Next time you hear someone criticizing socialism...

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

#1 economic growth period in 21st century = China (Socialist)

Nothing says “#1 economic growth” like total economic collapse!

Forget the Trade War. China Is Already in Crisis

Throughout most of the 21st century China had been the #1 economic growth champion.

 

[basquebromance]

Every morning, when I wake again under the pall of the sky, I feel that for me it is New Year’s Day.

That’s why I hate these New Year’s that fall like fixed maturities, which turn life and human spirit into a commercial concern with its neat final balance, its outstanding amounts, its budget for the new management. They make us lose the continuity of life and spirit. You end up seriously thinking that between one year and the next there is a break, that a new history is beginning; you make resolutions, and you regret your irresolution, and so on, and so forth. This is generally what’s wrong with dates.

I want every morning to be a new year’s for me. Every day I want to reckon with myself, and every day I want to renew myself. No day set aside for rest. I choose my pauses myself, when I feel drunk with the intensity of life and I want to plunge into animality to draw from it new vigor.

No spiritual time-serving. I would like every hour of my life to be new, though connected to the ones that have passed. No day of celebration with its mandatory collective rhythms, to share with all the strangers I don’t care about. Because our grandfathers’ grandfathers, and so on, celebrated, we too should feel the urge to celebrate. That is nauseating.

I await socialism for this reason too. Because it will hurl into the trash all of these dates which have no resonance in our spirit and, if it creates others, they will at least be our own, and not the ones we have to accept without reservations from our silly ancestors.

 

[2aguy]

Ask them how well capitalism was doing in 1929.
View attachment 245504 View attachment 245506 View attachment 245505

To the extent that capitalism’s problems – inequality, instability (cycles/crises), etc. – stem in part from its production relationships, reforms focused exclusively on regulating or supplanting markets will not succeed in solving them. For example, Keynesian monetary policies (focused on raising or lowering the quantity of money in circulation and, correspondingly, interest rates) do not touch the employer-employee relationship, however much their variations redistribute wealth, regulate markets, or displace markets in favor of state-administered investment decisions. Likewise, Keynesian fiscal policies (raising or lowering taxes and government spending) do not address the employer-employee relationship.

Keynesian policies also never ended the cyclical instability of capitalism. The New Deal and European social democracy left capitalism in place in both state and private units (enterprises) of production notwithstanding their massive reform agendas and programs. They thereby left capitalist employers facing the incentives and receiving the resources (profits) to evade, weaken and eventually dissolve most of those programs.

It is far better not to distribute wealth unequally in the first place than to re-distribute it after to undo the inequality. For example, FDR proposed in 1944 that the government establish a maximum income alongside a minimum wage; that is one among the various ways inequality could be limited and thereby redistribution avoided. Efforts to redistribute encounter evasions, oppositions, and failures that compound the effects of unequal distribution itself. Social peace and cohesion are the victims of redistribution sooner or later. Reforming markets while leaving the relations/organization of capitalist production unchanged is like redistribution. Just as redistribution schemes fail to solve the problems rooted in distribution, market-focused reforms fail to solve the problems rooted in production.

Since 2008, capitalism has showed us all yet again its deep and unsolved problems of cyclical instability, deepening inequality and the injustices they both entail. Their persistence mirrors that of the capitalist organization of production. To successfully confront and solve the problems of economic cycles, income and wealth inequality, and so on, we need to go beyond the capitalist employer-employee system of production. The democratization of enterprises – transitioning from employer-employee hierarchies to worker cooperatives – is a key way available here and now to realize the change we need.

Worker coops democratically decide the distribution of income (wages, bonuses, benefits, profit shares, etc.) among their members. No small group of owners and the boards of directors they choose would, as in capitalist corporations, make such decisions. Thus, for example, it would be far less likely that a few individuals in a worker coop would earn millions while most others could not afford to send children to college. A democratic worker coop decision on the distribution of enterprise income would be far less unequal than what typifies capitalist enterprises. A socialism for the 21st century could and should include the transition from a capitalist to a worker-coop-based economic system as central to its commitments to less inequality and less social conflict over redistribution.

