Caligirl
Oh yes it is too!
- Aug 25, 2008
- 2,567
- 240
- 48
Here are three guys that are providing testimony in a court case charging election fraud in Ohio (king-lincoln v blackwell) in the forms of affidavits, and depositions.
(1) Mike Connell. He was a top republican IT expert who has worked for the Bush family and other republican candidates, and worked for Secretary of State Ken Blackwell on IT in 2004. If there was electronic rigging, this guy would be likely to know about it. There have been a few indications (articles) that Connell has been pressured by Rove to take the fall for rigging in Ohio.
The lead lawyer for the plaintiffs in the case (the guys that want to show vote fraud) are trying to get a deposition from Connell, but so far there has been a stay on the case. Through word of mouth, Connell appears to know that Ohio 2004 was not clean:
(2) Stephen Spoonamore. Spoonamore is another republican, worked for the McCain campaign and was founder/CEO of an IT policy and security firm. He provided evidence in July that Georgia's 2002 gubernatorial race was compromised electronically. He is currently an expert witness in the King-Lincoln v Blackwell case in Ohio.
The Raw Story | GOP cyber-security expert suggests Diebold tampered with 2002 election
(3) Richard Hayes Philip, presumably a democrat, who wrote
This guy was very active following the 2004 election, examining ballots and so on. He's got a lot of stuff on the web in terms of lists of discrepancies in ballots and etc, if anyone is interested.
Cliff Arnebeck is the lead lawyer in the case, and you can read more about this case and some of the witnesses here:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Explosive-Events-Happening-by-Velvet-Revolution-080920-704.html
The stay on the case makes progress hard.
(1) Mike Connell. He was a top republican IT expert who has worked for the Bush family and other republican candidates, and worked for Secretary of State Ken Blackwell on IT in 2004. If there was electronic rigging, this guy would be likely to know about it. There have been a few indications (articles) that Connell has been pressured by Rove to take the fall for rigging in Ohio.
The lead lawyer for the plaintiffs in the case (the guys that want to show vote fraud) are trying to get a deposition from Connell, but so far there has been a stay on the case. Through word of mouth, Connell appears to know that Ohio 2004 was not clean:
"Mr. Connell is a devout Catholic. He has admitted to me that in his zeal to 'save the unborn' he may have helped others who have compromised elections. He was clearly uncomfortable when I asked directly about Ohio 2004."
(2) Stephen Spoonamore. Spoonamore is another republican, worked for the McCain campaign and was founder/CEO of an IT policy and security firm. He provided evidence in July that Georgia's 2002 gubernatorial race was compromised electronically. He is currently an expert witness in the King-Lincoln v Blackwell case in Ohio.
Spoonamore affidavit asserts that the election computer setup used by Ken Blackwell in 2004 provided the means and opportunity for the manipulation of the election results. "The vote tabulation and reporting system, as modified at the direction of Mr. Blackwell, allowed the introduction of a single computer in the middle of the pathway. This computer located at a company principally managing IT Systems for GOP campaign and political operations (Computer C) received all information from each county computer (Computer A) BEFORE it was sent onward to Computer B. This centralized collection of all incoming statewide tabulations would make it extremely easy for a single operator, or a preprogrammed single "force balancing computer" to change the results in any way desired by the team controlling Computer C. In this case GOP partisan operatives. Again, if this out of state system had ANY digital access to the Secretary of State's system it would be cause for immediate investigation by any of my banking clients.
The Raw Story | GOP cyber-security expert suggests Diebold tampered with 2002 election
(3) Richard Hayes Philip, presumably a democrat, who wrote
"Having personally examined 126,000 ballots, 127 poll books, and 141 voter signature books from 18 counties in Ohio, and having examined many other election records as well, it is my conclusion that there is so much evidence of ballot alteration, ballot substitution, ballot box stuffing, ballot destruction, vote switching, tabulator rigging, and old-fashioned voter suppression, that the results of the 2004 presidential election, in all likelihood, have been reversed."
This guy was very active following the 2004 election, examining ballots and so on. He's got a lot of stuff on the web in terms of lists of discrepancies in ballots and etc, if anyone is interested.
Cliff Arnebeck is the lead lawyer in the case, and you can read more about this case and some of the witnesses here:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Explosive-Events-Happening-by-Velvet-Revolution-080920-704.html
The stay on the case makes progress hard.
Last edited: