New Civil Rights Movement: Children-Americans.

I...

  • DO consider live & born children as viable human beings with their own civil rights

  • DO NOT consider live & born children as having their own civil rights


Results are only viewable after voting.
Why do you hate the children of polygamists and incest?
Why do you keep trying to dance away from the question?

Why do you want to harm the children of gay couples?

Once again- your proposals will not help a single child- but will hurt thousands.

Why do you want to harm children?

Is it because the parents are gay ?
Or polygamists? Or incestuous? :popcorn: You see...we're talking about children's rights here and what structures states can approve for their best benefits from marriage... In other words, what makes a "marriage" devoid of either a father or mother somehow superior in structure to other marriages that provide the missing role model?
 
Why do you hate the children of polygamists and incest?
Why do you keep trying to dance away from the question?

Why do you want to harm the children of gay couples?

Once again- your proposals will not help a single child- but will hurt thousands.

Why do you want to harm children?

Is it because the parents are gay ?
Or polygamists? Or incestuous? :popcorn: You see...we're talking about children's rights here and what structures states can approve for their best benefits from marriage... In other words, what makes a "marriage" devoid of either a father or mother somehow superior in structure to other marriages that provide the missing role model?
It depends on the individual and not the structure. Gay or straight couples or single parents can make great parents and also lousy ones. Thats just the way of the world.
 
Why do you hate the children of polygamists and incest?
Why do you keep trying to dance away from the question?

Why do you want to harm the children of gay couples?

Once again- your proposals will not help a single child- but will hurt thousands.

Why do you want to harm children?

Is it because the parents are gay ?
Or polygamists? Or incestuous? :popcorn: You see...we're talking about children's rights here and what structures states can approve for their best benefits from marriage... In other words, what makes a "marriage" devoid of either a father or mother somehow superior in structure to other marriages that provide the missing role model?

Polygamist families are not missing either a father or a mother- why are you including them?
Incestuous families are not missing either a father or a mother- why are you including them?

This is again what you always do in your hate campaign against homosexuals.

Your illogic is always this:
  1. Gays should not be able to legally marry
  2. Because that would deprive children of either a mother or a father
  3. When it is pointed out that preventing gays from marrying doesn't provide a mother or a father
  4. You bring up polygamist and incestuous families- which have mothers and fathers- and whom you are against marrying.
Your proposals would not benefit a single child- but would harm the children of gay couples.

Why do you want to harm children?
 
Which marriage is "legal" as of Last Summer's Decision in all 50 states? Homosexual (mother or father depriving) or polygamy? Remember, this thread is about children's rights as what we enshrine in a legally binding contract that they share.
 

Forum List

Back
Top