New Civil Rights Movement: Children-Americans.

[Silhouette]

THIS THREAD HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ABORTION. ALL POSTS ADDRESSING THAT TOPIC WILL BE FLAGGED FOR "OFF TOPIC".

I offer the following survey of around 90% of people who support this new civil-rights movement:

Poll. Please Vote. Did You Have a Mother & Father in Your Life?

Pope Francis: Children have right to a mother and father

“To reflect upon 'complementarity' is nothing less than to ponder the dynamic harmonies at the heart of all creation,” he said. “All complementarities were made by our creator, so the author of harmony achieves this harmony.”

Amicus brief filed in favor of children's civil rights: Amici Curiae Brief of Robert P. George, Sherif Girgis, and Ryan T. Anderson in Support of Hollingsworth and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group Addressing the Merits and Supporting Reversal by Robert George, Sherif Girgis, Ryan T. Anderson :: SSRN

if marriage is redefined, no civil institution will reinforce the notion that men and women tend to bring different gifts to child-rearing. In all these ways, redefinition will lower the pressures and incentives for men and women to stay with their spouses and children, or for couples to marry before conceiving. This would harm children’s development as children do best when raised by their married biological mother and father. The welfare and correctional state will have to expand to fill the developmental vacuum.

Prince's Trust Survey (the largest of its kind) 2010 PRINCE'S TRUST 2010 YOUTH INDEX SURVEY

"Young people with no role models of the same gender in their lives score a total of 65 in the well-being index compared with a score of 74 for young people with these role models .... ....... young people’s happiness and confidence both seem to be affected by the addition of a role model of the same gender."

Helpful link: "The Infancy Doctrine": http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=lawreview

To deny children civil rights protections is a form of agism. Which is bigotry. To say "children are too mentally unformed to make their own decisions, so they're more like possessions of adults without rights" smacks of slavery and oppression. Aren't some seniors and middle aged people slightly infirm mentally? Do their rights cease because of that? No, certainly not.

So where is the outcry for one of the most oppressed classes of people since the dawn of our nation? With the adoption of children-American civil rights Acts, it would also prevent Sharia law from endangering children and would make any act of violence, abuse or neglect of a child a federal crime.

That's a 100% win in my book. And it would be a deterrent to rogue Muslims entering our country; seeing it as a "Mecca of tolerance to insidious acts against minorities". Jihad continues because of adults raising up their children in abusive environments. These laws would draw a clear distintion between Muslim laws and Christians ones. Muslim laws allow abuse of children as part of a religious mandate. A clear civil rights protection for children's best interests would land the violators in prison.

 

[Theowl32]

I offer the following survey of around 90% of people who support this new civil-rights movement:

Poll. Please Vote. Did You Have a Mother & Father in Your Life?

Pope Francis: Children have right to a mother and father

“To reflect upon 'complementarity' is nothing less than to ponder the dynamic harmonies at the heart of all creation,” he said. “All complementarities were made by our creator, so the author of harmony achieves this harmony.”

Amicus brief filed in favor of children's civil rights: Amici Curiae Brief of Robert P. George, Sherif Girgis, and Ryan T. Anderson in Support of Hollingsworth and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group Addressing the Merits and Supporting Reversal by Robert George, Sherif Girgis, Ryan T. Anderson :: SSRN

if marriage is redefined, no civil institution will reinforce the notion that men and women tend to bring different gifts to child-rearing. In all these ways, redefinition will lower the pressures and incentives for men and women to stay with their spouses and children, or for couples to marry before conceiving. This would harm children’s development as children do best when raised by their married biological mother and father. The welfare and correctional state will have to expand to fill the developmental vacuum.

Prince's Trust Survey (the largest of its kind) 2010 PRINCE'S TRUST 2010 YOUTH INDEX SURVEY

"Young people with no role models of the same gender in their lives score a total of 65 in the well-being index compared with a score of 74 for young people with these role models .... ....... young people’s happiness and confidence both seem to be affected by the addition of a role model of the same gender."

 

[DigitalDrifter]

A lot of black males are shitting their pants right now.

 

[Silhouette]

^^ Why?

 

[MindWars]

I offer the following survey of around 90% of people who support this new civil-rights movement:

Poll. Please Vote. Did You Have a Mother & Father in Your Life?

Pope Francis: Children have right to a mother and father

“To reflect upon 'complementarity' is nothing less than to ponder the dynamic harmonies at the heart of all creation,” he said. “All complementarities were made by our creator, so the author of harmony achieves this harmony.”

Amicus brief filed in favor of children's civil rights: Amici Curiae Brief of Robert P. George, Sherif Girgis, and Ryan T. Anderson in Support of Hollingsworth and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group Addressing the Merits and Supporting Reversal by Robert George, Sherif Girgis, Ryan T. Anderson :: SSRN

if marriage is redefined, no civil institution will reinforce the notion that men and women tend to bring different gifts to child-rearing. In all these ways, redefinition will lower the pressures and incentives for men and women to stay with their spouses and children, or for couples to marry before conceiving. This would harm children’s development as children do best when raised by their married biological mother and father. The welfare and correctional state will have to expand to fill the developmental vacuum.

Prince's Trust Survey (the largest of its kind) 2010 PRINCE'S TRUST 2010 YOUTH INDEX SURVEY

"Young people with no role models of the same gender in their lives score a total of 65 in the well-being index compared with a score of 74 for young people with these role models .... ....... young people’s happiness and confidence both seem to be affected by the addition of a role model of the same gender."

Helpful link: "The Infancy Doctrine": http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=lawreview

Wait until the Country/world/Government make it so YOU PAY for all these so called Children.
But wait lets legalize abortions up to 9 mos. Mmm k some more Liberal hypocritical bs compliments of morons for world leaders.