Capitalism Is Not the “Market System”



An OP should be 3-4 paragraphs, link, content.
Angelo

Copyright. Link Each "Copy & Paste" to It's Source. Only paste a small to medium section of the material.

USMB Rules and Guidelines

And it was socialism that made the depression longer and deeper...as FDR tried to socialize the government......

How is capitalism working now, you doofus? Enjoy posting on whatever capitialistic created electronic device you are using? You socialists are so tiring.....you would simply be annoying if you didn't put millions of people into mass graves whenever you get real power...

Yeah sure, that's why FDR is the #1 champion of 20th Century American economic growth.

(Rolls eyes)

He isn't you dope.......as rational historians look at FDR, not the left wing secluar religionist cheer leaders....but real historians and economists.....they point out his attempt to control the economy put the "Great" in the Great Depression because normally, economic downturns happen and then there is a fairly quick recovery...his attempt to take over and control the economy lengthened and deepened the depression to the point we didn't recover until the War started......that was him, not capitalism...

 

[2aguy]

#1 economic growth period in 21st century = China (Socialist)

Nothing says “#1 economic growth” like total economic collapse!

Forget the Trade War. China Is Already in Crisis

Throughout most of the 21st century China had been the #1 economic growth champion.

As they have abandoned communist economic theory and embraced captalism in their economy, while they still maintain totalitarian control over the political system....

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Ask them how well capitalism was doing in 1929.
View attachment 245504 View attachment 245506 View attachment 245505

To the extent that capitalism’s problems – inequality, instability (cycles/crises), etc. – stem in part from its production relationships, reforms focused exclusively on regulating or supplanting markets will not succeed in solving them. For example, Keynesian monetary policies (focused on raising or lowering the quantity of money in circulation and, correspondingly, interest rates) do not touch the employer-employee relationship, however much their variations redistribute wealth, regulate markets, or displace markets in favor of state-administered investment decisions. Likewise, Keynesian fiscal policies (raising or lowering taxes and government spending) do not address the employer-employee relationship.

Keynesian policies also never ended the cyclical instability of capitalism. The New Deal and European social democracy left capitalism in place in both state and private units (enterprises) of production notwithstanding their massive reform agendas and programs. They thereby left capitalist employers facing the incentives and receiving the resources (profits) to evade, weaken and eventually dissolve most of those programs.

It is far better not to distribute wealth unequally in the first place than to re-distribute it after to undo the inequality. For example, FDR proposed in 1944 that the government establish a maximum income alongside a minimum wage; that is one among the various ways inequality could be limited and thereby redistribution avoided. Efforts to redistribute encounter evasions, oppositions, and failures that compound the effects of unequal distribution itself. Social peace and cohesion are the victims of redistribution sooner or later. Reforming markets while leaving the relations/organization of capitalist production unchanged is like redistribution. Just as redistribution schemes fail to solve the problems rooted in distribution, market-focused reforms fail to solve the problems rooted in production.

Since 2008, capitalism has showed us all yet again its deep and unsolved problems of cyclical instability, deepening inequality and the injustices they both entail. Their persistence mirrors that of the capitalist organization of production. To successfully confront and solve the problems of economic cycles, income and wealth inequality, and so on, we need to go beyond the capitalist employer-employee system of production. The democratization of enterprises – transitioning from employer-employee hierarchies to worker cooperatives – is a key way available here and now to realize the change we need.

Worker coops democratically decide the distribution of income (wages, bonuses, benefits, profit shares, etc.) among their members. No small group of owners and the boards of directors they choose would, as in capitalist corporations, make such decisions. Thus, for example, it would be far less likely that a few individuals in a worker coop would earn millions while most others could not afford to send children to college. A democratic worker coop decision on the distribution of enterprise income would be far less unequal than what typifies capitalist enterprises. A socialism for the 21st century could and should include the transition from a capitalist to a worker-coop-based economic system as central to its commitments to less inequality and less social conflict over redistribution.

