Hey Bush was not that bad, sure he did things that I wish he didn't and should have done this or that but at least he had balls enough to take it to the fuckers instead of blaming plane crashes on fucking Engine failure and shit like Clinton did.
Except the question didn't ask for a yes or no answer. In fact, it explicitly stated that was NOT productive or desired. The question asked for "the reasoning behind your stance." and noted "Please offer some substance and rationale, empty insults, ad hominem attacks, and one-word answers offer nothing to the serious discourse this topic deserves."
Reading is fundamental. If you choose to ignore the posts of others, perhaps you shouldn't participate in a discussion board.