 

[MindWars]

Although those who decide to get it on should be more responsible as to not end up Preg. You can not force nor make a parent want that child. Forcing parenthood will only result in more child abuse. Can't these idiots think oh wait that is to simple.

 

[Silhouette]

Although those who decide to get it on should be more responsible as to not end up Preg. You can not force nor make a parent want that child. Forcing parenthood will only result in more child abuse. Can't these idiots think oh wait that is to simple.

This thread has nothing to do with abortion. It concerns live, viable children already born and breathing on their own.

 

[MindWars]

Although those who decide to get it on should be more responsible as to not end up Preg. You can not force nor make a parent want that child. Forcing parenthood will only result in more child abuse. Can't these idiots think oh wait that is to simple.

This thread has nothing to do with abortion.

NO shit, you missed the point

 

[MindWars]

Although those who decide to get it on should be more responsible as to not end up Preg. You can not force nor make a parent want that child. Forcing parenthood will only result in more child abuse. Can't these idiots think oh wait that is to simple.

This thread has nothing to do with abortion.

Let's put it a litlte more simple

FORCED LAWS TO BE PARENTS, FORCE TO HAVE PARENTS WHATEVER.... ...............
Can you not get the HYPOCRITICAL POINT OF THIS............. KIDS SHOULD HAVE BOTH PARENTS ok they are wanting to enforce a two parent ideology with their bright imaginations of false reality but anyway, these are the same idiots who say " allow " CHILDREN" who are 9mos and under to be aborted WTF sense does that make.

On one hand give kids a family , on the other let a parent abort it riiiiight makes a lot of sense.

 

[Silhouette]

Let's put it a litlte more simple

FORCED LAWS TO BE PARENTS, FORCE TO HAVE PARENTS WHATEVER.... ...............
Can you not get the HYPOCRITICAL POINT OF THIS............. KIDS SHOULD HAVE BOTH PARENTS ok they are wanting to enforce a two parent ideology with their bright imaginations of false reality but anyway,

No, states have the right to set incentives based on a children's rights: mother & father. Not to incentivize legally disenfranchising children from those rights (gay marriage).

It isn't about force with the marriage issue so much as it is about states rights to incentivize the best climate for children & their rights.

 

[Onyx]

Do children have a right to a father and mother?

I'd say no. The natural parents should be there for their blood, but I am not going to support having the state round people up and pair them with an orphan.

 

[Silhouette]

Do children have a right to a father and mother?

I'd say no. The natural parents should be there for their blood, but I am not going to support having the state round people up and pair them with an orphan.

But you would be in favor of states incentivizing only mother/father marriages for the sake of children, right? Incentives to protect children's civil rights per contract?

You knew a mother and father, yes? So did most Americans. Children of "gay marriage" will NEVER EVER know either a mother or father as a matter of binding contract....for life...that states were "rounded up" and forced to ratify.

 

[Syriusly]

To deny children civil rights protections is a form of agism..

Children are not denied civil rights.

Why do you want to deny children married parents?

 

[Syriusly]

[
It isn't about force with the marriage issue so much as it is about states rights to incentivize the best climate for children & their rights.

So you are supporting States making divorce illegal- and requiring the parents of children to live together.

That is going to get complicated when you have someone like Trump who has 5 kids by three wives....

 

[Syriusly]

[Q
You knew a mother and father, yes? So did most Americans. Children of "gay marriage" will NEVER EVER know either a mother or father as a matter of binding contract....for life.

Plenty of children of gay marriages have both a mother and a father in their lives.

Remember- this is entirely about you trying to hurt the children of gay parents- by denying them married parents.

Because denying anyone marriage does not somehow provide a child with a father or a mother.

If you really cared about the welfare of children- perhaps you should actually try to work to get kids adopted, or to reduce the divorce rate- or maybe just focus on your own kids.

 

[AZGAL]

Don't vote on this creepy thread.

 

[Onyx]

But you would be in favor of states incentivizing only mother/father marriages for the sake of children, right? Incentives to protect children's civil rights per contract?[/qote]

No.

The state is the arbitrator of most evils. Should I call up Satan and ask him to incentivize mother/father marriages for the sake of children?

 

[Silhouette]

To deny children civil rights protections is a form of agism..

Children are not denied civil rights.

Why do you want to deny children married parents?

So then you're in favor of polygamy where kids are involved? Use Obergefell...yes? & what if kids are involved when a brother and sister get pregnant. Them too?

Bottom line is that Windsor 2013 was correct, when it comes to behavioral constructs, marriage is and always was up to the states to discriminate. And reluctantly, the High Court will have to find its mistake or ratify polygamy and incest marriage in all 50 states as it tried to do with gay.

 

[Silhouette]

Don't vote on this creepy thread.

Yeah, definitely... Don't let ANYONE know how you feel about legally divorcing a boy from a father or a girl from a mother for life. Keep that under your hat cuz if the word gets out that kids deserve both a mother and father in marriage, the gheystapo won't be able to teach the new "love" to your kids in kindergarten...

Wanna know what's creepy? Having regular contact with both a mother and father yourself...but being cool with denying that same vital contact to other children as a matter of a legally binding contract...for life...

It's like the kind of crap they used to pull with little black kids on cotton plantations back in the 17 & 1800s.

 

[Syriusly]

To deny children civil rights protections is a form of agism..

Children are not denied civil rights.

Why do you want to deny children married parents?

Bottom line is that Windsor 2013 was correct, when it comes to behavioral constructs, marriage is and always was up to the states to discriminate. And reluctantly, the High Court will have to find its mistake or ratify polygamy and incest marriage in all 50 states as it tried to do with gay.

Why won't you answer the question?

Why do you want to deny children married parents?