Capitalism Is Not the “Market System”



An OP should be 3-4 paragraphs, link, content.
Angelo

Copyright. Link Each "Copy & Paste" to It's Source. Only paste a small to medium section of the material.

USMB Rules and Guidelines

And it was socialism that made the depression longer and deeper...as FDR tried to socialize the government......

How is capitalism working now, you doofus? Enjoy posting on whatever capitialistic created electronic device you are using? You socialists are so tiring.....you would simply be annoying if you didn't put millions of people into mass graves whenever you get real power...

Yeah sure, that's why FDR is the #1 champion of 20th Century American economic growth.

(Rolls eyes)

He isn't you dope.......as rational historians look at FDR, not the left wing secluar religionist cheer leaders....but real historians and economists.....they point out his attempt to control the economy put the "Great" in the Great Depression because normally, economic downturns happen and then there is a fairly quick recovery...his attempt to take over and control the economy lengthened and deepened the depression to the point we didn't recover until the War started......that was him, not capitalism...

FDR achieved the #1 growth of any USA president in the 20th century.

National Socialist Germany achieved even faster economic growth than that.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

#1 economic growth period in 21st century = China (Socialist)

Nothing says “#1 economic growth” like total economic collapse!

Forget the Trade War. China Is Already in Crisis

Throughout most of the 21st century China had been the #1 economic growth champion.

As they have abandoned communist economic theory and embraced captalism in their economy, while they still maintain totalitarian control over the political system....

I never said Communism, or Capitalism were good.

But, rather the intermediate Hybrid system which China has & is STILL Socialist.

 

[2aguy]

Ask them how well capitalism was doing in 1929.
View attachment 245504 View attachment 245506 View attachment 245505

To the extent that capitalism’s problems – inequality, instability (cycles/crises), etc. – stem in part from its production relationships, reforms focused exclusively on regulating or supplanting markets will not succeed in solving them. For example, Keynesian monetary policies (focused on raising or lowering the quantity of money in circulation and, correspondingly, interest rates) do not touch the employer-employee relationship, however much their variations redistribute wealth, regulate markets, or displace markets in favor of state-administered investment decisions. Likewise, Keynesian fiscal policies (raising or lowering taxes and government spending) do not address the employer-employee relationship.

Keynesian policies also never ended the cyclical instability of capitalism. The New Deal and European social democracy left capitalism in place in both state and private units (enterprises) of production notwithstanding their massive reform agendas and programs. They thereby left capitalist employers facing the incentives and receiving the resources (profits) to evade, weaken and eventually dissolve most of those programs.

It is far better not to distribute wealth unequally in the first place than to re-distribute it after to undo the inequality. For example, FDR proposed in 1944 that the government establish a maximum income alongside a minimum wage; that is one among the various ways inequality could be limited and thereby redistribution avoided. Efforts to redistribute encounter evasions, oppositions, and failures that compound the effects of unequal distribution itself. Social peace and cohesion are the victims of redistribution sooner or later. Reforming markets while leaving the relations/organization of capitalist production unchanged is like redistribution. Just as redistribution schemes fail to solve the problems rooted in distribution, market-focused reforms fail to solve the problems rooted in production.

Since 2008, capitalism has showed us all yet again its deep and unsolved problems of cyclical instability, deepening inequality and the injustices they both entail. Their persistence mirrors that of the capitalist organization of production. To successfully confront and solve the problems of economic cycles, income and wealth inequality, and so on, we need to go beyond the capitalist employer-employee system of production. The democratization of enterprises – transitioning from employer-employee hierarchies to worker cooperatives – is a key way available here and now to realize the change we need.

Worker coops democratically decide the distribution of income (wages, bonuses, benefits, profit shares, etc.) among their members. No small group of owners and the boards of directors they choose would, as in capitalist corporations, make such decisions. Thus, for example, it would be far less likely that a few individuals in a worker coop would earn millions while most others could not afford to send children to college. A democratic worker coop decision on the distribution of enterprise income would be far less unequal than what typifies capitalist enterprises. A socialism for the 21st century could and should include the transition from a capitalist to a worker-coop-based economic system as central to its commitments to less inequality and less social conflict over redistribution.

