet if this is an appropriate moment to assess Kirk and issue bold statements about his participation in America’s political life, there ought to be room for a true discussion.

Kirk, a right-wing provocateur who founded and led Turning Point USA, an organization of young conservatives, was a promoter of Trump’s destructive and baseless conspiracy theory that the 2020 election was stolen from him. Two days before the January 6 riot, Kirk boasted in a tweet that Students for Trump and Turning Point Action were “Sending 80+ buses full of patriots to DC to fight for this president.”’

No, Charlie Kirk was not practicing politics the right way

His assassination deserves full condemnation; his full impact should not be sidestepped.

www.motherjones.com

Kirk’s lawless killing shouldn’t be used to conceal or whitewash the fact that he was a promoter of racism, bigotry, and hate; a conservative ideologue who was responsible for spreading all manner of rightwing disinformation, conspiracy theories, and lies contributing to current political division and acrimony.

Too bad for you we are not a far leftist one party state that you seem to want.

 

[justoffal]

Too bad for you we are not a far leftist one party state that you seem to want.

Bots don't really know what they want

 

[Mac-7]

Here’s the problem: Kirk built that movement with falsehoods. And his advocacy was laced with racist and bigoted statements.

You are the one spreading falsehoods about Kirk

Do you concede that Van Jones falsely accused Kirk of racism on CNN over the killing of the girl from Ukraine?

 

[BULLDOG]

Who cares?! You're cooked either way, no matter what I think

answer the question

 

[justoffal]

You are the one spreading falsehoods about Kirk

Do you concede that Van Jones falsely accused Kirk of racism on CNN over the killing of the girl from Ukraine?

Clayton is good with what the brutha did