Capitalism Is Not the “Market System”



An OP should be 3-4 paragraphs, link, content.
Angelo

Copyright. Link Each "Copy & Paste" to It's Source. Only paste a small to medium section of the material.

USMB Rules and Guidelines

And it was socialism that made the depression longer and deeper...as FDR tried to socialize the government......

How is capitalism working now, you doofus? Enjoy posting on whatever capitialistic created electronic device you are using? You socialists are so tiring.....you would simply be annoying if you didn't put millions of people into mass graves whenever you get real power...

Yeah sure, that's why FDR is the #1 champion of 20th Century American economic growth.

(Rolls eyes)

He isn't you dope.......as rational historians look at FDR, not the left wing secluar religionist cheer leaders....but real historians and economists.....they point out his attempt to control the economy put the "Great" in the Great Depression because normally, economic downturns happen and then there is a fairly quick recovery...his attempt to take over and control the economy lengthened and deepened the depression to the point we didn't recover until the War started......that was him, not capitalism...

FDR achieved the #1 growth of any USA president in the 20th century.

National Socialist Germany achieved even faster economic growth than that.

FDR had a war time economy where the country had to supply all the allies with war material.......without that he would have kept the country mired in the Great Depression....

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Ask them how well capitalism was doing in 1929.
View attachment 245504 View attachment 245506 View attachment 245505

To the extent that capitalism’s problems – inequality, instability (cycles/crises), etc. – stem in part from its production relationships, reforms focused exclusively on regulating or supplanting markets will not succeed in solving them. For example, Keynesian monetary policies (focused on raising or lowering the quantity of money in circulation and, correspondingly, interest rates) do not touch the employer-employee relationship, however much their variations redistribute wealth, regulate markets, or displace markets in favor of state-administered investment decisions. Likewise, Keynesian fiscal policies (raising or lowering taxes and government spending) do not address the employer-employee relationship.

Keynesian policies also never ended the cyclical instability of capitalism. The New Deal and European social democracy left capitalism in place in both state and private units (enterprises) of production notwithstanding their massive reform agendas and programs. They thereby left capitalist employers facing the incentives and receiving the resources (profits) to evade, weaken and eventually dissolve most of those programs.

It is far better not to distribute wealth unequally in the first place than to re-distribute it after to undo the inequality. For example, FDR proposed in 1944 that the government establish a maximum income alongside a minimum wage; that is one among the various ways inequality could be limited and thereby redistribution avoided. Efforts to redistribute encounter evasions, oppositions, and failures that compound the effects of unequal distribution itself. Social peace and cohesion are the victims of redistribution sooner or later. Reforming markets while leaving the relations/organization of capitalist production unchanged is like redistribution. Just as redistribution schemes fail to solve the problems rooted in distribution, market-focused reforms fail to solve the problems rooted in production.

Since 2008, capitalism has showed us all yet again its deep and unsolved problems of cyclical instability, deepening inequality and the injustices they both entail. Their persistence mirrors that of the capitalist organization of production. To successfully confront and solve the problems of economic cycles, income and wealth inequality, and so on, we need to go beyond the capitalist employer-employee system of production. The democratization of enterprises – transitioning from employer-employee hierarchies to worker cooperatives – is a key way available here and now to realize the change we need.

Worker coops democratically decide the distribution of income (wages, bonuses, benefits, profit shares, etc.) among their members. No small group of owners and the boards of directors they choose would, as in capitalist corporations, make such decisions. Thus, for example, it would be far less likely that a few individuals in a worker coop would earn millions while most others could not afford to send children to college. A democratic worker coop decision on the distribution of enterprise income would be far less unequal than what typifies capitalist enterprises. A socialism for the 21st century could and should include the transition from a capitalist to a worker-coop-based economic system as central to its commitments to less inequality and less social conflict over redistribution.

Capitalism Is Not the “Market System”



An OP should be 3-4 paragraphs, link, content.
Angelo

Copyright. Link Each "Copy & Paste" to It's Source. Only paste a small to medium section of the material.

USMB Rules and Guidelines

And it was socialism that made the depression longer and deeper...as FDR tried to socialize the government......

How is capitalism working now, you doofus? Enjoy posting on whatever capitialistic created electronic device you are using? You socialists are so tiring.....you would simply be annoying if you didn't put millions of people into mass graves whenever you get real power...

Yeah sure, that's why FDR is the #1 champion of 20th Century American economic growth.

(Rolls eyes)

He isn't you dope.......as rational historians look at FDR, not the left wing secluar religionist cheer leaders....but real historians and economists.....they point out his attempt to control the economy put the "Great" in the Great Depression because normally, economic downturns happen and then there is a fairly quick recovery...his attempt to take over and control the economy lengthened and deepened the depression to the point we didn't recover until the War started......that was him, not capitalism...

FDR achieved the #1 growth of any USA president in the 20th century.

National Socialist Germany achieved even faster economic growth than that.

FDR had a war time economy where the country had to supply all the allies with war material.......without that he would have kept the country mired in the Great Depression....

Isn't it something that every single economy that had champion growth was a hybrid Socialist system, FDR, Japan after WW2, Hitler, Franco's Spanish Miracle, modern China etc.

 

[2aguy]

And it was socialism that made the depression longer and deeper...as FDR tried to socialize the government......

How is capitalism working now, you doofus? Enjoy posting on whatever capitialistic created electronic device you are using? You socialists are so tiring.....you would simply be annoying if you didn't put millions of people into mass graves whenever you get real power...

Yeah sure, that's why FDR is the #1 champion of 20th Century American economic growth.

(Rolls eyes)

He isn't you dope.......as rational historians look at FDR, not the left wing secluar religionist cheer leaders....but real historians and economists.....they point out his attempt to control the economy put the "Great" in the Great Depression because normally, economic downturns happen and then there is a fairly quick recovery...his attempt to take over and control the economy lengthened and deepened the depression to the point we didn't recover until the War started......that was him, not capitalism...

FDR achieved the #1 growth of any USA president in the 20th century.

National Socialist Germany achieved even faster economic growth than that.

FDR had a war time economy where the country had to supply all the allies with war material.......without that he would have kept the country mired in the Great Depression....

Isn't it something that every single economy that had champion growth was a hybrid Socialist system, FDR, Japan after WW2, Hitler, Franco's Spanish Miracle, modern China etc.

They all had war time economies.......that were built on sand........and Japan after WW2 was lifted out of economic ruin by the United States......

Socialism is a cancer that kills a country

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Yeah sure, that's why FDR is the #1 champion of 20th Century American economic growth.

(Rolls eyes)

He isn't you dope.......as rational historians look at FDR, not the left wing secluar religionist cheer leaders....but real historians and economists.....they point out his attempt to control the economy put the "Great" in the Great Depression because normally, economic downturns happen and then there is a fairly quick recovery...his attempt to take over and control the economy lengthened and deepened the depression to the point we didn't recover until the War started......that was him, not capitalism...

FDR achieved the #1 growth of any USA president in the 20th century.

National Socialist Germany achieved even faster economic growth than that.

FDR had a war time economy where the country had to supply all the allies with war material.......without that he would have kept the country mired in the Great Depression....

Isn't it something that every single economy that had champion growth was a hybrid Socialist system, FDR, Japan after WW2, Hitler, Franco's Spanish Miracle, modern China etc.

They all had war time economies.......that were built on sand........and Japan after WW2 was lifted out of economic ruin by the United States......

Socialism is a cancer that kills a country

Wrong, Capitalism is a cancer that kills a country.

I outlined this below.

Our issues from Capitalism, NOT Communism.

 

[2aguy]

He isn't you dope.......as rational historians look at FDR, not the left wing secluar religionist cheer leaders....but real historians and economists.....they point out his attempt to control the economy put the "Great" in the Great Depression because normally, economic downturns happen and then there is a fairly quick recovery...his attempt to take over and control the economy lengthened and deepened the depression to the point we didn't recover until the War started......that was him, not capitalism...

FDR achieved the #1 growth of any USA president in the 20th century.

National Socialist Germany achieved even faster economic growth than that.

FDR had a war time economy where the country had to supply all the allies with war material.......without that he would have kept the country mired in the Great Depression....

Isn't it something that every single economy that had champion growth was a hybrid Socialist system, FDR, Japan after WW2, Hitler, Franco's Spanish Miracle, modern China etc.

They all had war time economies.......that were built on sand........and Japan after WW2 was lifted out of economic ruin by the United States......

Socialism is a cancer that kills a country

Wrong, Capitalism is a cancer that kills a country.

I outlined this below.

Our issues from Capitalism, NOT Communism.

You are posting from an electronic device created and improved by capitalism.......socialism leads at best to reduced quality of life, and at it's worst, mass graves in the millions.....

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

FDR achieved the #1 growth of any USA president in the 20th century.

National Socialist Germany achieved even faster economic growth than that.

FDR had a war time economy where the country had to supply all the allies with war material.......without that he would have kept the country mired in the Great Depression....

Isn't it something that every single economy that had champion growth was a hybrid Socialist system, FDR, Japan after WW2, Hitler, Franco's Spanish Miracle, modern China etc.

They all had war time economies.......that were built on sand........and Japan after WW2 was lifted out of economic ruin by the United States......

Socialism is a cancer that kills a country

Wrong, Capitalism is a cancer that kills a country.

I outlined this below.

Our issues from Capitalism, NOT Communism.

You are posting from an electronic device created and improved by capitalism.......socialism leads at best to reduced quality of life, and at it's worst, mass graves in the millions.....

Mass Immigration is Capitalism.
Hollywood, Facebook, MSNBC, CNN is Capitalism.

Capitalism is ruining America.

Socialism is the ONLY answer.

Even if Communism is also NOT an answer.

 

[2aguy]

FDR had a war time economy where the country had to supply all the allies with war material.......without that he would have kept the country mired in the Great Depression....

Isn't it something that every single economy that had champion growth was a hybrid Socialist system, FDR, Japan after WW2, Hitler, Franco's Spanish Miracle, modern China etc.

They all had war time economies.......that were built on sand........and Japan after WW2 was lifted out of economic ruin by the United States......

Socialism is a cancer that kills a country

Wrong, Capitalism is a cancer that kills a country.

I outlined this below.

Our issues from Capitalism, NOT Communism.

You are posting from an electronic device created and improved by capitalism.......socialism leads at best to reduced quality of life, and at it's worst, mass graves in the millions.....

Mass Immigration is Capitalism.
Hollywood, Facebook, MSNBC, CNN is Capitalism.

Capitalism is ruining America.

Socialism is the ONLY answer.

Even if Communism is a,sl NOT an answer.

Socialism destroys a country, leads to a lower quality of life and freedom then ends in mass graves....that is the life cycle of socialism...

 

[Desperado]

FDR had a war time economy where the country had to supply all the allies with war material.......without that he would have kept the country mired in the Great Depression....

Isn't it something that every single economy that had champion growth was a hybrid Socialist system, FDR, Japan after WW2, Hitler, Franco's Spanish Miracle, modern China etc.

They all had war time economies.......that were built on sand........and Japan after WW2 was lifted out of economic ruin by the United States......

Socialism is a cancer that kills a country

Wrong, Capitalism is a cancer that kills a country.

I outlined this below.

Our issues from Capitalism, NOT Communism.

You are posting from an electronic device created and improved by capitalism.......socialism leads at best to reduced quality of life, and at it's worst, mass graves in the millions.....

Mass Immigration is Capitalism.
Hollywood, Facebook, MSNBC, CNN is Capitalism.

Capitalism is ruining America.

Socialism is the ONLY answer.

Even if Communism is a,sl NOT an answer.

Socialism is Communism Lite

 

[2aguy]

Isn't it something that every single economy that had champion growth was a hybrid Socialist system, FDR, Japan after WW2, Hitler, Franco's Spanish Miracle, modern China etc.

They all had war time economies.......that were built on sand........and Japan after WW2 was lifted out of economic ruin by the United States......

Socialism is a cancer that kills a country

Wrong, Capitalism is a cancer that kills a country.

I outlined this below.

Our issues from Capitalism, NOT Communism.

You are posting from an electronic device created and improved by capitalism.......socialism leads at best to reduced quality of life, and at it's worst, mass graves in the millions.....

Mass Immigration is Capitalism.
Hollywood, Facebook, MSNBC, CNN is Capitalism.

Capitalism is ruining America.

Socialism is the ONLY answer.

Even if Communism is a,sl NOT an answer.

Socialism is Communism Lite

I like how Ann Coulter defined it...communists are socialists who really mean it.....

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Isn't it something that every single economy that had champion growth was a hybrid Socialist system, FDR, Japan after WW2, Hitler, Franco's Spanish Miracle, modern China etc.

They all had war time economies.......that were built on sand........and Japan after WW2 was lifted out of economic ruin by the United States......

Socialism is a cancer that kills a country

Wrong, Capitalism is a cancer that kills a country.

I outlined this below.

Our issues from Capitalism, NOT Communism.

You are posting from an electronic device created and improved by capitalism.......socialism leads at best to reduced quality of life, and at it's worst, mass graves in the millions.....

Mass Immigration is Capitalism.
Hollywood, Facebook, MSNBC, CNN is Capitalism.

Capitalism is ruining America.

Socialism is the ONLY answer.

Even if Communism is a,sl NOT an answer.

Socialism destroys a country, leads to a lower quality of life and freedom then ends in mass graves....that is the life cycle of socialism...

Capitalism is the same sh(t.

Capitalist monopolies cut corners, create junky products, and jack up prices.
Basically the same thing Communists do.

Mass graves?

Why not talk about how Brits in the UK, and Brits in the USA are the #1 genocidal, slave crazed ethnicity in more modern history?

Brits are the most Individualist & Capitalist ethnicity.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Isn't it something that every single economy that had champion growth was a hybrid Socialist system, FDR, Japan after WW2, Hitler, Franco's Spanish Miracle, modern China etc.

They all had war time economies.......that were built on sand........and Japan after WW2 was lifted out of economic ruin by the United States......

Socialism is a cancer that kills a country

Wrong, Capitalism is a cancer that kills a country.

I outlined this below.

Our issues from Capitalism, NOT Communism.

You are posting from an electronic device created and improved by capitalism.......socialism leads at best to reduced quality of life, and at it's worst, mass graves in the millions.....

Mass Immigration is Capitalism.
Hollywood, Facebook, MSNBC, CNN is Capitalism.

Capitalism is ruining America.

Socialism is the ONLY answer.

Even if Communism is a,sl NOT an answer.

Socialism is Communism Lite

Socialism has the #1 track record of economic growth champions.

 

[2aguy]

They all had war time economies.......that were built on sand........and Japan after WW2 was lifted out of economic ruin by the United States......

Socialism is a cancer that kills a country

Wrong, Capitalism is a cancer that kills a country.

I outlined this below.

Our issues from Capitalism, NOT Communism.

You are posting from an electronic device created and improved by capitalism.......socialism leads at best to reduced quality of life, and at it's worst, mass graves in the millions.....

Mass Immigration is Capitalism.
Hollywood, Facebook, MSNBC, CNN is Capitalism.

Capitalism is ruining America.

Socialism is the ONLY answer.

Even if Communism is a,sl NOT an answer.

Socialism destroys a country, leads to a lower quality of life and freedom then ends in mass graves....that is the life cycle of socialism...

Capitalism is the same sh(t.

Capitalist monopolies cut corners, create junky products, and jack up prices.
Basically the same thing Communists do.

Mass graves?

Why not talk about how Brits in the UK, and Brits in the USA are the #1 genocidal, slave crazed ethnicity in more modern history?

Brits are the most Individualist & Capitalist ethnicity.

Monopolies only occur with government......socialism creates monopolies. There is no such thing as Crony Capitalism.....the real name is Crony Socialism.

Capitalism creates innovation and creation.........

The #1 genocidal slave crazed people are the atheist socialists since 1917 who murdered close to 100 million people to create their socialist utopias. Capitalism stopped them, and lifted the world out of poverty and destruction.

 

[2aguy]

They all had war time economies.......that were built on sand........and Japan after WW2 was lifted out of economic ruin by the United States......

Socialism is a cancer that kills a country

Wrong, Capitalism is a cancer that kills a country.

I outlined this below.

Our issues from Capitalism, NOT Communism.

You are posting from an electronic device created and improved by capitalism.......socialism leads at best to reduced quality of life, and at it's worst, mass graves in the millions.....

Mass Immigration is Capitalism.
Hollywood, Facebook, MSNBC, CNN is Capitalism.

Capitalism is ruining America.

Socialism is the ONLY answer.

Even if Communism is a,sl NOT an answer.

Socialism is Communism Lite

Socialism has the #1 track record of economic growth champions.

Do you really believe that silliness or are you just trolling?

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Wrong, Capitalism is a cancer that kills a country.

I outlined this below.

Our issues from Capitalism, NOT Communism.

You are posting from an electronic device created and improved by capitalism.......socialism leads at best to reduced quality of life, and at it's worst, mass graves in the millions.....

Mass Immigration is Capitalism.
Hollywood, Facebook, MSNBC, CNN is Capitalism.

Capitalism is ruining America.

Socialism is the ONLY answer.

Even if Communism is a,sl NOT an answer.

Socialism destroys a country, leads to a lower quality of life and freedom then ends in mass graves....that is the life cycle of socialism...

Capitalism is the same sh(t.

Capitalist monopolies cut corners, create junky products, and jack up prices.
Basically the same thing Communists do.

Mass graves?

Why not talk about how Brits in the UK, and Brits in the USA are the #1 genocidal, slave crazed ethnicity in more modern history?

Brits are the most Individualist & Capitalist ethnicity.

Monopolies only occur with government......socialism creates monopolies. There is no such thing as Crony Capitalism.....the real name is Crony Socialism.

Capitalism creates innovation and creation.........

The #1 genocidal slave crazed people are the atheist socialists since 1917 who murdered close to 100 million people to create their socialist utopias. Capitalism stopped them, and lifted the world out of poverty and destruction.

BS, Monopolies are created often by nature because of inequalities between product quality, business men, pricing etc.

Let's hear all about how Standard Oil was helped by the government more than anybody else?

You are just stupid.

No, just no.

Brits are the biggest genocidal maniacs.

The five worst atrocities carried out by the British Empire will make you wonder why we're apparently proud of it

British war crimes - Wikipedia

List of massacres of Indigenous Australians - Wikipedia

Late Victorian Holocausts - Wikipedia

10 Evil Crimes Of The British Empire - Listverse

https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2015/eirv42n27-20150703/20-25_4227.pdf

The history of British slave ownership has been buried: now its scale can be revealed

10 Atrocities Committed by the British Empire that They Would Like to Erase from History Books

The killing times: the massacres of Aboriginal people Australia must confront

The Sad Story of the Moriori, Who Learned to Live at the Edge of the World

https://www.history.com/news/native-americans-genocide-united-states

United States war crimes - Wikipedia

When will America stop participating in Yemen's genocidal war? | Mark Weisbrot

It’s Been 50 Years Since the Biggest US-Backed Genocide You’ve Never Heard Of

The Genocide the U.S. Can't Remember, But Bangladesh Can't Forget | History | Smithsonian Magazine

List of wars involving the United States - Wikipedia

U.S. Regime Has Killed 20-30 Million People since World War II